Gypsies - A discussion on why they are the worst ethnic group

Ultimately, it, once again, comes down to culture and the nature of IQ tests themselves, which, it should be noted, are not even remotely accurate regardless.

But you can't have it both ways. Either we're all pink inside or there are significant differences.

Lets take niggers for example: I think you would be hard pressed to find anyone who disagrees that there are significant genetic differences when it comes to slow-twitch muscle fibers. Alright, who's to say these same differences can't be applied to skull shape, brain size, structure, shape, and deriving from this: intelligence, inherent hormonal levels, aggression or agreeability, whatever? On a very base levels humans have adapted through their skin's melanin content, but literally nothing else?

Of course IQ isn't perfect, noone said it is, but it gives you a decent estimate. Most people are OK with this when it comes to admitting that asians on average have marginally higher IQ than huwhites, and your example as well, the Samis, demonstrated that 'savages' who may not inherently have access to the same level of education or the same kind of environmental circumstances can have the same level of IQ. Why isn't this the case with native americans, abos, niggers? Why is it always the white and asian 'brutes' that this applies to, but not muh poor brown people? Did the person who create IQ somehow devised a secret way to check for how brown the skin is on the guy taking the test?
 
Honorary mention for Irish Travellers, who are practically the same as gypsies but wouldn’t face all the discrimination they cried about if they just lived in a house and didn’t steal anything that wasn’t nailed down.
Nah, the former is fucking retarded. The latter is partially true, but there's absolutely no reason that services should be tied to a property. The latter is because of the former - of the quarter million or so Irish Travellers, only about ten thousand actually live in caravans. Most are indistinguishable from other Brits. Imagine if you put the worst council estate on wheels and then shipped it around the country like a circus of carnage - that is the state of things, now.

Also, nobody gives a fuck about the "discrimination" someone like yourself gives - heed the warning that this is the only group where the police can overtly, in written form, discriminate based off of "suspected" ethnic background. Those laws are extremely open-ended, depending entirely on an officer's interpretation and do not require landowner consent. They can do this on your own property at will, with no return in mind. The police can just walk up, take your wallet, phone and vehicle, for no reason if they suspect you're a "nomad" - which means fuck all.

It's worse for the native Roma - the UK had its own subset of Roma gypsies, who were completely alien to the European Roma. Throwing them in together is like throwing a labrador into a home for abandoned XL bullies.

interestingly I worked with a guy from old gypsy stock who was pretty honest and hard worker and absolutely hated travellers.
English gypsies are a special group, called "Romanichal" - gypsies weren't hated in England because they had a separate community, typically "arts and crafts" shit and "magic" - Irish Travellers did metalworking, horses and combat sports. Britain was generally accepting of odd cultures, so long as they weren't criminal - so the gypsies in the UK developed into those two distinct groups.

Romanichal look, and act, like actual hobbits. They have a whole bunch of specific cultural quirks, which other Romani don't - specifically, the Vardo. They're basically an endangered species, since according to the regime, all nomads are the same, and thus, all bad.

He was very rare as travelling around Europe has taught me to spot gypsies from a thousand yards away and to watch my pockets around them.
It's like the red squirrel and the grey squirrel.

Gypsies and travellers get lumped together by lefties in the UK despite them hating each other.
It's not that. The two native groups don't hate one another, and both are facing the same set of problems that everyone else in Britain is. But they're on the edge - as the government pushes more, those who are closest to the fence get crushed against it. It's immigration, criminality and anarcho-tyrannical bureaucracy.

Irish Travellers didn't have any tradition of caravans, and were more "seminomadic" - but they were very well armed. They were famous for boxing, but also had a lot of shooting traditions and a surprising amount of military background. The state cracked down on the "unlicensed" firearms and without any real way to defend themselves, they were targeted by criminals. Those who didn't leave the community were criminals themselves, or the scant few who were lucky enough to survive this long. Those who remain free can usually defend themselves.

Romanichal is just sad - when you come out with shit like "if they just lived in a house" you dismiss the fact that they've lived here for hundreds of years. They've been nearly wiped out by the state.

1717663666525.png

Here is a traditional Romanichal man with his traditional Romanichal caravan. Notice that both the man, and the caravan, resemble hobbits. Unlike Irish Travellers, Romanichal don't have a martial culture. Bilbo Baggins isn't going to beat you to death, if you try to rob him and steal his home. He would likely die if you did. His entire lifestyle depends on skilled craftsmanship, access to major cities and public roadways.

Romanichal would set up in major parks, with their very decorated wagons, selling high-quality tailored goods. This is why they are so different - they produced goods of a high quality, so were granted state permission for centuries to live in the UK as they pleased. If you ran into a Romanichal with a knife, it was probably a very high-quality knife with a gold-leaf and ivory handle that he was trying to sell to you.


Now, here is a European Roma. Notice how much darker they look, and how their dwelling looks nothing like it. Many of these darker skinned, and the only tools they have are weapons, to stab unsuspecting locals.

1717663336481.png

How do you think it turned out when some retard decided that these two were the same ethnicity?
 
Now, here is a European Roma. Notice how much darker they look, and how their dwelling looks nothing like it. Many of these darker skinned, and the only tools they have are weapons, to stab unsuspecting locals.
That is a typical putri, or gyppo housey with the typical amount of purdé-s, or gypsy shitlets looking for wallets to nab and foreigners to beg from.
 
So I remembered reading about how gypsies actually have some pretty big houses - kinda like some begging groups in the US are dropped off in Mercedes at the hot intersections to do their grift for the day and get picked up to go to their suburban McMansion.

I have included a couple links for your perusal and opinions.

Notable quote: "Later in the day we got chatting to a local lady and I thought i’d ask her about the houses. As soon as I mentioned the big mansions with silver roofs she said ‘ah, the Gypsie houses!’ So that confirmed what we’d suspected at least. She said ‘I find it most odd how they don’t live in them’. ‘What?!’ Then she explained how a lot of the time they live in a little shack on the grounds, the mansion is just for show. That just baffles me, why would you build a house just for show, and not even live in it? It’s a very unknown and bizarre culture that I’d like to read more into and find out all my unanswered questions."


 
Maybe the mansion is simply empty inside?

I don't know, gypsies are retarded. But some are clever enough to be gypsy capos, skimming other gyppos theft goods, drug peddling and stolen shit fencing all on the black market, and since that means no taxes, they can splurge that.

Such Alpha Gyppos usually get graves that are huge and extremely tacky, ususlly made of glass and gold (or gold painted metal) that look like a gaybar more than a tomb.
 
Maybe the mansion is simply empty inside?

I don't know, gypsies are retarded. But some are clever enough to be gypsy capos, skimming other gyppos theft goods, drug peddling and stolen shit fencing all on the black market, and since that means no taxes, they can splurge that.

Such Alpha Gyppos usually get graves that are huge and extremely tacky, ususlly made of glass and gold (or gold painted metal) that look like a gaybar more than a tomb.
Bingo. Nigger economics- you do not actually care about your standards of living, all you care about is to show off your 'wealth'. These mansions are very often empty inside, or are literal death traps built shoddily from extremely unsafe material, like a literal dollhouse. Most of the antique looking shit is cheap chinese stuff and the 'golden' stuff is 'gold plated'.

One of the stereotypical fat gyppo I knew at the boxing gym I was a regular at a couple years back worked as a bouncer in one of the pubs, he lived in literal squalor and squatted in the flat he rented (but forgot to pay after the first month) with his wife and 5 kids (usually it takes months if not a year+ for the law to do what it has to and for you to be able to evict the shitskins), about 98% of his net worth was literally a fucking rolex submariner (was actually real), he owned nothing besides it and a 2000 Opel Astra with engine failure. Priorities.
 
Nobody's race makes them act a certain way.

I just think that is cope. Are we supposed to believe the genetics and evolution does not impact the brain and behaviour, but that it determines everything else about us?

I don't know if gypsies are "the worst", but I am pretty sure that different ethnic groups have different genetic makeup, and that genetics has a huge influence on many social outcomes, such as crime, literacy, mental illness, alcoholism and so on. If all the black people in Detroit were overnight replaced by, say, Chinese Americans, my prediction is that crime and drug use would drop an order of magnitude, and that school test scores would improve by a similar amount. There would also be more near sightedness and autism. And I think the difference is mostly because of genetics.

Fun fact: On pretty much all social outcomes there is a strong correlation between parents and their children. This correlation is almost completely absent between adopted children and their adopted parents. Regards
 
I just think that is cope. Are we supposed to believe the genetics and evolution does not impact the brain and behaviour, but that it determines everything else about us?

I don't know if gypsies are "the worst", but I am pretty sure that different ethnic groups have different genetic makeup, and that genetics has a huge influence on many social outcomes, such as crime, literacy, mental illness, alcoholism and so on. If all the black people in Detroit were overnight replaced by, say, Chinese Americans, my prediction is that crime and drug use would drop an order of magnitude, and that school test scores would improve by a similar amount. There would also be more near sightedness and autism. And I think the difference is mostly because of genetics.

Fun fact: On pretty much all social outcomes there is a strong correlation between parents and their children. This correlation is almost completely absent between adopted children and their adopted parents. Regards
What you say about Detroit actually backs up the point that I was making about it being an issue of culture, not race. Look at Detroit. It's a shithole, right? It's majority black. Now look at Bermuda, Aruba, Seychelles, the Netherlands Antilles, Grenada, Martinique, and so forth. Those are also majority black. Are those shitholes? No, of course not. In fact, places like Saba are so safe that most hotels there don't even lock the doors. That's because their culture is very different from the culture that has ruined Detroit. Their race is irrelevant.

As far as IQ statistics go, the scientific consensus is that genetics does not explain differences in IQ test performance between groups, and that observed differences are environmental in origin. Observations of phenomena such as the Flynn effect and disparities in access to prenatal care have highlighted ways in which environmental factors affect group IQ differences. In recent decades, as understanding of human genetics has advanced, claims of inherent differences in intelligence between races have been broadly rejected by scientists on both theoretical and empirical grounds.
 
Now look at Bermuda, Aruba, Seychelles, the Netherlands Antilles, Grenada, Martinique, and so forth.

Great, you have literally cherrypicked every single place that's essentially still a current-day colony and entirely lives off of having pretty beaches and/or is a tax haven. With most having a population of about 50000 people, but for the entirety of their modern history steered by white people.

So the recipe is: Be tardwrangled politically and economically by whities, be a tiny island of unparallelled natural beauty and exchange the population with highly vetted foreign blackies into the tourist sector workforce while shooting all the resident drunkards into the middle of the ocean and you too can have a functional country!

Now what about the other 50 african countries, sir?

The scientific consensus is also that men can give birth and women can have a dick my nigger, what's your opinion on that? Or do you only deepthroat labcoats when they are political agents when it comes to "we are all the same race, the human race! :(" but not when it comes to other, less convenient questions? Do you think you could publish a research in the year of our lord 2024 that says there are significant intellectual differences between different races? I'm not asking if you think it would be career suicide or not, I'm asking if it would ever see the light of day.

You bringing up the fucking Seychelles as an example of 'blackies are just like us'!!11!' is like a troon bringing up sex changing hooded chameleons or hermaphroditic eel or some shit as an example of 'yeah, women have dicks sometimes, they also sometimes realise they are women 54 years into their lives'
 
Last edited:
Great, you have literally cherrypicked every single place that's essentially still a current-day colony and entirely lives off of having pretty beaches and/or is a tax haven. With most having a population of about 50000 people, but for the entirety of their modern history steered by white people.

So the recipe is: Be tardwrangled politically and economically by whities, be a tiny island of unparallelled natural beauty and exchange the population with highly vetted foreign blackies into the tourist sector workforce while shooting all the resident drunkards into the middle of the ocean and you too can have a functional country!

Now what about the other 50 african countries, sir?

The scientific consensus is also that men can give birth and women can have a dick my nigger, what's your opinion on that? Or do you only deepthroat labcoats when they are political agents when it comes to "we are all the same race, the human race! :(" but not when it comes to other, less convenient questions? Do you think you could publish a research in the year of our lord 2024 that says there are significant intellectual differences between different races? I'm not asking if you think it would be career suicide or not, I'm asking if it would ever see the light of day.

You bringing up the fucking Seychelles as an example of 'blackies are just like us'!!11!' is like a troon bringing up sex changing hooded chameleons or hermaphroditic eel or some shit as an example of 'yeah, women have dicks sometimes, they also sometimes realise they are women 54 years into their lives'
Troonery and race are not even remotely comparable, and there are numerous credible scientific studies that point to troonery being a mental illness. There are no credible scientific studies that point to some races being inferior to others.

I brought up multiple examples of highly functioning black societies, and there are several more, including the Cayman Islands, Montserrat, the US and British Virgin Islands, the Bahamas, Saint Barthélemy, Réunion, Mayotte, Saint Martin, Anguilla, the Turks and Caicos Islands, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Barbados, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Mauritius, Trinidad and Tobago, and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, to name just a few. And that's just countries and territories. There are black-run cities right here in the United States that aren't shitholes - Atlanta, to use one good example, has one of the highest GDPs of any city in the country (the 10th largest in the country and 18th in the world with an estimated 2014 GDP of over $324 billion). You can't argue that blacks are inferior - and thus all black societies are dysfunctional shitholes - and then complain of cherry-picking when I point out numerous black societies that aren't dysfunctional shitholes.

Seychelles is the most developed country in Africa because their culture is the most civilized. Somalia is the least developed country in Africa because their culture is the most backwards. Again, culture is the deciding factor, not race.
 
autistic sperging
The way you wrote your retarded takes in other threads I'm 100% sure at this point you're a black homosexual larping as a terf, but alright, I'll entertain you.

Cayman Islands- tourism, real estate, nothing black about it besides the low level service sector wagies
Bahamas- kept afloat by tourism and luxury real estate, small island-nation, troublemakers are obviously dealt with to make it as appealing as possible to white money, and it recently has serious issues with the increasing number of burglaries and armed robberies
St. Barthélemy- literally France, also copy and paste what I wrote next to the Virgin Islands
Réunion- -ll-
Saint Martin- -ll-
Mayottee- -ll-, also: gang wars, machete murders, beautiful shithole
Anguilla- still not a country, nothing about its culture is African either
Turks and Caicos Islands- gang crime
Saint Kitts and Nevis- absolute irredeemable shithole, literal murder capital of the world, you fucking retard
Barbados- shithole
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines- shithole, pretty beaches but also becoming more and more crime ridden
Mauritius- Nice beaches, shithole
Trinidad and Tobago- murder and rape capital, shithole

I'm getting bored at this point, but I think you can notice a trend here. Most of these countries aren't even remotely African, they were populated by slaves (who didn't swim there, were brought there by either French or English ships) and then became muttified, now their only claim to fame is that the water is blue and the sand is soft, there is no value or culture they have generated or preserved. In fact a lot of them squander this singular opportunity, even the fucking Mexican cartels know not to shit where they eat but a lot of these islands become machete-shitholes. Having your cocktails brought to you by a nigger or going to a festival where some niggresses shake their asses in pink feather dresses doesn't make a country culturally African, sorry sweaty.

To save the best for last: You love the Seychelles as an example so much apparently, their civilization is quintessentially African, right? That's precisely why it was uninhabited until the British ships came, that's why it has had white presidents for 40 out of 48 years of its independence, and even though their current president is a darkie the guy's a second generation Indian.

Nigger.
 
Last edited:
You saying "nothing about its culture is African either" and so forth proves everything that I said regarding culture vs. race. It cracks me up when /pol/tards self-own. You are literally backing up my argument that it ultimately comes down to culture rather than some racial genetic code that makes people act a certain way. Also, "you're retarded" is not a valid argument and neither is "lol".

You calling me a nigger has about as much weight as me calling you a nigger. I'm not black and, even if I were, do you really think that I would care about some chudcel retard on the internet furiously typing slurs at me from his mother's basement?
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Mr Bones Wild Ride
Tell me you’re a Guardian reader without telling me you’re a Guardian reader.
A Graun reader wouldn't defend Romanichal by saying they are better than those fresh off the boat Roma you can regularly see, from a mile away, shoving the entire contents of the Aldi and Lidl meat fridges down their skirts and into their bags. Not to their other Graun reading mates anyway.
 
That's quite possibly the worst mix for a Jew. Not smart enough to run a bank, but not athletic enough to steal a horse.

But she does get points for being a Zionist. Even if only half of her is welcome.
You think you do, but you don't want to. If you think Palestinians are bad, wait until you get the gyppos. It can be worse.

To save the best for last: You love the Seychelles as an example so much apparently, their civilization is quintessentially African, right? That's precisely why it was uninhabited until the British ships came, that's why it has had white presidents for 40 out of 48 years of its independence, and even though their current president is a darkie the guy's a second generation Indian.
Don't argue with the gypsy tard or bri*ish, its like trying to force hygene on an indian.

Genetics must point to darkies being dumber, because there is literally no other explanation left. Its not the heat, you take the somali to Sweden he'll still be a chimp. Its not the food, or all the ethnic restaurants would make white IQ drop in a year or two.

But this does not mean all dark skinned races are equal. They are on a bell curve, and where they are on that bell curve can easily make or break the nation. Americans always say "black people" and mean it as a giant monolith. But it isn't, not any more than Irish and Spaniards and Croatians are the exact same.

I bet if scientists dared or were allowed to look, they could check the genes for intelligence, aggression and economists/geologists could check for resources, and find that some black places just have smarter folks and more resources for them to use.

IQ 70 and a jungle does not equal IQ 85 and a jungle with gold under it. But an IQ of 70 can explain why a jungle with gold doesn't work for some.

Now with gypsies, they evolved their low cunning and cowardly indian nature to a poinst where they are perfect to thrive in the West. With the other (long nosed) parasite tribe weakening the host's immune system (⚡⚡) the gypsies can now run rampant and their high reproduction rate, utter lacking of any needs beside food, make them the perfect second part of the parasite pozzload.

Even if all long noses suddenly went home for the Call of the Bibi, and took all their NGOs, the gyppos would be still there and still a grave problem. It is like a double whammy STD.
 
Back