Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 92 26.4%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 54 15.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.8%

  • Total voters
    348
Also, I'm not a lawyer, but I pay them a lot of money. To be clear, he's vastly overpaying for the Monty case and I expect he will do the same for the criminal thing. $100k is the cost of a pretty complex criminal case, and while Nick does not have one, he will make one.
Thanks for the assessment. Does this take into account TWO sets of lawyers on each case? One for him. One for Kayla.
 
I dont think suicide in on the table yet. This guy doesnt care about his kids or his family.
I personally predict a Lowtax ending.
His prefrontal cortex is so fucking fried from drugs, booze, and coom that he genuinely thinks he can Saul Goodman his way out of this .
Near the end of the trial, he's going to have a moment of lucid thinking where he realizes he is 100% fucked and there's no way out.
Now, the real question..?
Will he do it on stream or off?
 
Will he do it on stream or off?
Yes. His ego would demand it.
The more important question is how will he do it? They took his guns and tying a noose is harder than boiling an egg.
Like the guy who wanted to kill Bjork or R Bud Dwyer. While playing that horrible "Whiskey Drinking Lawyer" song. Can't he just go out and buy a new gun?

A final shot of Nick like this would be kino.
OIP (25).jpg
 
The more important question is how will he do it? They took his guns and tying a noose is harder than boiling an egg.
Suicide by car crash like Van Darkholme does in Great Adventures. Yes, it's not a red mustang but it's close enough.
Edit: This isn't accurate because we all know Nick can't turn properly.
 
So that's not really how it works. If a kid get removed and there are no relatives or fictive kin they can go to they go to an emergency foster. These are fosters specifically set up to grab children ASAP and keep them for short periods of time until a longer placement is found. The children I've worked with the only ones that ended up in group homes were ones that kept disrupting placement because they either were angry teenagers or their needs were beyond what a foster carer could give. Group homes and residential units are now held for the ones with actual issues that would be harmful to fosters since there is not a large amount of special needs fosters. Even then they go to a foster first since beds are hard to come by in them.
That's not true in my experience of the system, ~20% of any group home will be non-violent spergy kids, right along side the actual criminally hardened 16 year olds. This is a pre-mass immigration policy, I can only imagine how insane placement is right now. I bet space is so limited these days that kids just end up staying with their drug addict parents because CPS has a 3 month waiting list for a spot *anywhere*.

Like I said, the state treats children like widgets. They're mandated to remove them from their parents, but they don't really give a fuck where they go or how long they stay there. Storage is the correct term for what happens to these children.
 
bet space is so limited these days that kids just end up staying with their drug addict parents because CPS has a 3 month waiting list for a spot *anywhere*.
One thing that has always in my neck of the woods prevented fosters is that CPS in my state of residence does not allow foster parents (Not related to the kids) to legally carry a firearm in their own home or elsewhere, even with a CCP in a constitutional carry state. In one other state I knew you couldn't have firearms in the house period!
So yes, there's a long line but also CPS retardation with administrative rules also gets in the way.
 
Yes. His ego would demand it.

Like the guy who wanted to kill Bjork or R Bud Dwyer. While playing that horrible "Whiskey Drinking Lawyer" song. Can't he just go out and buy a new gun?

A final shot of Nick like this would be kino.
View attachment 6113970
Not to be too spergy about it but that iconic picture of Budd was because he was trying to fend off the photographer and others who were trying to stop him.

Who's gonna even try to stop Nick?
 
Thanks for the assessment. Does this take into account TWO sets of lawyers on each case? One for him. One for Kayla.
I sort of expect that Kayla's lawyers are going to go "yeah, what he said" with the motions Nick's lawyer writes and the appellate arguments he tries, and since courts don't like to do duplicate work, they will be OK with that. Kayla and Nick having separate trials could push the cost up, but there won't be duplicates of the important things like the motion to toss the warrant or the appellate arguments. The separate trials could push things over $100k, especially if they get adversarial.

Despite knowing very little about CPS, "fast = cheap" is a good approximation for the cost of legal processes, so I assume CPS might be cheap enough that $50k is the total bill for the two of them. It could be a complex process, though, so they could easily spend $100k or more dealing with CPS. It seems like it will be an ongoing process as the kids age, too, which could mean that Nick will be paying family lawyers for the next decade. I would love if someone more knowledgeable about CPS could opine.

Personally, I think Nick needs to go through a divorce to make it to $1 million. I believe in you, Nick! I hope your lawyers (and Monty and the state) make $1 million.
 
Last edited:
Can Nick still be redeemed? Of course. Even with all the horrible stuff he's done, it's all been on drugs. He can kick the habit and get his life back together. A sincere, unqualified mea culpa and putting himself in rehab would go a long way.

Will he be redeemed? From all the information we have so far, there's absolutely no indication. He hasn't owned anything. He's blamed everyone else, deflected, lied and basically said he's going to keep doing what he wants for the foreseeable feature. What he should be doing right now is getting on his hands and knees, crying his heart out and apologizing to everyone for all the horrible things he's done to his friends and family. He should be begging for forgiveness and admitting what he's done is the most horrible thing he could do, and he never wants to be this person again.

Instead, he's doing the typical crackhead thing where he won't admit to anything, even when he's caught red-handed. He thinks he can be a good parent and still snort coke and down booze. He won't admit he has a problem, and can't even start to fix it.
He created a situation where his 8 year old daughter is using cocaine.
He uprooted the lives of 5 children and had them removed from their home and their parents, and most importantly he doesn't give a single solitary fuck.
He is completely unrepentant.
There's no redemption for Balldo.
The only way to absolve his guilt is to kill himself.
 
I personally predict a Lowtax ending.
His prefrontal cortex is so fucking fried from drugs, booze, and coom that he genuinely thinks he can Saul Goodman his way out of this .
Near the end of the trial, he's going to have a moment of lucid thinking where he realizes he is 100% fucked and there's no way out.
Now, the real question..?
Will he do it on stream or off?
This, but he will do something to get a Wikipedia page. He idolizes the killdozer dude (as do I) and his narcissism will demand it. Nick if you're taking requests make your last straw be about secession from local government and particularly taxation that does not directly benefit the taxpayer (e.g. school taxes and other waste) and it's effect on the consent to be governed okay thanks.
 
Back