Exulansic / TT Exulansic / Sierra Weir / Sierra Dullea Weir - TERF detransitioner/desister who has a crusade against the "I Am Jazz" phenomenon and also a massive collection of Party City wigs.

is this what mandated reporter means?
IMG_2612.jpeg
 
I can't tell if she's on crack or I skipped a post somewhere but why the hell is she beefing with this guy in the first place?
The longer answer is Here. The short answer is he did a stream with Britney (A Slightly Twisted Female) and she asked him a question that called out Sierra by name and deboonked one of TT’s big brain AGP theories. She got butthurt and in true Sierra form she is still sperging about it and weaponizing government agencies against her perceived enemies. Inexplicably instead of letting it go Dr Jon is feeding the internet flames.
That’s literally all you need to know.. the rest is all made up between Sierra, her sock X accounts and the voices in her head.
 
Jesus. I feel so lucky that I'm naturally more of an observer who cherry picks ideas but never gets attached to people in a parasocial way or this would suck to see play out since her content and some of the others is part of my "peaking" journey.
I admit, I did have some kind of vague admiration for Sierra that was quickly shaken when I found this thread. It did not change my thoughts regarding peak trans, however, it did make me reach "peak radfem". I've spent over 10 years either writing or reading TERF shit on the internet, and I was always dismayed by the inevitable slide into crazed mean-girl conduct that occurs wherever radfems congregate. I always made concessions for this behavior: It's just this one person who likes to stir drama. It's just this one website we're using. I did not want to admit that this is a consistent pattern. It seemed like the ultimate indictment against radical feminism to acknowledge that the majority of its proponents act insane (or at least unable to properly handle disagreement).

Misjudging Sierra as an exception, then watching the same pattern play out for the millionth time was a such a disappointment, I am completely turned off by internet "activists" now. But that's probably for the best.
 
I admit, I did have some kind of vague admiration for Sierra that was quickly shaken when I found this thread. It did not change my thoughts regarding peak trans, however, it did make me reach "peak radfem". I've spent over 10 years either writing or reading TERF shit on the internet, and I was always dismayed by the inevitable slide into crazed mean-girl conduct that occurs wherever radfems congregate. I always made concessions for this behavior: It's just this one person who likes to stir drama. It's just this one website we're using. I did not want to admit that this is a consistent pattern. It seemed like the ultimate indictment against radical feminism to acknowledge that the majority of its proponents act insane (or at least unable to properly handle disagreement).

Misjudging Sierra as an exception, then watching the same pattern play out for the millionth time was a such a disappointment, I am completely turned off by internet "activists" now. But that's probably for the best.
Radfems are at their core hysterical. The ideology is a cope of one sort or another for them. I do very much agree with a lot of their criticisms of porn, prostitution, and trans...and even their critiques of men can at times be insightful but only when you frame it as a specific abusive relationship dynamic. A lot of them have trauma concerning SA or bad parents and really do project that onto everyone to an insane degree. You have to cherry pick their writing and all like mad. Always think, "this is about a specific piece of shit person they subconsciously think they still need to protect themselves from".

That being said, I'm not sure Sierra is a legit radfem. A lot of people took on that label simply because they recognized it as the "gender critical" position but they don't actually subscribe to radical feminist thought in any other area. It would be fair to say a lot of GC/anti-trans people are adjacent to a lot of individual radfem ideas, just not the whole movement.
 
The ideology is a cope of one sort or another for them.
The terminology they use to attack normie/straight women speaks volumes. Often sexualized- "dick riders" or "cum dumpsters"- revealing sexual jealousy and femcel tendencies. The "my Nigel" meme is just the seething wojak meme in words- someone bitterly jealous that other women are attached to husbands, sons, brothers, and fathers, when they either lack or are alienated from all of the above.
 
I won't inflict these people's voices on myself after the week I've had, someone have a summary?
It's an incredibly boring interview. She barely exhibits any cow behavior, except for the first 20 minutes while answering some personal questions about herself.

  • He prompts her to introduce herself, and she dives right in with her college birth control story: "I identified as a trans man and received gender affirming hormones".
  • She then volunteers: "My senior year I was diagnosed with a malformation called Eagle Syndrome". The interviewer interjects and asks if it was a result of the hormones. No, it is not, she was born with it and brought it up abruptly because she's a munchie. Apparently this Eagle Syndrome experience is relevant because it turned her off from the tit-chop.
  • The interviewer asks her to elaborate on her thought process behind identifying as trans. Sierra says "I was looking for an answer to my pain." She does not go on to describe any specific emotional turmoil, instead informing us that Eagle Syndrome can cause difficulty swallowing.
  • She mentions having felt ugly, but the pain she keeps referring to was physical.
  • Her Depo shot improved her joint pain and other physical symptoms, which reinforced her belief that she must be trans.
  • She says that looking back, the birth control "stunted" her, but does not explain further.
Her entire reasoning for why she had a trans phase keeps circling back to some indecipherable munchie logic. The interview feels slightly awkward at this point. He is asking predictable questions that would prompt a typical detransitioner's story, and Sierra doesn't have one. She just keeps talking about Eagle Syndrome and Depo Provera.

  • The interviewer asks her if she will appear at Genspect, and she answers in the affirmative, so I guess this was filmed sometime in fall 2023.
He then moves on to more generalized questions about the process of medical transition - types of top surgery, how phalloplasty works, complications, focusing on the gory details. This takes up the majority of the interview time. Sierra provides the standard gender-critical answers. She refrains from her usual PubMed conjecture, and sticks to proven anecdotes about the details and pitfalls of these surgeries. Most of the details she provides could be found on the SRS thread. She only mentions being a speech-language pathologist once, and does not attempt to stretch or distort her credentials.

It's all very predictable, if you've heard one gender-critical discussion, you've already heard this one. They conclude by discussing whether or not it is a right-wing opinion to feel opposed to these surgeries. The entire hour felt like a sloppy, incomplete regurgitation of Abigail Shrier's book.
 
is this what mandated reporter means?
It isn't what it means, of course. She would only be mandated to report situations she encounters in the course of providing professional services (speech therapy) to children.
I am completely turned off by internet "activists" now. But that's probably for the best.
It took me quite a while to realise this, but they are all narcissists, as is any one with a personal YouTube channel on which they appear on camera. Took me a long time to see it, but now that I do I can't think of a single exception.
He prompts her to introduce herself, and she dives right in with her college birth control story: "I identified as a trans man and received gender affirming hormones"
Speaking of which, she also received puberty blockers:
similartolupron.png
@gamipami
Why did menstrual suppression help with your joint pain?
@TTExulansic
It achieves it by acting on the brain similar to lupron, stopping the cycling of several hormones, including estrogen. Estrogen makes you stretchier and that plus the medication related loss of tone and strength led to instability, mobility limitations, swelling and pain. Lowering the estrogen made that stop happening, is my theory.
Jun 24, 2024 · 9:32 AM UTC
Ladies, ever taken the pill? Did you know you may as well have taken a puberty blocker? Scary stuff.

Did somebody say "munchie"?
munchie01.pngmunchie02.png
@TTExulansic
Interestingly, I required mobility aids due to joint pain and instability brought on by failed attempts to manage my undiagnosed eagle syndrome musculoskeletal symptoms with continuous muscle relaxers. Bad idea with extremely predictable consequences.
Gender affirming menstrual suppression fixed my joint pain enough I didn't need the braces and cane after the second shot. My suspicion is it was the result of eliminating the joint stiffness reduction of estrogen. My doctor just scoffed. But my joint symptoms returned like clockwork every 3 months, when it was time for the next injection.
That's one of the reasons I stayed on so long. I didn't want the pain to come back. My provider didn't understand the drugs he was prescribing to me, therefore I was not fully informed, therefore I didn't know why it helped when it helped, therefore I was afraid to stop, therefore I now have osteopenia and other long term effects.
This is not limited to gender medicine as the drug in question is commonly prescribed as birth control and to treat endometriosis as well, often by the same providers. But in my case it was because I identified as trans and wanted to be less female.
Jun 24, 2024 · 5:11 AM UTC

"People pointing out that I'm not a doctor and am therefore unqualified to speak on these matters ACKSHUALLY means not only that I'm right, but that they know I'm right and secretly agree with me:"
notadoctornotaproblem.png
I am happy to get to be here as a resource for anyone who wants to reach out. I'm proud to be a speech-language pathologist. Much of my knowledge and understanding is my own curiosity and the series of unusual and unfortunate medical circumstances in myself and loved ones. I've never been to medical school. There's much I don't know. The fact people attack my identity and not my argumentation and medical explanations is the highest praise, truth be told. It means they fundamentally agree with my model.
@TTExulansic replying to @cyberfrontier
Jun 24, 2024 · 10:43 AM UTC
 
I admit, I did have some kind of vague admiration for Sierra that was quickly shaken when I found this thread. It did not change my thoughts regarding peak trans, however, it did make me reach "peak radfem". I've spent over 10 years either writing or reading TERF shit on the internet, and I was always dismayed by the inevitable slide into crazed mean-girl conduct that occurs wherever radfems congregate. I always made concessions for this behavior: It's just this one person who likes to stir drama. It's just this one website we're using. I did not want to admit that this is a consistent pattern. It seemed like the ultimate indictment against radical feminism to acknowledge that the majority of its proponents act insane (or at least unable to properly handle disagreement).

Misjudging Sierra as an exception, then watching the same pattern play out for the millionth time was a such a disappointment, I am completely turned off by internet "activists" now. But that's probably for the best.
I used to feel this way about Britney. She made some good points I agreed with regarding surrogacy etc, but then I started realizing she was just a BPD whore who was bisexual and claimed to be straight. I thought Sierra was logical too, but alas. She is also insane. The real indicator was that she was nuts enough to be "trans" to begin with. I do still enjoy King Critical, though. But he's busy with life now.
 
@gamipami
Why did menstrual suppression help with your joint pain?
@TTExulansic
It achieves it by acting on the brain similar to lupron, stopping the cycling of several hormones, including estrogen. Estrogen makes you stretchier and that plus the medication related loss of tone and strength led to instability, mobility limitations, swelling and pain. Lowering the estrogen made that stop happening, is my theory.
Jun 24, 2024 · 9:32 AM UTC
Ladies, ever taken the pill? Did you know you may as well have taken a puberty blocker? Scary stuff.
Wait, doesn't the birth control actually increase estrogen? And that's why pooners don't take it, and get pregnant and annoy everyone by saying they're seahorse dads?
 
Wait, doesn't the birth control actually increase estrogen? And that's why pooners don't take it, and get pregnant and annoy everyone by saying they're seahorse dads?
Depends on the type of birth control. Most contain both synthetic estrogen and progestin, but there are a few progestin-only methods, which will decrease the body’s natural estrogen. Sierra bitches about Depo Provera, an injection of synthetic progestin that suppresses the ovaries’ production of estrogen.

I don’t think pooners bother to do this much research about hormones to begin with. Birth control is for icky girls, not men-bro-kings.
 
Frens, today our little Sierra's earned her place on the 28-page single-spaced 10-point list of lolcows who imagine themselves to be the object of sex fantasies. Huzzah!
She's been making this type of comment to Karen Davis for quite awhile now. Openly claimed that they had had an affair and that she had then "friendzoned" Karen. Extremely creepy. Karen unblocked Sierra and Sierra's been harassing her non-stop for the last couple of days.
She and Matt Osborne published an 'expose' on Uhler (archive: article one, article two), but it doesn't seem like anyone really cares and I was happy to see that quite a few among the terven objected to Sierra and Matt exploiting an obviously mentally-ill/emotionally-disturbed woman (one of Uhler's daughters) in order to prosecute a twitter feud. The article was ostensibly written by Matt Osborne (his twitter profile says he is a "book reviewer for Genspect"), but it has Sierra all over it:
Sierra01.png

It could not be more obvious what this is really all about; Sierra doesn't even try to hide it:
Sierra02.png

That last one-sentence paragraph has Sierra's bitchiness all over it. FFS, Brittany is entitled to her own opinion about Genspect (I think she's right about them, fwiw, although I think it's just a grift aimed at profiting from the gender shit and enhancing O'Malley's image, rather than anything nefarious/sinister as Brittany thinks). But she didn't stroke Sierra's ego or defer to her enough, so now she has to suffer.
Sierra04.png

"Uhler told a dog bite victim." As far as I'm aware, this is the first time that Sierra has ever explicitly denied that it was she who called CPS.
Sierra05.png

That first sentence is so hilariously pathetic. "Matt Osborne met this woman when he heroically intervened at a protest, rescuing the poor gcs from antifa thugs while risking injury ..."
Sierra's been sucking up to Laura Becker for awhile now, and sure enough, Laura Becker's in the article:
Sierra03.png
"Brittany made a video calling me out and reacting to my video about the ... conference." There you go - it's all about hurt egos. These fucking people don't even try to pretend.
All these articles prove to me is that Sierra (and this Matt person) are fucking horrible people. My opinion about Uhler (a bit of a nut-case but basically harmless) remains unchanged. Well done Sierra - keep revealing yourself.
 
It's shit like this that has really put the hole in my balloon over people wanting to be public on the internet. Anyone who puts themselves as the public face for anything is an attention whore who wants to put on a performance with all the deranged nasty that usually implies.

How it started: Sierra is a homely looking, awkward woman but one who makes some good points.
How it's going: Sierra is a habitual, compulsive liar who retroactively changes her own history to suit what she wants to talk about on a given day. Tries to present herself as having more medical knowledge and better job than she does. Commentates on other people with a whole host of medical conditions they likely do not have, diagnosis random shit to people who she has no business doing so. Delusions of grandeur. Thinks making eye contact with her makes you her bestie/romantic interest. Accuses people she decides to backstab with sex pestery. Still awkward and homely.
 
Back