Walmart is selling some of those silly things and they’re like $8k which sounds nice until you realize you can get a real truck for 2 to 3 times that toy.
That's more than a decent used car as-is.
Not to mention the raised sidewalks turn streets into shallow canals that help control the the flow of rainwater to drainage areas to prevent flooding.
.
Or, as they were intended as first designed? Channel all the manure and shit and carcasses and general trash to flow AWAY from your front door and into the river. The point of the sidewalk (and building stoop) was to be a raised boardwalk so you wouldn't have to step IN the street for the pure nastiness of what was in there.
in some countries, e.g. Bongland, it's also legitimately illegal - red lights apply to all road users, not just motorists, though the coppers are never around to enforce this when you need them
to be fair, cyclists where I've lived (South and West Yorkshire) are more mindful of this, and generally more road-wise, than those in London and the south
Anything allowed ON the public road in the US must obey all rules and signages OF said road.
This includes bikes, horses, animal-drawn carts, ATVs, scooters, everything.... nobody using the street is exempted from stop signs, stop lights, restricted turns, etc.
An Amishman who runs a red light in his buggy can (and sometimes is) ticketed for it.
Though the chances of it happening are inversely proportional to how big an asshole you're being about it all.
Railroads used to deliver to surprisingly small customers, and also had their own trucking departments for handling less than carload (LCL) freight. They don't anymore because they hate switching maneuvers (takes time and requires them to pay employees). Can't powerlevel but you'd be amazed at how hard it is for even multimillion-dollar businesses to deal with railroads now.
90% of the freight cars in a train used to be boxcars. Today, less than 10% are. They really don't want to "waste" time and energy on having to use a full size car for an LCL load that has to make 3 or 4 moves before it reaches the destination. If it's not a unit train (all the same cargo going to the same place, like 50 cars of coal direct from mine to powerplant? Or 50 cars of containers direct from port to inland distribution? Or 50 tanks of ethanol direct from field to refinery?) modern railroads don't want to be assed about it because the half-loaded boxcar going to some end-of-the-line tool and die shop will earn them 40 cents as opposed to the $400 per loaded double-stack at the port. However, this situation has existed/been coming since the 60's when trucks became big enough and fast enough and the interstates mature enough that local, regional and LCL freight became a trucking biz, not an RR one. Look at pics or the old street maps of a major eastern city like Baltimore or Philly sometime, until just after WWII, there were tracks in the streets right up to the downtowns in lots of them because that was how your shops and warehouses took deliveries. By train.
Count up EVERY FedEX, UPS and Amazon truck you see on the freeway next time you're out there. 40 years ago? That would've all been train traffic.
They're bitching about cameras because it takes away their visibility argument. If you had a sensor that warns you when there's a child in front of the car it basically make this image fucking useless because it becomes a non issue.
It's already a non-issue because there is no way in the real world you will ever encounter 10 kids sitting in a line in the road with no warning and a perfectly rational/innocent excuse as to why. All these "but muh visibility!" arguments are absurd at their core because short of a spontaneous teleportation? There's no way a kid, or a whole field-trip's worth, can suddenly appear like that in the frontal blind spot of a truck with no warning to an alert and proper driver to avoid them. It's like arguing a cruise ship is unsafe because it doesn't have seatbelts in case of a sudden collision with land.....