Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[DumbDude43]

Livestreams of the court hearing is going to be lawtube’s OJ. Instead of a nigger killing a mudshark blonde it’s a creep killing his real life for an american beauty degenerate fantasy.

what i still don't understand about the american beauty stuff is this: if that's his fantasy, why did he do it in such a public way?
like, the guy has money out the ass, he could easily just hit up 18 yr old escorts to satisfy his dreams of banging hot teens. if his wife was ok with having a live-in coke whore in the house, she would probably also have been ok with just letting nick drive out every other weekend to fuck hookers in minneapolis. this could easily have been done with discretion, without word ever getting out, without it interfering with his life like the imholte situation or the hedonism holiday did. he could have easily satisfied his inner gooner without burning down his family and reputation in the process.

so i really wonder, why did he carry out his degen fantasy in such a reckless way that was bound to blow up in his face eventually and go public? was it just because being drunk all the time leads to bad decision making, or is there another reason for it?

 

[Artificial Stupidity]

Just watched a few of the locals clips where nick is talking to his balldo washers and oh boyyyy nick is in denial, says it was alcohol & narcolepsy.
Yes nick fight the case ! That coke isn't yours it belongs to April! What's the bet nick does a dirtbag move?

 

[HarblMcDavid]

I did search but didn't find reference to this particular aspect of Nick's penchant for cocaine given his considerable proboscis, but forgive me if I did not search thoroughly enough.

I was watching Botched a while ago and there was an episode about "Demi", whose nose basically pancaked into her face due to chronic cocaine use.

Even the biggest of schnozes will disappear into his face like a deflating inner tube after a run-in with a briar patch after too much cocaine.

He's got not merely a figurative collapse of life and career, but a looming literal collapse of his nose, an integral part of his brand, if he doesn't pull up.

 

[Null]

Theoretically speaking, if you received some large sum of money during this financially hard period of time for you, would you sweep some dirt on the site connecting to person donating? I don't mean like deleting thread or something that severe, more along the lines of what you said in one of your streams, I think in was about Rakieta, where you said that you try not to talk/don't like to talk about drama associated with him, becouse you like the guy.

P. S. I not insinuating anything, just curious what would your actions be in this hypothetical situation.

No? How many more years of absolutely unrestricted criticism of every person associated with me do I need to put in before faggots stop accusing me of shit? Apparently 11 isn't enough. It's so fucking insulting.

 

[Dropsies]

It astonishes me that, in what is now a thread of well over 5000 pages, the real victim of Nick Rekieta's runaway degeneracy has scarcely been acknowledged.

And they said that the great American novel would never be written.

 

[Sharpeteer]

Just watched a few of the locals clips where nick is talking to his balldo washers and oh boyyyy nick is in denial, says it was alcohol & narcolepsy.
Yes nick fight the case ! That coke isn't yours it belongs to April! What's the bet nick does a dirtbag move?

Please God, please, let the trial be streamed.

This man is the stupidest lawyer on Earth, and he's representing himself in a case where the state already has him red handed.

 

[Oxyjen]

Just for infos

 

[Artificial Stupidity]

No? How many more years of absolutely unrestricted criticism of every person associated with me do I need to put in before faggots stop accusing me of shit? Apparently 11 isn't enough. It's so fucking insulting.

It will always be something retards will accuse you of.
It's a point of attack to sully your reputation, similar to blockland shit.

It's been insinuated multiple times, I assume if you actually did something like that you would end up being liable for extortion or at the very least blackmail or something?

 

[SaidNoOneEver]

No? How many more years of absolutely unrestricted criticism of every person associated with me do I need to put in before faggots stop accusing me of shit? Apparently 11 isn't enough. It's so fucking insulting.

And during Pride Month no less!

 

[Oxyjen]

It astonishes me that, in what is now a thread of well over 5000 pages, the real victim of Nick Rekieta's runaway degeneracy has scarcely been acknowledged.

@Null please do a dramatic reading of this on MATI. Backing music of your choice.

 

[Captain Manning]

I dunno if it was explicitly pointed out yet, but the Omnibus hearing scheduled for August 20th has been cancelled. I presume this is because of the switch in judges, and the new judge would have to find a free slot in his schedule.



In other news..

Nearby Willmar has a radio station, and they have a news item up on Rekieta concerning the judge swap out. Nothing we don't already know, but archiving for completeness.

https://www.willmarradio.com/news/rekieta-asks-for-new-judge-in-drug-and-weapons-case/article_81249012-2272-11ef-b51b-cb8b6497a7be.html

https://archive.is/nYFk3

 

[trash cat]

Just watched a few of the locals clips where nick is talking to his balldo washers and oh boyyyy nick is in denial, says it was alcohol & narcolepsy.
Yes nick fight the case ! That coke isn't yours it belongs to April! What's the bet nick does a dirtbag move?

Are there clips (or transcripts) of those yet? Very interested to hear what Nick has to say.

 

[Tablet County]

I dunno if it was explicitly pointed out yet, but the Omnibus hearing scheduled for August 20th has been cancelled. I presume this is because of the switch in judges, and the new judge would have to find a free slot in his schedule.

View attachment 6054218

In other news..

Nearby Willmar has a radio station, and they have a news item up on Rekieta concerning the judge swap out.

View attachment 6054221

https://www.willmarradio.com/news/rekieta-asks-for-new-judge-in-drug-and-weapons-case/article_81249012-2272-11ef-b51b-cb8b6497a7be.html

https://archive.is/nYFk3

Rackets asking for a new judge in this trial is probably the first smart thing he's done in years.
It won't save him.

 

[Strix454]

I never understood that one, because if Marbury is wrong, then how the fuck can our judicial system function?

The more intellectual people who hold this belief generally fall back on certain ideas of Thomas Jefferson who disagreed with Marbury . Jefferson held first that any problem with unconsititutional actions by President or Congress could be repaired by elections. And that beyond that, individual citizens and the states had the right to refuse to obey any law they considered unconstitutional. Essentially Jefferson believed that that were unlimited powers of nullification in the system.

The judicial function would be reduced to simply rendering court verdicts based on the laws as written.

Jefferson's ideas of personal and state nullification of laws are obviously very attractive to modern libertarians like Nick. But in practice, a system where the three branches independently decide what the constitution means could only end in violence and chaos.

 

[AnOminous]

I never understood that one, because if Marbury is wrong, then how the fuck can our judicial system function?

It can't which is why Nick's opinion is pure retardation. But at least he admitted that his opinion was fringe.

The more intellectual people who hold this belief generally fall back on certain ideas of Thomas Jefferson who disagreed with Marbury . Jefferson held first that any problem with unconsititutional actions by President or Congress could be repaired by elections.

While Jefferson is probably my favorite of the Founding Retards, this was a bunch of dumbfuck shit. And of course Jefferson disagreed with Marbury since it went against him personally. The irony is that it actually upheld his own choice to ignore the appointment of a judge, while simultaneously giving the Supreme Court itself power.

 

[The-Patriarchy]

Rackets asking for a new judge in this trial is probably the first smart thing he's done in years.
It won't save him.

Mixed feelings on this move- Yes, Nick said a bunch of retarded shit about the judge, and it's the judge who's handling his defamation trial- so yeah, he probably wants to avoid her if possible- so I don't blame him for filing for recusal.

BUT

He basically gets one shot at that, and if he gets a hard-ass judge who makes it a point to throw the book at junkies, he won't be allowed to do it again (I think he CAN, but only if the judge does something *really* egregiously bad) - and even if he can find grounds for it, it will look like he's judge shopping (which he basically is doing here) which will reduce his chances of getting another swap.

Six of one, half dozen of the other. He's either f'd himself by blowing his load too soon, or he dodged a bullet by getting rid of the judge he was talking shit about.

Also- now that he's drawn attention to the fact that he said vile retarded shit about Judge Fischer, he can expect to get stomped on in the Montegraph case, and should probably beg Monty to settle, unless he really enjoys humiliation (which he probably does)

 

[JamusActimus]

Theoretically speaking, if you received some large sum of money during this financially hard period of time for you, would you sweep some dirt on the site connecting to person donating? I don't mean like deleting thread or something that severe, more along the lines of what you said in one of your streams, I think in was about Rakieta, where you said that you try not to talk/don't like to talk about drama associated with him, becouse you like the guy.

P. S. I not insinuating anything, just curious what would your actions be in this hypothetical situation.

There's a thread on this website where a dude jerks off and cums on a picture on Null and he did not delete it.

This is the type of person you're dealing with.

 

[SquirrelSquire]

I think it’s time to rehash the butter dish discussion

Hey know what?
Anything but the faggy
"mUh 16 YeAr OlD sHouLd tAke CaR3 of eVeRytHinG! Let Crackets cook! (His meth)"
Vs
"NU'uH, mUh 16 year OlD sHouD GeT hIS AsS wiPeD AlWays duhhhh"

I for one, would welcome a Civil discussion about butter dishes.
My Personal favorite would be, of couse, the butter crock!
Your input Ladies and Gentlemen?

 

[Tablet County]

I for one, would welcome a Civil discussion about butter dishes.
My Personal favorite would be, of couse, the butter crock!
Your input Ladies and Gentlemen?

Why not just leave your butter in the fridge?
This isn't the 1800s.

 

[LiquidKid]

Once again that's complete nonsense. He's not defending Barnes he's simply reacting to/discussing his constitutional points right after Nick was arrested. Legal Mindset wasn't saying the warrant was unconstitutional at all, he was simply talking about things that could POTENTIALLY make it unconstitutional if those things were revealed when more information is available. As soon as more information became available he backed the warrant even more. You don't seem to understand lawtubers, especially Legal Mindset. He simply discusses the objective legal arguments both for and AGAINST a case. So any legal point he may bring up against Nick's case isn't him defending him, except in the most basic technical legal sense. But from the moment he talked about Nick's arrest he's hardly brought up any legal points against the case, as there are very few, and he's condemned both Nick and noseguards. You're being gung-ho about the truth, I'm just objectively pointing out facts. Anyone who watches Legal Mindset's first stream about Nick's arrest and think he's noseguarding is literally insane.

Buddy, your denial is extreme, and the fact that 9 of your 12 total posts are all defending legal mindset leads me to suspect you’re one of his fanboys who joined the site because of him