Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 91 27.2%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 123 36.7%

  • Total voters
    335
I think everyone has That One Book(tm) they can’t remember the name of.
There's another I've been trying to figure the name of, where a kid gets a timetravel device from his future self and uses it to save his sister from getting hit by a car, but it breaks in the process so he spends much of his life rebuilding it just to give to his younger self.
 
Aaron being retarded is the least surprising part of this saga.
I mean he got cucked by Nick, a none practicing lawyer that championed the Balldo because of his none functioning penis.
Aaron got cucked by an impotent YouTube "lawyer".
That indicates that he may be more than just a little retarded.
 
This is interesting that Minnesota could see any child 11 or older responsible for younger kids.
Yeah but is this referring to latchkey kids that babysit after school before mom gets home from work, or actually saying that it's OK for 11 year olds to raise their younger siblings because their parents checked out?

Methinks there's far too many aggravating circumstances for this to be used as any sort of defense.
 
That indicates that he may be more than just a little retarded.
Another thing I kinda remember is when he was talking about how manipulative Nick was, the example he gave really sounded like something only a midwit would fall for. Something about being able to do a bunch of coke all at once but it kicks in a different times somehow.

And it makes sense that Nick would intentionally surround himself and seek out it morons that he could more easily manipulate. As a narcissist he wants weak-willed, not terribly intelligent people around him because those types are easier to control.
 
Yeah but is this referring to latchkey kids that babysit after school before mom gets home from work, or actually saying that it's OK for 11 year olds to raise their younger siblings because their parents checked out?

Methinks there's far too many aggravating circumstances for this to be used as any sort of defense.
Probably for letting older siblings legally adopt their siblings or qualify to be considered caregivers for state assistance. To avoid them being split up and placed in foster care. They would also have a caseworker making sure they are actually capable. Like when a single parent dies, is hospitalized, becomes disabled, or goes to jail.
 
Last edited:
This is interesting that Minnesota could see any child 11 or older responsible for younger kids. 🤔
I'd bet that only reasonably applies in rare specific cases, like when the kid has a 600lb single mother and has no choice but to be self sufficient and take care of the house and family. I can't see a Jury being convinced in a case where the parents suddenly develop a coke habit and self-destruct in the span of a few months. I'm not a lawfag though so who knows?
 
Yeah but is this referring to latchkey kids that babysit after school before mom gets home from work, or actually saying that it's OK for 11 year olds to raise their younger siblings because their parents checked out?

Methinks there's far too many aggravating circumstances for this to be used as any sort of defense.

It's probably for kids who want to childmind for the neighbours on the weekend, and it allows them to do so in a legal status.

It does not stretch to cover abandoned children suddenly becoming parents to the younger siblings.

Another thing I kinda remember is when he was talking about how manipulative Nick was, the example he gave really sounded like something only a midwit would fall for. Something about being able to do a bunch of coke all at once but it kicks in a different times somehow.

And it makes sense that Nick would intentionally surround himself and seek out it morons that he could more easily manipulate. As a narcissist he wants weak-willed, not terribly intelligent people around him because those types are easier to control.

Have you seen thr mental calibre of Nick's remaining fan base? We are approaching 60 IQ...
 
And it makes sense that Nick would intentionally surround himself and seek out it morons that he could more easily manipulate. As a narcissist he wants weak-willed, not terribly intelligent people around him because those types are easier to control.
Yeah this is the exact reason his buddy Dax hangs around with pedos like Vito the Pedo and freaks like Riley and Mint Salad, guys like Nick and Dax surround themselves with idiots and losers both so they can feel like the "coolest guy in the room" and because they don't want people around them who are likely to challenge them on their bullshit.
 
Yeah but is this referring to latchkey kids that babysit after school before mom gets home from work, or actually saying that it's OK for 11 year olds to raise their younger siblings because their parents checked out?

Methinks there's far too many aggravating circumstances for this to be used as any sort of defense.
I don't think it can be used as a defense of anything. This is in CPS handbook, not the law books. I just wonder how much Nick tried to push his responsibilities onto older children, to CPS. These kids were pampered with a Nanny for years. They were lost on responsibilities that typical teens have.
 
This is interesting that Minnesota could see any child 11 or older responsible for younger kids. 🤔
Sure their oldest could have done something for the other kids; but its obvious their mom and dad didn't teach them any life skills. Rich people don't need to do things like cook, clean, and do laundry. I was going to ask what happened to the nanny, but apparently that was april, but what about the nanny before her? I guess it was too much of a risk to have a non-participating nanny in the house.
 
what about the nanny before her?
According to Aaron ( whatever that's worth) the nanny quit saying she couldn't take it anymore, implying narcissistic abuse. This is further supported by other posters who have found her liking post related to narcissistic abuse recovery on pinterest.
 
I think this is why the neglect charge. Of course, there was neglect involved, but I don't think a criminal charge of neglect would have happened without the drugs involved.
Screenshot_20240605-081728~2.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I know he was pretty degenerate but boy is this a great quote Kayla better hire someone besides Nicky boy:

“Criminal law is one of the few professions where the client buys someone else's luck. The luck of most people is strictly non-transferrable. But a good criminal lawyer can sell all his luck to a client, and the more luck he sells the more he has to sell.”
― William S. Burroughs, Junky
 
I've been torturing myself watching Aaron's 'show'. I saw someone superchat stating something along the lines of 'You do realise that you and your Ho are going to be called as witnesses".

He seemed completely surprised and then said he couldn't talk about it.

I think he may genuinely be retarded.
Do they really put that much effort into cases like this? I thought they could just present evidence and had a judge decide, depending on how pleas go. Like if they focus on the drug charges they don’t need Aaron to confirm he uses drugs, they have that evidence already. Not saying this will go that way, I just thought it was a possibility. Or if they get April to say what they want, they might not use Aaron. Not a lawfag unfortunately so can’t be sure, but I know some cases go that way.
 
I've been torturing myself watching Aaron's 'show'. I saw someone superchat stating something along the lines of 'You do realise that you and your Ho are going to be called as witnesses".

He seemed completely surprised and then said he couldn't talk about it.

I think he may genuinely be retarded.

Aaron may, or may not be retarded, but in this case the real retard is the superchatter.

What exactly would Aaron be called to testify about?
Weird sex? Interesting and degenerate, but not illegal.
Drug use? Taking drugs isn’t really illegal, and they don’t need him, because they caught Nick with almost an ounce of coke.
Could Aaron testify against neglect? What’s his expertise exactly? CPS would likely have a thick Rekieta folder at that point, so nah.

It’s not going to be a week long trial with lots of witnesses. It’s a pretty simple case, and Aaron is neither needed as a witness nor particularly relevant.
 
Back