Culture Noam Chomsky, 95, ‘no longer able to talk’ after famed intellectual suffered ‘medical event’

By Maira Butt, The Independent | Archive

Noam Chomsky’s health has deterioriated following a medical event, leaving him unable to communicate, his former assistant has revealed.
The 95-year-old famed linguist has not been seen in public since June last year, with many commenting on the weight of his absence from the broader debate surrounding the war in Gaza.

Chomsky, who has been vocal about his support for the Palestinian cause and what he has called the “crimes” of the Israeli state, has been notably absent from demonstrations and discussions on the issue over the last year.

In a post shared by Media Lens, it was revealed that the MIT professor is unlikely to ever return to the public eye following the deterioration of his health.
The post quoted Professor Chomsky’s former assistant Bev Stohl, who first shared the news on a reddit forum as she explained why the usually responsive academic “hasn’t been returning emails, or interviewing”.
Stohl, who worked as Chomsky’s office manager at MIT for 24 years until her retirement in 2017, wrote on 5 February: “I’m in contact with a close family member, and we know the basics, and hope to know more in the near future.

“In a nutshell, Noam is 95-years-old and suffered a medical event in June. As many have noticed, he has not been writing, corresponding, or interviewing, as his health situation has taken the majority of his time and energy.
“He is still with us, now watching the news (he doesn’t look happy about what he’s watching).”
Stohl shared further details on the linguist’s ability to communicate, adding that he was no longer mobile or walking either.
221483e3543d2b5051e41840e128aa3c70c63c69.avif
2
(AFP via Getty Images)
“His ability to speak is complicated by factors I can’t yet disclose,” she continued. “When the relative I’m in touch with visited him a month ago, he did not communicate with her.

“He is not ambulatory. I’m not sure for how long this will go on. He is not in pain. His eyes are open and he seems to be watching what’s happening around him.”
The assistant, who also wrote a memoir titled Chomsky and Me on her time working with the world-renowned thinker, provided an update in April as she wrote, “Noam has not made significant progress, I’m sorry to say. I doubt he will be able to return to the public eye, as he is not communicating much if at all.”

1718090890926.png


Some of the comments have since been deleted as Stohl edited a post to say that Chomsky’s “family is very private” and she will “no longer be adding to this discussion”.

The Independent has contacted Noam Chomsky and his literary agent for comment.
Tributes have poured in from across the media industry as many noted the linguist’s passion for language, having dedicated over seven decades to the study of words and communication, and expressed sadness at his now limited ability.
Nathan Robinson, founder and editor of socialist magazine, Current Affairs, is also co-author of Chomsky’s forthcoming book, The Myth of American Idealism: How US Foreign Policy Endangers the World. He wrote: “Chomsky has been unbelievably kind over the years I’ve known him.
“He treats everyone as an equal. Doesn’t care who you are. He would give as much of his time to a high school student as some celebrity or NYT reporter. And devoted himself to attacking cruelty and injustice.

“So many thousands of people have stories about how he has changed their lives. He certainly changed mine.”
British-American journalist and Zeteo founder Mehdi Hasan added, “Sending prayers Noam’s way. There has been no one else like him in our lifetime.”
 
Holy fucking shit, You must have fucking brain damage if you truly believe this shit.
A fucking Pol Pot defender here.
Show me where I'm wrong. Pol Pot was pretty average in terms of "evil", and arguably not even that bad given what happened to Cambodia after he was overthrown. How about you actually dig into claims being made? Start with "Pol Pot killed 1/4 of Cambodia's population" which is based on a faulty estimate of Cambodia's population and totally ignores the fact the Khmer Rouge didn't even control most of Cambodia and also that Cambodia was regularly bombed by the USAF and that militias on all sides of the conflict (including the Vietcong and US-backed groups from both Cambodia and Vietnam) routinely stole food and abused villagers. You won't hear that story because that requires research beyond silly memes and pop history.

It's really funny how offended some people here get about questioning other alleged "genocides" given the usual response when the Holocaust comes up. Did you know, BTW, that modern Cambodia considers the so-called "Cambodian genocide" on the same level as Israel considers the Holocaust, and they regularly misrepresent and exaggerate facts about the death camps you can tour? Oh, or how Vietnam portrays themselves as liberating heroes for what they did in Cambodia against Pol Pot's regime, despite acting in a manner which makes the USSR's actions in Eastern Europe in the late 40s look positively civilized?
Technically killing your own group is called autocide so you can’t genocide your own group.

Such linguistic quibbles allowed retards like Chomsky and the people who pretended to read him to support fucking monsters whilst sounding like le epic Reddit intellectuals.

Anyway, fuck Chomsky and his retarded personality cult.
Pol Pot was actually a fairly based nationalist (read what he thought about Angkor Wat) and most Cambodians he killed were either directly related to the former government or were pro-Chinese/pro-Vietnamese cucks. He also killed Western commies who were of course fags.
 
Show me where I'm wrong. Pol Pot was pretty average in terms of "evil", and arguably not even that bad given what happened to Cambodia after he was overthrown. How about you actually dig into claims being made? Start with "Pol Pot killed 1/4 of Cambodia's population" which is based on a faulty estimate of Cambodia's population and totally ignores the fact the Khmer Rouge didn't even control most of Cambodia and also that Cambodia was regularly bombed by the USAF and that militias on all sides of the conflict (including the Vietcong and US-backed groups from both Cambodia and Vietnam) routinely stole food and abused villagers. You won't hear that story because that requires research beyond silly memes and pop history.
Dude he literally made it a rule that crying in pain in response to a whipping meant more whipping, and electrocution if you really irritated him.
You need to log off and get some kind of exposure to normal human beings again before opining on how averagely evil Pol Pot was.
 
It's really funny how offended some people here get about questioning other alleged "genocides" given the usual response when the Holocaust comes up. Did you know, BTW, that modern Cambodia considers the so-called "Cambodian genocide" on the same level as Israel considers the Holocaust, and they regularly misrepresent and exaggerate facts about the death camps you can tour? Oh, or how Vietnam portrays themselves as liberating heroes for what they did in Cambodia against Pol Pot's regime, despite acting in a manner which makes the USSR's actions in Eastern Europe in the late 40s look positively civilized?
I will never understand why people defend the excessive violent actions of totalitarian governments, in particular if you never had to endure them yourself. It's a pretty fascinating behaviour and I can only hope the jackboots taste good.
 
Last edited:
I only wish this had happened 70 years earlier.
I wish this happened 95 years ago
Dude he literally made it a rule that crying in pain in response to a whipping meant more whipping, and electrocution if you really irritated him.
You need to log off and get some kind of exposure to normal human beings again before opining on how averagely evil Pol Pot was.
Yeah and the Nazis made sausage of Jewish flesh and chased them into acid pits and there was a cage with a bear and an eagle and I got gassed 4 times oy vey, its unbelievable, but it happened
 
Let's hope that he suffers on till the new year so that, drooling and shitting himself in front of CNN, he gets to live long enough to witness Trump deliver his acceptance speech, then strokes out in a rage and the last thing he hears before shuffling off this mortal coil is the words, "it's great to be back folks! I'm going to make America great again!"
 
Pol Pot was right about intellectuals
His method for sorting out who was one was nigger-tier though.
How convenient he didn't purge anyone speaking French or just eliminate Phnom Pen, he found the one standard that didn't apply to his inner circle, at the time.
Hilariously, most of them still wound up with at least reading glasses as they aged and their eyes tired out writing all that commie literature.
 
Back