I know you tend to equate Christianty to Judaism but their ethics are very different. Unless your argument is that Christianity is just Judaism repackaged to appeal to Euros and informed by European ethics.
Jews in the diaspora were seeking answers from their holy writings. There were many Jewish sects at the time Christianity came to be, and it's obvious that the philosophy of the Bible is a blend between misunderstood Greek philosophy of that time and barbaric Hebrew morals.
Paul was taught by the top Jewish rabbi of the time, Gamaliel. Only weirdos claim Early Christians weren't Jewish.
Everything questionable and immoral in the Bible is the Hebrew influence, and all the decent moral writings are the Greek ones.
Christianity did not improve the moral codes of the Greeks; it made them worse because these Jews didn't understand half of the concepts.
I'm also interested in sources for these pre-Christian European laws, not because I need Muh Ebidence but I'm genuinely interested
Roman and Greek laws and moral codes are abundant, and there are only a few laws protecting minors from sexual abuse, but the moral code is clear despite what the LGBTQ mafia likes to invent about them. You might know of the YouTuber Metatron; he always battles against this gay propaganda.
Homosexuality and sexual abuse of minors were seen as morally wrong.
You can read the Edda and ancient sagas, and you can clearly see the high morals these people subscribed to.
The Gulating Law is a pre-Christian European code of law, and it clearly shows the far more just morals compared to Hebrew law.
You answered your own stupid question.
You claim just in the next few passages of
Sanhedrin 55b it actually disagrees and argues that raping 3 year old children is bad.
Please provide a link to it, as it seems either hidden to me or merely a thought in your mind.
All I read is how raping boys under the age of 9 is permissible, since they cannot ejaculate; raping 9-year-old boys does not make you unclean.
Could you please provide the part I must have missed that clarifies this?
Says the halfwit scumbag who can't read a paragraph beyond half a sentence, then labels a thousand year old tradition in the shitheelest way possible.
You feel very passionate about defending pedophilia.
Again provide the next paragraph that clears it all up.
No, because first of the ancient Germans were illiterate pagans, and second, there is no pagan morality that would at any point stop a raging barbarian from raping anything.
Hates and disparages ancient Europeans, defends pedophiles.
Don't tell me your mom is Jewish, right?
The Orthodox Jews were not exposed to anything. The ultrarads that you are talking about are a radical wing of the Hasidic movement who were always isolationist welfare monkeys and who split off the mainstream hasidic movement a few centuries ago.
So the Orthodox Jewish communities, which are plagued with child rape that their holy texts clearly permit, are not considered real Jews? And they don't matter because they adhere strictly to Orthodox traditions and morals compared to Reform Jews.
I suppose this makes sense in your opinion.
You still haven't attempted to answer my original question.
