Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Tablet County]

there is an entire English Major thesis that could be written about Nicholas Rekieta taking the moral lessons from media like American Beauty and Redo of Healer to lead his life into manifest ruin, and how the catharsis theory of fantasy media fails in men with low impulse control

You're a faggot.

 

[polar bear]

"Dear John" is not even the biggest thing anymore.

For me personally, Dear John, double drowning of the skunk, and Nick *allegedly* neglecting kids (and being content with them finding out about his sexual degeneracy one day), is the top three things that turned me from laughing at the stupid alcoholic, to detesting his guts, proper MATI style. I was very boring talking about sending him to gulags - but yeah, that's what he deserves in my opinion - pain and suffering, for the pain and suffering he caused, and for him never apologizing for it. Fuck him. I didn't understand Dear John thing that well at the time, but the more I thought about it, the more I hated him. Glad you're doing better.

 

[anionfarflung]

Based on many things I have read, and contrary to what he was hoping for, I think "Dear John" backfired on him badly. I

Perhaps I'm stating the obvious, but aside from being aghast that Nick could be so vicious to a certain person, fans had to start to wonder if they could equally set Nick of that way if they said or did the wrong thing. I think fans started to wonder if he really just had contempt for most of them. That's how I felt.
You can combine that with little hints he strains to pull back from when he describes what losers his fans are. If you have ever been to a meetup with Nick, especially in the later years, you know that most of his fans were pretty pathetic. He was probably angry his fans weren't cooler.

 

[Swole McPole]

It has been suggested to me by a number of people (some in site administration) to not do a long autistic bullet-pointed power-leveling post confirming or denying specific points of his drunken drugged-up "Dear John" rant. I think it's sage advice. What I will simply say is that it is fact mixed with fiction and leave it at that.

Yeah, sorry I wasn't really asking for that as much as what it was about him or his behaviour that led to your seeing him differently. I'm not familiar with the Ralph/Faith revenge porn story. What happened with that?

I'd always assumed his Dear John rant was a mix of fact and fiction. Some people will just flat out lie and when you catch them out, they'll just laugh and own it. Rekieta's one of those people who'll insist that he never lies, and that's invariably because there's enough truth in there to be able to convince themselves that they're being truthful.

Anyway, he who laughs last, etc.

He was probably angry his fans weren't cooler.

That was never working out. Parasocial relationships with YouTubers is the very antithesis of cool.

 

[Fapcop]

I, along with others, think the primary reason he did it is he was mad at the Farms in general, and I got singled out specifically that night because, unlike most people here who are anonymous to him, he knew who I was and certain things about me, and therefore he saw me as the most vulnerable link in the chain.

Makes sense.

Rekieta doesn’t really NEED viewers, and when he says that haters don’t matter since there are so many potential viewers, I believe him a good part of the way.

What’s really funny here though is Heimdal (sorta) doxxing his locals.

You can take Rekieta’s viewers: He doesn’t care.

You can take Rekieta’s money: Meh, there’ll be more coming.

But screencapping his Locals, ensuring that the winemoms won’t post tits? REEEEEE!!!! That really pissed off Nick!

With one little, innocuous act you shut down his degen Locals funhouse and he will NEVER forgive you.

 

[FedPostalService]

Nick’s “but my kids” were fine cope reminds me of a former work friend.

We went out on a Friday and and I got back early hours of Saturday but he kept on partying with booze and coke until his parents dropped his daughter off on Sunday.

His ex picked her up in the evening, saw he was off his cake and naturally fireworks.

He was trying to explain this to me on Monday like it was his ex who was the problem. His brain couldn’t compute that being awake and high/drunk for 72 hours was not a thing you do when you need to care for a child.

It was the first time I’d witnessed addict behaviour in real life and thankfully I’ve not seen it many times since.

How Nick has been coping and seething reminds me of this guy so much. This poor guy had a really shitty life and his demons made him piss a lucrative profession away, so I’m not sure what Nick’s issue with as he had a pretty comfortable upbringing that he lies about.

The golden rule of irresponsible behaviour is never do it around kids. Once you forget that rule you’ve fucked up being a human being.

 

[Sharpeteer]

What’s really funny here though is Heimdal (sorta) doxxing his locals.

But screencapping his Locals, ensuring that the winemoms won’t post tits? REEEEEE!!!! That really pissed off Nick!

With one little, innocuous act you shut down his degen Locals funhouse and he will NEVER forgive you.

Normally one gets a computer virus when they look up porn in all the wrong places, but on this day, when he clicked on waifu.exe it took all his leathery wrinkly old porn away from him, instead of providing more than the user originally intended like usual.

Nick is a self-proclaimed porn addict, and addicts don't do very well when you take their vice away from them.

I wish Nick was more specific when bitching to Josh about the Farms "breaking the rules."

"IT TOOK ALL MY OLD LADY PORN AWAY! Now all I have is my boring destroyed wife!"

 

[feral cat #6385]

Nick's going to pay and pay. I want worse than that. I want him driving around in a shitbox car working at Clown Dog and living in a dank basement apartment full of slugs and water beetles and paying 90% of his income, sucking off hobos for crack rocks and not even able to afford his daily single Dorito.

With three roommates.

It was Reflector/Refraktor. It was a combinate of 3 smaller transformers that formed a functional camera:

View attachment 6090562

I thought it was soundwave. Not the best G1 figure but that was a rare one only available through mail order. Like most G1 figures it's not even close to cartoon accurate. Maketoys, KFC Toys, and Fans Toys put out masterpiece versions several years back. Only the KFC Toys one is currently available for sale. I have the Maketoys one.

The G1 figure and the Masterpiece figure. The masterpiece figure is more cartoon accurate.

 

[troonshine]

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I thought it was soundwave. Not the best G1 figure but that was a rare one only available through mail order. Like most G1 figures it's not even close to cartoon accurate. Maketoys, KFC Toys, and Fans Toys put out masterpiece versions several years back. Only the KFC Toys one is currently available for sale. I have the Maketoys one.

I think I have it right, but I am not ready to hunt for the exact clip. Nick talked about it at least 10 times in the 2019-2021 timeframe. It should be relatively easy to find via CTRL-F on transcripts because it was pre-Rumble days.

ETA: Clip

 

[Captain Manning]

You can combine that with little hints he strains to pull back from when he describes what losers his fans are. If you have ever been to a meetup with Nick, especially in the later years, you know that most of his fans were pretty pathetic. He was probably angry his fans weren't cooler.

What's more disturbing is the people he does consider cool. People like Mint and Riley. He's said they are a lovely "fun" couple, and he envies their lifestyle.

Think about that for a moment.

Yeah, sorry I wasn't really asking for that as much as what it was about him or his behaviour that led to your seeing him differently. I'm not familiar with the Ralph/Faith revenge porn story. What happened with that?

My issue was his defense of Ralph. Said defense even went as far as entering into an attorney-client relationship with Ralph (that might be something @Himedall All-seeing Waifu has to put in the OP if it's not there). It also included things like willfully ignoring Ralph trying to fuck with Null's merchandise income sources in retaliation for the Farms laughing at his gross sex tape (obligatory: ).

Anyways, like I say, old news. Can't hold a candle to anything going on now. I think it's scarcely worth mentioning anymore. I just noticed his defense of Ralph was inconsistent with the values he previously professed.

Now, if you are asking for a recap of the revenge porn saga in general, somebody like @AltisticRight, @Haru Okumura, or @Makoto Niijima are better people to ask. Also, in a Ralph thread probably. I know the tale in broad strokes, but I was never a close Ralph follower so I'd probably fuck up certain details.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Yeah, sorry I wasn't really asking for that as much as what it was about him or his behaviour that led to your seeing him differently. I'm not familiar with the Ralph/Faith revenge porn story. What happened with that?

My best summary from memory is that a horrific video of the Gunt and FAITH was 'leaked' online and mocked roundly--especially here. As you can imagine, hre family (especially Daddy Vickers) were not very happy about it, and some evidence pointed toward Ralph as the leaker (because it was not FAITH). A VA criminal case was started under a law prohibiting the non-consensual disclosure of intimate imagery or video (colloquially known as 'revenge porn') and Ralph was looking down a conviction.

Nick covered the case and ran some middling amount of cover for Ralph by posing the question of what 'non-consensual' (or some other such wording) meant in the strict legal sense. At the time, however, he did not disclose that he had talked to Ralph about his case in some capacity. DM's revealed later by Ralph during the Nose v Gunt feud had Nick saying that he considered their DMs as privilleged and Ralph as his client.

There is more, but this is a brief sketch.

In hindsight, it seems now similar to his defence of Riley and that other guy allegedly urinating on Isom July's grave in order to make Eric July angry. Double-faced, duplicitous, and weasel wordy.

ETA: I can't be arsed to remember which BPD whore Ralph is with... Names corrected.

 

[Laura Loomer]

My best summary from memory is that a horrific video of the Gunt and Pantsu was 'leaked' online and mocked roundly

I think you meant Faith, not Pantsu.

 

[TheRaptorJesus]

However, whether Kayla is able to take advantage of this, is also up in the air.

Doesn't really matter if the mom is a pile of shit and the father wants the kids and has money and means to take of them. The mom will still get them 9/10 times.

 

[Captain Manning]

In hindsight, it seems now similar to his defence of Riley and that other guy allegedly urinating on Isom July's grave in order to make Eric July angry. Double-faced, duplicitous, and weasel wordy.

I would imagine if Nick didn't encounter a certain gigantic stumbling block in his life recently, he would have done one or more streams passionately defending Riley by now. Except they'd be exceptionally incoherent compared to when he defended Ralph.

The close timing of the two arrests is bad for Daddy Dax propaganda.

 

[Chibitzen]

It has been suggested to me by a number of people (some in site administration) to not do a long autistic bullet-pointed power-leveling post confirming or denying specific points of his drunken drugged-up "Dear John" rant. I think it's sage advice. What I will simply say is that it is fact mixed with fiction and leave it at that.

I, along with others, think the primary reason he did it is he was mad at the Farms in general, and I got singled out specifically that night because, unlike most people here who are anonymous to him, he knew who I was and certain things about me, and therefore he saw me as the most vulnerable link in the chain.

I agree with your first point. It was better you didn't take the bait and allow the event to become about anyone but the primary subject.

But I disagree a bit with the reasoning. It's not that it was about "the Farms"... it was about one person and one person only: Nick

He can't do anything about what detractors say about him, he knows this, so all he can do is react to the misery he's perpetuating for himself. He's not going to change minds and hearts, so he'll shift the blame to someone else. Just don't respond to any of it and before long, they'll find someone or something else to complain about. It's 100% pathological.

 

[AnOminous]

you're like every cancel mob feminine aggressor that wishes middle aged men suicide

Go felch the pig cum out of Nick's asshole elsewhere.

 

[Chazzed Up]

It has been suggested to me by a number of people (some in site administration) to not do a long autistic bullet-pointed power-leveling post confirming or denying specific points of his drunken drugged-up "Dear John" rant. I think it's sage advice. What I will simply say is that it is fact mixed with fiction and leave it at that.

I have a lot of respect for that decision, for a number of reasons, but I especially respect not using it as an opportunity to get attention and revenge. I'm sure it would be tempting to correct the record on the things he said, but ultimately I think nobody needs to know exactly what details are true. The fact that Nick made such a malicious rant toward someone that he himself described as troubled/down on their luck, says all that really matters.

 

[AnOminous]

You can combine that with little hints he strains to pull back from when he describes what losers his fans are. If you have ever been to a meetup with Nick, especially in the later years, you know that most of his fans were pretty pathetic. He was probably angry his fans weren't cooler.

They were never going to be "cool" as such. Internet nerds with a parasocial relationship with him who on top of that were predominantly obsessed with anime are just not going to be the "cool kids." However, his original audience could raise nearly $300,000 on a dime just for Vic and make Nick himself six figures for just shooting the shit.

It's not like they were the broke basement-dwelling incels LawlTwitter would have had you believe.

He pissed in the face of that audience and now wonders why the only people willing to be his unironic fans are losers who will put up with some smug shithead pissing all over them.

"Bitch set me up... I shouldn't have come here... goddamned bitch." - Marion Berry, during his own cocaine arrest back in the 80s.

If you've seen one criminal asshole crackhead, you've seen them all. Pure wigger mentality.

Nick covered the case and ran some middling amount of cover for Ralph by posing the question of what 'non-consensual' (or some other such wording) meant in the strict legal sense.

He ran some pretty deceptive defense when he was gunt-guarding, pretending that consent to the recording and consent to release it to the public weren't two entirely separate things. In fact, there are two paragraphs of the statute addressing the two kinds of consent, with violating either of them counting as a separate offense.

You could be convicted separately of either or both.

 

[A Cardboard Box]

you wish 5 children's father misery

Correct. Just because you're a parent doesn't mean you deserve a relationship with your kids. Just because you're a child doesn't mean you need to feel bad or let yourself be affected by your parent being a miserable sack of shit. In fact, it might amuse his kids and bring them comfort to see their piece of shit father languish away in squalor.

you're like every cancel mob feminine aggressor that wishes middle aged men suicide

Now that's a retarded fucking take. Tranny cancel mobs want people to suffer for having wrong opinions and using the wrong words. This nigger deserves to suffer for abusing his children and destroying their innocence and depriving them of a childhood.