171,300 patients traveled out of state for abortions in 2023 - Of course those who can’t pay should just use a wire hanger am I right bros?


More than 170,000 people have traveled out of state to receive abortion care since January of last year, according to new data from the Guttmacher Institute, a figure underlined by the increasing difficulty to access care in some states.

Out-of-state care accounted for more than 15 percent of the estimated 1 million clinician-provided abortion procedures between 2023 and March of this year, according to the data. That figure has more than doubled since 2020.

“Traveling for abortion care requires individuals to overcome huge financial and logistical barriers, and our findings show just how far people will travel to obtain the care they want and deserve,” Guttmacher data scientist Isaac Maddow-Zimet said in a statement.

“Despite the amazing resiliency of abortion patients and providers, we can’t lose sight of the fact that this is neither normal nor acceptable,” he continued. “A person should not have to travel hundreds or thousands of miles to receive basic health care.”

Fourteen states have near-complete bans on abortion, a rapid change sparked by the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision in 2022, which overturned a prior federal standard mandating access to abortion procedures.

States that border those with recent near-total bans, such as Kansas and New Mexico, saw a majority of abortions in their state be from out-of-state patients. Texas’s abortion ban is one of the most restrictive in the country.

Florida has also served as a state with relatively easy access to abortion care when compared to its neighbors until earlier this year. The state implemented a strict six-week abortion ban in May.

“The state of residence data makes it clear that this policy change will be devastating not only for Floridians, but also for the thousands of others who would have traveled there after being denied care in their home states,” Guttmacher Vice President Kelly Baden said of Florida’s ban. “Once again, we see that a state’s abortion policies affect thousands of people beyond that state’s borders.”
The new bans could also have political ramifications. Florida is among the states with an abortion rights measure on the ballot this November, and Democrats have hoped to use the referendums to increase turnout.

Two-thirds of the approximately 1 million abortions were via medication, the institute also found. That method was under threat via a federal lawsuit until last week, when the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government does have the authority to limit restrictions on certain abortion medication.
 
Cause you say so?
lol. Nah.
I think you hate women and just want them to suffer due to your ressentiment and self-hatred. The solution is to lighten up and embrace a more life affirming philosophy. You'll be happier.
You both support the systematic murder of unborn children, you hardly have the moral high horse here
 
Why are abortions such a contentious topic in the US? I don't understand. It would be better to keep a life from suffering . As we see, we can stop them from getting one in their state but they will go to another to get it done . so what is the point of a ban? Also people can always go overseas to get one. (Or take home remedy to terminate the pregnancy) The ban just makes it more inconvenient and it won't stop it altogether. We have the ability to terminate it and I think we should make it accessible to everyone.

I personally knew a woman in the west who was trapped by a baby with her ex boyfriend and it ruined her life. I wish she aborted it so she could have a normal life. Kids are hard to raise and if you have kids at the wrong time, you are hurting another life. It is better to not bring it into the world in the first place. Call me a baby killer, I don't care. But we are people, not pregnant dogs in a puppymill.
Because killing children is wrong. I will say I have much more respect for foids who are just open about their desire to be legally permitted to kill children rather than the ones that disingenuously use the 1% scenario of rape/severe birth defect to justify the 99% where it's entirely elective.
 
You both support the systematic murder of unborn children, you hardly have the moral high horse here
Who said anything about morals? I never did. You definitely did say you hate women though. Maybe you don't think I'm moral, but you also didn't deny my assertion. You are resentful towards the world, aren't you?

How many porn reddit subs and only fans accounts are you subbed to?
With my gambling profits I can afford the executive plan. It's kind of like on Audible where you get access to millions of trash novels nobody reads. So I'm not subscribed to individual accounts.
 
Literally what abortion does, friend,
You already had the child, abortion is just murdering it.
You value those 10 minutes of having something inside your empty hole more than a human life, you are evil.
Who said anything about morals? I never did. You definitely did say you hate women though. Maybe you don't think I'm moral, but you also didn't deny my assertion. You are resentful towards the world, aren't you?
Again, you argue for the murder of unborn children so dont act all high and mighty about "life affirming philosophy" and "ressentiments".
 
@Android raptor
Raptor.png
This is what you look like. #doxed #pwned
 
Again, you argue for the murder of unborn children so dont act all high and mighty about "life affirming philosophy" and "ressentiments".
The only moral grandstanding in this thread are the dysgenics enthusiasts. And AR I guess but she's a low status woman so it's not like you can really have a rational argument with her.
 
Do you ever see fat ugly bitches get raped? No? Maybe don't dress and act like a fuck-slut and you won't get raped.
Or don't welcome in hordes of infinityniggers.

Actually, that would be an interesting study. How many women who are raped are considered objectively attractive, compared to morbidly obese fuglies. Of course, you'd never be allowed to publish the study because it doesn't conform to the appropriate narrative.

That's one thing that drives me nuts in current era science. Science should be objective, if you do a study that is well designed, collect data according to acceptable protocol, and provide a reasonable analysis, you should be able to get it published just about anywhere. There should be no "narrative" that your work must support.
 
It's okay to not have sex, even for a prolonged period of time. You, as a woman, won't die if there isn't a bare dick in you every week, or month, or year. Sex isn't the only fun activity in the world. Sex can have consequences, including pregnancy, so maybe choose who you fuck a little more wisely.
There is another solution: stop being sex addicted whores. Goes for men too.
Close your fucking legs.
I'm just gonna pitch in for this position as well. Not having sex is not the end of the world. If you feel the need to go out and hook up with randoms at bars or on Tinder or something, you are a sex addict. Get help. A very good portion of not only elective abortions, but STD spread and general relationship fuckery can be easily prevented by just NOT HAVING CASUAL SEX. It really is that fucking easy. If you need to get off that badly, buy a goddamned toy, open the literally free porn, and do it yourself if you don't have a stable partner whom you can risk (yes risk, because there is always some pregnancy chance) having sex with.

The funny thing is, my incredibly autistic positions on morality and laws actually say that abortion should be legal and available even though I also consider it horrifyingly unethical and immoral, but I'm sure that despite this I'll get some seething from the usual suspects for daring to speak in favor of not being a whore of either the male or female variety. Have some god damned restraint and use that free will you were born with for more than pleasure seeking you fucking animals.
 
You already had the child, abortion is just murdering it.
Except that it’s not.

You can‘t put the genie back in the bottle no matter how hard you try. There are pockets of society that will struggle with access, but most women who want to have an abortion now will get one. Kids are a life ruining burden when they are unwanted and this saves the pain of broken families and foster care.

It’s just asinine to me how you think multiple people, one who doesn’t even need to be here, should be punished for a lifetime for the crime of… having sex. This is serious fundamental backwater bullshit.

Unwanted kids and forced births don’t have happy endings. It’s not the demographics you want breeding anyway, if you also want to be blunt about it.
 
Except that it’s not.

You can‘t put the genie back in the bottle no matter how hard you try. There are pockets of society that will struggle with access, but most women who want to have an abortion now will get one. Kids are a life ruining burden when they are unwanted and this saves the pain of broken families and foster care.

It’s just asinine to me how you think multiple people, one who doesn’t even need to be here, should be punished for a lifetime for the crime of… having sex. This is serious fundamental backwater bullshit.

Unwanted kids and forced births don’t have happy endings. It’s not the demographics you want breeding anyway, if you also want to be blunt about it.
Where do babies come from? What makes babies?
 
most women who want to have an abortion now will get one
Yeah and most crack addicts will get their crack when they want it, should we legalize that too? I mean, people are breaking the law, so obviously it shouldnt exist. What an amazing juristic insight you just offered!
Kids are a life ruining burden when they are unwanted and this saves the pain of broken families and foster care.
Most parents who had their child accidentally will still tell you its the best thing that happened to them.
punished for a lifetime for the crime of… having sex
A child is not a punishment.
Unwanted kids and forced births don’t have happy endings.
Cause you say so?
lol. Nah.

Everyone is arguing about murdering babies and nobody is saying at which point a fertilized egg becomes one
Day 1
 
When this topic comes up I always wonder how many of the "abortion is murder" crowd would legitimately encourage THEIR girlfriends/wives to carry a rapebaby to term, because I know that number isn't anywhere close to 100%.
When this topic comes up I always wonder why people who want to be allowed to kill children insist on hyperfocusing on 1, maybe 2% of cases rather than just admit they want women to be allowed to kill children just because they feel like it.

Don't be a pussy, just say it. There's nothing wrong with it, right? So be open about what you really want.
 
Back