War Firestorm erupts over requiring women to sign up for military draft - "Conservatives": Only men should die for Globohomo

Article
Archive

Firestorm erupts over requiring women to sign up for military draft​

BY ALEXANDER BOLTON - 06/20/24 6:00 AM ET

Senate Democrats have added language to the annual defense authorization bill to require women to register for the draft, prompting a backlash from Republicans and social conservatives and complicating the chances of moving the bill on the Senate floor before Election Day.

Conservatives led by Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) are certain to attempt to remove the provision requiring women to register for the draft, which could present a tough vote for Sens. Jon Tester (D-Mont.) and Jacky Rosen (D-Nev.) and other Democrats in tight reelection races.


Republican candidate Sam Brown, who is running against Rosen, is already making it an issue in the Nevada Senate race.

Brown, an Army veteran who was severely burned by an improvised explosive device explosion, slammed Rosen in a video for voting to require women to sign up for the draft.

“Look at my face. This is the high cost of war,” he posted recently on the social platform X.

“Amy and I volunteered to serve, and we honor all who serve,” he wrote, referring to his wife. “But forcing America’s daughters to register for the draft is UNACCEPTABLE. Shame on Jacky Rosen.”

In the video posted below those comments, Brown pointed to the scarring on his face as evidence of the dangers women would face in combat theaters.

“Look at my face. This is the high cost of war and I just found out that Jacky Rosen voted this week to make signing up for the draft mandatory for our daughters. You’ll be hearing more from me on this,” he said.


Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) called the provision requiring women to sign up for the draft “insane.”

He accused the Biden administration of trying to implement a woke agenda at the Pentagon.

“There shouldn’t be women in the draft. They shouldn’t be forced to serve if they don’t want to,” he said on Fox News. He criticized Democrats for wanting to experiment with the military, saying “normal people are like, ‘Leave our daughters alone.’”



Hawley led efforts to strip language requiring women to sign up for the draft from the defense authorization bill in 2021 and 2022.

A group affiliated with former Vice President Mike Pence also weighed in on the issue Wednesday.

The group, Advancing American Freedom, wrote a letter to Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) and Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) declaring that “the notion of the United States of America requiring women to register to fight our wars is simply untenable and must be opposed at all costs.”


Wicker, the top-ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said he’ll try to strip it out of the bill.

“I’m opposed to that. I don’t think this is the time to get into a debate on the floor of either house about that. We’re not anywhere near implementing a draft, and to me it’s a distraction when we need to be talking about real issues that are immediate,” he said.

“I hope it will fall out, either on the floor or in conference,” he added.


But Senate Armed Services Committee Chair Jack Reed (D-R.I.) defended the proposed policy change, arguing that women can hold many warfighting positions without serving as front-line infantry troops.

“Women are doing a remarkable job in our forces today, and if we were in a situation requiring a draft, I think we would need all able-bodied citizens 18 and above,” he said.

“If we go to a draft, that means we’re in a serious, serious situation,” he added.


“It’s not like World War II where we need a lot of infantry. We need cyber experts, we need intelligence analysts, linguists, etc. Wait a second, there are a lot of women out there that can do this better than men,” he argued.

He said the intense GOP opposition to the proposal “just doesn’t make any sense.”

Senate aides point out the issue cuts across party lines, with some Republicans generally supportive of requiring women to sign up for the Selective Service System, just like men when they turn 18.


Senate Republicans are already raising doubts about whether Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) will even bring the bill to the floor anytime soon, given the dwindling number of days on the legislative calendar before the election.

“I do hope we get to the floor. It’s very important we have this debate publicly. … I hear rumblings that the Democratic leader may not bring it to the floor, I hope that can be reversed,” Wicker said.

McConnell on Monday urged Schumer to bring the defense bill to the floor “without delay.”


The Republican leader hailed the Senate Armed Services Committee for marking up the defense bill earlier this month but then suggested Democrats may drag out the process of bringing it to the floor.

“But shortly after the committee’s action, senior Senate Democrats shattered any expectation that they were ready to start taking the requirements of the national defense seriously,” he said.

Voting to require women to make themselves eligible for the draft could come back to bite Democrats in Republican-leaning or battleground states, such as Montana and Nevada.

National Republican Senatorial Committee Chair Steve Daines (R-Mont.) seized on the issue in the last Congress when he backed an amendment in 2022 to remove a provision requiring women to register for the Selective Service System from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA).

“Brave Montana men and women carry out the Treasure State’s rich legacy of service by voluntarily joining our nation’s military. There is no need to force our nation’s daughters to enter the draft,” Daines said at the time.

Hawley offered an amendment to strike the women’s draft language from the NDAA in 2021. His action put pressure on Democrats to ultimately remove the issue from the bill without voting on the amendment in December of that year.

He also sponsored an amendment to the defense bill in 2022 to remove language requiring women to register for the Selective Service System, which was co-sponsored by Republican Sens. Ted Cruz (R), Tom Cotton (Ark.), Mike Lee (Utah), Marco Rubio (Fla.), Roger Marshall (Kan.), John Boozman (Ark.), James Lankford (Okla.) and Daines.
 
If they actually end up drafting women i predict its going to majorly turn young women against leftism. Women only support leftism out of a naivite that its compassionate. But as soon as it requires potentially actually dying due to going to war where sex differences are actually a big fucking deal they'll flip the script around.
 
I don't agree with the draft period but if politicians are going to force men to die for their country, why shouldn't the "girl boss" women stand right next to them.
I don't agree with the draft, or that a serious nation should put its women into martial institutions (military, police, fire).

But since we are a thoroughly pozzed country, and our only likely wars are to plant McRainbow flags in Third-World shitholes that Israel dislikes, why should women be exempt? Let the DEI competency crisis accelerate so the G.A.E.'s damage is at least limited.
 
“It’s not like World War II where we need a lot of infantry. We need cyber experts, we need intelligence analysts, linguists, etc. Wait a second, there are a lot of women out there that can do this better than men,” he argued.
Well, that's retarded. You should be easily able to fill non-combat/non-cannonfodder positions without a draft. If neither men nor women are applying for these positions maybe look at your hiring and salaries.
 
Men in the military:

8mhjpyn116n01-4274143828.jpg

Women in the military
143121.jpg

The thing is, even if they do get drafted, they'll be with an enemy contact infantry unit for about 2 engagements.

Margaret Houlihan they are not.

Just take a look around at a lot of GWOT images. Women eating at fucking food courts, sitting around being 'badass' in clean uniforms.

They lived in barracks and buildings, not in tents, not in holes in the ground, with regular showers. They had clean uniforms they didn't hand wash in a plastic bucket. They weren't sleeping in the same dirty sleeping bag they had slept in for 3 months.

No, the "Badass Bitch" meme of the current military is a lot of lowered standards.

Ranger school? No, lower the standards and give them preferential treatment until the pass.

Old APFT having too many female failures? Better come up with this new Crossfit bullshit. What's that, they're still failing? CHANGE THE METRICS!!!

I found out that apparently women can be tankers now.

Can you imagine being stuck in a hot metal box for 3 months with some chick who hasn't had the chance to scoop out her gash with a wet cloth?

And seeing them piss or shit into an ammo can is going to be funny.

See, women getting into combat arms and all these restricted schools had NOTHING to do with 'equality' like they sold it on. No, it was all about promotions and being able to wear the same bling the men did.
 
Why do you want women conscripts in your army?
I don't want me in my army, the rest is white noise. But I have to fight and die for Lockheed-Martin and co, then the "yass queen slay" can come along. That way I might laugh myself to death watching them try the frontline infantry bit, which sounds better than death by bullet, explosion etc...
 
Honestly, in the past it made sense from both a societal and biological level for women to be excluded. On a completely factual emotionless scale there is no argument that a woman who has to carry a child for nearly a year is more valuable than a man who can just produce sperm at any time. Much of the male population could have been killed in action and there would still be a path forward for the society to continue without too much of a road-bump. However the society in which that was feasible is long gone - there is no longer any meaningful partnership between men and women on a societal scale and if women at large are not engaging in the behavior that made this worthwhile they've given up the primary reason why they should be excluded. In the current free-for-all the only reasoning they could give for why they shouldn't have to be treated the same as males in drafting are things they will otherwise deny such as superior male strength and decision making under pressure. If there must be a draft then women should absolutely be included if men are - it's only fair. As another cold logical aside, lesbians should be the first picked for combat and more dangerous roles as they are even less valuable than males biologically in a free system.
 
Pfft I wish I'd come to this. Remember Phyllis Schlafly? All of a sudden the feminists who had no argument against the era (equal rights amendment) part with the draft suddenly got help by a conservative woman. In group preference especially in women is quite strong, they will send your sons to death, but Stacey and her girlfriends are going to sit in an office with an AC.
 
Back