Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 18.0%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 26.6%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 55 15.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 135 38.6%

  • Total voters
    350
cgoody cumcumcum.png


Cgoody tuning in to this very small live streamer going over one of Nicks videos.
 
not really it is just extrapolation from all the other speculation from the thread. I disavow.
To recap:

- Aaron said Nick tried coke for the first time at Hedonism II.

- Upon researching that claim, @Balldo's Gate finds an instance where Nick does indeed admit that he first tried coke in 2022, around the time Hedonism II happened. Said clip wasn't posted here (or even extent till Balldo made it), and was from a show that aired when this was still a fan thread.

- You nonetheless claim Aaron "extrapolated" it from the thread.

If that's what you wanna go with, I certainly can't stop you. But it seems pretty silly to me.
 
Regarding Nick possibilities to go Lowtax-mode, we need to make it so Nick boxes Eric July. That way the Nicktax questline will start.
I can't imagine any medical professional clearing Nick for a sanctioned combat sport event of any kind.

Shit, I can't imagine Nick being medically cleared to play bridge with old women.
 
I don't think there's anyone on this website that would disagree with the statement: "CPS needs across the board reform."

But I have my doubts it ever seriously will. This is because any ground-level, organic movement to change CPS started by good-hearted people who are tired of seeing headlines like "child gets awarded back to druggie parent, gets sold for sex and murdered" is going to have retard trailer trash parents whose children were taken away from them for very good reason riding their coattails.
This is definitely one problem of CPS reform: it attracts a lot of bad people. I'm going to point out an additional difficulty: even a good CPS will have bad outcomes which means that even a good CPS will have calls for reform from idealists morons who demand all outcomes be good outcomes.

CPS+Foster will always have bad outcomes
The best possible outcome when CPS gets involved is that they investigate, disturb a good family's life, and correctly decide to leave them alone. Which is already a slightly bad outcome.

Generally CPS is deciding between two bad options: leave the children with mediocre, bad, or horrible parents, or use government force to rip those children away from their parents (and often give them to strangers collecting a paycheck). When you're choosing between two bad options, the best you can get is a bad outcome (ideally one that avoids a much worse outcome).

A healthy functioning CPS does its best to balance those bad outcomes, to intervene if and only if the result of intervention will be a net-good. Unfortunately this means that even a perfect CPS will have a lot of (at best) mediocre outcomes.

The Rekietas and even good CPS having only bad options
The Rekietas are a good example of what I'm saying about only bad options. What can CPS do? (1) leave the kids with druggie parents, (2) use government force to give the children to the grandparents that raised those druggie parents, or (3) use government force to give the children to foster strangers. None of these are good. Even if things go surprisingly well and one set of grandparents steps up and does a great job, that still involves taking the children from their parents which does inherently hurt them. Likely hurt them less than leaving them with their unfit parents, but still not good.

Reform unnecessary?
I'm not saying that reform is unnecessary. I'm only noting the need to keep expectations reasonable, because often pushes for reform come as "a bad outcome happened, we need reform!" No, that's unreasonable. But let's get into why CPS rarely meets the ideal.

CPS+Foster can stray from bad to horrorshow
CPS+Foster is run by humans and it has the same problems as cops and prison guards but worse. Government power attracts bullies and self-serving corruption, while access to (particularly vulnerable) children attracts pedophiles. Politicians, cops, and prison guards attract the former, CPS+Foster attracts both.

Ideally these bad actors are filtered out and when not filtered they are (ideally) still limited by rules and oversight. But it's a difficult problem, the reasons for which are beyond the scope of this, but are basically because it's impossible to "solve" corruption.

As an example of how bad it can get, see that time in Germany when Helmut Kentler intentionally and purposefully placed children with foster pedophiles as an "experiment" which went on for decades (started late 60s, but children remained until at least 2003, so 30+ years). But don't worry, Kentler described the experiment as a "complete success."

Of course severe problems can go the other way, leaving children with horrifically abusive parents when it's clear they're monsters.

Both of these problems can come from corruption, racial activists, lazy or incompetent employees, lack of funding, bad rules, etc. Some of these can be fixed (or made worse) by reform.

CPS+Foster conclusion
CPS is a necessary evil. A good CPS has the job of balancing between bad choices, so even a good CPS will have bad outcomes. But CPS also has a propensity for being so much worse because its powers will always attract corruption, bullies, and pedophiles while suffering from our basic reality of limited resources. Like all necessary evils: it needs to be watched for unnecessary evil.
 
The issue here is that because Nick grew up in a violent neighborhood (according to what he told Eric July at least), he thinks that he's black, and because of this thinks he'll get off purely due to his race.
someone should probably tell nick that just because he's Eskimo bros with the Jamaicans that railed kayla at hedonism that doesn't make him black.
 
I fully believe balldo suffers from ED but I do not believe he would share a story of sexual dysfunction at a swingers resort with steel balldo. This isn't the first time steel balldo has claimed this, but I'm just not buying it.

A wife with a cuck husband would gleefully tell the story though.

>The tests were clean
How am I supposed to interpret this statement? So Balldo didn't reach the 500pg threshold while one of his children blew it out (literally) by 1000%?
Or was he suggesting the test itself was hygienically done, nothing stated about the results?

Balldo would score at least high 5 digits, if not over 100,000pg/mg.

He doesn't care about public perception! He's said it himself! It all lines up with the grand government conspiracy angle. Yeah, it may be the only defense that completely exonerates him and there's not a shred of evidence, but it's VERY REAL. The state continues to contradict itself by posting proof, but it's Nick words that are the truth here!!!
 
awww is he gonna go back to Houston after all?
If Ty Beard does an online notary, then TX can claim jurisdiction just like Massachusetts did to Alex Jones.
Right now they are going to be cross checking those serial numbers with every shop in Minnesota. They are required to keep records. If he has a hot gun he can't explain, he is fucked.
One thing that might save his ass is if his gun was brought in from Texas when he was a TX resident, since MN doesn't require a registry. That's also not fun because the ATF/FBI for sure will be involved with the NICS trace and trying to find the original purchase record.

The only other thing that will save him from the gun charge (aside from tossing the warrant) is the plethora of court cases in the 5th Circuit (mainly Texas) that keeps throwing out portions of 922 as unconstitutional. Honestly there's not much chance since the only person who would throw those out on SCOTUS is Thomas. Maybe he'll vote to make it 9-0 to deny if he sees Nick as a "white bread ass nigga" like July did.

United States v. Merriman (5:22-cr-01439) - Southern District of Texas
Overturns 922(k), (Defacing a serial # off a firearm) is still a toss up on appeal after Northern District of Texas in the 5th circuit threw it out post Bruen. It will likely be reheard due to the reversal of Texas v. Ramihi on 922(g) being unconstitutional as "no exact historical regulation" test was deemed improper.

USA v. Daniels, No. 22-60596 - Northern District of Texas
Overturns 922(g), the ban on a person who is addicted or unlawful user as unconstitutional (Will be reheard post-Rahimi ). This does not apply to possession.
 
Kino Casino hinting at even worse Rekieta news dropping in the near future. Waiting on verification.
PPP and Warski claim to have a source that "would know" and that it'll come out in the next few days, supposedly will make the cocaine "look like a cigarette". PPP hinting that it's something so bad that all the adults involved at the Rekieta house should be executed if true.
What worse news could still happen. Rekieta's kids trooning out? Kayla killed herself? Corpses buried in the backyard?
Child sexual abuse.
 
Except he didn't deny it at all, he just called the guy stupid.

This is Nick's MO-- to lie and imply.

Nick doesn't care, he once opined that it would be good for his children to know about his sex life. No doubt that extends to drug use too.

Always evergreen...


There’s something weird and gay about a man tolerating another man in his marital bed, even if it means you get sexual access to that guys wife. How much of each other do they end up seeing in the hot tub? The bedroom? When he’s slamming your wife? The shower and toilet? Seems like this would require more than just a normal hetero male tolerance for male nudity and sexual behavior.

Relevant clips:






Kayla being zonked out was 2020 I think. Here's my reasoning
1) Ralph called her a slatternly woman in retaliation for Nick laughing at the shart

No, I was specifically talking about why Nick got locked out of his room one one specific occasion where Kayla was incapacitated.

2) Drexel bitched at fellow housnigger Q (Into the Darkness) about the video where Q was saying he banged our wife. I recall discussing this specifically because I tried to archive the video but Q's channel was nuked for "election interference" shortly after, hence the dating of that statement.
3) I specifically recall trying to archive 2 but Q was literally nuked off youtube for election interference within a day.

This was Q claiming that Drexel said something 'inappropriate' about Kayla--not Q implying any had fucked her.

99% of the things said by balldowashers are sad at best and infuriating at worst, but Earthworm Janny's sweeping has been the most confusing for me so far.

Many sweepers have been trying to downplay what's happened so far by saying something like, "well I went without changing MY clothes for days when I was little hahaha." But in that instance they are saying that's what happened to them, not what they did to someone else. Doug goes one further and says that his own children went without a change of clothes for 2 weeks and had "bones poking out" on their "worst day." So Doug, a famous animator and writer, openly admitted on an internet drama livestream run by two Canadians that he has, for whatever reason, neglected his children. I don't remember if the KC boys asked him why he allowed this to happen.

Doug is implying 'we were poor, thin, and in threadbare clothes at one time! If people saw us then, they would have thought the same!'

Except Nick is not financially challenged, so the analogy is not fitting.

According to Minnesota defense attorneys Nick could be facing a mandatory minimum sentence of 5.5 years for a first offense felony cocaine possession. Taking in to consideration the aggravating factors, unsecured firearms and distributing it to child it would be a 7 year mandatory minimum. Just having the scale test positive could lead to him being sentenced as a dealer. The kids testing positive for cocaine will probably get him more than the minimum since it basically proves it wasn’t just for personal use.
View attachment 6117778
Source: Minnesota First Degree Controlled Substance Offenses

No. Look at the actual sentencing guidlines on this page/posts:



Spend some time in the actual legal thread for more in-depth discussion.
 

Attachments

  • Good_kids_see_this_wants_to_know_parents_sex_lives.mp4
    18.4 MB
Kino Casino hinting at even worse Rekieta news dropping in the near future. Waiting on verification.

PPP and Warski claim to have a source that "would know" and that it'll come out in the next few days, supposedly will make the cocaine "look like a cigarette". PPP hinting that it's something so bad that all the adults involved at the Rekieta house should be executed if true.
Yeah I’m very interested to know what this is gonna be
Source : trust me bro
PPP and warski are literally retarded.
 
Back