2016 US Presidential Election Thread 2 - Always Darkest before Don

Status
Not open for further replies.
Clinton's a lock to win.

The Trump supporters went too exceptional with the child slave shit that nobody believes. The e-mails were never a smoking gun, no matter how much @Null's penis really wanted them to be. The e-mails were nothing more than day to day business, a bunch of boring shit - the only thing they exposed is just how biased Wikileaks actually is. Julian Assange is a liar and deserves every ounce of ass fucking he'll eventually get in Guantanamo.

Trump's currently being lambasted as a "coward" for "running away" from that fake attack, and media is reporting that the "attacker" was a Republican. Trump is being made to look like an absolute fool and there's zero he can do to fix it.

While the Trump campaign ends up going into full on special ed mode, Hillary has laid low and kept quiet.

It's over, folks. GG and all, but it was pretty clear from the start that the Trump campaign was a full on exceptional individual monorail.
In the end I don't think that these last two days of revaluations are going to affect turnout or the end result. I agree with the /pol/ /x/ nonsense about Podesta; even if Clinton is a Satanic cultist who rapes and murders children, the case made to prove that would have to be so complete and so compelling for anyone to take seriously you're talking about months of work regardless of who wins.

I do think the #SpiritCooking buzz was just in time to shake some Latino and perhaps even white Christian support, but not by more than one percentage point anywhere. You're talking, tops, less than a few hundred thousand in even the best case scenario.

As I said, I don't trust the polls, and in my big, feelsy heart I sense one final surprise to write this election into the history books. I have no idea what it could be.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: DuskEngine
As I said, I don't trust the polls, and in my big, feelsy heart I sense one final surprise to write this election into the history books. I have no idea what it could be.

Hillary rips off her containment suit and comes out as a transexual humanoid lizard. She then screams "WHAT ARE YOU DEPLORABLES GONNA DO ABOUT IT?" and loses the election.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Clinton's a lock to win.

The Trump supporters went too exceptional with the child slave shit that nobody believes. The e-mails were never a smoking gun, no matter how much @Null's penis really wanted them to be. The e-mails were nothing more than day to day business, a bunch of boring shit - the only thing they exposed is just how biased Wikileaks actually is. Julian Assange is a liar and deserves every ounce of ass fucking he'll eventually get in Guantanamo.

Trump's currently being lambasted as a "coward" for "running away" from that fake attack, and media is reporting that the "attacker" was a Republican. Trump is being made to look like an absolute fool and there's zero he can do to fix it.

While the Trump campaign ends up going into full on special ed mode, Hillary has laid low and kept quiet.

It's over, folks. GG and all, but it was pretty clear from the start that the Trump campaign was a full on exceptional individual monorail.

The email imbroglio was about Hillary circumventing the freedom of information act.
Anyone else would have been hauled off to Fort Leavenworth for pulling that kinda shit.
Chelsea Manning is doing 35 years in military prison for less.
 
Hillary rips off her human containment suit and comes out as a transexual humanoid lizard. She then screams "WHAT ARE YOU DEPLORABLES GONNA DO ABOUT IT?" and loses the election.
She does that after she wins the elections.
Her supporters defend her fervently, being the first lizard president and all.
/pol/ supports Hillary because they're a bunch of closet degenerates and Hill is a lizard.
Everyone in the Farms promptly drinks themselves to death.
 
The email imbroglio was about Hillary circumventing the freedom of information act.
Anyone else would have been hauled off to Fort Leavenworth for pulling that kinda shit.
Chelsea Manning is doing 35 years in federal prison for less.

Nothings come of it, and nothing is going to come of it. So, enjoy patting yourselves on the back. You did it. You figured it out - Hillary found a FOIA loophole. There's also direct evidence that she and Colin Powell circumvented skiff room security procedures.

Nobody is going to do a thing about it. Now what?

That brings us right back to where we are - Assange is full of shit. Wikileaks is a waste of time. Trump is a fool. Hillary is going to win based on pandering to the left's feely words alone while fluffing big banks testicles. A guaranteed 8 more years of this - higher stock prices, lower wages, and less freedoms (gun control + speech control).

Unless this group of faggots is ready to actually pull the trigger, that's all that's ever going to happen.

Welcome to America, kid.
 
Someone's been paying attention. The Brexit results were a nightmare come to life for these people, Trump winning because of apathy would be the apocalypse.

I wonder how long fear based voting will last before we stop caring about the various technicolor Hitlers we're supposed to hate?
I give it 2-3 more cycles at most. The mask is breaking for me and I've only been of age since the last one.
 
Nothings come of it, and nothing is going to come of it. So, enjoy patting yourselves on the back. You did it. You figured it out - Hillary found a FOIA loophole. There's also direct evidence that she and Colin Powell circumvented skiff room security procedures.

Nobody is going to do a thing about it. Now what?
I know life isn't fair, but that doesn't mean I cannot be angry about it.
 
The email imbroglio was about Hillary circumventing the freedom of information act.
Anyone else would have been hauled off to Fort Leavenworth for pulling that kinda shit.
Chelsea Manning is doing 35 years in military prison for less.

Nah, realistically this is the kind of thing you get chewed out for, but not hauled to jail for. Obv, trying to find loopholes around FOIA is shady as hell, but the "lock her up" takes were always wishful thinking. Chelsea Manning deliberately handing shit over to wikileaks is pretty clearly a bigger deal.
 
Nah, realistically this is the kind of thing you get chewed out for, but not hauled to jail for. Obv, trying to find loopholes around FOIA is shady as hell, but the "lock her up" takes were always wishful thinking. Chelsea Manning deliberately handing shit over to wikileaks is pretty clearly a bigger deal.
The information Hillary was mishandling did get out, so classified documents did leak.
 
Nah, realistically this is the kind of thing you get chewed out for, but not hauled to jail for. Obv, trying to find loopholes around FOIA is shady as hell, but the "lock her up" takes were always wishful thinking. Chelsea Manning deliberately handing shit over to wikileaks is pretty clearly a bigger deal.
You're so fucking dumb it makes my blood boil.

Do you know what happened when Clinton's emails leaked? In one of them, an Iranian nuclear scientist and American spy was mentioned by name. The very next day, Iran hanged him for treason.

She deserves to hang too.

Edit: and before you blame the FUCKING RUSSIANS, there were 5 different foreign actors that had gained access, according to the FBI.
 
Not really. A lot of them are now getting their news from Infowars and Prison Planet. . . Instead you buy gold and build a bunker for when they come for you.

He has been shilling gold recently as a new introduction into his Glenn Beck 365 a year Halloween costume, to be fair. I'm sure he has absolutely no investment in the hedge that would benefit from panic sending cash into the reserve as the price swells due to demand.

I think something a lot of the professional pollsters are not counting is the lethargy of millennial voters. . . because so few of those hashtag activist turned out to actually vote.

Democratic party base turns out in Presidential elections more than any others. Primaries, midterms, that's where you can say young voters lag at getting their vote in. Obama activated young voters at modern record levels so if he can transfer a little of that on the campaign trail to Hillary, she'll be fine. As long as Trump voters are caught when performing voter fraud in places like Iowa at least . . .

Party of Lincoln had a good run but jumped the shark in the 1980's. Now it's all over except another Roger Stone run Brooks Brother's riot trying to overcome, instead of defend this time, a lead in vote totals.
 
I have a question - looking at US mainstream media right now, it's unbelievable how all seemingly high quality newspapers like NYT and Washington Post all post anti-Trump and pro-Hillary propaganda in complete unison. Even during America's invasion of Iraq, the propaganda wasn't so blatant.

Could there be such a scenario: due to Hillary's 'progressive' status (first woman president and all), fears of Russian subversion of American democracy, and Hillary's extensive connections within the media and the corporations that own them (as uncovered by various leaks), major news outlets like CNN, NBC and others might drop all negative coverage of her Presidency and only praise her and her policies, like any media of an authoritarian country. Thus, any negative coverage of Clinton will be limited to widely discredited fringe media outlets like Fox News and Breitbart. Others will be accused of being Russia's "useful idiots" or simply misogynists. This situation will continue until either Hillary's relationship with her corporate buddies tanks, or there's a scandal that no one can cover up or downplay.

It is even remotely possible, or not?
 
I have a question - looking at US mainstream media right now, it's unbelievable how all seemingly high quality newspapers like NYT and Washington Post all post anti-Trump and pro-Hillary propaganda in complete unison. Even during America's invasion of Iraq, the propaganda wasn't so blatant.

Could there be such a scenario: due to Hillary's 'progressive' status (first woman president and all), fears of Russian subversion of American democracy, and Hillary's extensive connections within the media and the corporations that own them (as uncovered by various leaks), major news outlets like CNN, NBC and others might drop all negative coverage of her Presidency and only praise her and her policies, like any media of an authoritarian country. Thus, any negative coverage of Clinton will be limited to widely discredited fringe media outlets like Fox News and Breitbart. Others will be accused of being Russia's "useful idiots" or simply misogynists. This situation will continue until either Hillary's relationship with her corporate buddies tanks, or there's a scandal that no one can cover up or downplay.

It is even remotely possible, or not?
I don't doubt it, there have been scandals like that before and media outlets are accused of bias a lot. I wouldn't be suprised if it happened. However I don't think it'd be to the extent you suggest.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Guardian G.I.
The information Hillary was mishandling did get out, so classified documents did leak.

Not really, but even if they had, the distinction between deliberately passing the material on and mishandling it is significant. I get that her behavior was deeply irresponsible and would probably be disqualifying if her opponent wasn't a reality-TV buffoon.
You're so fucking dumb it makes my blood boil.

Do you know what happened when Clinton's emails leaked? In one of them, an Iranian nuclear scientist and American spy was mentioned by name. The very next day, Iran hanged him for treason.

She deserves to hang too.

Edit: and before you blame the FUCKING RUSSIANS, there were 5 different foreign actors that had gained access, according to the FBI.

See now you've gone and gotten us on the Secret Service's radar.
 
I have a question - looking at US mainstream media right now, it's unbelievable how all seemingly high quality newspapers like NYT and Washington Post all post anti-Trump and pro-Hillary propaganda in complete unison. Even during America's invasion of Iraq, the propaganda wasn't so blatant.

Could there be such a scenario: due to Hillary's 'progressive' status (first woman president and all), fears of Russian subversion of American democracy, and Hillary's extensive connections within the media and the corporations that own them (as uncovered by various leaks), major news outlets like CNN, NBC and others might drop all negative coverage of her Presidency and only praise her and her policies, like any media of an authoritarian country. Thus, any negative coverage of Clinton will be limited to widely discredited fringe media outlets like Fox News and Breitbart. Others will be accused of being Russia's "useful idiots" or simply misogynists. This situation will continue until either Hillary's relationship with her corporate buddies tanks, or there's a scandal that no one can cover up or downplay.

It is even remotely possible, or not?

No, the second the threat of Trump is gone President Clinton will become the number one most hated cunt in the universe.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back