This was way too many words just to say fags are gay.
It's odd, because the my post before that was similar but had a better reception. Not complaining, though. I'll have to be quiet until I can figure out the difference between them.
Can't win 'em all I guess.
Do you have a lot of experience watching gay porn made by experienced gays? Where are you getting this information from? Why do you have such knowledge what what faggots do?
What an odd series of questions. Obviously I'm writing from a position of personal experience. What gave you the impression that I was trying to hide that? The detailed breakdown of gay furry porn psychology?
Why did you feel the need to write all this?
That's a better question. The simple answer is that I enjoy breaking down these kinds of processes. When it gets too long I usually try to spoiler it. Maybe I should have done that here.
A longer answer, regarding why I feel a need to write about this topic specifically, is linked in the inline spoiler at the bottom of the post you're quoting.
Apologies for the double-post. I figured it out. Got tunnel-vision and didn't notice I'd continued beyond the scope of the conversation. Took some time away from the screen for things to reset.
I think the biggest difference between weebs and furries is that weebs aren't encouraged to make OCs . . .
Furries, on the other hand, make a character to represent themselves as the very first rite of passage among them. And they're heavily encouraged by their peers to act out their sexual fantasies as their characters in roleplay. The coombrain comes as part of the group identity, and has a knock-on effect on everything they do.
But yeah this is a really good point. It's about your fursona, and as things are there's really nothing to
do with your "fursona" other than sexual stuff. Furries have no lore to work with. If you have any kind of consistent set of worldbuilding or context for characters to act in, then there'd be something solid for the autism to latch onto and start building.
In the absence of that, they have to fall back on coom dynamics; it's the only "rule system" for them to use—or at least the easiest and most profitable one to default to. You could theoretically transmute those dynamics out of the sexual context and have something better
(which is my major fixation), but that'd have to be a splinter group—or just a separate unrelated thing entirely—with how committed the organizers and tastemakers of that "fandom" are to sex politics.
The MLP community may have been similarly depraved (having a ton of overlap), but they at least made other stuff and had giant writing communities. You could honestly say that they weren't
about sex. Furries can't really have that like weebs and other groups can. The best they could do, without a common lore, is come with something that's
like sex, but isn't.