"Mad at the Internet" - a/k/a My Psychotherapy Sessions

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Yeah that should be the end of the discussion. If you are not sexually attracted to children you shouldn't be called a pedophile. Vito is, so he is. Max Carson is, so he is. Pippa isn't, so she isn't. Kirshe isn't, so she isn't.
Yeah, sure, technically, pedantically.

But a child porn producer who is thoroughly disgusted by the material he produces but keeps going because it's so profitable doesn't get to escape the label.

AND OF COURSE there's a difference of an order of magnitude here. But if she's participating the promotion of sexualized drawings of child characters for profit, guess fucking WHAT
 
If you enable pedos you're a pedo. Full stop.
Public Defenders are Pedos if they are assigned to defend a pedophile.
If you are a police officer assigned to bring a pedo from the jail to the court house without being attacked you are a pedo.
Etc. Etc.

Can we please stop turning pedos from "Is sexually attracted to children." to "Whoever I think is bad and whoever associates with them." ?

All I want.

If you find a list video of one of these people saying they are sexually into it like the other rabbit vtuber, FINE. Completely justified in putting the pedostamp on them. If you find her liking sexual loli/shota pictures completely unassociated with her company advertizing, FINE. If you find one of those sites where they have their fetishs or preferences and it lists that, fine.
But there is just no equivocation between the two. You can be suspicious. Hell because they are willing to retweet it for the company without complaint you can be extra suspicious. But, there is just not enough to cross the threshold without either expanding the definition beyond uselessness or bad faith arguments of using jokes and fan content submission games saying it was real approved merch.
 
Public Defenders are Pedos if they are assigned to defend a pedophile.
If you are a police officer assigned to bring a pedo from the jail to the court house without being attacked you are a pedo.
Etc. Etc.

Can we please stop turning pedos from "Is sexually attracted to children." to "Whoever I think is bad and whoever associates with them." ?

All I want.

If you find a list video of one of these people saying they are sexually into it like the other rabbit vtuber, FINE. Completely justified in putting the pedostamp on them. If you find her liking sexual loli/shota pictures completely unassociated with her company advertizing, FINE. If you find one of those sites where they have their fetishs or preferences and it lists that, fine.
But there is just no equivocation between the two. You can be suspicious. Hell because they are willing to retweet it for the company without complaint you can be extra suspicious. But, there is just not enough to cross the threshold without either expanding the definition beyond uselessness or bad faith arguments of using jokes and fan content submission games saying it was real approved merch.
You are either fundamentally retarded or you are a pedo. There's literally no other option for you. To misrepresent the argument so blatantly. I'm going with the latter option.
 
Guns should be towards the viewers who cultivate the relationship.
I agree, which is why I was happy to see the yt clip, and my point still stands:
w/r/t the yt clip -- this really brings into question how on earth she sees fit to feed her fetlife audience with the art already seen ITT
That all non-aged up fan art will be that of a child. That was all that point was. Not everyone who drew Strawberry-Shortcake fan art are pedophiles. Manchildren still exist.
That doesn't sound good at all.
What the fuck is even this argument

Whether in fiction or reality, there's possible reasons to kill someone for a good reason, like protecting someone else.

There's no possible reason where FUCKING A CHILD or even lusting after one can have a good justification.


If he really believes they're pedos, or catering to pedos, WHO GIVES A SHIT if they're big "creators" or "friendly to KF"?

Do you let unconscionable shit go unchallenged because the one in question has a scary big audience, or because they can be useful to you? THAT'S RALPH SHIT.

I can't believe I'm agreeing with ffffffucking retard Lidl but

Is my entire understanding of the situation. And no amount of "it was a bit/it's taken out of context"* is offsetting the evidence of her retweeting sex drawings of child characters. Oh it's automated, oh it's the company. And she doesn't tell them NO DON'T DO THAT, or QUIT ON THE SPOT?

*I'm listening as we speak a stream by that TheAlmightyLoli (no, don't think the name means anything guys, no) guy who has been seething about Null's stance for like an hour now, and that's his main argument. It's out of context, it's a joke, Kirche wanted to help him and now he's burned that bridge. Who cares, if (IF [IF]) they are profiteers from pedoshit
I agree with the above, except @Lidl Drip couldn't possibly be half as retarded as I am.
mustache.jpg

I might as well add something unpopular: I don't hate all anime nor vtubers. There are some Twitch channels I follow which are run by artists that might be considered furries, but all of them are actual working artists who either make comics or do commissions, and they vary from a 3d-amimated vtuber couple who play/create games as a bird and a bear with antlers, to a Christian fox, to a real live face-doxing male human military veteran who creates anthropomorphic comic books. So I just wanted to put some context out there. I've met completely asexual people online, one of note being a British-Guianan female self-identifying furry, and that was my introduction to this subculture; I'm neutral on the topic, just as I am on oh, let's say tabletop gaming. Not my bag; the people who partake are harmless in my eyes.
Therefore, when I cast a jaundiced eye on a vtuber, it is not due to prejudice against women, rabbit ears, nor animated face-rigs. It is specifically about feeding CSAM in the same way that people who have documented this stuff have observed that virtual females/dolls/prostitutes/child sex slaves, no matter how fake, only feed the demand for the real thing.
It is bad shit and not to be fucked with.
 
Public Defenders are Pedos if they are assigned to defend a pedophile.
If you are a police officer assigned to bring a pedo from the jail to the court house without being attacked you are a pedo.
Etc. Etc
Uh...what the fuck is this leap in logic?

Pippa: *actively promotes content sexualising her apparently 3 year old avatar for financial gain and makes "jokes" about good paedophilia*

Col: Yes, this is exactly the same as people who have to remain impartial in their vocations due to taking some form of oath or being bound by a code of ethics to prevent civil or human rights violations.

Can we please stop turning pedos from "Is sexually attracted to children." to "Whoever I think is bad and whoever associates with them." ?

All I want
Nobody is doing that except you.

Again I ask, why is this particular splitting of hairs necessary?

She actively promotes the material.
Lidl has given you tonnes of evidence.
Pippa sexualises a minor.

Why are you defending this person?
 
Finally. Thank you.
Yeah Pippa does need to answer for this shit. I looked up the twitter and her(im guessing it is a her) site. It seems they are just an artist and not affiliated with phase connect or any other vtubing related company.
Idk, maybe they were commissioned by phase connect or something, but it would be a stretch and a cope to think Pippa would be obligated to like their posts.
Do you have any more actual evidence like this, maybe we can actually find out if she is a pedo and build a case?
 
Finally. Thank you.
Yeah Pippa does need to answer for this shit. I looked up the twitter and her(im guessing it is a her) site. It seems they are just an artist and not affiliated with phase connect or any other vtubing related company.
Idk, maybe they were commissioned by phase connect or something, but it would be a stretch and a cope to think Pippa would be obligated to like their posts.
Do you have any more actual evidence like this, maybe we can actually find out if she is a pedo and build a case?
and she had posted it before that too
Edit: felted. Kill yourself pedos
 
@kilgoar has written a 4th article about Null, specifically in response to the Xitter deletion. I’m not going to link the article because he’s a chronic attention seeker and I don’t feel like boosting his website engagement numbers from one to (at best) 5.

Joshua Moon melts down as rumors of an FBI investigation into Kiwi Farms heats up​

1718167373852.png

The owner operator of Kiwi Farms is Josh Moon, age 12, of St. Augustine, Florida. His irresponsibility in publishing has led to a widespread clampdown on internet freedom in the US and abroad

INTERNET — Joshua Moon was banned from X on the D-Day anniversary after insulting veterans and the freedoms they fought to protect. Moon’s company Final Solutions LLC operates Kiwi Farms, an internet gossip site known for abandoning all responsibility in publishing. So long as the material isn’t criminal, he’ll publish it.

The loss of this X account dealt Null a mortal blow, and he’s been posting about buying the same make and model of pistol that lowtax, the former owner operator of Something Awful used to end himself. However, he’s written in a now-deleted post that he’s just angry, not depressed, and in full control over the choice between these two emotions.

In complete turmoil following his ban from Elon Musk’s free speech platform, Null’s staged a theatrical self-castration for his gaggle of half-literate teenage fans, dubbing himself the “gigavictim.” He’s emoted deeply that his self-sacrificing efforts to make a change in the internet are all in vain, and any pretense of activism or reform have left his mind. What remains of this cockless former man is only “speech terrorism.” This is, no doubt, a reference to his continued writing of crappy essays rather than any of the milquetoast edgeposting on his extreme gossip forum.

Republican representative Marjorie Taylor Green said that the Kiwi Farms website should not be allowed to exist. Donald Trump and Joe Biden have yet to comment, but the overwhelming bipartisan determination is that this website is wrong. The one lawyer in America who came out to support Kiwi Farms before a later disavowal is the now disgraced YouTuber Nick Rekieta, who was definitely smoking something at the time.

Moon rants on Kiwi Farms about how even “free speech” oriented providers will not do business with him. Laughably, the Australian Vincent Zhen, a provider for the site, was so irresponsible as to no-show for a lawsuit and lose $400,000 on the basis of simply providing services to Moon. Civil suits have been a persistent issue for Moon, and now the FBI is closing in as well. Even Google is telling him, in automated messages, that his account has been turned over as evidence. The FBI toolkit of broad-reaching criminal charges is likely to find something, anything, and finally end the stupidity. Maybe Moon’s even involved in the Daniel Larson case, a homeless man who was trolled into pulling fire alarms, n-bombing strangers, and ultimately streaming bomb threats targeting investigating FBI agents.

I hopped onto Kiwi Farms and confronted Moon, who as far as I can tell is trying his damnedest to make as much case law against a free and open internet as possible. He claims to be a warrior for the freedom of speech, and yet his actions and comments indicate that he actually hates freedom.

Taking up the pitiful cowed posture of half-defeated Palpatine, Null is ready to zap down his next unwary victim. The lawsuit against Zhen, the public pressure on network infrastructure, it is not a great direction for internet freedom. Yet these precedents are a legacy that will long outlast Kiwi Farms, and gigavictim Moon is the one to blame. While funny, the chronicles of the life of Chris-Chan will not make or break humanity, and are not worth such sacrifice. Perhaps others will be zapped like Zhen, and Moon will continue with his website. But this late in the game, it sure doesn’t look like it. In fact, it’s a wonder he’s got so far.

Alas, a trans vine of thorns wrapped itself around Moon’s esophagus and his brokeass pendulum just wouldn’t swing. I was banned from Kiwi Farms and received no response. Let the coward’s effigy hang forever as a blood payment, sweethearts: Freedom ain’t free
 
Do you have any more actual evidence like this, maybe we can actually find out if she is a pedo and build a case?

I will recite Null's advice here. If you think she is SO bad and doing all this shit you accuse: jerking off Pedos, encouraging people to be pedos, etc. "Then just go assault her." [...] If you want it to change write an actual intellectual article or something on the topic on why it is happening and what can be done to change it, if you don't want to put in the effort to change it than just laugh at her online when she does someting cringe
Maybe take your own advice then champ?
 
Shit like this is why I now avoid all things japtrash. From manga to video games, all things entertainment from that island has been ruined by Westerners. Can't even get a body horror or psychological horror movie from them that isn't made to cater to scum. Fucking Koreans and Chinese do a better job with their stuff, least I just have to worry about rape fiction and even that is becoming rarer and if it is going to be there it's not within the first few chapters of a story like it used to be. Japan needs another intervention before the youth there fuck up the country again.
 
Back