Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

[AnOminous]

Which is why I’ve also said his last ounce of sense must have been gone by that point. Because that seems to be when he started neglecting his kids.

I seriously doubt he started then. He already had to have a nanny despite having no job and no fixed schedule of any kind.

He didn't just go straight from Dad of the Year to Balldo Cocaine Pope.

 

[Sexual Chocolate]

Maybe the children forced Nick to give them cocaine, ever think of that?

No, you only think of yourselves.

 

[AltisticRight]

And guess what: The cutoffs for cocaine vs metabolites like Benzylecgonine (Which again: IS TYPICALLY WHAT IS TESTED FOR) are the same:

Cutoff being the same is irrelevant.

First of all, we have bonidea WHAT exactly the hair follicle were tested for.

Metabolites or cocaine.

Cocaine, it's right on their website AND in the report for fuck's sake.

none of them seemingly stepped in

Where were you? When Balldo was going on his degenerate shit, most of us tried to intervene, some even coped about tripods hooked to a remote trigger.

My wonder is how possible is it for them to mix Nick's hair follicles with the child's?

Nope. Balldo would get 5 digits easily.
His wife might have been a more relaxed user, so that could be the case. I'm not sure how the collection procedure is, but some anonymise the samples, ie only the police/agency would know through special barcodes.

The way everyone seemed to be talking it seemed to be dangerous. If it is the event Nick talked about that is.

You're just fucking retarded. You think it's either 0 or a full on drug overdose. >5000pg/mg is obviously astronomically high for a child (or anyone) but not high enough to kill. The kid, assuming tests were accurate, would suffer consequences when they grow up. Learn how to read.

I'm sorry.
Line their parents up against a fucking wall for enabling this.

 

[Boss Nigger]

So the current working theory now that I'm all caught up is that there was a single instance dubbed Nicks worst day, where the stalker child got into balldos stash and went Henry the hoover, and this incident stayed in the childs hair so long the test freaked out and called her a recreational addict. do we know if there are different tests for adults vs kids? because kids are small sure, but 10x test minimum? that feels like a lot, not that im a medical professional by any means.

Still though, nick should definitely off himself because when he goes to prison and get his papers checked, they're going to find out.

 

[Twinkletard]

How did kid end up with coke in his system anyways

terrible parenting!

 

[Tiger Jack]

I hope Nick Rekieta is never allowed to see his kids again.

 

[footballteam]

Anyone else find Imholte's reaction to all this kind of weird? He cut a whole Wrestlemania promo, sounding very fake imo.

Here is a complete timeline of what happened with contemporary speculation

Sunday January 28 2024:

Infamous hot tub swinger stream with the Rekietas and Imholtes. This was a STMS member's only show on the Sunday night.


Monday January 29:

Nick does not stream. He does not post any cancellation notice on Locals, as is his usual practice.

Perhaps why Aaron freaked out so bad about his kid being around the coke is because he witnessed Rekieta's kid OD on it. Him not reporting it then, could land him in trouble now. That would explain his weird behavior around the topic, and there is no way he can make himself look like the hero in that situation.

My assumption is that IF the Rekieta's did in fact have a child that OD'd in January - regardless if its related to the current issue listed in the report - that they did not take the kid to the hospital, as that would have triggered a call to CPS/Police.

There is not a "Narcan" shot for cocaine like there is for opioids. Most of the time, if the OD isnt to the point where your organs start shutting down, then the hospitals take a "wait and see" approach on cocaine overdoses. Sometimes this can take a day or two... with a child and being a first time exposure - I could see it taking 3 days of CONSTANT monitoring... checking heart rate, ox level, blood pressure, breathing rate, etc... you can technically do this at home with equipment you can get at any local Walgreens.

 

[The Holmes]

Let's be real guys. I know this is hate rekieta thread but he certainly didn't give the kid coke and let him snort it .
Did the kid find and try it? Did his mom kiss him with coke nose and mouth? How did kid end up with coke in his system anyways

Have you not been reading shit? From the first page or so of this thread, it's clear the kid tested way too high from just simply absorbing it from a kiss from mommy. The kid is also a she, not a he.

 

[BathTubShine]

My wonder is how possible is it for them to mix Nick's hair follicles with the child's?

0%
It's been pointed tens of times, that documents clearly state; All kids were tested. Nick and Kayla REFUSED to be tested (so the lab doesen't have their hair) and did not grant CPS access to all rooms in the house.
EDIT: Might be a retarded nigger faggot and a too fast reader, apologies.

 

[6MillionCoofs]

Cutoff being the same is irrelevant.



Cocaine, it's right on their website AND in the report for fuck's sake.

Where were you? When Balldo was going on his degenerate shit, most of us tried to intervene, some even coped about tripods hooked to a remote trigger.

As said, we were the only ones trying. But we are Nick’s friends or family. That’s my point we told anyone supposedly close to him and they seemingly did not listen.

You're just fucking retarded. You think it's either 0 or a full on drug overdose. >5000pg/mg is obviously astronomically high for a child (or anyone) but not high enough to kill.

Not saying it is high enough to kill. Just that most parents would likely panic enough and not know what to do and therefore would call the hospital.

I'm sorry.
Line their parents up against a fucking wall for enabling this.

Indeed.

 

[Mr. Brown]

I didn't follow the nick arrest stuff, I figured it was all over nothing. An adult doing coke, big fucking deal.

However I cannot believe this children shit is real, this man should be fired into the fucking sun. 10+ years of being Big Bubbas butt slut is exactly what he deserves.

If you as an adult decide to do drugs, cool. You do you. The moment it impacts anyone around you, especially your children then you are a heap of shit and I hope you fucking die.

 

[Sensitive Young Man]

So has it been confirmed that this is a real document? Not gonna bother reading through the whole thread.

 

[Deputy Riddle]

These might just be the most retarded names that I have ever seen barring only the ghettotards that I went to high school with.

Something about a kingdom hearts dude calling things ghetto is funny, be funnier if it was a dbz avatar/name

 

[he who has thus come/gone]

Yeah, if they were drugging her to molest her she'd pop for the ketamine. K holing somebody would actually be an effective date rape drug (for lack of a better term) as opposed to making them MORE alert and active.

Doesn't Kayla take some form of benzodiazepine as a prescription medication? That would be a far more logical option than giving a kid what your shady dealer sells to you as ketamine. Benzos also mess with your memory. And if you're a really sick scumbag, I bet you could convince a doctor to prescribe your kid a benzo for some made-up behavioral issue so the appearance of such drugs in their system can be explained away.

I don't know if the test is entirely accurate as it appears on the court documents—it really isn't strange for small town government to fuck up a test—but if it is accurate and it reflects actual drug usage then it's more likely that the kid was curious about her parents' conduct, rambunctious, unmonitored by guardians, bored without serious parental involvement in her daily life, living in an unregulated and dysfunctional household, and found access to drugs that had been recklessly left in the open.

I'm more curious about the amount and timing of cocaine use that would cause this type of positive test. Cocaine use can appear in your hair for about 3 months, but it depends on a lot of factors like the regularity of use and amount used. I wouldn't be surprised if the fact that it's an 8-9 year old (e.g. the kid has a lower weight) would play into the results of such a test. Is this the type of thing where a kid swallows a half gram of cocaine and it could appear like this for 3 months? I'm really not sure.

I truly hope it's a lab error because I already feel bad enough for the situation those kids are in.

 

[AltisticRight]

Hair testing isn't that reliable.

Results​

Overall concordance between hair testing and self-report was 57.5% (marijuana), 86.5% (cocaine), 85.8% (amphetamines), and 74.3% (opioids). Specificity of hair testing at standard laboratory cut-offs exceeded 90% for all drugs, but sensitivity of hair testing relative to self-report was low, identifying only 52.3% (127/243) of self-disclosed marijuana users, 65.2% (30/46) of cocaine users, 24.2% (8/33) of amphetamine users, and 2.9% (2/6 of opioid users. Among participants who disclosed using marijuana or cocaine in the past 3 months, participants with a negative hair test tended to report lower-frequency use of those drugs (p< .001 for marijuana and cocaine).

Hair Drug Testing Results and Self-reported Drug Use among Primary Care Patients with Moderate-risk Illicit Drug Use

Read the damn paper, they're assessing self-report in conjuction with hair testing the evaluate its accuracy and they found that cocaine users underreported their activities, it had nothing to do with the accuracy of the hair test itself.

Are we now Vaush? Just post an abstract and the results, everything in between assumed?

It even says in the first line.

Overall concordance between hair testing and self-report

 

[AnOminous]

Hair testing isn't that reliable.

Results​

Overall concordance between hair testing and self-report was 57.5% (marijuana), 86.5% (cocaine), 85.8% (amphetamines), and 74.3% (opioids). Specificity of hair testing at standard laboratory cut-offs exceeded 90% for all drugs, but sensitivity of hair testing relative to self-report was low, identifying only 52.3% (127/243) of self-disclosed marijuana users, 65.2% (30/46) of cocaine users, 24.2% (8/33) of amphetamine users, and 2.9% (2/6 of opioid users. Among participants who disclosed using marijuana or cocaine in the past 3 months, participants with a negative hair test tended to report lower-frequency use of those drugs (p< .001 for marijuana and cocaine).

Hair Drug Testing Results and Self-reported Drug Use among Primary Care Patients with Moderate-risk Illicit Drug Use

In the case of a positive result, the important issue isn't the false negative rate but the false positive rate. How often does a false positive result occur?

 

[Chazzed Up]

Nick’s past behaviour would suggest that he’d focus on his kids so much to the detriment of everything else.

Stop sweeping. The only past behavior we have to go on is his word which is worthless.

 

[ATI Escapee]

Okay Kiwi Spergs, some of you skipped statistics 101.

The null hypothesis is the inverse of whatever your hypothesis is. If your hypothesis is "monkeys like bananas" the null hypothesis is "we will not find that monkeys like bananas".

Type 1 errors, in short are false positive results of a test. In more technical terms, the null hypothesis is rejected and it is erroneously affirmed that there is a statistical difference.

Type 2 errors are false negatives. The null hypothesis is erroneously affirmed.

Drug testing optimizes for type 2 errors, not type 1 errors. Meaning, they are highly optimized to only incorrectly. I found this study that says when it comes to cannabis follicle testing, they expect 0 (with 95% confidence) instances of false positive (meaning the person was erroneously found to have drugs in their system when they did not), and many more false negatives.

I would expect the balldowashers to come out in droves to say "'nooo follicle testing has an x% chance of being wrong" while completely misunderstanding (or lying) about the fact that those are false negatives, not false positives.

So like how a false positive on a pregnancy test is very rare- a false negative, however, is the more common error, right?

So a positive result is much, much more likely to be accurate than a negative result

 

[Glowie]

Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?

If Nick's daughter doesn't end up in a foster home and rehab over this shit, CPS is useless

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

Not to sound more grim but what are the odds that between this and all the molestation jokes he made, especially of his own kids, that Rackets pimped out his 9yo to one of the people he met at the gay nightclubs for coke?

I'm going to choose to believe this line was never crossed. Shit's bad enough as it is..

Driving them round constantly was always killing him even before all this happened.

This is retarded, Nick is the father and if driving the kids around is "killing him" he should have been the man in the family and reduced the number of activities the kids were in or hire a full time driver. My family was not poor, but nowhere near Nick levels of money and it was piss poor easy to pay a local, well respected church teen to ferry us to and from school.

Nick is a fucking liar who lies.

One of my key complsints in all of this is the Farms has been telling Nick’s friends this was happing for years and none of them seemingly stepped in and a lot of them are now seemingly dancing on his grave.

Nick doesn't have friends, he has internet contacts and average joe internet persona will ignore scuttlebutt if the money is good. And then do an about face when that's more profitable.

Nick's worst-day-ever has been a big question for half a year now.

Nick's 2 or so worst-days-ever happened during or immediately after the Johnny Depp trial and is only related to this in that they were the "Fuck Dad" moment that metastasized Nick decided he didn't care what the incel prudes thought anymore and the mask started slipping.

By the way the worst day and the mystery illness cancellation aren't connected. He talked about his worst day ever at least a year ago. Speculation runs rampant because he has never elaborated but at the time it was assumed to be relationship issues or issues with our wifes family

About 2 years ago now. 2 years from the peak of success raking in hundreds of thousands of dollars on super chats to his children getting removed from his home and tested for Coke.