"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

Next Highlight
  • Like
  • TMI
  • Winner
Reactions: anionfarflung, byuuWasTaken, Irrational Exuberance and 5 others
AnOminous said:
When John Lydon is the voice of reason, everyone else is the voice of lunacy and idiocy.

He deserves mad props for being literally ONE guy who had the balls to call out Jimmy Savile as the pedo piece of shit he was, and look what happened to him. He was all but blacklisted for just telling the truth.

On top of that, while he was deplatformed, he was basically denounced as a lunatic for simply having said what was a goddamn fact, by chickenshit cowards who wouldn't have dared to do it had he been allowed to respond.

Malcolm McLaren was a scumbag (and probably a nonce in his own right), Sid Vicious was a deranged junkie, I have nothing particularly bad to say about the others, but Johnny is a national treasure any country should be proud of.
Click to expand...
He has very good takes on most shit and is very conservative despite his punk background. Everything I’ve read about him or from him paints a picture of a pretty good guy. I wouldn’t say he’s moderate, but he’s nuanced in his opinions. He shat on the rich for being out of touch faggots (he’s against gay adoption, too) and called the poor lazy niggers with no investment in the country always looking for a hand out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, murph, Gorton Colu and 3 others
Musk add the community-noted signal
1717646264453.png
 
  • DRINK!
  • Lunacy
Reactions: byuuWasTaken and PhoBingas
Col said:
LOL. Holy shit dude. You are really citing the guy that was one of the people that Marv attacked and who was a part of the group fucking with Marv before the attack? The one who was shown to be very shady and unreliable with inconsistent facts among his own articles by the lorelodge documentary?
Yeah I am sure he is completely unbiased and would have no reason to obsessively report things that portray him and his friends favorably for the past 2 decades.
Click to expand...
I missed this response, and it's almost making a point.
Like I said, "This debate will be about everything except the facts of Marv's life." Why wouldn't someone whose town was destroyed by a petty moron want to set the story straight? Are they not allowed to because Marv didn't like them? All that shows us is you're in the tank for Marv, which isn't interesting.

I trust a guy who knows the town and backs up what he says more than people who just watched a youtube video and turned him into a folk hero for a pet ideology.
You can say he's personally shady (with no substance behind that, it could mean anything or nothing) but he can show the claims of blocked access are just made up and not even what Marv himself claimed. And that is the main reason people claim Marv was being denied his livelihood. Along with arguments about a cut sewage line which never existed in the first place, and would have occurred after Marv sold the shop anyway. The rest is a conspiracy resting on the fact that these people didn't like him, which could be entirely innocent and reasonable. Marv and he did not fight it out with Killdozers and he emerged victorious with Marv slain, Marv took revenge on people he'd decided wronged him so his grievances ought to make sense.

This doesn't matter at all but saying it anyway. Even 'don't tread on me' gun forums know Marv was a lunatic, they just cope about how what matters is what his legend represents. That's where this will end up. "LOL. Holy shit dude" is kind of a dead giveaway on that.

Edit: also, the author does not hide his involvement here. Probably important to note.
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, Friedrich Hayek's Ghost, Johnny Salami and 9 others
notorietus said:
"The FBI subpoenaed Google for my account information in 2022. I have never been notified until now. It stands to reason there was a grand jury subpoena and associated gag order. This was undoubtedly related to #DropKiwiFarms and, unsurprisingly, it amounted to nothing."

View attachment 6057399
Tweet
Click to expand...
“You were under investigation and we can’t tell you why“ is clearly how a functioning democracy should work and is in no way a symbol of totalitarianism out of the nightmares of Franz Kafka.

AnOminous said:
He deserves mad props for being literally ONE guy who had the balls to call out Jimmy Savile as the pedo piece of shit he was, and look what happened to him
Click to expand...
Comedian Jerry Sadowitz (in b4 people do an early life check on Wikipedia: you people are mentally ill) and he gradually disappeared from the mainstream media.

He would be on the lefty ones occasionally, like channel four, as every comedians favourite edgy comic, but seemed to be ghosted about the time he called out.

He was also interestingly the only person to try and get a death at a party at Pete Doherty‘s looked into as it seems like a sober who had just arrived guy and was in an arguement was murdered rather than falling out of a window.

The entire media ran with the accident story and memory holed it as quickly as possible. The Times of all people just ran a puff piece on Doherty. He’s from a military family so there’s no doubt some sort of establishment shenanigans going on.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: byuuWasTaken, NoReturn, Big Mommy and 2 others
Berrakh said:
I trust a guy who knows the town
Click to expand...
Marv knew the town as well. Your logic is not only baffling, it is fucking inert. You are making an entire podium to yap off of one person's account because you like his side better while saying "But GUYS, we CANNOT trust Marvin's account because the faggots on a gun forum call him crazy! And this guy I like also say he crazy! So he crazy!"

What makes one account worth more than the other? All you've pointed to is the fact that there are people who didn't like Marvin. A collection of retards saying "It's raining" on a dry day doesn't make a sudden monsoon, you fucking spastic.

As for "Marvin made up claims", can you please do what you're supposed to on this website and uhhhh BACK THAT CLAIM UP? I'm so sick and tired of seeing you fucking assholes act like newfags and just write autistic essays based off your emotions and not facts. Why would I believe one of the guys who was having a slapfight with Marvin? There's an obvious conflict of interest and his account can't be trusted more than a redditor saying "Well, in my humble opinion".

Go back to watching Shinji jack off on bitches in the hospital.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: lol rascal, byuuWasTaken, Markass the Worst and 7 others
FedPostalService said:
“You were under investigation and we can’t tell you why“ is clearly how a functioning democracy should work and is in no way a symbol of totalitarianism out of the nightmares of Franz Kafka.
Click to expand...
Investigations generally need to be kept secret as a practical matter. It's secret arrests, trials and verdicts that are the problem.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Postal_Rat
Col said:
Wait... so if he never had a license how is he guilty of driving with a suspended license?
I am not sure if it is a dumb nigger just taking everyone for a ride, or a dumb nigger trying to cover for government incompetence and screw a dumb nigger to hide it all.

No matter what there is at least 1 dumb nigger involved in the situation. I don't know who to believe.
Click to expand...
For someone claiming to be a level 99 racist Josh being unable to sniff out obvious dindu bullshit makes me very doubtful. "Yeah the car nigger had all these exculpatory factors and he just happens to be the one nigger who isn't gonna plead his case before a judge while the judge is waiting, begging for a shred of context." And suspended licenses generally explicitly allow driving for medical appointments too. What's the next hot take jewsh wants to give? "Did you know that the closest emett till had come to Mary was when the dragged him out to kill him?" Or whatever the new party line is
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: byuuWasTaken
Vect said:
But is vodka dog kill?

I like Slav but he's always been very sensitive about getting pushback from Null. Rest in goulash, dear Farmer.
Click to expand...
He is very sensitive, period. And he always responds by being really passive aggressive, which doesn't exactly endear him to people more. Null just went off on him because he was once again bitching about something in the chat. Imo it was like a Wolfetone situation where he thought Null has to listen to him about stuff because "I'm like his big brother" just cause he took his advice once, but somehow even more homosexual and melodramatic and when he realized the feeling was not reciprocated he got pissy and left.
 
  • Feels
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: PhoBingas, byuuWasTaken, latinlover and 13 others
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Mimitchi, Marvin, Slurs McKenzie and 41 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back