Disaster "I wasn't dead enough for an abortion": Texas mom blames Trump for almost losing her life - Actions have consequences.

If Trump wins in November, "he will make this nightmare a reality nationwide," says Lauren Miller​

By CHARLES R. DAVIS

Deputy News Editor

Lauren Miller was pregnant with twins when she landed in the emergency room after 36 straight hours of vomiting. An ultrasound would reveal that one of her expected twins had fluid where the brain should be developing.

"After speaking with multiple doctors and genetic counselors, we kept arriving at the same point: our son would die," Miller recalled during a press call organized by the Democratic Party on Monday. She could die too too, her doctors said, which would in turn kill the viable fetus and leave her toddler at home without a mother.

The course of treatment was obvious: Miller needed an abortion. Before the summer of 2022, that wouldn't have been much of a problem, even in her home state of Texas, as there was a federally recognized constitutional right to terminate a pregnancy. After the Supreme Court's conservative majority overturned Roe v. Wade, however, more than a dozen states imposed strict bans on the procedure. And while Texas, like other states, has exceptions to protect the life of a mother, in practice there is a concern that recommending one could result in a medical professional being liable for what the state GOP argues is an act of murder.

"As my medical providers tried to counsel me on my options," Miller said, "they would just stop mid-sentence, looking for the right words. It was like they were afraid that they would be arrested just for saying the word 'abortion' out loud."

One specialist, Miller recalled, was visibly upset, tearing off his gloves and angrily tossing them in the trash. "I can't help you anymore," he said. "You need to leave the state."

Miller was finally able to terminate the pregnancy when she heeded the specialist's advice and left the Lone Star state.

"I was at risk of organ damage to my kidneys and brain, but I wasn't dead enough for an abortion in Texas, " Miller said.
Texas Republicans imposed a near-total ban on abortion following the Supreme Court's 2022 Dobbs decision, a move that has been followed by complaints, from pregnant people and their doctors, that the prohibition is unclear on when a pregnancy can be terminated to protect a life.

Last week, the state's all-Republican Supreme Court rejected a legal challenge from women who said their lives were endangered as a result of complicated pregnancies that their doctors were hesitant to properly treat; the court said abortions could go ahead based on the "good faith judgment" of a medical professional that an individual would be "unlikely to survive."

But what if a doctor performs an abortion that a court later decides wasn't absolutely necessary? Under current state law, that could mean a sentence of life in prison. Some Republicans want to go even further than that.

As writer Jessica Valenti noted, the Texas Republican Party has adopted a plank that effectively calls for people who perform or obtain abortions to be prosecuted and potentially sentenced to death. The party's platform urges lawmakers "to enact legislation to abolish abortion by immediately securing the right to life and equal protection of the laws to all preborn children from the moment of fertilization." That language was first added in 2022, Valenti reported, "after a lobbying effort by Abolish Abortion Texas," a group that refers to "preborn babies" as being "murdered," the punishment for which includes capital punishment.

"The fact that this platform could even be brought up for a vote is disturbing," Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-Texas, told reporters on Monday. "But it should remind us how extreme and out of touch Donald Trump's MAGA Republican Party has become. If we allow Trump to get to the White House, he will subject all women across this country to his agenda of revenge and retribution."

While boasting of his responsibility for state abortion bans, Trump, who appointed three of the six justices who overturned Roe v. Wade and previously endorsed punishing doctors who perform abortions and patients who receive them, has waffled on just how far he would go if he wins in November. Last month, the presumptive Republican nominee told an interviewer he was "looking at" allowing state bans on birth control, only to walk back the statement after criticism.

Miller, who ultimately received a single fetal abortion and give birth to a healthy son, said she's not confused about the former president's positions when it comes to women and reproductive rights. Trump won't make America great, she said, but he will make it more like Texas, subjecting millions more Americans to the sort of abortion restrictions that now cover a third of the U.S. population.

Should he win in November, according to Miller, "he will make this nightmare a reality nationwide."
 
And if she didn't have the funds to go to a different state, the outcome could've been much worse.

This shit is why the government has no business micromanaging the organs of girls and women.
There’s no indication she did have to go to a different state. The article makes it seem that but never says where she had it done which implies she didn’t have to travel at all.
The outcome seems to show that she was able to access the selective termination Ok, and had the best outcome she could have done. She was able to access medical care, and she is thankfully left with the healthy twin and her health intact. There is absolutely no way the doctor snapping his gloves and blaming politics happened, they just do not do that
 
I’m not sure it’s always possible to do that (can you do it if they share sac a/o placenta? I’m not sure…)
Really this is the kind of situation where a termination is the lesser evil, and it’s why medical type exemptions should be there. There will always be awful cases like this where you have to do some harm to save the mother or another child.
The issue is that then being used as a wedge to make it a free for all up to birth for any pregnancy by choice, which is just wrong imo.
Seems like there needs to be better guidelines and training so that doctors can act on medical need rather than political.
It might not always be possible, but you have to think that the reason it was being (not-)discussed in her Texas facility was that it was possible. Sounds like that's what she got done in the end?
Never had a termination so no idea tbh about the complex or later ones. Did have twins but that was all surprisingly undramatic on their side of the uterine wall.
 
I don't give a shit about abortion tbh I think the states should be able to set it however they want as long as it doesn't result in the mother dying. I wish the article would explain texas law on abortion more but it seems like a true enough story. Why would a doctor go out of their way to recommend an abortion and possibly be legally liable when they could just tell them to go to another state. I mean most doctors are scum bags in my experience so it makes perfect sense to me.

Also, why does the abortion issue bring out the most retarded people on both sides.

Pro Abortion: AAAAAA I LOVE KILLING BABIES, WOMEN SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SLAUGHTER THESE PARASITES BY THE MILLIONS.

Anti-Abortion: AAAAAA I HATE KILLING BABIES AND I DON'T CARE YOU GOT RAPED LOOK AT THESE PICTURES OF DEAD BABIES
 
Also, why does the abortion issue bring out the most retarded people on both sides.

Pro Abortion: AAAAAA I LOVE KILLING BABIES, WOMEN SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO SLAUGHTER THESE PARASITES BY THE MILLIONS.

Anti-Abortion: AAAAAA I HATE KILLING BABIES AND I DON'T CARE YOU GOT RAPED LOOK AT THESE PICTURES OF DEAD BABIES
Look, dude. I'm fine with the baby murder. But is giving women reproductive rights really the road we wanna go down?
 
Well you can thank Trumps appointmenents for that.
Yeah, Trump should've done the decent, sensible thing and stood around with his thumb up his ass not bothering to nominate anyone while as many as three vacancies exist on the nine-member SCOTUS, not only kneecapping himself politically in a staggeringly retarded fashion but compromising the function of the entire judicial branch by altogether refusing to do his fucking job, because that has no implications outside of your pet issue. Lmao do you hear yourself?

Assuming one twin is fine and the other one is fucked, can humans even naturally miscarry the dead one and leave the other one intact, the way that cats can?
Yup. Rates of complications depend on whether the twins are monochorionic or dichorionic, obviously danger to the remaining twin will be more likely if they share a chorion and amniotic sac or how entwined their placentas are. If you lose one early on it typically just withers away and gets mostly reabsorbed without too much of an issue, but if one dies later in the pregnancy, the fact that the mother still has a live fetus gestating in her uterus means that her body does not undergo contractions and such attempting to expel the remains on its own as typically happens if you miscarry a late singleton pregnancy. Monochorionic fetuses that survive the death of a twin in utero have a very high rate of various organ damage, especially neurological, and are often delivered soon after even if premature. Danger to the mother is more likely with death of a mono twin as well because diffuse clotting issues and placental abruption are more likely. If a dichorionic twin dies, though, usually the best thing is to monitor the mother closely but try to leave the dead twin as is. Odds are decent the surviving twin will be fine, though typically labor begins within about five weeks of the first twin dying, so prematurity may still be a factor. The dead twin just kind of mummifies or turns to mush but sealed inside its sac it's unlikely to go septic or anything, that only really becomes a potential problem if tissue is retained after birth.

Afaik there's not really a consensus on anything more specific than that. @Otterly is absolutely correct that there is no easy path forward when it comes to making this call, it really should be decided on a case by case basis, and imo gov't paper pushers and their retarded politics have no business even being a factor in an already messy situation.
 
And if she didn't have the funds to go to a different state, the outcome could've been much worse.

Can't get 50 bucks to go to a different state but somehow can afford an abortion.

If only there was one of the many charities that already exist dedicated to this exact cause that could help. If only....if only one of these charities that I found in two seconds on a brave search existed!

Charities to provide funds to go out of state to get an abortion​

If you are seeking financial assistance to travel out of state for an abortion, the following charities may be able to provide support:
  • Texas Equal Access Fund (TEA Fund): Provides financial support to individuals seeking abortions who cannot afford it, with a focus on supporting people of color, low-income individuals, people in rural areas, and young people.
  • The Lilith Fund: Offers direct financial and emotional support to Texans forced to travel to access abortions, as well as those who need reproductive care close to home.
  • The Brigid Alliance: Provides referral-based services, including travel, food, lodging, child care, and other logistical support, to help individuals access abortion care.
  • New York Abortion Access Fund (NYAAF): Supports New Yorkers and people traveling to New York State to access abortion care through financial assistance, case management, and connections to other resources.
  • Fund Texas Choice: Has helped Texans equitably access abortion through safe, confidential, and comprehensive travel services and practical support for over a decade.
These charities may be able to provide financial assistance for travel, accommodations, and other expenses related to accessing abortion care out of state. It’s essential to note that each charity may have specific eligibility criteria and application processes, so it’s crucial to reach out to them directly for more information.

If only!

I fucking swear as soon as abortions come up there's a subsection of women who become the most helpless useless people possible in counter to "muh abortion is empowering" narrative
 
She says she herself, the mother, was in danger. She names specific organs. She says her life was at risk.
From long bitter experience, I've found usually what these people are doing in these cases (at the prompting of the activist creeps who hoist them up as an example) is bundling all the fine print "things that could potentially go wrong in a pregnancy" (or in this case, specifically are more likely in a twin pregnancy) into clear and present life-threatening dangers rather than the hypotheticals that they are in reality.

So yes, sometimes you can get kidney damage from preeclampsia, and preeclampsia is more common in multiple pregnancies, and there is some indication that hyperemesis may be correlated with it (has to do with placental issues). But that doesn't mean, obviously, that every woman pregnant with twins is right now, this minute, imminently in danger of dying from kidney failure.

It's like a dramatic psycho claiming you are putting her at risk for DRESS because she got a headache from you debunking her dumb arguments and she had to take a Tylenol.
 
All 50 U.S states currently allow for emergency termination of a fetus if there is immediate danger to the wellbeing or health of the mother.

This article is literally propaganda with not a single hint of truth to it.

If I was a journalist I would feel ashamed to tell such naked lies.
most of those states like Texas, don't grant exceptions. Abortion is almost never performed there. Your comment is literally propaganda with not a single hint of truth to it.

If I were your mom, I would feel ashamed my sperglet told such naked lies.
 
there is no easy path forward when it comes to making this call, it really should be decided on a case by case basis, and imo gov't paper pushers and their retarded politics have no business even being a factor in an already messy situation.
In the UK this would be sensitively managed , the best clinical course would be taken after discussion with the parents and whatever specialists you’d need. We have an abortion law that’s not contentious, and we don’t have the heightened emotion that America seems to have.
I’d prefer that we weren’t aborting babies for fun and frolics or contraception, and the idea of aborting a healthy baby up to term is abhorrent. At the same time sometimes random awful shit goes wrong in pregnancy and we have to have a way of dealing with that. I don’t think the current abortion debate in America helps with any of it. I’d rather there weren’t any that aren’t 100% needed but in the real world, maybe just discouraging ‘by choice’ strongly and keeping the expectations for bad shit is the way to go.
 
most of those states like Texas, don't grant exceptions. Abortion is almost never performed there. Your comment is literally propaganda with not a single hint of truth to it
Except all the states that have banned abortions literally do have exceptions.

I’m pro-choice but if you’re going to make a serious argument at least ensure that it’s backed up with evidence.
 
"actions have consequences"
she should be punished for having sex?
This but unironically.

If you are fucking around outside marriage, with the expectation that you can murder/have murdered any offspring that naturally result from the act that is designed to produce offspring, you should be punished. I would like to see you and your fuckbois in the town square getting pelted with rotten vegetables. Too bad.
 
Back