Dambusters' Dog II
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2022
But his "totes true, trust me bro" claim that Michael Bailey had a man insert a dildo attached to a chainsaw into a woman in front of a crowd of students in a lecture hall was the point at which I realised that he is off his head.
I have a couple of things to add to this tangent. Bailey's summary of events and statements in his defence are still up on his site: 1, 2 (archived* 1 2, also attached below). It's clear that he uses "sex negative" the way troons use "transphobic", as a way of saying that people who disagree with him are persecuting him because of some supposed evil prejudice. Despite what he claims, I think he knew perfectly well what he was doing - the students signed up to the course for the "optional" parts of hearing weirdos talk about their sex lives, and having to listen to Bailey lecture and do homework was something they had to put up with to get to the interesting part. Otherwise 600 students wouldn't have signed up for it.No, that really happened. Students weren't required to attend, but the fucksaw incident was real:
https://dailynorthwestern.com/2011/...ass-sex-toy-demonstration-causes-controversy/
*archive.org because archive.ph does not do pdfs correctly.
The other is that a "fucksaw" does not derive from a chainsaw, but a reciprocating saw or Sawzall, the type that moves a (replaceable) sawblade back and forth lengthways:

It is converted into a "fucksaw" by replacing the blade with a smooth metal cylinder onto which a soft dildo is attached. In researching this, I found that predictably, some idiot tried attaching a dildo directly to the sawblade, and luckily it wasn't fatal (archive).