Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Us nuclear silos are designed to be second strke weapons meaning they can still launch after taking a direct hit. Us nuclear subs could continue retaliatory strikes for years to come.Launch just one nuke and the world's entire nuclear arsenal will drop on the US.
just out of curiosity, can you think of any possible concerns someone would raise about you claims? Something involving a 50 year old technology that needs regular maintenance at a level that the US military doesn't indicate it reaches anymore?We would survive. You aren't accouning for THADD, AGEIS, even Patriot. There are layers. And the Chinese would pray we would be merciful. It's called a counterforce attack. Absorb the first wave and launch your own. We have 400 silos. 400 targets. China would be foolish to launch a strike.
Most of our counterforce would be the Ohio SLBMs, and just one of them would devastate China. We have 6 of them at least that would be available at any time.We would survive. You aren't accouning for THADD, AGEIS, even Patriot. There are layers. And the Chinese would pray we would be merciful. It's called a counterforce attack. Absorb the first wave and launch your own. We have 400 silos. 400 targets. China would be foolish to launch a strike.
I'd argue having a feminist sjw incharge is also pretty bad just ask Canada. At least America hasn't made that mistake yet.If the nukes landed in LA, Detroit, NYC, and DC it would legitimately help the US. It has already been proven by the delta between Hiroshima and Detroit that getting nuked is less detrimental than niggers being in charge.
not really, a nuclear bomb is different from a cherenobyl disaster. The blast zone is just due to an air blast, and the radiation fallout fades to background level within weeks. It is a severe disaster, but nothing a nation with a large landmass, bunkers, and a continuance of government plan can't handle. To fully level Moscow would need 50 minutemen alone, and the US doesn't have enough nukes to level even three of China's largest cities, and the fourth and fifth ones can easily assume control of the country if it didMost of our counterforce would be the Ohio SLBMs, and just one of them would devastate China. We have 6 of them at least that would be available at any time.
However, say what you want, we're in a state of mutually assured destruction with China, same as Russia.
We have more warheads period. The math is simple. Either China eats limited targeted strikes from bombers on tactical targets or it eats the whole enchilada from the entire triad. China cannot tank the entire US triad, however the US just might. One choice it can limp away from. One means certain death. That is China's dilemma.Most of our counterforce would be the Ohio SLBMs, and just one of them would devastate China. We have 6 of them at least that would be available at any time.
However, say what you want, we're in a state of mutually assured destruction with China, same as Russia.
I'm sorry, but what? The only way it would need that many nukes to destroy Moscow is if their ABM somehow worked against most of them, and I highly doubt that.not really, a nuclear bomb is different from a cherenobyl disaster. The blast zone is just due to an air blast, and the radiation fallout fades to background level within weeks. It is a severe disaster, but nothing a nation with a large landmass, bunkers, and a continuance of government plan can't handle. To fully level Moscow would need 50 minutemen alone, and the US doesn't have enough nukes to level even three of China's largest cities, and the fourth and fifth ones can easily assume control of the country if it did
Yes we have more warheads, but this is akin to saying I can pump 30 rounds of 5.56 into your head so I win cause you can only do 2.We have more warheads period. The math is simple. Either China eats limited targeted strikes from bombers on tactical targets or it eats the whole enchilada from the entire triad. China cannot tank the entire US triad, however the US just might. One choice it can limp away from. One means certain death. That is China's dilemma.
Don't forget the retard arguing for nuclear war. A cherry for your shit sundae, sir.I was so excited when I opened the thread. Over ten new pages! What has Trump or Biden done now?
Instead it's just draft talk. ten goddamn pages of talk about a draft that doesn't exist. You got me you bastards.
I'm making fun of your hysteria at the THOUGHT of serving your HOME.
It's simple really. America is home. You have obligations if you live here. Getting drafted is not a choice. Serve your country willingly or unwillingly, but serve it nonetheless. And stop the larping. You'll go to the drafting station willingly because you don't want to get shot. Simple as.
Leave your NEET cave tomorrow and enlist, put your money where your mouth is Mormon.I'm making fun of your hysteria at the THOUGHT of serving your HOME.
No Abraham's since sipshit commandant (or previous one) got rid of tanks last year.Yeah, there's 7 of them. That's a grand total of 14 LCACs and 21 LCUs they can carry to theater. It ain't exactly the Normandy invasion.
Assuming the landing craft even survive to reach shore, at best you'd get a few dozen Abrams and maybe a few thousand men on the beach, against 50K+ dug-in Chinese troops, artillery, tanks, and anti-ship missiles, who have near limitless reinforcements heading their way.
Im guessing your circumcised and have a Rabbi. Would I be wrong?I'm making fun of your hysteria at the THOUGHT of serving your HOME.
It's simple really. America is home. You have obligations if you live here. Getting drafted is not a choice. Serve your country willingly or unwillingly, but serve it nonetheless. And stop the larping. You'll go to the drafting station willingly because you don't want to get shot. Simple as.
If you're eligible, a recruiter can have you on a bus by the end of the week.is enlisting in the US army as slow as it is in the Canadian army? here you can expect to wait maybe nine months to get an offer after applying, maybe only 5 months if you applied to a program with a fast track
No fuck that magic underwear wearing faggot. Member since 2022 with 15k posts and it's all inane jabbering. He's a dumb bitch and deserves bullying.also dont pick on the Mormon
Rep. Robert Garcia: 'The Army that defeated Hitler and saved the world included drag queens'
There are more important things for Congress to do than try to restrict drag, according to Representative Robert Garcia.
The California Democrat passionately defended the art form during a debate in the House of Representatives over the National Defense Authorization Act. Republicans sneaked a number of culture war issues into the annual defense funding legislation, including amendments preventing funds from covering service members' abortion travel costs and gender-affirming care, as well as preventing funds from being used to host drag shows on military bases.
Garcia zeroed in on the drag ban when it was his turn to speak, expertly dismantling the measure by citing the military's storied history of hiring female impersonators for entertainment.
“We can document and celebrate Drag shows on military bases since the late 1800s and through both world wars. The USO and the Red Cross supported drag during World War II," Garcia said. "That’s right: The Army that defeated Hitler and saved the world included drag queens.”
He continued, “Ronald Reagan starred in a movie called This Is the Army! — a movie about World War II that featured four drag performances. And he’s not the only Republican president who knew that drag can be fun and sometimes silly."
The House of Representatives, narrowly controlled by Republicans, approved the defense bill Friday with the attached amendments. The measures are not expected to pass the Democrat-controlled Senate.
Garcia added that in the face of "threats to the health and well-being of our service members and their families" such as "poisoned water, toxic mold in military housing, PTSD, and suicide," he was "stunned to see that the Republican idea to protect our troops is to ban drag shows."
"My Republican colleagues want us to believe that ‘these gays are trying to murder us,’" he said, referencing Jennifer Coolidge's iconic scene in White Lotus season two. "They want us to believe that drag is harmful, or immoral and wrong. This is ridiculous."
Garcia then called out the hypocrisy of the GOP for referring to drag as "obscenity" and banning it when they did not have condemnation for Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene after she showed nude images of President Joe Biden's son Hunter during a hearing.
“Mr. Speaker, drag is art. Drag is culture. Drag is creativity. Drag is comedy. And no, drag is not a crime. It’s not pornography," Garcia said. "The real obscenity is when one of our colleagues, the gentlewoman from Georgia, shows literal posters of revenge porn in our Oversight Committee! If we want to end porn in government facilities, let’s ban that.”