Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.3%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 57 16.1%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 137 38.7%

  • Total voters
    354
Good luck with Nick or Kayla ever being able to tell their kids what they should or should not do, or what they can or cannot have.

They have no moral standing to enforce on their kids.

Mom & Dad are junkies. Dad is a cuckhold. Mom's a whore.

Those kids will lose every "I've fucked your Mom & so did the principal & the football team" argument on the playground.

You have to keep the end of American Beauty in mind to understand Nick's point of view on this.

At the end of the film, the father is dead. His daughter despises him. His underage daughter is running away with the drug dealer who set the father up to die. She and the drug dealer are going off to live with his connections in the city. The father, as he is dying, thinks that this is fantastic. That his daughter has really proved to be a great person and is now set up for a great life.

You have to understand. At some very basic level Nick's dream for his children is probably that they become degenerate junkies and cam whores. To Nick, someone like Digibro or Riley represents some sort of ultimate freedom dream for his sons to aspire to. I don't think Nick could imagine a better future for his daughters than being pimped out in porn or becoming cam whores.

And if they hate him, so much the better. Because then they will not be in the way of Nick doing what he wants or taking up his time anymore.
 
My disturbing prediction is that April is the leader of all this degeneracy. She's given me Impulsive BPD symptoms in all content and social media I've seen from her, and those symptoms have rubbed off on Nick who is openly simping hard for her. By all signs, everything changed with Nick once April came into their lives, disposing most friendships he had. Then April becomes the 5 kids' nanny? BPDs often have horrifying views on family. If what I'm feeling about April is correct, then it could be really sad for those kids.
 
Read the charges in the legal thread. They are 2nd degree charges currently so unless they are upgraded or new charges added, he is getting a presumptive stayed sentence.

Before you talk about the crimimal history score, read the second link in my post where the gross midemeanours are only one-half point each, so at 2nd degree felony with 2 GM's he is still only at one point and a stayed presumptive sentence.
IMG_8870.jpeg
IMG_8871.jpeg
Source: 152.021 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CRIME IN THE FIRST DEGREE.

If he has more than 25 grams with an unsecured firearm it’s 1st degree, hopefully they will amend the charges to 1st degree after weighing it without the packaging at the Omnibus hearing. Or even better it gets upgraded to Aggravated 1st Degree because of the amount, firearm, scale, and distributing it to children.
IMG_8619.png
IMG_8867.jpeg
 
Last edited:
I think I am late on this, so clocks may be warranted. But Nick has discussed how they cannot prove USE. Has anyone considered that, in piss tests, cocaine is like GONE in 24 hours~ish? So.... as we saw.... on the Weekends, when government is off the clock, he is free to cut loose. So this most recent weekend stream... why wouldn't he use?
I expect him to MAYBE cut back on the booze, but to continue coke weekends. Because they would never know. And, he is only charged with posession.

As a side note, I have been greatly dismayed to find out that drug use is basically not a crime, or not one the cops try to prove. Apparently it really is the posession, because use is too tough to prove.

Same thing to me mostly. And others have pointed out Nick is talking himself into dealer charges by denying use, because if you have 26g of coke you're obviously doing SOMETHING with it... If you're not using it, what are ya doing with it?

Opinions welcome
 
My disturbing prediction is that April is the leader of all this degeneracy. She's given me Impulsive BPD symptoms in all content and social media I've seen from her, and those symptoms have rubbed off on Nick who is openly simping hard for her. By all signs, everything changed with Nick once April came into their lives, disposing most friendships he had. Then April becomes the 5 kids' nanny? BPDs often have horrifying views on family. If what I'm feeling about April is correct, then it could be really sad for those kids.
nah, she's not good for him and definitely makes him worse, but nick's slide into degeneracy predates her by a long time.
 
It's entirely possible Nick let his 8yr old sleep in the bed with him and the rest of the polycule. Little kids like to sleep with their parents when they get scared a night. That would definitely be putting a child in a real position to be sexually abused.

Imagine having to sleep in the same bed with the people that are fucking your parents. Eww.
 
Has anyone considered that, in piss tests, cocaine is like GONE in 24 hours~ish? So.... as we saw.... on the Weekends, when government is off the clock, he is free to cut loose.

It depends on the type of test done. You can for example do hair tests for drug use which can see drug use going back as much as 90 days.

Nick is talking himself into dealer charges by denying use, because if you have 26g of coke you're obviously doing SOMETHING with it... If you're not using it, what are ya doing with it?

At least to me, they don't have any of the evidence necessary to bring or prove a charge like that. Nick talking like a fool about how he never used cocaine isn't proof that he was dealing cocaine.
 
If nothing comes out, the Casino's credibility will be significantly damaged. And you might roll your eyes at that and go "What credibility?", but I can't recall an occasion over the past two or three years where they flat out made up a major bombshell. They exaggerate, sure. But make up a huge revelation? I don't recall them doing that.
How many Bingo cards have we made for this retard? How can you not believe, @Obsul?
 
I didn't say that I'm sure nothing will come out. I said "if nothing comes out, the casino's credibility will be damaged", and I said that in response to someone doubting.
I'm aware. I'm poking fun at the situation. I just didn't think he would get this far, so fast. I feel like a plumber checking for new leaks when I come to the thread now.
 
If he has more than 25 grams it’s 1st degree,
No it is not. We have been over the different classification multiple times ITT. Between 25 and 50 grams of coke is a second degree possession charge.

In order to catch first degree, he would have to have 50 grams or more, or 25 grams or more while brandishing/using a firearm on their person (not just having one in the house) plus two additional aggravating factors.

He's charged with second degree, which is the appropriate charge based of what they/we know and the preliminary weight of the coke recovered in the search.

Second degree:
Screenshot_20240623-193527~2.png

First degree:
Screenshot_20240623-193943~2.png
 
View attachment 6118010
View attachment 6118012
Source: 152.021 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CRIME IN THE FIRST DEGREE.

If he has more than 25 grams with an unsecured firearm it’s 1st degree, hopefully they will amend the charges to 1st degree after weighing it without the packaging at the Omnibus hearing. Or even better it gets upgraded to Aggravated 1st Degree because of the amount, firearm, scale, and distributing it to children.
View attachment 6117972
View attachment 6117976

To add to what @Captain Manning has said, even if he could be charged with 1st degree he has NOT yet been. At his point (unless they emend the charges) he is still very unlikely to go to prison unless he monumentally cocks this up--a distinct possibility.

Also to consider in the balance against confinement are:

1. He has no previous criminal history
2. The court is allowed and will weigh the impact on the community and his family
3. His family has money
4. If he takes a deal or cooperates, they will decrease the severity of the charges


I am not saying he should NOT get charged or WILL NOT/CAN NOT be charged with worse crimes, but as it currently stands, it is not likely. Speculation that says they WILL do so is just that--speculation. It is fair to theorise, but irresponsible to proclaim with certainty.

I think I am late on this, so clocks may be warranted. But Nick has discussed how they cannot prove USE. Has anyone considered that, in piss tests, cocaine is like GONE in 24 hours~ish? So.... as we saw.... on the Weekends, when government is off the clock, he is free to cut loose. So this most recent weekend stream... why wouldn't he use?
I expect him to MAYBE cut back on the booze, but to continue coke weekends. Because they would never know. And, he is only charged with posession.

It is a dumb argument on Nick's part that has been hashed in the legal thread. It is the kind of rule-lawyering and technicalities that Nick's inexperience as a lawyer takes much too seriously. Practicing lawyer know how things actually work.

Common NPL L.

As a side note, I have been greatly dismayed to find out that drug use is basically not a crime, or not one the cops try to prove. Apparently it really is the posession, because use is too tough to prove.

Same thing to me mostly. And others have pointed out Nick is talking himself into dealer charges by denying use, because if you have 26g of coke you're obviously doing SOMETHING with it... If you're not using it, what are ya doing with it?

Opinions welcome

This is by design. Much like TX recent abortion ban criminlisation of the medical provision of the service--not the woman--it is indicative of the focus of the governmental strategy to attack the supply line and distributors instead of the users. It is a deliberate choice.

Personally, I think it is a fine policy one if you have social stigmatisation of the use of really nasty shite, but with it becoming more and more normalised, people are enabling it. Added on top of that government's inability to stem the flow of the hard drugs, it is a failure all around. The strategy needs to be revised...
 
In order to catch first degree, he would have to have 50 grams or more, or 25 grams or more while brandishing/using a firearm on their person (not just having one in the house) plus two additional aggravating factors.
The image you provided says ‘or’ regarding the firearm and aggravating factors, not ‘and’.

The Aggravating Factors are the difference between First Degree and Aggravated First Degree.


Subd. 2.Possession crimes.​

(a) A person is guilty of a controlled substance crime in the first degree if:

(2) the person unlawfully possesses one or more mixtures of a total weight of 25 grams or more containing cocaine or methamphetamine and:

(i) the person or an accomplice possesses on their person or within immediate reach, or uses, whether by brandishing, displaying, threatening with, or otherwise employing, a firearm; or

(ii) the offense involves two aggravating factors;

IMG_8872.jpeg

Source: 152.021 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CRIME IN THE FIRST DEGREE.

Subd. 24.Aggravating factor.​

Each of the following is an "aggravating factor":

( 8 ) the offense involved the sale of a controlled substance to a person under the age of 18 or a vulnerable adult as defined in section 609.232, subdivision 11;

( 10 ) the defendant or an accomplice possessed equipment, drug paraphernalia, documents, or money evidencing that the offense involved the cultivation, manufacture, distribution, or possession of controlled substances in quantities substantially larger than the minimum threshold amount for the offense.

IMG_8867.jpeg

Source: 152.01 DEFINITIONS.


Nick is particularly fucked if the state decides to charge him with First Degree Sale since he had a digital scale and multiple bags of cocaine, in addition to the unsecured firearm. Multiple containers can be interpreted as intent to distribute.

Subdivision 1.Sale crimes.​

A person is guilty of controlled substance crime in the first degree if:

(1) on one or more occasions within a 90-day period the person unlawfully sells one or more mixtures of a total weight of 17 grams or more containing cocaine or methamphetamine;

(2) on one or more occasions within a 90-day period the person unlawfully sells one or more mixtures of a total weight of ten grams or more containing cocaine or methamphetamine and:

(i) the person or an accomplice possesses on their person or within immediate reach, or uses, whether by brandishing, displaying, threatening with, or otherwise employing, a firearm; or

(ii) the offense involves two aggravating factors;

IMG_8873.jpeg

Source: 152.021 CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE CRIME IN THE FIRST DEGREE.
 
Last edited:
I
Exactly. I have many friends and family who have been front-line social workers. It's underfunded, and heart-wrenching work. They're obviously, prone to both government overreach and underreach.

We NEVER hear the success stories because we will NEVER know how it may have gone otherwise. (There's a stats/economics word for that but I cannot be bothered to google.)

It's a god-awful job. In my city they only let front-line social workers do three years on rotation because it's so difficult. TUG, a supposed mental health expert who has worked with kids, has spoken to this... but he's mind-numbingly still sweeping for Nick, low key.
I really hate the fed and state, and even I know that CPS is entirely necessary. There needs to be an interventionary force to seperate children from abusive homes. Unfortunately the success stories arent talked about because to do so would be to admit that your kid got taken or you were otherwise looked at for child neglect, at best. The only people posting about their issues with CPS are innocent, regular people being taken advantage of by a corrupt government or malicious social workers, or are complete scumbag white trash wiggers that will call a cop handcuffing them police brutality.

I wonder which one nick is.
 
I am not saying he should NOT get charged or WILL NOT/CAN NOT be charged with worse crimes, but as it currently stands, it is not likely. Speculation that says they WILL do so is just that--speculation. It is fair to theorise, but irresponsible to proclaim with certainty.
There's also been speculation they might drop the possession to third degree upon reweighing the coke, and subtracting the baggies/containers. No more than 24.99 grams would get him there.

That's speculation too though. We only know what we know. The decision/determination rests in the hand of the investigators and DA. As it stands, it's second degree possession.
 
Back