Disaster "I wasn't dead enough for an abortion": Texas mom blames Trump for almost losing her life - Actions have consequences.

If Trump wins in November, "he will make this nightmare a reality nationwide," says Lauren Miller​

By CHARLES R. DAVIS

Deputy News Editor

Lauren Miller was pregnant with twins when she landed in the emergency room after 36 straight hours of vomiting. An ultrasound would reveal that one of her expected twins had fluid where the brain should be developing.

"After speaking with multiple doctors and genetic counselors, we kept arriving at the same point: our son would die," Miller recalled during a press call organized by the Democratic Party on Monday. She could die too too, her doctors said, which would in turn kill the viable fetus and leave her toddler at home without a mother.

The course of treatment was obvious: Miller needed an abortion. Before the summer of 2022, that wouldn't have been much of a problem, even in her home state of Texas, as there was a federally recognized constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy. After the Supreme Court's conservative majority overturned Roe v. Wade, however, more than a dozen states imposed strict bans on the procedure. And while Texas, like other states, has exceptions to protect the life of a mother, in practice there is a concern that recommending one could result in a medical professional being liable for what the state GOP argues is an act of murder.

"As my medical providers tried to counsel me on my options," Miller said, "they would just stop mid-sentence, looking for the right words. It was like they were afraid that they would be arrested just for saying the word 'abortion' out loud."

One specialist, Miller recalled, was visibly upset, tearing off his gloves and angrily tossing them in the trash. "I can't help you anymore," he said. "You need to leave the state."

Miller was finally able to terminate the pregnancy when she heeded the specialist's advice and left the Lone Star state.

"I was at risk of organ damage to my kidneys and brain, but I wasn't dead enough for an abortion in Texas, " Miller said.
Texas Republicans imposed a near-total ban on abortion following the Supreme Court's 2022 Dobbs decision, a move that has been followed by complaints, from pregnant people and their doctors, that the prohibition is unclear on when a pregnancy can be terminated to protect a life.

Last week, the state's all-Republican Supreme Court rejected a legal challenge from women who said their lives were endangered as a result of complicated pregnancies that their doctors were hesitant to properly treat; the court said abortions could go ahead based on the "good faith judgment" of a medical professional that an individual would be "unlikely to survive."

But what if a doctor performs an abortion that a court later decides wasn't absolutely necessary? Under current state law, that could mean a sentence of life in prison. Some Republicans want to go even further than that.

As writer Jessica Valenti noted, the Texas Republican Party has adopted a plank that effectively calls for people who perform or obtain abortions to be prosecuted and potentially sentenced to death. The party's platform urges lawmakers "to enact legislation to abolish abortion by immediately securing the right to life and equal protection of the laws to all preborn children from the moment of fertilization." That language was first added in 2022, Valenti reported, "after a lobbying effort by Abolish Abortion Texas," a group that refers to "preborn babies" as being "murdered," the punishment for which includes capital punishment.

"The fact that this platform could even be brought up for a vote is disturbing," Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, told reporters on Monday. "But it should remind us how extreme and out of touch Donald Trump's MAGA Republican Party has become. If we allow Trump to get to the White House, he will subject all women across this country to his agenda of revenge and retribution."

While boasting of his responsibility for state abortion bans, Trump, who appointed three of the six justices who overturned Roe v. Wade and previously endorsed punishing doctors who perform abortions and patients who receive them, has waffled on just how far he would go if he wins in November. Last month, the presumptive Republican nominee told an interviewer he was "looking at" allowing state bans on birth control, only to walk back the statement after criticism.

Miller, who ultimately received a single fetal abortion and give birth to a healthy son, said she's not confused about the former president's positions when it comes to women and reproductive rights. Trump won't make America great, she said, but he will make it more like Texas, subjecting millions more Americans to the sort of abortion restrictions that now cover a third of the U.S. population.

Should he win in November, according to Miller, "he will make this nightmare a reality nationwide."
 
I always wondered how viable it would be to use those as free baby sitting? Drop them off in the morning, no question asked. Pick them up in the afternoon before they get shipped out to the local mines.
I certainly wouldn't try it if it's a kid you care about.
2nd time around would probably be all it takes to get CPS crawling up your ass.
 
We always go back to the standard talking point about rape babies for abortions, but that actually just sucks as a talking point.

In this case and the Texas case that got famous, the women seemingly wanted the babies and purposefully got pregnant, only to have medical complications with the fetus during that pregnancy.

Plan B and keeping legs shut or avoiding niggers or whatever would not help because she intended on getting pregnant.

If this is anything like the reality of the Texas case, this is all about edge cases and what the definition of "abortion" is in a legal sense. (I.e. is a dead/dying baby being removed to save mother an abortion? (dead is not an abortion, but dying or braindead might be more blurry))

Articles like this are just rage bait and only further blur the line.

Yeah in the era of states trying to prosecute women who travel to other states for abortions the law is OH SO CLEAR at what point conservatives will go to jail doctors.

edit: show me a news article or even post online that thanked Trump for killing Roe v Wade
Trying to earn your pink triangle back, I see.
 
"As my medical providers tried to counsel me on my options," Miller said, "they would just stop mid-sentence, looking for the right words. It was like they were afraid that they would be arrested just for saying the word 'abortion' out loud."

One specialist, Miller recalled, was visibly upset, tearing off his gloves and angrily tossing them in the trash. "I can't help you anymore," he said. "You need to leave the state."
Certain fields in medicine are filled with lefties and I have no doubt they will turn on the histrionics to get the law overturned.

I believe the Texas law allowed the procedure but they medical staff just acted like they couldn't do anything.
But what if a doctor performs an abortion that a court later decides wasn't absolutely necessary? Under current state law, that could mean a sentence of life in prison. Some Republicans want to go even further than that.
Why didn't the doctors confer with the hospitals in house legal counsel?

How about the hospital Board of Directors?
 



just admit you are okay with women dying.

All 50 U.S states currently allow for emergency termination of a fetus if there is immediate danger to the wellbeing or health of the mother.

This article is literally propaganda with not a single hint of truth to it.

If I was a journalist I would feel ashamed to tell such naked lies.
Bullshit because they differ on what is an emergency you faggot.
 
Spergery about abortions aside, In pregnancies with twins when one is braindead and killing you is there a way to save the normal child? Can't you terminate only the baby thats causing the issue?
if it’s later on in the pregnancy, depending on how entangled up the twins are in the womb, it can be extremely difficult and risky for the mother. The womb is tiny and only stretches so much to accommodate what it needs to accommodate considering the mothers vital organs are already getting smushed out of the way. During the first trimester, things are a little easier and the term for this is called selective reduction, typically this is done if a mother has twins or more and one or multiple of the fetuses is nonviable. iirc it’s mostly done by air embolism to the affected fetus.

edit: clarifying that if the mother is in bad health from the pregnancy and unlikely to recover, all fetuses will be aborted. Most cases involve genetic defects/fetal malformation.
 
1000002200.jpg
 
Spergery about abortions aside, In pregnancies with twins when one is braindead and killing you is there a way to save the normal child? Can't you terminate only the baby thats causing the issue?
Yeah, exactly my questions on it as well. I'd love a legal analysis of the involved laws/definitions to clarify where the issue with the law lies (if any).

Too bad all those youtube lawyers are busy with balldos or whatever.
 
I can't see how someone could be held liable for an abortion after the fact if their decision was based on the best information available at the time. In an emergency situation you have to make immediate decisions that may or may not be the most optimal in hindsight, but you don't have the luxury of hindsight when seconds matter.

It'd be difficult to argue this for a civil malpractice suit, let alone for a criminal charge.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Not Really Here
If you can't get an abortion in your location, go to another location where you can. It's so easy teenage girls have been doing it since forever.

Hell, I can't go to the ocean in my state and you don't see me blaming Donald Trump for that.
Ex eat the state wants to prosecute tapers on for abortion even if it it is for life saving reasons
 
Back