- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Nobody should care about "helping" this "man" at this point. It's just wall time.the only way to help this man is to put him behind bars. and even thats optimistic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nobody should care about "helping" this "man" at this point. It's just wall time.the only way to help this man is to put him behind bars. and even thats optimistic.
He did a single video entertaining Barnes legal conspiracy theory and then immediately dropped Nick as a retarded addict who should shut up and get a plea deal.Don't think it's fair to keep legal mindset on the balldo washer list because he's been going in on nick after the details emerged
Nick liked his double-standards even before his crash.Weird how Nick will treat anyone coming to his house as a Stalker but if Riley did it to someone else its no big deal.....
Godwinson - I would have done the same
For whatever it's worth, I think these two in the list are just trolling.Dan Mullen - allegedly taking the same “kids can take care of themselves” stance. will need to verify
To be fair, Nick is an audibly quavering faggot.Weird how Nick will treat anyone coming to his house as a Stalker but if Riley did it to someone else its no big deal.....
This is actually a little odd. So what I quoted there is the statutory definition of physical abuse of a child by drugging. It's defined for the purposes of mandatory reporting but is referenced in other sections. But it's not a statute. You can't be charged under it and there is no associated penalty.Not wildly incorrect but a misstatement. Kayla has a charge of neglect by knowing permission of somebody else's child abuse, not of direct child abuse. Nick has a charge of child endangerment (by exposure to drugs) but not abuse. As it stands these charges are a bit wonky because if someone was alleged to have deliberately given a kid drugs, this would be charged under a separate statute260E.03.18(c)(9)(i) Physical abuse of a child by administering of poison, alcohol, or dangerous, harmful, or controlled substances.This charge has not been levied against either of the Rekietas at this time.
Edit: Misquoted that, that's the definition of physical abuse of a child not the statute. Still, neither of them has a charge of physical abuse by drugging.
609.235 | USE OF DRUGS TO INJURE OR FACILITATE CRIME. Whoever administers to another or causes another to take any poisonous, stupefying, overpowering, narcotic or anesthetic substance with intent thereby to injure or to facilitate the commission of a crime may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than five years or to payment of a fine of not more than $10,000, or both. |
609.228 | GREAT BODILY HARM CAUSED BY DISTRIBUTION OF DRUGS. Whoever proximately causes great bodily harm by, directly or indirectly, unlawfully selling, giving away, bartering, delivering, exchanging, distributing, or administering a controlled substance classified in Schedule I or II may be sentenced to imprisonment for not more than ten years or to payment of a fine of not more than $20,000, or both. |
152.137 | METHAMPHETAMINE-RELATED CRIMES INVOLVING CHILDREN AND VULNERABLE ADULTS. Subd. 2.(b) No person may knowingly cause or permit a child or vulnerable adult to inhale, be exposed to, have contact with, or ingest methamphetamine, a chemical substance [defined as a chemical substance used in the production of methamphetamine], or methamphetamine paraphernalia. |