Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 27.1%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.9%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 127 37.4%

  • Total voters
    340
Nick has attempted to set up an at home sex dungeon next to his children’s bedrooms. The only thing that stopped this was repeated refusals by contractors.
This point is new to me- can anyone point me towards where I can read/see about this? I have gone through the general rekieta thread and don't remember this/I am retarded.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Brett DeLawyer
"Nick Rekieta PROBABLY always liked giving little girls coke."

It's interesting thinking about the position Nick is putting himself in it's like he's on the stand 24/7 being questioned by a gaggle of a-logs deadset on getting him to slip up and say something he shouldn't. But I imagine it wouldn't matter much no matter what, it seems like throwing out the warrant is Nick's only hope.
Drug-addicted sexual degenerate Nicholas Robert Rekieta is responsible for 100% more little girls being under the influence of cocaine than Montagraph.
This point is new to me- can anyone point me towards where I can read/see about this? I have gone through the general rekieta thread and don't remember this/I am retarded.
IMG_8857.jpeg
Rekieta talks about his sex dungeon troubles and the contractors ghosting him:

View attachment 5135686

Things that should never be said:

View attachment 5135689
Relevant videos regarding his aspirational sex dungeon are embedded in the post above.
 
Last edited:
Maybe he's hoping for a Keith Raniere situation, in which all the women in the cult gather outside the prison and engage in dance routines to boost his morale?

I can already see Sally78 shaking her ass thong towards the prison complex in solidarity.

"Like, oh my God, Nick was like wrongfully convicted, and...like... things and stuff!"

Speaking of Sally, is there any funny shit from her lately? I need a pallet cleanser from all this dark shit. Last time she was talking about the kid's CLOTHS. It's not Nick's fault they don't have clean CLOTHS. That's why the house is so messy, I guess. You need them CLOTHS for cleaning. Lol.
If you're a sociopath who never wants to admit you're wrong it's the only option;

If the case is thrown out on a technicality he gets to say "see? the warrant WAS illegal! I never did anything illegal ever!"

If he gets convicted with a light sentence he gets to go back to streaming immediately and say "see? The government WAS out to get me! This is all bullshit and the evidence was faked!"

If he gets convicted with a large sentence then he's fucked no matter what he does.

If he tells the truth then he has to admit that Josh, Sean, the Kino Casino, and all the other haters were 100% right and that would hurt a narcissist more than any prison sentence. He'd also lose some of the handful of fans he had left because he'd have to admit he was lying the whole time.

It's like a fucked up dark triad version of Josh's optimism speech.
 
Archives: 1st Xeet / 2nd Xeet

He is continuing to "speak" about the juvenile court document @ X btw:


View attachment 6111411
Well he's 100% wrong here. Neglect and endangerment are child abuse in MN.

MN does not have a criminal charge called "child abuse." Criminally, the closest charges are endangerment, neglect, torture, and malicious punishment. They are broad categories and can include a variety of abuses (physical, mental, etc.)

"Child abuse" is defined in the procedural laws:

MN Stat. 630.36 (ISSUES; HOW DISPOSED OF)
§

Subdivision 1.Order.​


The issues on the calendar shall be disposed of in the following order, unless, upon the application of either party, for good cause, the court directs an indictment or complaint to be tried out of its order:


(1) indictments or complaints for felony, where the defendant is in custody;

(2) indictments or complaints for misdemeanor, where the defendant is in custody;

(3) indictments or complaints alleging child abuse, as defined in subdivision 2, where the defendant is on bail;

(4) indictments or complaints alleging domestic abuse, as defined in subdivision 3, where the defendant is on bail;

(5) indictments or complaints for felony, where the defendant is on bail; and

(6) indictments or complaints for misdemeanor, where the defendant is on bail.

After a plea, the defendant shall be entitled to at least four days to prepare for trial, if the defendant requires it.

Subd. 2.Child abuse defined.​


As used in subdivision 1, "child abuse" means an act which involves a minor victim and which constitutes a violation of section 609.221, 609.222, 609.223, 609.2231, 609.2242, 609.255, 609.321, 609.322, 609.324, 609.342, 609.343, 609.344, 609.345, 609.377, 609.378, 617.246, or 609.224 if the minor victim is a family or household member of the defendant.

609.78 is the statute under which both Rekietas have been charged for neglect and endangerment.

So: YES, Nick, child abuse has been alleged. You dumb fuck.
 
View attachment 6111650

"WHY not just make evidence for the government?" To be fair, I might be reaching a bit here, but could this be construed as him trying to hide evidence from the state?
Just along the lines of "stop talking about the case, NICK" he thinks he's being clever. But could this be portrayed as him knowingly trying to withhold or deny evidence? Or again, the state probably doesn't even need to go this route.

But something like "Why make evidence for the government?" Oh so this is evidence then eh? And you know it, and you're trying to stop CPS from having it?
As annoying as he is, he's also correct. Don't give the state more rope to hang you with. Guilty or not guilty.

We all know he's guilty. There's no point in trying to force confessions/answers out of him on social media. Just keep compiling the evidence until it's overwhelming. He's cooked.
 
If it was a negative cocaine test result, that'd be evidence you'd WANT them to have because it helps you. His first answer might as well be "because it was positive, dispshit".
I'd like to point out all of this is completely irrelevant because his 9 year old tested positive for cocaine. Cocaine which was spoted and taken from his house.

he can play as coy as he wants to. He's fucking finished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Associate Rick
As annoying as he is, he's also correct. Don't give the state more rope to hang you with. Guilty or not guilty.
The stupid nigger is on the internet all day giving exhibit after exhibit to the prosecution. He could at least post something to attempt to clear his name and turn the tide.
 
Back