African-American Appreciation Thread - Highlighting contributions from our most productive citizens

These niggers act surprised when the local shartmart decides to close and there is a "food desert". Fuck niggers.
watching the way these people behave, i'm starting to see how some people who don't see them or interact with them much can be so vehemently anti-racist
they hear the stories and they say "i can't believe this"
the way they act, the way they act and then pretend like they're being unjustly oppressed, it's so cartoonishly awful that it feels like it's straight out of a hyperbolic political newspaper cartoon, surely NOBODY can be this absurdly caricature-like
they simply tell themselves it's impossible
 
i'm starting to see how some people who don't see them or interact with them much can be so vehemently anti-racist
they hear the stories and they say "i can't believe this"
These Leftists, they start with the belief that “there’s only one race, the human race” i.e. there are no population-level differences. All races are the same, and race itself is a concept made up out of nothing; a “social construct”

They buttress that with “blank slate” theory - the belief that every person is born with the same potential, and then his environment determines his outcomes. Take any of the people in any of the videos in this thread - picture in your mind a black woman politely asked for her license and registration, who loudly and shrilly screams, “you ain’t need my ID!” - these Leftists believe that if you raised her in the exact same environment as (just to pick an example) Elon Musk, then she would be a billionaire.

That’s what they believe, and it follows from the beliefs that there are no races, and everyone starts out as a blank slate.

And if you showed them this thread (though you’d have to strap them to a chair to get them to look at it) they would say, at every example of blacks behaving badly, “there are white people who act that way too”

…which is true… in the same way it’s true that there are golden retrievers who have bitten people. But that’s not really a rebuttal of the fact that there’s a problem with pitbulls. If I show you 1000 videos of pit bulls murdering children and all you can say is, “sometimes golden retrievers bite people” that just means you’re an idiot.

On Reddit, I’ve seen them deny that dog breeds are real. I suppose they have to deny it in order to preserve their fragile worldview.
 
Throwback clips of Sam Hyde sitting down and critiquing/watching videos of black people doing content for other black people on YouTube:



(For some reason, I’m not able to archive these videos, so if one can do that, it would be much appreciated.)
Last Sam vid I saw, he was hanging around some nigger "comedian" on the podcast and going fishing with him. Acting like the dude was hilarious. So was Nick. They're strange cats and it's hard, for me, to tell where the act starts and stops with them. Most consistent I've Sam be is his dislike of Jews.
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: Jonah Hill poster
These Leftists, they start with the belief that “there’s only one race, the human race” i.e. there are no population-level differences. All races are the same, and race itself is a concept made up out of nothing; a “social construct”

They buttress that with “blank slate” theory - the belief that every person is born with the same potential, and then his environment determines his outcomes. Take any of the people in any of the videos in this thread - picture in your mind a black woman politely asked for her license and registration, who loudly and shrilly screams, “you ain’t need my ID!” - these Leftists believe that if you raised her in the exact same environment as (just to pick an example) Elon Musk, then she would be a billionaire.

That’s what they believe, and it follows from the beliefs that there are no races, and everyone starts out as a blank slate.

And if you showed them this thread (though you’d have to strap them to a chair to get them to look at it) they would say, at every example of blacks behaving badly, “there are white people who act that way too”

…which is true… in the same way it’s true that there are golden retrievers who have bitten people. But that’s not really a rebuttal of the fact that there’s a problem with pitbulls. If I show you 1000 videos of pit bulls murdering children and all you can say is, “sometimes golden retrievers bite people” that just means you’re an idiot.

On Reddit, I’ve seen them deny that dog breeds are real. I suppose they have to deny it in order to preserve their fragile worldview.
“Blank slate” theory is inherently Marxist and also retarded. The idea that one’s looks can be genetic but intellectual capacity isn’t is absurd. White liberals and mudsharks should be deported along with all the various kinds of trash back to whatever 3rd world hellhole they came from. Let them decide if white countries are truly so racist and horrible.
 
“Blank slate” theory is inherently Marxist and also retarded. The idea that one’s looks can be genetic but intellectual capacity isn’t is absurd. White liberals and mudsharks should be deported along with all the various kinds of trash back to whatever 3rd world hellhole they came from. Let them decide if white countries are truly so racist and horrible.
They don't want to deport the 3rd worlders back to the 3rd world, even if the 3rd world was happy to take them back lol.
 
IMG_5224.jpeg
I’ve been seeing normies start to take notice as a result of this case. Who attacks a 3 year old and his mother “at random”? They want to say it’s “mental health” but those of us who are a little further down the path know this sheboon is representative of her community. She went to police station and demanded the return of “her money” and then went on to stab the mom and her son minutes later when the police said they didn’t have it. Clearly she thinks the “yt people” stole her money and wanted to take that out on an innocent white mom and her son. In the old days, this bitch wouldn’t have made it to trial.
 
These Leftists, they start with the belief that “there’s only one race, the human race” i.e. there are no population-level differences. All races are the same, and race itself is a concept made up out of nothing; a “social construct”

They buttress that with “blank slate” theory - the belief that every person is born with the same potential, and then his environment determines his outcomes. Take any of the people in any of the videos in this thread - picture in your mind a black woman politely asked for her license and registration, who loudly and shrilly screams, “you ain’t need my ID!” - these Leftists believe that if you raised her in the exact same environment as (just to pick an example) Elon Musk, then she would be a billionaire.

That’s what they believe, and it follows from the beliefs that there are no races, and everyone starts out as a blank slate.

And if you showed them this thread (though you’d have to strap them to a chair to get them to look at it) they would say, at every example of blacks behaving badly, “there are white people who act that way too”

…which is true… in the same way it’s true that there are golden retrievers who have bitten people. But that’s not really a rebuttal of the fact that there’s a problem with pitbulls. If I show you 1000 videos of pit bulls murdering children and all you can say is, “sometimes golden retrievers bite people” that just means you’re an idiot.

On Reddit, I’ve seen them deny that dog breeds are real. I suppose they have to deny it in order to preserve their fragile worldview.

Human groups have evolved to have average differences in skin colour, hair type, proneness to certain diseases, bone density, fat distribution, musculature, facial structure, oral bacteria, ability to produce vitamin D, response rates to certain medicines, malocclusion occurrence, vocal resonance, dental patterns, rates of hair loss, penis size, rates of myopia, average height, propensity for sweating, breast density, vaginal canal width, hip-to-waist ratio, leg-to-height ratio, muscle fibre type, jaw width, CRANIAL CAPACITY and BRAIN VOLUME...

....but cognitive ability has remained the same across all human groups to the 10th decimal place.

The blank slate, ladies and gentleman
 
Human groups have evolved to have average differences in skin colour, hair type, proneness to certain diseases, bone density, fat distribution, musculature, facial structure, oral bacteria, ability to produce vitamin D, response rates to certain medicines, malocclusion occurrence, vocal resonance, dental patterns, rates of hair loss, penis size, rates of myopia, average height, propensity for sweating, breast density, vaginal canal width, hip-to-waist ratio, leg-to-height ratio, muscle fibre type, jaw width, CRANIAL CAPACITY and BRAIN VOLUME...

....but cognitive ability has remained the same across all human groups to the 10th decimal place.

The blank slate, ladies and gentleman
Yeah, I'll steel-man it for you if you like; if you haven't interacted with one of these lefties yourself. Maybe you'd find that interesting.

BUT FIRST: THE TAX! In this video, a couple of girls set up a lemonade stand in their nice suburban neighborhood. They earn $30, and I'm sure their neighbors appreciated how these two girls made the world just a little better.

...a wild black approaches. He announces that he has no money. The girls give him a glass of lemonade for free. He walks away. But then later he returns and robs them - not just robs them, but flips their table over.

I wonder what he was thinking between the time he left, and when he decided to go back and rob them. "sheeeeet, dem yt bitches got money! Dat my money!"



Anyway, back to the "blank slate" discussion.

Human groups have evolved to have average differences
The lefty is going to say, "there's more variation within the group than between any two groups." If you haven't heard that statement before, and you don't know how to counter it, or why it's a fallacy, let me know. For now, I'm just telling you their position.

in skin colour, hair type, proneness to certain diseases
etc. etc. The lefty is going to say:
(1) none of those things is related to intelligence. I realize that is completely ignoring the point you're making. Again, I'm just letting you know what they'll say.
(2) those differences (skin color for example) are on a spectrum. The claim here is that because there are gradations, you cannot make statements about averages. It's like pointing out that height varies millimeter-by-millimeter from one person to the next ...so therefore you cannot say "men tend to be taller than women."
(3) race isn't real. Since you pointed to differences in hair color, you are likely to get a response that points out that there are hair color differences within the group you're calling "white people" and you'll get a claim that, if whites are different from blacks due to (in part) hair color, then all these groups of white people are also different races ...which the lefty thinks renders your argument moot. It's a bit like saying that golden retrievers are different from poodles, so therefore you can't claim that pit bulls are violent.

CRANIAL CAPACITY and BRAIN VOLUME
Just FYI, if you ever say that online, you have to link to a study. If you say it in person, you'd better have the study printed out. Otherwise, bringing that up is an instant and irrecoverable derail, and the lefty screams PHRENOLOGY and drops the mic.

And to a lefty who has done this before (admittedly, that's a rare one), you also need a source other than Rushton.

but cognitive ability has remained the same
The lefty is going to say that cognitive ability is so substantially dependent on environment as to smooth over any population-level differences. If you imagine a concrete floor with some minuscule bumps and depressions making it not perfectly level, then you pile 150 rugs on top of it, the resulting surface is entirely due to the rugs, and it makes no sense to even discuss a tiny bump in the concrete below.

The lefty is going to point out that IQ is effected by things like nutrition. And they're right ...but we can control for literally everything with statistics, so we know very precisely the extent to which nutrition contributes vs. the genetic contribution. But that's what the lefty is going to say.

Oh an also, they'll say that IQ isn't real. "Isn't real" as well as "not scientifically valid" and the old standard, "a social construct" are some of their favorite memes in support of the blank slate.
 
I'm working some place where recently we had a large number of Foreign shareholders stay for a week. I mostly dealt with the Africans and Hindus. We had to stop letting female staff work where they were cause the South Africans would get behind the desk sit next to them and take pictures/videos of them saying they're going to "show their friends later."
I had one guy drunkenly tell me he was from the same area Mandela was and how he loves Johannesburg. It took everything in me to not try to be cute and ask him how the toilet towers are.
 
Shitlibs have probably laid the seeds for strong immigration memoratorims or isolationism in the future.
See: EU election results. Despite all of the shouting/protests/screeching/ripping down rightwing posters and vandalizing them with profanity and insults, the "far-right" parties managed to perform incredibly well. They might not be the most openly vocal, because Western countries generally value politeness, but their views are well-represented among the general public.

Just today, I was in the metro and an African man (who I would be VERY surprised if he had papers) sitting near me started laughing out loud and I could hardly breathe from the stench. It was only when he stood up that I noticed he had pissed all over himself and the seat. Somehow, he managed to be more repulsive and filthy than the drunks in the metro at midnight. People are so tired of putting up with this sort of behavior, even if they're too courteous to get into a shouting match in a crowded public space, like how somebody from their own culture would have dealt with the.
 
I'm working some place where recently we had a large number of Foreign shareholders stay for a week. I mostly dealt with the Africans and Hindus. We had to stop letting female staff work where they were cause the South Africans would get behind the desk sit next to them and take pictures/videos of them saying they're going to "show their friends later."
I had one guy drunkenly tell me he was from the same area Mandela was and how he loves Johannesburg. It took everything in me to not try to be cute and ask him how the toilet towers are.
White women all want to virtue signal and kiss the ass of exotic looking men until they realize that they are just a fetish to these men and will never be treated well or respected by them. It’s pathetic how white men sold out to women’s whining and allowed them to vote. You can’t run a society on empathy when the rest of the world understands it’s a zero-sum game. Were it not for the pathetic white men who sell out their own in return for a modicum of power, these issues could all be fixed.
 
Sure, go ahead
Okay, the statement "there's more variation within the group than between the groups" is a fallacy because "variation within the group" includes outliers at many standard deviations. Thus, pointing to those outliers, and noting that the distance between the two far ends of that bell curve is greater than (and what they're saying is true - the distance is greater) than the distance between the two populations' statistical means ...pointing to that does not rebut the claim that the populations themselves exist.

After all, this statement is true of everything. For example, among men, the variation in height ranges from as low as 4'6" to as high as 7' - a difference of 2'6"

But the difference in mean height between men and women is only 6 inches. So the variation within the group called "men" is five times greater than the variation between the groups, "men" and "women"

...and yet, men are taller than women.

so if you claim, "men are taller than women" and someone fires back with, "height is just a social construct, and besides, there's more variation in height within each group than there is between the groups" - that person is making a fallacious argument.

Here's a graph to illustrate what I just said:

unnamed-chunk-11-1.png
Those are two distinct groups, even though there's overlap, and even though the size at the bottom is larger than the distance between the peaks.

This (fallacious) argument even has a name: Lewontin's Fallacy, named for Richard Lewontin who was among the first to claim that there's no such thing as race. He was the first to use it.

I used height as an analogy because it's easy to see, but when talking about race, what we're actually talking about is DNA. And when you want to study variations in DNA, you use a statistical tool called a "principle component analysis." Using this tool, you can actually tease out exactly the racial categories that people invented before knowing what DNA was. Check it out:
Screen Shot 2024-06-13 at 11.28.51 AM.png
This is not something you would expect to be true a-priori. It's also not something you would find if you were actually wrong about your categories - for example, if I claimed that Yankees are categorically different from Southerners, I would not be able to prove that using PCA (because it's not true).


Anyway, here's my thread tax:
1660256128429349.jpg
 
Back