Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am not defending anyone involved in any capacity but I still wouldn't rule out the possibility of CPS pulling bullshit out of their ass because as benevolent and necessary as social work is, the reality is that it's a field full of self-righteous busybodies with savior complexes who think they know better than everybody and that's exactly something they would (and do) do.

I don't believe CPS bureaucrats do these drug tests in-house, though. I believe they farm them out to some toxicology lab. So we'd be relying on a conspiracy here, even if CPS wildly varies in quality and has some outright corrupt people involved in it.

CPS doesn't have the ability to do drug tests themselves. They usually send them to a place to get it done, sometimes the police station sometimes in certain areas there are labs that specifically deal with it.
 
3) Camelot wasn't talking to Nick during his four-person coke buying. Its not clear how he would know the 20k a month number.
Camelot appeared on Nick's show in late December 2023 during Nick's first disaster stream where he was clearly drugged out of his mind. This would have been several weeks after Aaron says the polycule started.

Camelot also confirmed that he knew about the polycule situation when it started which would have been December, or at earliest October depending on whether Nick was hooking up with April without Aaron's knowledge prior to December.

If it's assumed Nick stopped talking to Camelot sometime between December and January, there would still be time for Nick to tell him how much he was spending on drugs that month.
 
CPS doesn't have the ability to do drug tests themselves. They usually send them to a place to get it done, sometimes the police station sometimes in certain areas there are labs that specifically deal with it.
You'd generally be sending it to some SAMHSA certified lab. I try to avoid categorical statements, though, since it's possible some CPS agencies do have some kind of captive certified lab. I don't think Minnesota does, though.
 
I found his latest stream interesting. Another guy who yapped on for 80 mins telling us about how he couldn't talk about what he couldn't talk about.

It is now a government conspiracy, the prosecutors are lying and all in on it with the CPS and Judge. The Prosecutors and CPS have fabricated evidence and he will be for his followers the beacon of truth that will cut the courtroom in half as he exposes the fraud of the charges, and will appear in the court to hold the government fully accountable.

He goes on to lecture about how "courts were always to hold government to account, not your fellow man", but fails to see the lawsuits he made the most money on was on trials about...fellow "man" suing "fellow man" (Depp) and his own lost case about defamation (fellow "man" suing fellow "man").

Folks. Rehab will be a horrible place for him, probably just as horrible when he goes on stream in 4-6 months talking about his plea deal his lawyer told him to take as he chickens out of the trial option. Apparently, he is fighting for all our rights. Who knew?

It's so hard to take a guy seriously lecturing us on the constitution while he has 2 terrible paintings of Johnny Depp and Joaquin Phoenix behind him. And to add salt to the wound, he is wearing plaid.
 
You'd generally be sending it to some SAMHSA certified lab. I try to avoid categorical statements, though, since it's possible some CPS agencies do have some kind of captive certified lab. I don't think Minnesota does, though.
I'd imagine any lab used by an agency would have some sort of 3rd party accreditation. ISO, NIST... ect.
 
She doesn't. It's going to be orders of magnitude worse than if she were say, a crack baby, because she's nine. Fucking NINE. She's gonna remember the high. She's gonna remember the withdrawals. Getting into daddy's coke pile is going to be a core memory for her.

She's fucked.
fucking christ. fucking hell man.
 
The 9yr old developing a coke interest while copying daddy without the others trying too doesn't make sense to me.
If she was his favourite and he was that obvious, then the other kids know she's the favourite. (And honestly, sometimes if you're not the favourite, you know you're the lucky one.) I can see the older kids at least, distancing themselves and not wanting to be like the parents.

It is sus that only one child tested positive. I don't think it's impossible that she was the only one who tried out of curiosity, but I think it's more likely the parents "let" her "try" on her "own" wink wink nudge nudge aww she's just so precocious!

There's no way it's just environmental or else the other kids would've got a hit on their tests, too. I can see only one kid actually using/being given it, it's not impossible. Especially if there was abuse-- abusers treat all the kids differently, it's part of the game.
 
You know, people are saying the test is fake, or that the kid didn't get into the cocaine. Ok sure I can buy that being a case, but mother fucker has 5 kids. If 1 is 10x the limit, how are the other 4 coming up clean?
My kids suggested Nick's kids watched the movie cocaine bear, which has a scene where two kids find a brick of cocaine and eat some. Their theory was that one or more of the kids found some coke and dared each other to try it, and the 9 year old was the only one brave enough. Maybe she liked it and did it more than once.
 
If I had to make a wild guess, it's the most simple one:
  1. They were high as shit and weren't paying attention
  2. They had a small to-go container of coke somewhere
  3. The kid found it and maybe ingested some orally. (idk how coke works)
I think this for 2 reasons:
  1. Didn't Aaron leave the polycule because he caught his kid playing with a container of some kind that contained coke?
  2. Wasn't it Nick that left it there?

I'm still begging that Nick IS right and this particular document is totally fabricated.
The alternative is too grim.
Sure, I will absolutely buy 1-3. As far as reasonable neglectful cokehead shit goes, why not.
But that isn't what they are saying. They are going up and down saying the kid never had coke, no access to the coke, that the test is a lie and yada yada yada.
 
"courts were always to hold government to account, not your fellow man",

Yeah. According to Nick nobody ever envisioned that people who broke a law could be charged and convicted of having done done so in any court.

This is sovereign citizen thinking. That US courts have no jurisdiction over individuals. That the idea of criminal courts themselves is either illegal or unconstitutional.

Nick has moved past libertarian thinking all the way to crazy town.
 
Screenshotting it would remove the metadata before it was sent to the printer, but at that point what's the point in printing it? You'd be better off just merging the images to a .PDF file by printing to .PDF. You wouldn't leave any traces on the print server that way. Then just wipe the screen shots and .PDF from the drive, and it's like you've never been there.
Those printers log who printed at what time along with a copy of it. So an audit can easily find the leaker if they printed it at the court.
 
The problem is the claims of environmental exposure fall flat when you realize it was only 1 kid out of 5. And not the youngest who needed the most direct care and contact.
Exactly. If all five kids tested positive, that would give us reason to believe that it was incidental exposure. It would also make us wonder just how much coke was lying around the house to make all the kids test positive. It'd have to be a hell of a lot more than an ounce.
Nick is huffing copium if he thinks he can use this argument to hand-wave away the test result.
The logical conclusion that can be drawn from the test result is simple - one of Nick's kids was (as Sean would say) riding the white stallion.
The only question that remains was whether or not this kid was doing so with or without Nick's knowledge.
 
We mock and pity white trash who spend the last dollar to get high rather than feed their kids.

Here is nick, entirely allowed to have his kids if he merely does drug tests. He chooses the coke over his kids and then slaps the blame on CPS when all he has to do is merely testing.

His kids know it too. It’s a burn that will mark the end of their bond and it will never be repaired. The kids will always know he chose the coke over them. Nick will say it’s being done as a protest to his constitutional rights, but the kids know better.

They will never forgive him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back