Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Screenshot 2024-06-11 095051.jpg


Hilary Cass would like a word with the Judge.

"Judge Robert L. Hinkle of Federal District Court in Tallahassee sided with advocacy groups and three families who had said that the law stripped them of parents’ rights to make medical decisions for their transgender children.

In a 105-page order, Judge Hinkle said that “gender identity is real” and that a “widely accepted standard of care” includes puberty blockers and hormone treatments that Florida unlawfully banned. “The state of Florida can regulate as needed but cannot flatly deny transgender individuals safe and effective medical treatment — treatment with medications routinely provided to others with the state’s full approval so long as the purpose is not to support the patient’s transgender identity,” Judge Hinkle wrote.

Judge Strikes Down Florida’s Ban on Transgender Care for Minors

This is somewhat interesting because Hinkle was already under appeal in the 11th circuit in this case for fucking up his preliminary rulings and applying incorrect standards. I am assuming that Tony and Big Al's celebration will be short lived because the 11th circuit already ruled on the Alabama ban and Hinkle's ruling seems incompatible with that ruling.

"Hinkle last year also struck down Florida’s ban on Medicaid covering treatments for gender dysphoria. The state is appealing that ruling, and opponents have argued that the state has been defying Hinkle’s order and still denying Medicaid coverage. DeSantis’ press secretary, Jeremy Redfern, said that the state would appeal Hinkle’s new ruling, as well.

“Through their elected representatives, the people of Florida acted to protect children in this state, and the Court was wrong to override their wishes,” Redfern said in an emailed statement. “We disagree with the Court’s erroneous rulings on the law, on the facts, and on the science. As we’ve seen here in Florida, the United Kingdom, and across Europe, there is no quality evidence to support the chemical and physical mutilation of children. These procedures do permanent, life-altering damage to children, and history will look back on this fad in horror.”

Florida ban on medical treatments for trans kids struck down by judge

The wacktivist Judge ruled that the utter lack of evidence does not matter.


Screenshot 2024-06-11 133142.jpg


I'm still dumbfounded by the Judge's "the evidence doesn't matter.... only the feelings of autistic cross dresssers" stance.

Screenshot 2024-06-11 155018.jpg
 
Last edited:
“Through their elected representatives, the people of Florida acted to protect children in this state, and the Court was wrong to override their wishes,” Redfern said in an emailed statement.
Translation from Troonglish: chopping off a little boy's dick because he played with a Barbie doll is "protecting" him.
 
Finally, an airtight case that "gender identity is real" and from a federal judge no less: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flnd.460963/gov.uscourts.flnd.460963.223.0.pdf
1718173771885.png1718173793763.png1718173806703.png1718173828988.png

Your "deeply felt internal sense of being male or female" so get fucked non-binary we're defining gender identity as the sex binary today! Anyone who doesn't adhere to these deeply felt beliefs of their "gender identity" meeting their "natal sex" needs medical intervention.

Transphobes in shambles! WE JUST KEEP WINNING!
 
Finally, an airtight case that "gender identity is real" and from a federal judge no less: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flnd.460963/gov.uscourts.flnd.460963.223.0.pdf
View attachment 6079391View attachment 6079392View attachment 6079393View attachment 6079394

Your "deeply felt internal sense of being male or female" so get fucked non-binary we're defining gender identity as the sex binary today! Anyone who doesn't adhere to these deeply felt beliefs of their "gender identity" meeting their "natal sex" needs medical intervention.

Transphobes in shambles! WE JUST KEEP WINNING!
I'm sorry but how the fuck is that absolute retard a judge? He sounds so low IQ it made my brain hurt to read his gibberish.

Also this bullshit "but they give the meds for other conditions" is still like saying that everyone who asks for it should get chemo because we use it for other patients and it's a proven treatment.
Why are they always making the most stupid arguments.
 
Finally, an airtight case that "gender identity is real" and from a federal judge no less: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flnd.460963/gov.uscourts.flnd.460963.223.0.pdf
View attachment 6079391View attachment 6079392View attachment 6079393View attachment 6079394

Your "deeply felt internal sense of being male or female" so get fucked non-binary we're defining gender identity as the sex binary today! Anyone who doesn't adhere to these deeply felt beliefs of their "gender identity" meeting their "natal sex" needs medical intervention.

Transphobes in shambles! WE JUST KEEP WINNING!
And how does this judge determine gender identity is real? Is there a way to measure it or check through a CT brain scan? I find it insane how many people believe in the concept of a gender identity and yet nobody on the TRA side can properly explain the characteristics of what a male or female brain is (especially when they told me that male and female brains dont exist). Like are you more prone to liking dolls and dresses if you have a lady brain? TRAs claim that stereotypes have nothing to do with that so then what is it?
 
This is a bizarre decision. At one point, the Judge correctly notes that the 11th CIrcuit troon ban decision is the controlling law of the case.

That case held that:

Section 4(a)(1)–(3) is therefore subject only to rational basis review—a standard that it is exceedingly likely to satisfy for the reasons discussed. See supra Section III.A. The district court erred as a matter of law by applying heightened scrutiny, and that error tainted its assessment of Plaintiffs’ likelihood of success. Because that is true with respect to both the due process claim and the equal protection claim, we vacate the preliminary injunction

Eknes-Tucker v. Governor of Alabama (11th Cir. 2023) 80 F.4th 1205, 1230–1231

The Judge then spent roughly 100 pages doing the very thing the Alabama case prohibits. To wit, applying various forms of heightened scrutiny.


BREAKING NEWS! Troons grow old too!

Screenshot 2024-06-12 095214.jpg


Quck deboonk of Snaggle Tooth's bogus revisionist history. Conway did not troon out until LONG AFTER his work at MIT and IBM.

Lynn Conway


"COVID 19 was wonderful because it helped more people troon out." - Dr. Professor Anthony Reed

Screenshot 2024-06-12 101443.jpg


Tony is flapping his arms around so much he is about to fly away

Bogus anti-trans doctor group goes spreads disinformation
 
Last edited:
And how does this judge determine gender identity is real? Is there a way to measure it or check through a CT brain scan? I find it insane how many people believe in the concept of a gender identity and yet nobody on the TRA side can properly explain the characteristics of what a male or female brain is (especially when they told me that male and female brains dont exist). Like are you more prone to liking dolls and dresses if you have a lady brain? TRAs claim that stereotypes have nothing to do with that so then what is it?
Unfortunately most people are not skeptics, they accept the assertions of others. I'm paraphrasing a bit but this is a thing actual studies have repeatedly found. It's not "brainwashing" but rather the fact that most things don't actually matter so it takes effort (or some intrinsic nature of self) to not just go with the flow. You see this in other studies of social behavior, it's just easier and less stressful. As someone who has been accused many times in my life of being too skeptical those studies confirm my biases and therefore are airtight. I also think it is related to "trendy rebellion" where you can obtain more seeming cachet from rebelling against a nebulous faceless "dominant" other that itself is a form of conformity.

Just to use a politico-cultural example because of this being Tony's thread, look at how both Republicans, Democrats and everyone else use the same framing of themselves against The Man to where Tony can tweet about Biden having his back and also how there's a giant genocide going on and he can't even travel to Florida or Montana. He's trying to be both the most popular kid and an oppressed rebel at the same time. The inconsistency in the story simply affirms it and works with others because none of this really matters so few people are "triggered" into noticing his contradictions. Most people are either deciding to believe it in the moment and forget what Tony said or they're completely ignoring him. This is why pundits of all stripes are never held accountable for being constantly wrong about everything. We're inclined to give them benefit of the doubt unless we're "too skeptical." It also fits with our cultural narratives, that you're the unknown average everyday hero who rises above the odds to topple the bad guys and be cheered by everyone because your personal quest was really a quest for everyone. Tony's trans clique tweets the same as the MAGA grifters because they're selling this same story to themselves.

Except I can turn this around on you with just a basic 101 understanding of psychology. Stripped from typical social interactions you were able to more easily delude yourself because of the lack of feedback. The "time to ourselves to think" is a bad thing if you're ruminating which is what all of you are doing about "gender" as a stand-in for your insecurities and anxieties about your self image and how others do not share it with you. With nobody around to continue confirming that reality is not your narcissistic self-image you concluded you could easily become a woman because you were spending even less time than normal seeing actual women. Instead you could picture an "ideal" woman who was yourself because you're the ideal person. It's also the typical self-reinvention your type of person does, you believed that you could launch a new persona because the stupid idiots hadn't seen you in a while and would be fooled. You'll make the mistake of thinking I'm saying you did this intentionally, that's the standard defensive reaction we all make, when I'm simply arguing that you did all of this unconsciously because you lack self-skepticism.

Again, you have no theory of mind, and no skepticism about your own intent and locus of control, so you just reinvented your habits of launching new personas until others finally see the "true" you and like you as they should IF THEY JUST KNEW YOU LIKE YOU KNOW YOURSELF by tying it into an incoherent ur-theory about gender that plays into and reifies stereotypes that should be opposed rather than affirmed. Only this time instead of insisting that you're a doctor to be, or you're the world's coolest drug dealer, or the world's most important Reddit mod, or the world's best political pollster, or whatever reason you got that Grateful Dead tattoo, you're insisting that others see you as a woman because you think the "ideal" woman should be treated as some kind of sacred species that dispenses sex. At no time did you have any skepticism about your own ability to simply "identify" into something that's not solely in your control in the first place and could simply assert it to others who would accept it. It was entirely premised on once again fooling the rubes with an act that would grant you to the key to all the 10's panties. And if people don't accept that you're the world's best lesbian journalist married to a rising political superstar, well, there's always the next time. Subscribe to my Substack to support my work.
 
In what universe has anyone asked for transwomen to be allowed to use the women's showers whilst transmen are also using the women's showers?

Are they this fucking dumb? Are they this fucking deluded? Are they this fucking dishonest? The transwomen would be out of the women's showers if TERFs had their way. They wouldn't be there for a transman to 'walk in on'.

These CUNTING RETARDS vote.
 
2. Tony didn't label Cass as "anti trans" until AFTER she reached conclusions that contradict wwhat this scientifically illiterate half wit believed about his fetish with no actual basis for belieiving it. Tony now imlies without evidence that Cass's conclusion was pre-determined.

He has no qualms about smearing and lying, blatantly, as long as it serves his extremely biased narrative. He does the same thing to transgender trend, who are a group of parents who got together to talk about their kids' beliefs that they were 'transgender'. These parents wanted to do their best by their kids but they wanted a solid evidence basis for it, not just woo and fairies. Unsurprisingly they came to the same conclusion as the Cass Review, that it was illogical, that there was nothing near the amount of evidence needed to make drastic interventions into their kids lives and health, and that the idea that their kids were 'born this way' or 'had always been trans' did not make any sense from their kids' early lives (the trans widows say the same, that their husbands come out with the 'always been' narrative and stories about 'knowing' from early ages, when it has never come up before and in fact they used to say the opposite).

Tony, naturally, refers to them as an 'anti-trans hate group'. If they supported troonery, he would have described them as I have described them. Because they realized the whole idea was nonsense, anything they say is 'hate campaigning' not 'lived experience of trans kids' which it would have been if they were A-okay with the drugs. He then extends this to anything that is in any way connected with them, which is also tainted because 'the survey came from an anti-trans hate group' (translation: the survey was of parents of 'trans kids' who did actual research) or 'they are connected to a hate group' (they once spoke to parents of 'trans kids' who did actual research).

The wacktivist Judge ruled that the utter lack of evidence does not matter.

This is.... stunningly bad logic. Absolutely amazing. And the Pooner is CELEBRATING this? "There is only 'low quality evidence' but there is evidence so let's do it"? Have sterilizing cancer drugs based on studies where 60% of the patients were lost to follow up but we're going to assume they're fine and still troons and all b/c why not? Does she or the judge realize that's what 'low quality' means? We asked if the troons were happy 24 hours after their surgeries when they were hopped up on opioids but didn't bother to ask them two months, six months, or a year or five years later? But it's fine? Good enough for deluded kids, since they feel quite strongly about it. Holy shit.

Finally, an airtight case that "gender identity is real" and from a federal judge no less:

This is also an amazing level of retardation. What the fuck. I don't have a 'gender identity'. How the fuck can this person conclude as a matter of law that such a thing exists? It's like claiming a soul exists or the tooth fairy exists because a small percentage of people with a stake in it swear blind that it does. What about those of us who are like, um, no, I just feel like a person? (you know, all of us except sad teen girls and cum-soaked creepy men). This is like reading one of those 16th or 17th century laws that are all like 'We are all created by God and therefore we all have the ultimate right to burn heretics as their atheism taints our community, so ordered'.

The fuck.
 
Fine, maybe more people "came out as trans" because of Covid, Tony.

There's also been a sharp uptick in other psychological issues across the board since then, especially in children. Why would troonery be any different (and yes, it's a mental disease to think you were born in the "wrong body", and you need to cut off "the wrong parts" when they are healthy and functional)? Ask any veteran teacher about kids before lockdown and post lockdown - they all admit that kids are more of a challenge now, because they are working out issues that came from being isolated and fearful of death/abandonment.

The kids are not alright, and that makes your "community" preying on their insecurities even more evil.

The loss of regular, normal daily interaction with other people in society did a number on everyone. If you were lucky, you had other people who you could check in with (who also weren't batshit crazy). If you didn't, well.....look at this freaking decade, ffs. Does anyone really think that society in general is more sane and rational than it was in the 2010's?

There are reasons why solitary confinement is considered the cruelest punishment, Tony. Even the most mentally strong people get broken by it, and can go psychotic.

Someday we'll look back and see this troon epidemic for what it is......a group of people caught up in madness after social upheaval, just like the Flagellators and other self-mutilation groups throughout history.

So yeah, Tony, you're right, your "type" has always existed - not troons, but the religious extremists who go in for mortification of the flesh. They beat themselves up to get closer to the Divine, while you only wish you passed as well as.....well, Divine (RIP).
 
"that won't please a very particular type of male," is a bold, bold statement from a man who hacked intl his first ex wife's diary.
Dude, men have hated short hair on women my whole life. I ended up with a whole bunch of Seventeen magazines from the mid-80s right around 92-93 when I was a teenager. Those 80s magazines had articles talking about how boys don't like short hair, but also don't let that stop you if you want your hair to be short.

This dislike has nothing to do with trannies, or "being gender non-conforming". It's not going along with societal conformation that gets some people up in arms. Growing up, women with short hair was more acceptable than men with long hair. Certainly more than the male rock stars wearing makeup, long or short hair. Now only a few people even bat an eye at hair styles. Honestly, compared to some of the absolutely retarded haircuts the "GNC" girls have, this girl is practically a tradwife.

Trannies really do try to make everything about them.
 
Sterilized male eunuchs obsessing over abortion will never not be amusing to me.

Screenshot 2024-06-13 124327.jpg

Screenshot 2024-06-13 124339.jpg
wtf now I love the far-right fascist Supreme Court?

This is meaningless word salad Snaggle Tooth.

Screenshot 2024-06-13 124353.jpg
Uh, aren't you the ones who say that "any gender nonconformity whatsoever" means you must be the opposite sex? Or possibly not even human at all?
 
Uh, aren't you the ones who say that "any gender nonconformity whatsoever" means you must be the opposite sex? Or possibly not even human at all?

Like all things tranny, they talk out of both sides of their mouth. They argue than trans women ( by being men and visibly male) help to break gender stereotypes of how a woman should look or act.
 
Back