Culture Anti-gay ‘No U-turn’ signs come down in LA’s LGBTQ-friendly Silver Lake - Traffic laws are homophobic


About 27 years after “No U-turn” signs were posted along Griffith Park Boulevard in Silver Lake in an attempt to keep gay men from cruising the neighborhood to pick up other gay men, members and allies of the LGBTQ+ community joined two Los Angeles city councilmembers on Monday, June 10, as they took down the last two remaining “No U-turn” signs that were put up in the 1990s.

The removal of the signs took place at Griffith Park Boulevard and Fernwood Avenue, which straddles Los Angeles City Council Districts 4 and 13.

Getting rid of the signs was long overdue for many, including Donovan Daughtry, a gay man who five years ago moved to Silver Lake, known as being LGBTQ-friendly.

Two years ago, Daughtry reached out to L.A. City Councilmember Nithya Raman’s office about the signs after learning about them from a podcast hosted by Chris Cruse, founder of queermaps.org, an online archive of 150 years of queer history in L.A. On Monday, moments after he helped take down the last sign, Daughtry said, “This is a small effort, but just to have a sign that I would have to walk past with my dog every day be taken down meant a lot.”

Before the signs came down, city elected officials and community members gathered nearby at the AT Center, a recovery and wellness center for the LGBTQ+ community, to mark the occasion with speeches and performances.

The AT Center is less than half a mile from The Black Cat, a famous tavern on Sunset Boulevard that was the site of a 1967 demonstration after police raided the gay bar. That demonstration preceded the 1969 Stonewall Inn uprising in New York City and was, at the time, the largest pro-LGBTQ+ demonstration in the nation.

City Councilmember Hugo Soto-Martínez represents Council District 13 where one of the signs was removed Monday. Given Silver Lake’s history of supporting the LGBTQ+ community, one might not think that signs meant to stop gay men from meeting would appear in this community, he said.

“It’s just another example of what (LGBTQ+) folks continue to face, and especially what they were facing in that particular time,” Soto-Martínez said.

Citing hateful transphobic attacks reported across the country, he said, “I think it’s good that we’re finding the areas and the symbols within our own city that … have these hateful remnants of the past” and to address them.

Councilmember Raman, who represents Council District 4 where the other sign was removed, described Los Angeles as a city that has led the fight for justice in many ways, but where resistance to change also “has inscribed itself on our physical spaces in so many different ways.”

“And now we get to do the work of taking it apart, piece by piece, and building an even better city going forward,” Raman said.

“We come here today in joy and in love,” she said.

In 1997, “No U-turn” and “No Cruising” signs went up around Silver Lake to stop members of the LGBTQ+ community from cruising in the area. Citing a 2011 article by The Eastsider, Hugo-Martínez’s office said “cruising” in that context was a euphemism for “searching for sex partners.”

The “No Cruising” and “No U-turn” signs allowed law enforcement to arrest any driver who did a U-turn on Griffith Park Boulevard between midnight and 6 a.m. or who drove down the street more than once within a six-hour period.

At the time, members of the gay community claimed that undercover police deliberately lured men they suspected of being gay in order to arrest them.

In 2011, the city removed the “No Cruising” signs in response to local activism and advocacy from the Silver Lake Neighborhood Council. But nine “No U-turn” signs remained up along Griffith Park Boulevard until Monday when the last signs were taken down.

Those who attended Monday’s ceremony were treated to performances by West Hollywood Drag Laureate and singer “Pickle,” as well as violinist “Queen Angelina.”

The group then walked up the street to the corner of Griffith Park Boulevard and Fernwood Avenue, where the two last signs stood on opposite sides of Griffith Park Boulevard.

The crowd broke into cheers and applause after the first sign came down. One person said, “(There’s) no going back to being straight,” prompting laughter from the crowd.

Among those at Monday’s event was Maebe A. Girl, a Silver Lake Neighborhood council member who made history in 2019 as the first drag queen to be elected to office in the country. Her work on the neighborhood council has included efforts to get anti-LGBTQ+ signs removed.

“As a queer person myself, I didn’t feel comfortable having these relics of the past still lingering in our neighborhood, as did everyone else that I’ve spoken with,” she said. “I don’t think anybody wants to keep these relics of the past that essentially were designed to profile gay people.”

A spokesperson for Soto-Martínez said the city hasn’t decided what to do with the signs that were removed this week, but at least one may be donated to the ONE National Gay & Lesbian Archives at the University of Southern California.
 
The very sight of this terrifies the homosexual:
1718071116218.png
 
These people don't even appear to notice that an essential practice of their "lifestyle" is literally driving down the street looking for random strangers to engage in dangerous sex acts with. Apparently they just expected everyone else not to notice it either, even though it's literally "homophobia" to tell them not to pick up strangers on the street for sex.

And these same people deny that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for behavior virtually identical to this.
 
Homosexuality is never inherently degenerate, so claiming that measures to prevent casual sex are homophobic is homophobic in itself. To think we had almost left the idea that homosexuality is degenerate behind -- this was probably done on purpose to fuel homophobia and give gay rights orgs a continued reason to exist (even though there's still plenty of work to do without considering this crap).
 
This is the sign in question. Seems like a bad place to do a U-turn in a narrow residential area right before a curve for incoming traffic and downhill intersection Along with large plants blocking vision in all directions and more so for the steep downhill street. But kudos for once again proving the born again Christians in the 70s and 80s right. It's not love is love but weird fetishist behavour that comes off quiet disgusting.

Screenshot (221).png
 
These people don't even appear to notice that an essential practice of their "lifestyle" is literally driving down the street looking for random strangers to engage in dangerous sex acts with.
We're talking about a group of people for whom getting fucked in the ass is a core part of their identity.
I don't think the "sex" part went unnoticed.
 
There must be some sort of "gay exception" to urbanism. I'm reminded of how they put up "no left turn after dark" signs in a part of Houston known for gay bars and the like back in the day. Traffic control in a narrow road with no turn lanes? Nope, must be CLEARLY homophobia!

I swear, if they created a pedestrian mall in the area like they discussed in the day, urbanists would be decrying it because "it had homophobic roots".
 
I have seen "no cruising" signs in many cities, and have understood as long as I can recall that it is in reference mostly to bored teens with shitty fast cars driving up and down the main drag when bored and antsy.

The idea that it had anything to do with homosexuals at all is preposterous. Paranoid delusions. They do call their practice "cruising" but I was not under the impression that they engage in this specifically while driving a car, more like wandering some godforsaken bar or park.

edit: proof


For teenagers of the 1980s, Omaha offered little to do on warm summer nights.

Too old to hang with their parents and too young for the bars, scores of teens hopped in their cars and headed for Dodge Street to cruise the main stretch from 69th to 90th Streets.

Each crew had a “home base” along the arterial road. Dawn Slama Seefus’ hung out in front of Jiffy Lube.

Friends excitedly called out her name as she pulled up in her baby blue Chevy Malibu Classic, Slama Seefus recalls.

“Dodge Street was like a recurring party that you could show up at and feel like you never left,” Slama Seefus said.

In 1992, the party came to an abrupt end.

Citing an uptick in car crashes, traffic jams and teenage tomfoolery, the Omaha City Council voted to ban cruising on Dodge. Local leaders across the country had taken similar steps to clamp down on the pastime in the previous decade.

The city mounted “No Cruising” signs along a busy 2.3-mile section of the road.


The signs refer not to American Gigolo–style cruising, but instead to American Graffiti–esque “unnecessary repetitive driving,” according to the Chicago Municipal Code. Drivers who pass by in these cruise-free zones twice within an hour are subject to a written notice; a third time results in a $100 ticket. (The fine increases to $200 and $300 for subsequent offenses within one year.) These areas were established in 1990 to “reduce chronic traffic problems sustained by motorists in an area where cruising may result in congested traffic,” reads Title 9 of the Municipal Code. Prostitution? That’s covered under Title 8.

 
Last edited:
This just means that more fags cruising through the area could get potentially run over, which can only be a good thing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ann
It couldn't be that all those colon campers and rump rangers flipping U-ies because they found some young boy to hit on was causing car accidents or other safety issues, and that's why those signs got put up, right? No, that's ridiculous. It was done only to smear the queers and put them in their place.

I'll be interested to see how much car wrecks and injured pedestrians go up along that strip without those signs.
 
To think we had almost left the idea that homosexuality is degenerate behind
That was never the case and faggots never seemed to understand that. I was taught to be tolerant and accepting of faggots, which, as long as they act like normal people otherwise was reasonable enough. That never changed the innate sense of revulsion and disgust homosexual displays causes. I just learned to be polite and treat them like people which again, seemed reasonable until I learned more about the faggot community after society decided to make it mainstream.

Being gay is not normal, it's not natural, it's biologically backwards and high numbers of homosexuals in a mammal population is indicative that there's something seriously fucked with that population. Homosexuality is a degenerate symptom of a fucked up population not a natural state of being.
 
Pffft, and I thought that LA was one of the gay capitals of the world. Don't they know that in London they've even tried to get gardening banned as being homophobic.

Burgess Park court injunction: Stopping men having sex in bushes is homophobic, says Peter Tatchell

Veteran gay rights campaigner and former Bermondsey parliamentary candidate Peter Tatchell has branded Southwark Council ‘homophobic’ over its efforts to stop gay cruising in Burgess Park.

As the News has reported, Burgess Park has developed a reputation as hookup area in recent years but park goers have been particularly concerned about sex acts, including those being filmed, taking place in daylight hours.

Complaints to police include cases where parents and children have witnessed sex acts. One distraught mum hurried away her children after stumbling across men having sex at 8am on a Sunday morning. Much of the activity occurs in close proximity to children’s play areas.

Tatchell said the council should have liaised with the LGBT+ community before seeking its year-long injunction, which is mainly in response to repeated all-night raves, BBQs and large gatherings.

He claimed cutting back greenery was ‘eco vandalism’ that would simply make it more likely that any passersby would get an eye-full.
 
These people don't even appear to notice that an essential practice of their "lifestyle" is literally driving down the street looking for random strangers to engage in dangerous sex acts with. Apparently they just expected everyone else not to notice it either, even though it's literally "homophobia" to tell them not to pick up strangers on the street for sex.

And these same people deny that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for behavior virtually identical to this.
When are you going to start cruising in Salt Lake city, hon?
 
Back