Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[owed to joy]

If his excuse is he doesn't want to give evidence to the gubment, then he should sign the bodycam footage release form. The government already has it and the only thing it can do now is prove his innocence to the public, which he claims is just as important as the actual court verdict, if not more.

Unless, of course it actually proves his guilt...

He's literally giving evidence as we speak. Lol what a fucking retard.

 

[break these cuffs]

He's literally giving evidence as we speak. Lol what a fucking retard.

And not any evidence that will clear him either. Nobody is going to stick their neck out for him because it looks so bad. All he has to do is sprinkle some breadcrumbs to show the conspiracy. Bodycam footage, phone logs, the county cashing the checks he wrote for his tickets that they left off the record. "Just trust me bro" isn't enough. Nick needs to give the people who want to support him a reason to. Release it anonymously on the other farms if he has to.

 

[Captain Manning]

Nick says he "revoked consent before the test results were available, and had no knowledge of what they may be."

This may be the most ridiculous thing he's ever said, and I'm including his atrocious attempts at standup.

Everyone, everyone, including everyone with a brain who watched his streams in the last 6 months, knew exactly what the results of his tests would be. His "bathroom breaks" which he never did before were obviously to do drugs, and that was before the pile of coke was found in his house.


Nick also said that he is "literally ordered to do tests in the order".

Of course, being ordered to do it is different from actually doing them.

Has he submitted test results or not?

He's shucking and jiving. Trying to confuse the issue.

The fact that he won't consent to his own tests being released to CPS isn't even the worst thing. Though a parent who wanted their kids back should want to cooperate. Yes, the first tests would come back positive, but it would show them he is looking to cooperate, and they would do subsequent tests where he could show he's clean.

No, the worst thing is the results for the 9 yo, for which CPS does have the test results.

It suits him to do everything to get people off the subject of the 9 yo. People are dumping him in waves now because of that. It is the worst revelation to date. This keeps getting worse and worse.

Him testing positive for cocaine? Well, no shit. We all knew THAT was gonna be the result. It would have shocked nobody who had been watching him.

The 9 yo testing positive for cocaine? Get on the wall, asshole!

Big difference. He's crossed the rubicon for all but the most disgusting of people now.

 

[huckbeine]

His top priority is always seething about Eric July.
View attachment 6111302

jesus christ, a non-practicing lawyer who got pied in the face regarding a trademark dispute is now commenting on supposed patent infringement, fucking lol. drink more Nicky, someday, you might have a good legal take regarding IPs. also patent doesnt work like that fucking kek

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

(A)

"There aren't any findings of abuse. Not even an allegation of it on the record; only in people's imaginations."

This is the most egregious one to me. Even without the recent "8y child with a cocaine test positive" document, negligence constitutes child abuse fucktard.

 

[owed to joy]

And not any evidence that will clear him either. Nobody is going to stick their neck out for him because it looks so bad. All he has to do is sprinkle some breadcrumbs to show the conspiracy.

Nah. He's giving the state evidence by providing numerous exhibits of him showcasing how little of a fuck he wants his kids back.

 

[Potato CPA]

"WHY not just make evidence for the government?" To be fair, I might be reaching a bit here, but could this be construed as him trying to hide evidence from the state?
Just along the lines of "stop talking about the case, NICK" he thinks he's being clever. But could this be portrayed as him knowingly trying to withhold or deny evidence? Or again, the state probably doesn't even need to go this route.

But something like "Why make evidence for the government?" Oh so this is evidence then eh? And you know it, and you're trying to stop CPS from having it?

 

[Fools Idol]

WHY not just make evidence for the government

Wouldn't this already be evidence for the government?

 

[owed to joy]

How realistic is it that Nick is so terminally online due to a combination of factors (eg. isolation, resentment of wife/kids, porn sickness, brain damage through drugs/alcohol etc) that he really believes in his mind that he's fighting this case against everyone talking online vs in real life in a court of law. And if he wins here it's like it all goes away? I mean can he really not discern between the two anymore? He's seemed to feel the same way in talking about the Monty case. I loled when he streamed last week and said "I'm not going to be talking about my case. Anyone who watches my channel should know that."
Lmao like bro I only know you'll talk about your case bc I've seen your channel. Fucking retard, how are so many people getting clipped saying he's smart.

 

[Cirrhosis_of_Liver]

The absolute chutzpah to be a criminal child abuser and still have what looks like a Ranger badge as your avatar.


Edit: I meant abuser not molester. I just saw vito

 

[WelfareNiggerQueen]

View attachment 6111650

"WHY not just make evidence for the government?" To be fair, I might be reaching a bit here, but could this be construed as him trying to hide evidence from the state?
Just along the lines of "stop talking about the case, NICK" he thinks he's being clever. But could this be portrayed as him knowingly trying to withhold or deny evidence? Or again, the state probably doesn't even need to go this route.

But something like "Why make evidence for the government?" Oh so this is evidence then eh? And you know it, and you're trying to stop CPS from having it?

He already gave them the hair. I don't see why he's sperging about that.

 

[Sumptinsfuckey]

View attachment 6111650

"WHY not just make evidence for the government?" To be fair, I might be reaching a bit here, but could this be construed as him trying to hide evidence from the state?
Just along the lines of "stop talking about the case, NICK" he thinks he's being clever. But could this be portrayed as him knowingly trying to withhold or deny evidence? Or again, the state probably doesn't even need to go this route.

But something like "Why make evidence for the government?" Oh so this is evidence then eh? And you know it, and you're trying to stop CPS from having it?

I dunno, because a negative test result would be EXCULPATORY fucking evidence? Something a fucking lawyer should know you coked out fucking yam. Thank god this cognitive sigularity never represented someone on trial for murder, apparently he would advise a client to refuse to provide an alibi for the same reason.

 

[None More Black]

It just makes it so obvious how damaged he is that he thinks this looks fine. Any actual human being would be hounding the shit out of anyone and everyone 24/7 until they got their children back. He'd rather prioritize dragging his feet, acting like a jackass, and taking potshots at some comic book guy.

 

[polar bear]

View attachment 6111650

"WHY not just make evidence for the government?" To be fair, I might be reaching a bit here, but could this be construed as him trying to hide evidence from the state?
Just along the lines of "stop talking about the case, NICK" he thinks he's being clever. But could this be portrayed as him knowingly trying to withhold or deny evidence? Or again, the state probably doesn't even need to go this route.

But something like "Why make evidence for the government?" Oh so this is evidence then eh? And you know it, and you're trying to stop CPS from having it?

Lol but he did talk to cops.
This is just further evidence he doesn't care about his own children.
If you're absolutely clean and have nothing to hide, and the evil government is sending their Dark CPS Legion to kidnap your kids, and everyone is out to get you, and you have no ways to fight the system - you can still be ultratransparent and proactive in showing people that you're being treated unfairly.
If Nicks' children would be his priority, he wouldn't care about anything else, including his own rights- he'd stream himself doing coke tests, send daily test results to CPS, do a stream walking around in his house, approve release of bodycam, get Kayla to speak online, show texts, calls, emails, explain how 26 grams of coke appeared in his house, do a tell all stream.
If Nick would be genuinely hounded by the government, he'd be able to do quite a lot to prove it.
But in his previous xitter, the very first sentence he typed was "There is no requirement".

Of course. There is no requirement to fight for your children. One day they will forget you exist anyway, so who cares. You can just keep snorting and drinking and fucking around, and never have to keep yourself accountable and be responsible. Who cares. There is no requirement.

 

[AnOminous]

It's even more fucked up when you realize rekieta knows how fucked up the cps/foster related systems are and still put his kids in a situation that could get them taken away.

Yes, it makes him even more of an absolute piece of shit.

 

[Angry Crustacean]

He's unable to reflect on his streams being used as evidence against himself. He actually recorded enough of his life for the government to view such that it was used to obtain a search warrant. He's so worried about beating the immediate threat (Not the Twitter mob, eek) that he makes nonsensical arguments, and provides enough ammunition to the prosecutors that they can easily show him for what he is on trial even if he never takes the stand.

This is breathtaking stupidity.

 

[Sharpeteer]

Its good to know his lolbertarian politics are more important than getting his children back.

I wonder how they would feel about that.

And Dax said "He misses his kids."

My ass he does.

 

[Rodeo Roadrunner]

I guess I don't understand the order to undergo drug tests and then not providing them. The order for the drug tests wasn't part of the criminal trial, but the CPS investigation, right? Could the drug test results taken for CPS be used as evidence in the criminal trial? If yes, then what purpose would he have for not turning over the results of the tests, considering that the police have overwhelming evidence that he and Kayla were doing coke, unless the defense strategy is to say that actually April was the only one doing it?
If the drug tests for CPS CAN'T be used as evidence in the criminal trial, then I don't understand the purpose of hiding the test results.

 

[SaltyFanta]

This is the most egregious one to me. Even without the recent "8y child with a cocaine test positive" document, negligence constitutes child abuse fucktard.

Man the prosecutor must be overjoyed with Nick's propensity to talk about is case while seething on Twitter. I wonder if this will come up during sentencing along with all the times Nick has acted completely unrepentant about his actions.

 

[owed to joy]

I guess I don't understand the order to undergo drug tests and then not providing them.

I think it's a case of, getting raided and seeing your two cracked out corpse ladies crying and your kids crying, probably pretty sobering. But then he came home and read Twitter for 3 days or so. Saw some people had this bullshit sovcit sweep running and decided oh yeah fuck those cops they can keep my kids forever I'm not licking no govboot.

Or he just did it to get out of jail bc he was too broke to front the bond at first till later. And then the same thing happened.