Hochul Halts Congestion Pricing in a Stunning 11th-Hour Shift - Governor decides not to do something retarded, urbanists assblasted

Hochul Halts Congestion Pricing in a Stunning 11th-Hour Shift​

Weeks before New York was to charge motorists to enter Manhattan’s business district, Gov. Kathy Hochul postponed the program citing economic concerns.


Gov. Kathy Hochul on Wednesday directed the Metropolitan Transportation Authority to pause the congestion pricing program.Credit...Cindy Schultz for The New York Times
By Grace Ashford
Reporting from the State Capitol in Albany, N.Y.
June 5, 2024Updated 1:36 p.m. ET
Gov. Kathy Hochul of New York announced on Wednesday that she was shelving the long-awaited tolling plan known as congestion pricing, just weeks before it was to go into effect.
“After careful consideration I have come to the difficult decision that implementing the planned congestion pricing system risks too many unintended consequences,” Ms. Hochul said, adding: “I have directed the M.T.A. to indefinitely pause the program.”
The decision, Ms. Hochul said, was not an easy one, but nonetheless crucial in light of the lingering effects of the coronavirus pandemic on working families and New York City’s economy.
The congestion pricing plan, the first of its kind in the nation and a program that has been decades in the making, was slated to start June 30. Drivers using E-ZPass would have paid as much as $15 to enter Manhattan south of 60th Street.

The governor said she feared that instituting a toll to drive into the borough would “create another obstacle to our economic recovery.”

“Let’s be real: A $15 charge may not seem like a lot to someone who has the means but it can break the budget of a hard-working middle-class household,” Ms. Hochul said.
Word of the governor’s last-minute misgivings began to circulate in Albany on Tuesday night, and quickly sent shock waves through the New York State Capitol by Wednesday morning, the penultimate day of the legislative session.
Few could say that they loved congestion pricing. It was a politically unattractive proposal championed by both economists and environmentalists as the solution not only to the financial woes of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, the state agency that runs New York’s subways and buses, but also the city’s infamous gridlock.
But after decades of debate, hearings, studies and planning, most Democrats had made a grudging peace with the plan — none more publicly than Ms. Hochul, who has defended it as a necessary step toward rebuilding New York’s economy.

Just two weeks ago, the governor told attendees at the Global Economic Summit in Ireland that implementing congestion pricing was critical to “making cities more livable.”
“I’m very upset that suddenly, out of the blue, this would pop up,” Senator Liz Krueger, a Manhattan Democrat said on Wednesday, adding: “If we stop congestion pricing now we’re never going to get it.”
Kate Slavin of the Regional Plan Association, a nonprofit urban research and advocacy group that has championed the tolling program, called the move “a total betrayal of New Yorkers and our climate.”
But even as transit advocates decried the move, an undercurrent of support was stirring among lawmakers, particularly those representing purple districts.
“Many see it as welcome news,” James Skoufis, a Democrat who represents Orange County in the State Senate said, adding that despite the plan’s approval five years earlier, opposition had been growing in the Legislature. “Some of it is outspoken, some of it is quieter, but it is widespread.”

In her address, Ms. Hochul stressed her commitment to public transit, and ensuring that the transportation authority had the funding it needed to complete long overdue capital projects. But she said that the city’s outlook had changed since the plan was approved in 2019. “Workers were in the office five days a week, crime was at record lows and tourism was at record highs,” she said. “Circumstances have changed and we must respond to the facts on the ground.”
Ms. Hochul needs only the approval of the authority’s board to halt implementation of the plan. But without the projected $1 billion a year for the city’s buses and subways, the transit system would soon fall into crisis.
Ms. Hochul could fill that gap, at least temporarily, with money from the state reserves. But she is also said to be looking at a more durable revenue source, in the form of a tax on city businesses, which would require the approval of the State Legislature.
Reporting was contributed by Nicholas Fandos, Jeffery C. Mays and Claire Fahy.
Grace Ashford covers New York government and politics for The Times. More about Grace Ashford

........
Source / Archive

The $15 charge was basically to keep the subway system afloat.

@quaawaa
 
There's a lot of reddit salt:
1717643865590.png
1717644363475.png
1717643910958.png
1717643956682.png
1717644011436.png
1717644027821.png
1717644040036.png
1717643972082.png
1717644081506.png
1717644156713.png
Bugmen don't know where their water comes from:
1717644196055.png
1717644217896.png
1717644270857.png
1717644281442.png
1717644312398.png
1717644338108.png
1717644407307.png

1717644654630.png
1717644680460.png
1717644691794.png
Real New Yorkers want congestion pricing:
1717644711217.png
1717644736207.png
1717644782827.png
r8gyjc8tqs4d1.jpg
1717645073657.png
1717645089991.png
1717645101162.png
1717645143821.png
1717645165980.png

1717645024852.png
1717645188371.png
1717645233011.png
1717645264438.png
 
Does anyone honestly believe that after installing millions of dollars of infrastructure (toll cameras) in preparation for this that they will just "cancel" it?

I don't think permanently, no. What I think happened was that nobody liked the idea except for faggy urbanists and NGOs; everyone else hated it, including businesses in NYC. Hochul finally read the room and realized that there was enough opposition with the suburban Democrats (and their constituents) that even if they remained blue, her own political career would be jeopardized, and she pulled the plug.
 
There's a lot of reddit salt:
People on public transit are second-class citizens. If they weren't, they'd be able to get where they need to go in something that isn't full of other peoples' farts. That said, I'm disappointed to see this. New Yorkers deserve to get fucked raw by the people they keep electing and making visiting NYC less desirable is a way to keep the cancer from spreading.
 
People on public transit are second-class citizens. If they weren't, they'd be able to get where they need to go in something that isn't full of other peoples' farts. That said, I'm disappointed to see this. New Yorkers deserve to get fucked raw by the people they keep electing and making visiting NYC less desirable is a way to keep the cancer from spreading.
No, you don't want to do that. You end up getting a California situation where the disease spreads.
 
Lol damn my doctor is gonna really have a Serious Discussion with me about all that added salt in my diet after reading those comments!!

Fuck those notjustbikes bugmen. Governor Karen gets one right, I'll give her credit there. A stopped clock is right twice a day, even if it has a face that could stop a clock.
 
Does anyone honestly believe that after installing millions of dollars of infrastructure (toll cameras) in preparation for this that they will just "cancel" it?
Similar situation happened in the Greater Manchester area in the UK, got paused because it was recognised that it was a vote loser. I anticipate it coming in under the Labour government and know that I will lose competent colleagues as a result of this, no doubt to be replaced by a dyed in the wool bug hive dweller.
 
I don't think permanently, no. What I think happened was that nobody liked the idea except for faggy urbanists and NGOs; everyone else hated it, including businesses in NYC. Hochul finally read the room and realized that there was enough opposition with the suburban Democrats (and their constituents) that even if they remained blue, her own political career would be jeopardized, and she pulled the plug.

Agree, this was a polling failure, not an ideological one.
 
Seems like a rare W for the people. Seemed like a measure that punishes people who have to commute because they can't afford to live in the city/can't find work elsewhere. Bonus: Environmentalists/anti-car freaks LIVID.
Honestly I’m curious what the demographics of people who drive in Manhattan even are. I don’t think it’s going to be a lot of commuters, because if you’re commuting for work it’s most likely by train (out of state) or subway (another borough).
 
Honestly I’m curious what the demographics of people who drive in Manhattan even are. I don’t think it’s going to be a lot of commuters, because if you’re commuting for work it’s most likely by train (out of state) or subway (another borough).
That’s a fair point! Not something I considered. I realize my opinion lacks a lot of nuance, as I’m neither a NYC dweller or commuter lol.

I just think of a reason to go to a large metro area, and it’s work or events. If I get charged an additional “welcome to our city” charge upon entering, whether for work or pleasure(one being more egregious than the other), I would be unpleasantly surprised.

I am incredibly bias in that I’ve never experienced decent public transport in the areas I’ve lived.
 
Back