Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Kayla probably didn't do that because she, at least in one theory which Aaron lightly confirmed/said he believes(so again, shaker of salt with that), Kayla was the one who got them on hard drugs/illicit drugs. Nick was lusting for a more exciting rockstar life and in order to try to fit that image, the theory goes that Kayla then got some coke and things spiralled. Not sure if that counts as sweeping for Nick to work off of that theory, but seeing as Nick quite literally had all the power in the relationship(naive wife, all the money, the house etc) he should have controlled the situation, but they were both fucked up, neither were good people, or perhaps its a vicious cycle where one of them started the cycle and it got worse and worse from there.
I'm saying that women aren't the only ones with the instinct to protect (when they are of sound mind and not on fucking drugs)

Fathers have paternal instincts, different from maternal, yes, but complimentary. Fathers have just as much a (legal and moral) responcibility to get children out of abusive/druggie situations as mothers do.

We always hear about mothers getting charged and put in jail because they let their children stay in abusive households when they should have gotten them out of there like a bat outta hell. We sneer and scorn the mothers who do nothing, and righfully so, they should have done something and they don't deserve them if they are just going to let their husband beat them too hard with a switch or activly do drugs around them.

All I am saying is that we should put the same pressure on the father, if Nick was sober and was a good family man who had a fucking brain...... and his wife DID suggest coke, or bring the coke in the house, it was his duty to take the children and run to Florida or some shit.

They both should have done something, but they both wanted to do it, it does not matter who introduced it if the other did nothing and went right along with it. Now we have a little girl hooked on fucking cocaine
 
Write-up of the Order with Rules and Statutes ... if anyone care.
As it currently exists at the time of writing this post, users can't click to download that attachment for some reason. I got it from inspect element though at this link: https://kiwifarms.st/attachments/cpo-34-jv-24-96-pdf.6109141/

First impressions, it's good for dissemination purposes that you redacted the kids' names, but it's obviously erroneous from the first page which is an issue. You omitted John Mueller representing Kayla Rekieta in the appearance list, "unoficcial", "bec" instead of "because" when even if you wanted to abbreviate it the standard colloquialism would be "bc", this is all pretty immediately obvious stuff.
 
He needs a first class ticket to Auschwitz.
Why are you gonna send this nigga somewhere with theatres, swimming pools and soccer courts? Law mutt needs to be punished, not get a vacation.
As it stands letting your 9 year old into your stash isn't responsible drug use and I believe is justified for crucifixion.
Having drugs-drugs in a house with your children is absolute jigaboo, pavement ape, porch-monkey, scallywag nigger shit. Like once you have children, it's time to stop partyin'. Nick's officially blacker than Drexel, with a youngin' doing drugs.
This clip was from a stream in August 2022, so could the child's increased aggression have been a consequence of being exposed to cocaine, as she was Daddy Rekieta's favourite & he shared some of his special powdered sugar with her?:
People further back in the thread seem to think that Nick's 9 year old's acting out might have been because she was getting molested. Grim shit, and it's starting to seem like a possibility.
Is this the biggest fall from grace for an E-celeb? At least with losers like Ralph and Chris Chan they were never considered successes to begin with.
Ralph's biggest claim to fame was failing to sock a lady cop and getting arrested over it, that coupled with employing murderer for his vanity blog.
You're suggesting someone messed up hair samples.
Hair collected, put into barcoded baggie.
Baggie processed and tested for.
You're saying they mixed the samples up, how? So they tested Kayla's hair instead or what? It's getting dumber and dumber.
To be fair, some employees are pretty fuckin' dumb. Diversity hire or some overworked intern might have just grabbed the wrong sample and ran that.
I will admit it seems more likely the coke got in Racket's kid's system the old fashioned way, by either being given blow by Rackets or his hole, or getting ahold of the coke tray and copying mommy and daddy.
Do you even know the process?
It's so automated now that these errors are insurmountably improbable.
Well sure, non-zero chance. Doesn't sound like coping.
Maybe in big cities, but doesn't Rackets live in like Podunk MN? Wouldn't surprise me if a lot of places there were running on PC systems from the 80s or 90s or even paper files.
Because doing so strongly implies to the Court that he did so to beat them to the punch on a Court-ordered hair test. With cutting it short, shaved on the sides, and then bringing to cut an inch off the top week after week, in his fucked-up LOLyer mind he probably thinks he has plausible deniability about him trying to cheat the test.
I choose to believe Nick caught lice from his new coke dealer's drug den and had to shave his hair to get the nits out.
The power balance didn't change until after fame gave him confidence. He became a monster. The good man that was Nick Rekeita was destroyed.
Nick was never a "good man" he was just a degenerate coomer who hid it well for a while.
It occurs to me the girl mightve observed (and mimicked) the adults putting coke on their gums, which would make sense to do if you're an addict but can't get away from your kids to sniff.
Kids do love to copy their parents. I'm not sure if gummies would get levels as high as their kid had in their system though.
PPP went just went there.

Ethan Ralph is a better father then Nick Rekieta. At least Ralph's kids never tested positive for cocaine.
"ROSEY AYY! STAY OUTA MAH FUCKIN' COKE YEW FUCKIN' AYYLAWG!"
That's only because Ralph is too greedy to share his blow with even his own kids. (:_(
The consequences of affirmative action.
Yakubians don't season they lab samples!
 
They should never be allowed to contact their children again. The issue is not whatever harm they have already inflicted, but the absolute contempt they have shown for the lives of their own children. Stopping bad behavior won't change their personalities or values.
Really that would just punish and hurt the kids even worse as bad as Kayla and Nick have been what’s so awful is kids look up to and love their parents they’ve really let their children down the kids will never forgot this even if they eventually forgive they’re going to need lots of therapy we won’t know until they’re grown how bad they were affected.


Nick and Kayla really fucked up this case shows why cocaine is a schedule II controlled substance.
It leads to pure degeneracy destroys your marriage. and robs your children of childhood. Nick was probably always a narcissist, but the coke, and streaming boosted it to another level ,and he got real sloppy to the point of neglecting anything besides, coke, perverted sex, alcohol, and streams just purely operating at a animalistic level where all he wanted was that dopamine spike in his brain.
 
My understanding based on earlier conversations was that Mr. and Mrs Baldo's follicle test was related to their arrest, they disallowed its being released to CPS as it appears that they can choose to opt out of release for that use.
Incidentally, this is really stupid unless he's still on cocaine in which case it just doesn't matter. CPS isn't a criminal court and it isn't like taking the Fifth where a court can't use that against you. CPS can and has taken it into account and drawn an adverse inference from it. They're just going to conclude that yes, you're on coke still.

Once you're in this particular spiderweb where they've decided no, you're an unfit piece of shit who shouldn't be allowed access to your children, it is up to you to prove your innocence.
 
Do you even know the process?
It's so automated now that these errors are insurmountably improbable.
Well sure, non-zero chance. Doesn't sound like coping.
As long as it’s not contracted out to Labcorp. They have insane productivity goals and are capable of fucking up tests. They also have low pay and DEI so there’s a chance Shaniqua could’ve mixed something up.
 
Kayla probably didn't do that because she, at least in one theory which Aaron lightly confirmed/said he believes(so again, shaker of salt with that), Kayla was the one who got them on hard drugs/illicit drugs. Nick was lusting for a more exciting rockstar life and in order to try to fit that image, the theory goes that Kayla then got some coke and things spiralled. Not sure if that counts as sweeping for Nick to work off of that theory, but seeing as Nick quite literally had all the power in the relationship(naive wife, all the money, the house etc) he should have controlled the situation, but they were both fucked up, neither were good people, or perhaps its a vicious cycle where one of them started the cycle and it got worse and worse from there.
if all of this started because of his wife then I'm never letting feminist Jersh hear the end of it.
 
Incidentally, this is really stupid unless he's still on cocaine in which case it just doesn't matter. CPS isn't a criminal court and it isn't like taking the Fifth where a court can't use that against you. CPS can and has taken it into account and drawn an adverse inference from it. They're just going to conclude that yes, you're on coke still.

Once you're in this particular spiderweb where they've decided no, you're an unfit piece of shit who shouldn't be allowed access to your children, it is up to you to prove your innocence.
Nick is claiming that his reluctance to cooperate stems from his Libertarian views rather than a reluctance to see his children or having something to hide. I know it's bullshit, but that's what he's using as an excuse.
 
That’s why I wouldn’t be surprised if it some kind of testing fuck up.

(Yes, it happens all the fucking time. Or at least frequently enough that anyone with experience with drug tests can recount an incident.)

Things don’t really add up.

We got one sky high result of one kid, yet no mandatory reporter or anyone in their church noticed anything.

(Don’t have experience with nine year olds on coke, but I’d ASSUME someone would notice things being off.)

someone did notice something was off, you absolute dent. That was why they tested her. They don’t hair test every child they pull out of a home.
You desperately want Nick to be innocent, why so attached bb?
Denial is a stage of grief.
Don’t you think that if it was a lab fuck up that Nick would’ve been denying it on his live stream? No, he admitted it. But you’re still praying for this mythical lab fuckup.
Listen, this is a tiny town. This is the biggest scandal they’ve seen in a generation. Even Shaniqua paid attention this time, for the gossip if nothing else.
One more time for the cheap seats: if it was environmental exposure, all the kids would’ve tested positive and if it was a lab fuck up, Nick wouldn’t have admitted it was true.
Ignoring you now, because God you’re annoying.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back