Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Cocaine itself is one of the metabolites that is looked for, but there are others, like benzoylecgonine, which is also abundant in hair follicles.

The amount and ratio of these two indicates active cocaine use, if they did not detect any benzoylecgonine, they know that the kid did not touch coke, and it was just in the sample, if they found it in a good ratio, they know it was actual use.

See the attached paper for more info (or look it up yourself, it's open access: doi/10.1002/dta.1903 )

EDIT: Conclusion if you're lazy:
View attachment 6102538
The thing about that is, the 5-panel only detects the presence of cocaine AND/OR cocaine metabolites. It's a preliminary test, according to the patent you have to follow up with mass spectrometry to determine the relative quantities of each, meaning that from the information printed on the document, if I'm reading correctly, it could at this time be a false positive caused by external contact.
 
Im not familiar with CPS, but can nick and Kayla immediately have the grandparents or some relative adopt all the kids legally. if they intend to make sure the kids stay together, this could be a smart course of action,
I'm gonna go on a limb and guess that CPS talked to the children about what was going on, and if anyone tried to step in or ask them how they were doing. One could guess the grandparents knew about it, but decided to not do anything due to wanting to cover for the parents. There is also the chance (and I pray it is this) the grandparents didn't know about what was going on and/or were led astray by the parents as for the true state of the children.

I've seen my sister lie to my parents and gaslight her children into believing that things were allright, when they were not allright; for quite some time my parents let this slide as they wanted the children to stay with her, as to promote strong family ties. Granted my folks finally understood what was actually happening once one of her older children (after they became an adult) told the truth about what was happening, leading my parents to understanding the bigger picture at hand and what to do to try to help their grandchildren.

I can only hope and pray that racket's parents realize the true evilness the they have been engaging in; to bring about a secure and loving live for their grandchildren.
 
Oh shit can someone help me out here. There was a legal case some time ago that Nick covered. I forgot the names of the people involved. The case involved a custody battle between a separated husband and wife. In the case the husband was trying to get sole custody of the children. The mother was accused of doing all sorts of fucked up shit with their children including exposing their children, daughter specifically I believe, to drugs. It may have even been cocaine. I would like to review some of the streams where Nick talked about this case as I am willing to bet there are some fucking GEMS from Nick in those streams. It would not surprise me to hear Nick making some "up against the wall" type statements.

Does anyone remember this?
 
Sonichu curse is real, curse is real. Sent that shit to lucas, fast
1718782730774.png
 
Knowing this libertarian asshole it wouldn't surprise me if he claims that he was just trying to DIY treat his daughter's ADHD or something.

Dick will ACK ACK ACK and call you a big pharma bootlicker if you say it's a bad idea to self-medicate your kids with street drugs. Dick's cockholster - Karl from WATP - will likely just move his lips while Dick dubs his voice.
 
could you explain it for us stupid kiwis
Some chemical reactions will lead to multiple chemicals being created, cocaine itself needs to transform into another compound, Norcocaine, to work.

These reactions, given the same input, will generally give the same output, this paper shows that if you have (in this case) 10 units of cocaine in the hair, there is at least 1 unit of benzoylecgonine in the hair.

If that ratio is not present, or is too low, it is not reliably indicative of active cocaine use.

The thing about that is, the 5-panel only detects the presence of cocaine AND/OR cocaine metabolites. It's a preliminary test, according to the patent you have to follow up with mass spectrometry to determine the relative quantities of each, meaning that from the information printed on the document, if I'm reading correctly, it could at this time be a false positive caused by external contact.
According to this post, the lab they tasked with the analysis does use GC-MS
This one even has the exact machine they're using. It's EIS.

Edit: reading is hard and i'm bad at it.
 
Last edited:
Amusing but should not be trusted IMO.
If the guy did pilfer shit he shouldn't have, it probably wouldn't be in their best interest to lay out exactly how they got it.
Really hope this is just some troll op, because the alternative is Rackets was giving his kid blow... for whatever reason.
Now that it's looking likely it's true, I want to posit a question:

Who's a worse father:

Nick or Ralph
Hey at least Ralph never let his spawn get into his stash. :story:
View attachment 6102129
This bitch needs to get a pap smear with a boot.
Weld her box shut if she's sweep
Obviously bossman sent the coke to those kids. He wanted to lock in not being LotY.
BMJ must have been betting on rackets to win and wanted to make it a sure thing. RatmanJack arc confirmed?
If he is mixing coke into his booze it wouldn't be too far a fech if he seasoned his food with it. Could explain how the stuff got into the kids other than them snorting it themselves .
If you eat cocaine you generally throw up not long after. I doubt he was putting it on his food. The kid probably got into his stash, or being given the coke by Rackets and his woman for reasons I don't even want to think about.
 
One thing to understand about the follicle test is that it is a shit test, unless done correctly, as in they actually get the hair follicle, and test just the hair follicle, and none of the shaft of the hair. it is a really easy test to screw up and get a false positive or a false negative.

I politely disagree with this assessment, The test is more likely to return a negative result than a positive one.

In the Mexican rehab study the hair test only picked up 65.2% of the self-admitted cokeheads, 32 out of 46. That's where the test is flawed: it doesn't pick up on nearly enough drug abusers to be a fully useful tool.

So if a hypothetical kid allegedly tested positive at those levels indicated in the document of uncertain origin, it would absolutely be an indication of continuous cocaine abuse.
 
Oh shit can someone help me out here. There was a legal case some time ago that Nick covered. I forgot the names of the people involved. The case involved a custody battle between a separated husband and wife. In the case the husband was trying to get sole custody of the children. The mother was accused of doing all sorts of fucked up shit with their children including exposing their children, daughter specifically I believe, to drugs. It may have even been cocaine. I would like to review some of the streams where Nick talked about this case as I am willing to bet there are some fucking GEMS from Nick in those streams. It would not surprise me to hear Nick making some "up against the wall" type statements.

Does anyone remember this?
Is it Michael Long / Sophie Long case from 2021?
 
The 9 year old is the one that crawls in bed with nick and kayla right.... im guessing theres probubly alot of drugs and who knows what other substances... and liquids are in and on that bed edit sorry if my post double posted
No, I'm calling it. Nick rapes his nine year old daughter. I have no proof, it's purely conjecture, but I'm convinced. I'll take my trash cans and hats or whatever the fuck, but he's giving cocaine to his nine year old daughter, his "favorite child" in his own words, that suffers from "night terrors" and "climbs in bed with them" frequently. After he gives her cocaine he molests her.

Shoot him and dump him in an unmarked grave. I'm done with him.
 
It taints any potential jury pool, making a fair jury trail impossible. SCOTUS has been extremely clear that all defendants have a constitutional right to see all evidence against them and prepare a defense BEFORE IT IS PRESENTED IN COURT.

He was at the hearing where the drug findings regarding the children were presented. He currently faces no charges that stem from that test. He received the results the same time as the state and long before any trial. No evidence has been presented against Nick in court. His probable cause hearing, where the prosecution presents the evidence they plan to use against him in criminal court, is in August. There is a timeline by rule where the prosecution will provide all their evidence before that hearing.

The leak of the document doesn't taint the jury pool any more than the search warrant or body cam. The record is considered private to protect the children, not Nick. If the state does charge him with an additional crime and used the drug test as evidence, it would redact the names of the kids and released publicly. Nick received that evidence 3 weeks ago. He has no "due process" arguments for that leak.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back