US Congress is weighing automatic registration for wartime draft - Registration for Selective Service is already mandatory but a proposed law would automatically sign up men between 18 and 25 years old for national draft rolls.

1.png
Registration with Selective Service is already mandatory but American men between 18 and 25 could be automatically signed up for the draft under a measure making its way through Congress. Air Force photo by Tech. Sgt. Eric Burks.

American men ages 18 to 25 would be automatically signed up for the draft if a measure making its way through Congress becomes law.

The proposal by Rep. Chrissy Houlahan would mean that men would be automatically registered for the draft when they turn 18. Under current federal law, all American male citizens and green card holders 18 to 25 years old must register with the Selective Service, but the requirement to do so falls on individuals. Those roles would be the basis of a military draft if Congress or the President decided to implement one, which Houlahan’s proposed measure does not address.

Women would continue to be exempt from Selective Service registration under the proposal submitted as an amendment to the national defense policy bill for fiscal year 2025.

During debate on her amendment last week, Houlahan argued that the measure would allow Congress to spend more money on “readiness and towards mobilization” instead of “education and advertising campaigns driven to register people.”

According to the Selective Service’s annual report to Congress for 2022, the national registration rate that year for qualified men was 84%.

The Selective Service says it will spend $33 million this year on programs “to improve registration compliance rates” — money that might not have to be spent if registration was automatic.

“We really sort of saw this as a chance to both save government resources, save taxpayer dollars and to help young men avoid the special challenges later in life that can come from not having registered,” a congressional aide for Houlahan told Task & Purpose.

A majority of U.S. states, the four territories, and Washington D.C. automatically register eligible people for Selective Service when obtaining a driver’s license, driver’s permit, or other Department of Motor Vehicle identification.

Men who knowingly fail to register can become ineligible for federal student aid or jobs at federal agencies, and have trouble obtaining security clearances. They can also face five years in prison or thousands of dollars in fines, according to a 2019 Congressional Research Service report.

Houlahan’s amendment also comes after a decline in registrations due to the FAFSA Simplification Act, which removed the option for Selective Service registration on student applications for federal tuition assistance. According to the agency, FAFSA applications historically accounted for 20% of annual registrations, officials said in the 2022 report to Congress.

The Selective Service System, the federal agency in charge of registrations maintains a database of more than 92 million registrant records. The measure would allow the agency to tap into other federal databases to enroll eligible Americans, the congressional aide said.

“This is not a collection of new information. This is just an example of using the information that federal agencies already have more efficiently,” the aide said. “The underlying law of who has to register remains the same.”

Kate Kuzminski, deputy director of the Washington D.C. think tank, Center for New American Security’s program on Military, Veterans & Society said the measure could be simply bureaucratic as a way to make sure that the agency has up-to-date information.

“Another challenge is that the Selective Service relies on physical addresses,” Kuzminski said. “How many kids between the ages of 18 and 26 change addresses multiple times and perhaps never think to update that with selective service?”

The draft

The measure comes amid a resurgence of mandatory military service being considered and reinstated by other European nations as the war in Ukraine drags on and NATO assesses threats posed by Russia. Latvia, which borders Russia, reinstated the draft this year and Denmark plans to broaden the draft to include women, and extend the length of service. Last week, the UK’s governing Conservative Party vowed to mandate all 18-year-olds in Britain do a year of mandatory military or civilian national service if the party wins its July 4 national election.

But not all are in agreement. Hungary’s foreign minister called the “crazy proposals” to reinstate the draft across Europe “unacceptable.”

Kuzminski said policy conversations about military drafts haven’t been this widespread since World War II but that “in the face of a truly existential threat” like Ukraine with Russia or Taiwan with China, more countries are thinking about it.

“But we are not having that conversation in the United States because there’s no constituency in Congress. Who’s gonna argue pro-draft, right? This is a break glass in case of emergency situation,” she said. “No one wants to be pro-draft.”

Even though someone is registered for the Selective Service, it does not automatically mean they will be inducted into the military should a draft be implemented. In the event that Congress and the President call upon the agency to use its registry for a draft, men would be called “in a sequence determined by random lottery number and year of birth.” They would then undergo mental and physical fitness tests before being deferred, exempted from military service or inducted into the U.S. armed forces, according to the Selective Service website.

Houlahan’s proposal also comes as certain military branches like the Army face challenges recruiting new troops due to image problems with Gen Z and Americans waning trust in public institutions.

Houlahan’s amendment to the national defense policy bill was approved by the House Armed Services committee last week but it still must pass the full House and Senate before it may become law.

Article Link

Archive
 
They're planning something, you don't just update the draft system for its own sake. They need it streamlined for a purpose.
There's been an awful lot of talk of conscription lately from a number of Western countries. Germany, France and the UK are talking about bringing back compulsory service, and now this.
 
The logistics of this don't make sense.

How does one "automatically" do anything for every member of the population at a specific age?

Where is the database they are using? Whose records are they plundering? Why do they think those records would allow them more accuracy in registering 18 year olds than the current voluntary methods?
 
Germany talks of draft
UK discusses bringing back national service
America wants the draft.

We going ww3, aren't we?
Yes you will eat ze bullets and you will like it. You will also be replaced by immigrants who are dumb and can be easily turned into a new serf class

But that's not very progressive now is it. What about the women? Come on bitches equal rights for all! And don't you dare "we can have babies!" Most of those will happily abort theirs in a heartbeat
 
Excellent. We already have large numbers of dissatisfied military veterans but we're going to need even more if we're going to overthrow this shithole.

Hey retards, since I know you're here, make sure your little draftees get extra training in marksmanship. It will make them more effective killers.
 
The logistics of this don't make sense.

How does one "automatically" do anything for every member of the population at a specific age?

Where is the database they are using? Whose records are they plundering? Why do they think those records would allow them more accuracy in registering 18 year olds than the current voluntary methods?
I'm guessing the register of births, deaths and marriages, or your American equivalent. To match current addresses - tax records? You all have to declare everyone who lives with you for "tax purposes" every year, right?
School records and Social Security records would also be helpful - is your Social Security number what you all use for payroll/tax/pension purposes?
 
Then there is the part where those who do get sent don't follow anything or actively hurt America. You think those Palestine kids are going to fight on Israel's behalf? A better prediction would be them turning the tank around and firing on the holy land, if not outright give the weapons to the Hamas.

Ukraine would maybe be a little bit better, but those 4chan white boys they will most certainly be sending, will likely jump to ship to Russia.

Actually, given that America's fighting age male demographic is 63%+ single, any side that offers brides would likely lead to a mass cucking of the US military, since we know the US won't allow for that to happen in fear that feminists would be mad if found out. We all know these boys will not come home as heroes, especially for the current Jew war, so there really is no benefit to fighting for the US.
And if you remember what happened during Ukraine where a battalion of Redditors quite literally got themselves bombed by posting the training ground for updoots, the level of sabotage, both deliberate or accidental is gonna be very high. You'll have leftists drafted in who will sell out the fighting force for ideological reasons ala Palestine and a bunch of regular dudes who understand the horror stories Army vets tell everyone about the service being true and will try to undercut the system as a result. An army shooting itself in the foot every step isn't gonna be much of an army.

After all, your country already betrayed you by ruining everything you love and on top of that forced you into a war you have no say in. May as well make some bucks and ruin whatever plan your masters had for you. Because unlike previous generations, the fighting-aged generation knows for a fact that your suffering is to the profit of Shekelberg who is bankrolling this war. Be it Leftist or non-Leftist.

WW3 is gonna resemble a game of Paranoia. Everyone in the team is a traitor and will actively undermine whatever Friend Computer has in plan.

A draft can only work with a strongly patriotic populace that's greatly invested in the country they're being drafted to fight for. Millennials and zoomers are the furthest thing from that imaginable right now for good reason. I for one certainly have no desire to fight & die against Corporal Ivan, Private Wang or Private Abdul so that...Idk, the degenerate kike fucks who own the West can troon out, rape and eat their kids & mine both? If I can't get out by throwing Roman salutes & vomiting explosively all over the draft office I'd rather just swap out my would-be CO's alarm clock for a grenade and fuck off to hide innawoods until whatever crazy world-threatening shit said Learned Elders are planning blows over, if it gets me shot at least I know I'll be dying for my own interest and not that of the Soroses. And I doubt I'm alone in feeling that way.
No doubt about it. Tensions are at an all time high for men. They literally have no stake in society running anymore. There is nothing rewarding because there is no family to build in the first place. Throw in all the blatant anti-men laws and rules, the last thing they want is being forced to defend the plantation whipping them daily.

Which brings me to the next outcome that TPTB have created themselves. They have entire swathes of brown men who bought into a destructive ideology that is literally being a nigger. Nogs in general, ghetto nogs and ideologically ghettoized guys of any race aren't gonna play along when the draft officer shows up. At best, they'll slam the door and tell them to fuck off. At worst, the guy or gal in uniform is gonna get culturally enriched because the entire deal of being a self-destructive hoodrat is being selfish and a slave to your vices based on the vapid life of ghetto culture.

Gun bans in a nutshell.jpg

And thanks to the martyrdom of St Floyd, a movement they have helped created by making "I CANT BREEF" the rallying outcry for these nogs to be all they can be in being hoodrats... Its not gonna end well.
 
Guess who they'll tap next once they run out of 20-somethings?
My grandfather was 31 when he was called up in 1943 and given a choice of the Army, or doing war work.
He chose the war work and built ships in the Portland Kaiser shipyards.
He was married and had a child, he didn't want to fight, his younger brother was already serving.
Don't know if you would get that choice today.
 
The proposal by Rep. Chrissy Houlahan would mean that men would be automatically registered for the draft when they turn 18.
So a woman is telling men they have to sign up to be drafted to die for some retarded reason in the middle east or eastern europe

Yeah fuck right off lady. Good luck enforcing any of it anyway. Some would sue claiming unlawful gender discrimination in only drafting men violates their civil rights and the rest would claim they now identify as women and therefore are exempt and scream hate crime and threaten to sue if the government questioned that

No matter what the law says the days of the US government being able to draft people korean war or vietnam style are over. It barely avoided turning into a major shitshow for vietnam. Try it now and they're asking for all kinds of trouble
 
The draft is disgusting and a violation of human rights.

So many young men died in Vietnam that never wanted to die in a jungle on the other side of the world that were never meant to be soldiers.
It needs abolished, not brought back.
It makes me shit when someone says "the draft hasn't been used since Vietnam" when someone says we need to get rid of it. Like okay, then we could get rid of it and it wouldn't matter, right? They don't know what dormant laws are, and are going to be in for a rude awakening when TPTB decide the ordinary man has to die for them again.
So a woman is telling men they have to sign up to be drafted to die for some retarded reason in the middle east or eastern europe

Yeah fuck right off lady. Good luck enforcing any of it anyway. Some would sue claiming unlawful gender discrimination in only drafting men violates their civil rights and the rest would claim they now identify as women and therefore are exempt and scream hate crime and threaten to sue if the government questioned that

No matter what the law says the days of the US government being able to draft people korean war or vietnam style are over. It barely avoided turning into a major shitshow for vietnam. Try it now and they're asking for all kinds of trouble
I hope you're right.
 
I must say I appreciate the fact the rep proposing all this shares a name with a character from mash.

As someone who works for the MIC and gets a bonus that's linked to company profits, let's get this shit rolling. I could do with a new car.
 
It makes me shit when someone says "the draft hasn't been used since Vietnam" when someone says we need to get rid of it. Like okay, then we could get rid of it and it wouldn't matter, right? They don't know what dormant laws are, and are going to be in for a rude awakening when TPTB decide the ordinary man has to die for them again.

I hope you're right.
And the people telling young men not to worry about the draft are old hags who will never have that fear or old men who seek to profit.
 
WW3 is gonna resemble a game of Paranoia. Everyone in the team is a traitor and will actively undermine whatever Friend Computer has in plan.
Kinda, except as several editions of the Paranoia rulebooks have gone out of their way to explicitly state, Friend Computer is genuinely, legitimately doing what It believes is best for Its citizens and Alpha Complex. There is no malice or cynicism in Its actions and decisions. It truly does mean well and believes It is helping Its friends.

It's also genuinely broken because of its damaged historical data banks and endlessly-conflicting core directives (thanks to meddling by high programmers), but that's what makes it a delightfully nasty benevolent leader in-game.

Our government has no such concern for its citizens. It is actively malicious and hateful towards us.
 
The logistics of this don't make sense.

How does one "automatically" do anything for every member of the population at a specific age?

Where is the database they are using? Whose records are they plundering? Why do they think those records would allow them more accuracy in registering 18 year olds than the current voluntary methods?
Meta, YouTube, Twitter, cell phone companies, etc. Do you think zoomers could stay off their phones and social media if their lives depended on it?
 
Back