Have a nice day. Consider adopting the view that the Talmud and many of it's authors belong in a woodchipper, feet first.
The same Talmud that literally made up a situation and you took it for granted? Must be nice being the chad genius of the kindergarten yard.
I was talking about you but go off.
Good for me then.
This is really slimy the way you're framing it. Clearly he finds it disgusting, otherwise he wouldn't try to distance himself from it by saying it's just fringe orthodox extremists who engage in such diddling.
Trust me on this. I've been in this discussion countless times. Every single mongrel who does not have the fucking gray matter to actually do the basic fucking research on what the Talmud is, but still yaps about how the Jews are pedos and shit, that type of asshole always, and I mean ALWAYS, turns out to be a massive pedo himself.
It doesn't matter if this faggot is trolling or not. Irony can only go so far and I would not trust this motherfucker with anything he says.
It's also dishonest to claim that because the top guys of Judaism are talking about how fucking a three year old is legal according to purity laws means that every kike in existence signs off on it.
And that is the point. The Talmud is a 'test drive' of potential situations. Just because one rabbi says it would be legal, another rabbi will argue that it is not in a different way.
You find me a nominal Jew who would say that marrying a fucking 3 year old is kosher and I will give a million North Korean dollars.
Also he's probably trolling.
Trolling about pedophilia. He must be a comedy genius or something.
Or he's an orbiting pedophile himself.
See? Like this. Just because atheism's top guys are allegedly
Not allegedly. Many atheist intellectuals going back to the French Revolutions were proactive child molesters and they were proud of that, seeing it ass some fucked up sexual liberation or some shit.
morally bankrupt diddlers doesn't mean atheists as a whole think that 16/18 is just too old.
Of course not. Many atheists are normal people, I do not contest that. Of course that is because these atheists grew up in the west under the Judeochristian moral upbringing.
The key here is the evolution of ideology. Atheist, and I will continue to reiterate this, have no moral objection to anything. Now in the modern day we have scientific research of how child abuse will brutally harmful and any sane person can only look at that and object to child abuse, which both atheists and Christians rightfully do. But go back a few centuries back and you would have no objection to it from atheism at all. Even today the troons and the gays, who are overwhelmingly atheistic, skewer the science for identity politics, while the Christians already have their moral laws of sanctity.
Isn't it weird to see two people on the opposite side of an argument use the same tactic to make the other look bad? Thunderdomers, I swear.
Difference between me and Tall Order man is that he has to dig deep to find two sentences just to assume the Jews are pedoes, unlike him, he's definitely a normal, honest person with morals.
While all I have to do is look up who Simone de Beauvoir was and her whole association, and show what kind of intellectual liberty atheism produces.
