US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Launch just one nuke and the world's entire nuclear arsenal will drop on the US.
Us nuclear silos are designed to be second strke weapons meaning they can still launch after taking a direct hit. Us nuclear subs could continue retaliatory strikes for years to come.
 
We would survive. You aren't accouning for THADD, AGEIS, even Patriot. There are layers. And the Chinese would pray we would be merciful. It's called a counterforce attack. Absorb the first wave and launch your own. We have 400 silos. 400 targets. China would be foolish to launch a strike.
just out of curiosity, can you think of any possible concerns someone would raise about you claims? Something involving a 50 year old technology that needs regular maintenance at a level that the US military doesn't indicate it reaches anymore?

realistically, those missiles are extremely old and the US has shown no indication that it won't just dump the demoralized or DEI hiring targets on the job of managing them. Likely only a small fraction of them will fire, and many will fail to launch or even explode over American soil
 
We would survive. You aren't accouning for THADD, AGEIS, even Patriot. There are layers. And the Chinese would pray we would be merciful. It's called a counterforce attack. Absorb the first wave and launch your own. We have 400 silos. 400 targets. China would be foolish to launch a strike.
Most of our counterforce would be the Ohio SLBMs, and just one of them would devastate China. We have 6 of them at least that would be available at any time.

However, say what you want, we're in a state of mutually assured destruction with China, same as Russia.
 
If the nukes landed in LA, Detroit, NYC, and DC it would legitimately help the US. It has already been proven by the delta between Hiroshima and Detroit that getting nuked is less detrimental than niggers being in charge.
I'd argue having a feminist sjw incharge is also pretty bad just ask Canada. At least America hasn't made that mistake yet.
 
Most of our counterforce would be the Ohio SLBMs, and just one of them would devastate China. We have 6 of them at least that would be available at any time.

However, say what you want, we're in a state of mutually assured destruction with China, same as Russia.
not really, a nuclear bomb is different from a cherenobyl disaster. The blast zone is just due to an air blast, and the radiation fallout fades to background level within weeks. It is a severe disaster, but nothing a nation with a large landmass, bunkers, and a continuance of government plan can't handle. To fully level Moscow would need 50 minutemen alone, and the US doesn't have enough nukes to level even three of China's largest cities, and the fourth and fifth ones can easily assume control of the country if it did
1718513478379.png


Most importantly, Americans would celebrate it's capitol and largest cities being nuked, and take the opportunity to forcefully dismantle the remaining national government. Russians and Chinese would instead band together and step up for their government, and lay their lives down for coordinated retaliation
 
Most of our counterforce would be the Ohio SLBMs, and just one of them would devastate China. We have 6 of them at least that would be available at any time.

However, say what you want, we're in a state of mutually assured destruction with China, same as Russia.
We have more warheads period. The math is simple. Either China eats limited targeted strikes from bombers on tactical targets or it eats the whole enchilada from the entire triad. China cannot tank the entire US triad, however the US just might. One choice it can limp away from. One means certain death. That is China's dilemma.
 
not really, a nuclear bomb is different from a cherenobyl disaster. The blast zone is just due to an air blast, and the radiation fallout fades to background level within weeks. It is a severe disaster, but nothing a nation with a large landmass, bunkers, and a continuance of government plan can't handle. To fully level Moscow would need 50 minutemen alone, and the US doesn't have enough nukes to level even three of China's largest cities, and the fourth and fifth ones can easily assume control of the country if it did
I'm sorry, but what? The only way it would need that many nukes to destroy Moscow is if their ABM somehow worked against most of them, and I highly doubt that.

A Trident D-5 can carry 12 160kt warheads, but is usually downloaded to a mix of 6 W76's 160kt and W88s which are 300-450kt. MIRV's are designed to land in a hexagon type pattern to each 5PSI blast area overlaps, which would kill somewhere over 75%+ just from heat and blast within 15 miles of the center of the collective warhead hits. Watch the movie Threads. I think it's fairly accurate and even the bunkers would be probably all be dead within a few weeks.

Saying we can't destroy more than a few cities in the world with just 10% of our nuclear stockpile is frankly, retarded.

We have more warheads period. The math is simple. Either China eats limited targeted strikes from bombers on tactical targets or it eats the whole enchilada from the entire triad. China cannot tank the entire US triad, however the US just might. One choice it can limp away from. One means certain death. That is China's dilemma.
Yes we have more warheads, but this is akin to saying I can pump 30 rounds of 5.56 into your head so I win cause you can only do 2.

To think of this another way, China could at known forces put 4 large warheads each into all the top 50 cities of the USA. That's how they used to call it 'make the rubble bounce' level of destruction.

ETA: Apparently they're upgrading to the Sentinel ICBM from the Minuteman 3 and will insanely still only use 1 warhead when both are capable of 3. I think we need a full triad, but it sucks we got rid of the 10 MIRV capable Peacekeepers which were even more accurate than the D-5's. The D-5's are believed to be plenty accurate for a first strike on their own though. The next change for US SSBN's will be to replace the 24 missile Ohio's with 16 (fixed) missile Columbia's, but with only slightly upgraded D-5's.

Another thing people don't consider is EMP. No non-space based interceptor can stop them. When the power goes out for good, that alone will probably kill 1/2 the population in a few months.
 
Last edited:
I was so excited when I opened the thread. Over ten new pages! What has Trump or Biden done now?

Instead it's just draft talk. ten goddamn pages of talk about a draft that doesn't exist. You got me you bastards.
Don't forget the retard arguing for nuclear war. A cherry for your shit sundae, sir.
 
I'm making fun of your hysteria at the THOUGHT of serving your HOME.


It's simple really. America is home. You have obligations if you live here. Getting drafted is not a choice. Serve your country willingly or unwillingly, but serve it nonetheless. And stop the larping. You'll go to the drafting station willingly because you don't want to get shot. Simple as.

I'll keep that in mind

If they ever make me go back I'm going to kill as many of them as I can
 
I'm making fun of your hysteria at the THOUGHT of serving your HOME.
Leave your NEET cave tomorrow and enlist, put your money where your mouth is Mormon.

I already spent a decade serving my country in the infantry you faggot. That America doesn't exist anymore so you can go fight for cheap graphics cards in my place.
 
Yeah, there's 7 of them. That's a grand total of 14 LCACs and 21 LCUs they can carry to theater. It ain't exactly the Normandy invasion.

Assuming the landing craft even survive to reach shore, at best you'd get a few dozen Abrams and maybe a few thousand men on the beach, against 50K+ dug-in Chinese troops, artillery, tanks, and anti-ship missiles, who have near limitless reinforcements heading their way.
No Abraham's since sipshit commandant (or previous one) got rid of tanks last year.
 
I wish you spergs would stop being retarded congress wants to moderize the admisnistration of the draft because recruitment levels are fucking in the gutter.

The US woud turn to mercenaries and PMC before commeting to political sucide

No one is getting drafted to go fight for the EU or the jews.

China has its own fucking problems when they can beat up india, and africas i ll be impressed.

Russia has spent almot 2 and half years trying to de nazify the ukraine or what ever the fuck its doing there.

also dont pick on the Mormon
 
I'm making fun of your hysteria at the THOUGHT of serving your HOME.


It's simple really. America is home. You have obligations if you live here. Getting drafted is not a choice. Serve your country willingly or unwillingly, but serve it nonetheless. And stop the larping. You'll go to the drafting station willingly because you don't want to get shot. Simple as.
Im guessing your circumcised and have a Rabbi. Would I be wrong?

Also what branch of the military are you signing up for?
 
is enlisting in the US army as slow as it is in the Canadian army? here you can expect to wait maybe nine months to get an offer after applying, maybe only 5 months if you applied to a program with a fast track
 
is enlisting in the US army as slow as it is in the Canadian army? here you can expect to wait maybe nine months to get an offer after applying, maybe only 5 months if you applied to a program with a fast track
If you're eligible, a recruiter can have you on a bus by the end of the week.
 
Bold strategy from a Democrat politician but not a surprising one.

Rep. Robert Garcia: 'The Army that defeated Hitler and saved the world included drag queens'​

There are more important things for Congress to do than try to restrict drag, according to Representative Robert Garcia.

The California Democrat passionately defended the art form during a debate in the House of Representatives over the National Defense Authorization Act. Republicans sneaked a number of culture war issues into the annual defense funding legislation, including amendments preventing funds from covering service members' abortion travel costs and gender-affirming care, as well as preventing funds from being used to host drag shows on military bases.

Garcia zeroed in on the drag ban when it was his turn to speak, expertly dismantling the measure by citing the military's storied history of hiring female impersonators for entertainment.

“We can document and celebrate Drag shows on military bases since the late 1800s and through both world wars. The USO and the Red Cross supported drag during World War II," Garcia said. "That’s right: The Army that defeated Hitler and saved the world included drag queens.”

He continued, “Ronald Reagan starred in a movie called This Is the Army! — a movie about World War II that featured four drag performances. And he’s not the only Republican president who knew that drag can be fun and sometimes silly."

The House of Representatives, narrowly controlled by Republicans, approved the defense bill Friday with the attached amendments. The measures are not expected to pass the Democrat-controlled Senate.

Garcia added that in the face of "threats to the health and well-being of our service members and their families" such as "poisoned water, toxic mold in military housing, PTSD, and suicide," he was "stunned to see that the Republican idea to protect our troops is to ban drag shows."

"My Republican colleagues want us to believe that ‘these gays are trying to murder us,’" he said, referencing Jennifer Coolidge's iconic scene in White Lotus season two. "They want us to believe that drag is harmful, or immoral and wrong. This is ridiculous."

Garcia then called out the hypocrisy of the GOP for referring to drag as "obscenity" and banning it when they did not have condemnation for Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene after she showed nude images of President Joe Biden's son Hunter during a hearing.

“Mr. Speaker, drag is art. Drag is culture. Drag is creativity. Drag is comedy. And no, drag is not a crime. It’s not pornography," Garcia said. "The real obscenity is when one of our colleagues, the gentlewoman from Georgia, shows literal posters of revenge porn in our Oversight Committee! If we want to end porn in government facilities, let’s ban that.”

Article Link

Here is a video of Garcia:

Here is the film he is referencing:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back