Return of the Draft Megathread - There's a shitstorm a brewin'.

Will anything come of it?

  • Yes.

  • No.

  • Probably.

  • Maybe.

  • Well yea why did you even make this poll


Results are only viewable after voting.
Part of the problem is they're not serving their country. At best they're helping men die for Israel and Ukraine (but mostly Israel) slower. This isn't WW2 whereby there was an illusion of purpose. Has their rhetoric changed because they think only chuds will die, and their reproductive strategy has kicked in?
I still say when it comes to WW2, we bet on the wronggggg horse.
 
Did any of you ever ever get those military recruiter faggots who liked to approach your lunch table and ask you to enlist back in high school? I remember the one at my high school would approach our table every week and we'd tell him to fuck off every time.
Not so in-your-face as that, but we had more than one Army Recruitment station in our local mall, with people passing flyers around frequently. Commercials at the time were also overloaded with "join NOW" texts or sub-texts on shit like Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon. There were even contests sponsored by the military.
 
My question is when exactly are they going to bring the draft back? The House and the President both have to sign off on it. We have six full months left in the year and some time before the next president is sworn in. When are they going to do it?
Right before the election. Maybe a Chinaman will assassinate Biden, allowing the Democrats to have Harris as President, she shuts down the election, they'll accuse the Chinaman of being a Chinese spy sent to assassinate the President and BAM. Draft. It'll be a unanimous vote in the house from both Democrats and Conservatives across the aisle.
 
I understand this could all change but historically how did this work? Were existing skills taken into consideration when deciding where to place you? Were unemployed people selected first or was it completely random? With the way things are I imagine a lot of American companies would be fucked if all the young people willing to work for low salaries ended up getting drafted. Mine certainly would be.
if you have a skill they can use, they will put you in a position that makes use of it.
you're a truck driver = you'll be driving supply trucks
you're a car mechanic = you'll be a tank mechanic
etc
everyone else goes wherever they need warm bodies at the time (infantry most of the time)
 
if you have a skill they can use, they will put you in a position that makes use of it.
you're a truck driver = you'll be driving supply trucks
you're a car mechanic = you'll be a tank mechanic
etc
everyone else goes wherever they need warm bodies at the time (infantry most of the time)
Better yet, if you want to become a part of the (ch)air force, they'll make you a bell boy or a desk jockey.
 
Draft? Seriously? I thought Ukraine was winning the war. Did some Ukrainian Jew pass this bill? Just let the nukes fly 1st I live far enough from cities, have enough food, a gun and a truck that doesn't have fancy electronics that can start up.
americans are not gonna send conscripts to ukraine (though europeans might do that)
for americans it's gonna be destination israel, if the gaza war escalates into a larger regional war
 
Obligatory 4chin memery:
hit the wall die in war plan glowie draft.jpgww3 is coming.jpgww3 will be a cleansing.jpg
OBVIOUSLY I don't condone the obvious fedposts in these posts, this is purely for archival purposes to show we knew this was coming for a while now.
 
The Federalist ran an article on women being drafted (L/A).

If They Want To Vote, Women Should Be Subject To The Draft​


This year’s reauthorization of U.S. military spending includes a provision registering women for the draft when they turn 18, same as men. Under the provisions, both sexes also will be automatically registered with Selective Service when they turn 18, rather than having to personally fill out the paperwork or face prison time.

Even in our highly feminist culture, women do not support being drafted. Yet of course many support female-preferential policies if it gets them privileges and sinecures instead of responsibilities, such as in sports (Title IX) and workplaces (Title VII).

I also don’t support drafting women, because I have moral and natural rights objections to women serving in combat positions in the military. Men and women are different, and part of that difference is that female bodies poorly sustain combat-level stress. Even ripped women are physically inferior to average men, and female soldiers are much more likely to get and stay injured, damaging the readiness and lethality of their units. This means more U.S. soldiers dead and injured because of sexual politics.


On top of all this is the fact that putting women in the military also increases pregnancy and STD rates, which also damages unit readiness because pregnant women are lost to their command for a significant time. Units train together and need every member to function at peak, so losing one person affects all the rest. Not to mention that it’s terrible for the baby — and the mother! — for mom to have to return to full-time military duty just weeks after giving birth.


Women and combat should only combine in foreign invasion scenarios, not as the routine order of military operation. Women do not make good soldiers, and a humane country would never force women into combat duty.

But the people leading our society don’t care about any of this. Women have been approved for combat positions in the U.S. military since the Obama administration.


My daughters will be conscientious objectors if they are ever drafted because of our religious and natural rights convictions that men are the God-designed protectors of their homes and nation, and it’s a violation of nature and its Creator for women to be soldiers. That said, drafting women is also absolutely consonant with women voting.


In the founders’ era, every voter was required to join in local and national self-defense. That’s a big part of the reason only men voted at the time (so no, it wasn’t “the founders were wicked, sexist, KKK,” like you’ve been told). Voting is not a natural right, it is a civil right, which means people’s rights can be protected even if they don’t vote. Women didn’t need to vote to have their natural rights secured, because the laws and institutions of the country protected those rights from the country’s creation, through the state and national constitutions and other organic laws that superseded all others.


Voting was for people with literal skin in the game. Those who voted also had to serve on juries, own property, join the local fire brigade, be commandeered into a posse at any time, and join the militia any time it was required (which was often). Voting rights did not vest at simply staying alive for 18 years; they were earned through securing the community against violence by not infrequently risking the voter’s own life.


In addition, voting was considered a household act. As heads of their households, the fathers usually exercised that privilege, but so did widows who were heads of their households. Women voted through the representation of their husbands, brothers, and sons, just like their husbands, brothers, and sons were in turn represented by those they elected to the state and national legislatures and executives.


That’s how republican government works — through representation, not direct democracy. The founders knew direct democracy really means mob government, and they didn’t want that, because it breeds chaos and state-sponsored looting through wealth redistribution.


Not imposing voting duties on women was humane because it’s inhumane to ask a nursing mother to serve on jury duty when her baby doesn’t take a bottle, a position I’ve been in twice. It’s inhumane to ask a young woman to carry a rucksack that crumbles her knee joints at twice the rate of a man’s.


It’s inhumane for a woman to give birth and then leave her baby for full-time physical labor just a few weeks later. It’s inhumane to place a young woman in a foxhole with a young man for days, where they defecate and bake in the sun and are susceptible to barbarians who routinely rape female captives. Not asking young, child-bearing-age women to assume the physical defense responsibilities required to earn voting privileges was not sexism, it was magnanimity.


But American women have rejected this magnanimity. For about a century, those speaking for them have demanded that our government make women do everything men do. Well, this is a package deal. It’s not fair for women to get the same privileges as men without also executing the same responsibilities. If women want to vote and be treated in every way by our government as if they are actually men, that includes being subject to the draft.


If you don’t like it, ladies, how about start embracing your womanhood instead of continuing to insist everyone treat you like men?
 
It's been said before but most of the mystique and wonder that warfare has had in the media for a while now has been completely annihilated by footage of what warfare is really like thanks to the Russia-Ukraine war. No one with a normal state of mind wants to get their legs blown off and bleed out in a muddy ditch while dozens of ghoulish redditors jerk off to their last moments.
 
Yes, I'm sure the people will finally rise up this time unlike every other time people have said this.
they're not gonna rise up they'll just do whatever it takes to dodge the draft, which is super easy now

the military already rejects recruits who are found to have extremist views. they call you up, you tell them how much you hate niggers and jews and trannies, they are no longer interested in recruiting you.
same if you tell them about your mental illnesses. it's easy as pie to get a shrink to diagnose you with depression or anxiety disorder or some shit.
you can also show up drunk or high, makes them drop you fast. alcohol is legal, weed is legal in some places, and the army does not like recruiting drunks and potheads. i don't know about drug tests but if you want to be a real joker you can dose yourself with meth a few days before the piss test, watch them shit bricks and send you home immediately when you test positive for amphetamines.

will they do a complete turnaround on all these principles just to get more recruits? i really doubt it, just imagine the unholy amount of screeching from progressives if the army starts drafting all their "neurodivergent" friends.
 
Back