State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Rekieta, Kayla Rekieta, April Imholte

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

Anyone laying odds on Kayla's unconditional bond receipt being "fixed" today? Nick did say it would be on the website.

 

[Chug Smuckle]

Sorry if this has been asked and answered, but would Nick deleting his stream or disabling chat and coomalot doing the same count as tampering with/destroying evidence?

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

And still no bond forms for Kayla.

 

[Kopasea]

I'm trying to figure out what objective evidence we actually have, as opposed to a bunch of subjective evidence provided by a handful of people from Nick's church who asked to remain anonymous. I'm sure CPS will do their own investigation to determine whether there's truth to the claim, but that won't be released to the public.

I agree we don't have any evidence of the neglect except hearsay from multiple people. I'm unfamiliar with how child neglect investigations work so it could be forthcoming. For the internet though, the body cam will be all the evidence necessary. If it's a pigsty in there, that will signify neglect to Nick's detractors.

 

[Gehenna]

Kayla and Nick filed a "notice to remove" Judge Fisher

"He who represents himself has a fool for a client."​

 

[Useful_Mistake]

but would Nick deleting his stream or disabling chat and coomalot doing the same count as tampering with/destroying evidence?

The cokestream/appeal stream? Probably not. Afterwards? Could be, depending on the value and how mean the prosecution is feeling.

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

"He who represents himself has a fool for a client."​

"and spent all their money on cocaine."

 

[Bogliacci]

Rackets are scared that much cuz of all the trashing Nick did on the judge cuz of Montys lawsuit.

I hope she doesn't recuse, she hasn't actually done anything but rule against him in a different case. It was Nicky that made it clear he has a bias against the judge, not the other way around.

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

Can someone who is a lawyer answer how bad having his e-mail on both forms is? At this point they are co-defendants and having court communications go to the same e-mail seems improper.

 

[NadeND-001]

That goes for Nick, but I don't see why Kayla has any cause to ask for another judge. "My husband talked about Your Honor's dripping pussy juice on a stream once" does not sound like a good legal argument, but I am not an attorney.

they are co-defendants

Sorry if this has been asked and answered, but would Nick deleting his stream or disabling chat and coomalot doing the same count as tampering with/destroying evidence?

he wasnt arrested and slapped with criminal charges at that time yet

 

[Spaded Dave]

Foolish Scandinavian Incel Prudes! You just don't understand the secret to getting away with every crime forever. If you rant on a YouTube video about a judge or cop you are immediately immunized from them taking any action against you. Once he gets Fischer removed he will get the next guy, and the next guy, and then they are all out of judges. Checkmate.

I agree we don't have any evidence of the neglect except hearsay from multiple people. I'm unfamiliar with how child neglect investigations work so it could be forthcoming. For the internet though, the body cam will be all the evidence necessary. If it's a pigsty in there, that will signify neglect to Nick's detractors.

Yeah, we just have the words of the stupid kids that they weren't being fed and were stuck wearing dirty clothes. It's just a bunch of people from different walks of life giving similar stories that were corroborated by what the police saw as far as the state of the house and were told by at least one of the kids themselves. But have we actually SEEN the kids not being fed? Have we PERSONALLY SEEN the kids wearing the same clothes for days? If you don't have security cameras in the Rekieta's house that you monitor 24/7 you must acquit!

Kosher Salt has consistently proven himself a retard. Further entertaining of him is ill-advised for your own sanity.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

Kayla and Nick filed a "notice to remove" Judge Fisher

Didn't Nick superchatted or published somewhere that he akshually had retained a lawyer or something like that?
Why did he filled this pro se if that's the case?

 

[Spaded Dave]

Didn't Nick superchatted or published somewhere that he akshually had retained a lawyer or something like that?
Why did he filled this pro se if that's the case?

Saves money for what is actually a pretty simple matter. I don't fault him for self representation at his arraignment or in this specific matter. We will see what he does going forward though because everything after this would be retarded.

 

[talk talk talk]

Minnesota criminal procedure rules allow a free strike of a judge if the defendant does it within seven days of learning the identify of the judge who will preside over a hearing or trial. This is a free strike--no reason has to be given.

This is the first smart thing Nick has done in a week.

(4) Notice to Remove. A party may remove a judge assigned to preside at a trial or hearing as follows:

(a) A notice to remove must be served on the opposing counsel and filed with district court within seven days after the party receives notice of the name of the presiding judge at the trial or hearing;

(b) The notice must be filed before the start of the trial or hearing; and

(c) The notice is not effective against a judge who already presided at the trial, Omnibus Hearing, or evidentiary hearing if the removing party had notice the judge would preside at the hearing.​

Minn.R.Crim.P. 26.03, Subd. 14(4).

 

[Kosher Salt]

Kayla and Nick filed a "notice to remove" Judge Fisher

The relevant rule, MN Court Rules 26.03 Subd. 14(4):

Note that there is no requirement for a showing of cause on the first Notice to Remove. It is simply served, and if it is filed early enough, it is automatic. Cause is required to be shown only if a party has already removed a judge, and wants to remove a subsequent judge (Subd. 14(5)).

edit: damn, ninja'd by @talk talk talk

 

[Bogliacci]

Well that's gay, nick why do you not want to have to face the judge you went on a narc rant against in court? You're so much smarter than her yet you don't want to prove it?

 

[Mike Stoklasas Spock Ears]

within seven days of learning the identify of the judge

His arraignment was on the 24th, did he really wait until the last possible minute? lol

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

Dumb legal question, but would Kayla have a case for getting a new judge? I know Nick doesn't because he shit his own bed and now he has to lie in it. But I wonder if Our Wife can say "My idiot coked up husband may have sabotaged my case."

 

[Chirping Smoke Detector]

Dumb legal question, but would Kayla have a case for getting a new judge? I know Nick doesn't because he shit his own bed and now he has to lie in it. But I wonder if Our Wife can say "My idiot coked up husband may have sabotaged my case."

The statute says you can remove a judge from your case if they haven't done anything on it. But you are basically stuck with the next judge.

 

[Kosher Salt]

Well that's gay, nick why do you not want to have to face the judge you went on a narc rant against in court? You're so much smarter than her yet you don't want to prove it?

I personally think that her making negative remarks about Nick's client hiring him in her sentencing hearing would be sufficient reason to remove her, even without his civil case or anything negative he's said about her.