We've talked about what happens when trannies get dementia and forget they their organs removed, but have there been studies (or depressing/hilarious reddit posts) on:
- Parents get dementia and freak out when they see their tranny kids ("I don't have a daughter! Also you're dressed like a whore, get out!")
- The spouse who didn't transition gets dementia and wakes up every day next to a misshapen creature instead of the man/woman they married
Both of these must be extremely upsetting.
Very much doubt it. I doubt there are even studies about the psychological difficulties and issues of kids who's dad decided one day he is actually a woman and are told to call him mom or by his (new) personal name now. And having your once-dad starts to compare the developing of breasts with you, if you are a teenage girl still visibly developing. The damage done to these kids is unreal, they lose their dad and they are not even allowed to grieve. Their feelings are deemed insignificant or at least less important next to their once-dad "need" to be affirmed and the difficulties of his transitioning and his so-called "gender dysphoria". We all know these "trans women" usually also abandon their parental responsibilities, at least partly if not fully. But I guess "gender identity" trumps all.
The wives of course suffer greatly as well, but at least there are some talking about "trans widows" (even if they are deemed "transphobic" and "hateful" and are silenced); I have yet to see talking about "trans orphans". I suppose this will come in time too, perhaps in a decade or two, when the kids would be older and less brainwashed and start to fathom the heavy psychological damage done to them by their own father.
On another subject, it's perhaps a small thing but I've seen it so much lately that I want to acknowledge it here: there is a ridiculous trend of trans activists to say that singular "they" predates plural "they" which apparently in their minds seems to mean singular "they" is more valid, and transphobes are just so stupid, hateful and don't make any sense when they say that to call a single person "they" is ridiculous and unnatural.
They also have a little song they made for the occasion, the highest of poetry:
roses are red
violets are blue
singular "they"
predates singular "you"
Just the ridiculousness, irony and sheer nerve of these people, the same people who change the definitions of words more frequently than most people change their socks, to tell other people that the fact that "they" was used to refer to a single person in the fucking
14th century means it's more valid than the way it is used nowadays, to refer to multiple people. Their appeal to the past - which is appeal to tradition, a logical fallacy - is simply hilarious, considering the zero respect they have for it and their will (which they proudly declare, it's not "transphobes'" imagination) to change everything in our society because "progress".
A funny small anecdote, I happen to listen to "lord of the Ring" audiobook nowadays since I haven't read it in forever and thought it would be nice to "read" it again while I do chores like cleaning the house and the like. Tolkien used the word "queer" often in LOTR to simply say strange, odd, peculiar (i.e. the hobbits of Hobbiton thought the hobbits of Bree were "queer"), as it was used in his days and originally as far as I can tell. Perhaps we should resume this use of the world "queer" again, since by the same logic it means it's more valid.
