Alex Jones’ Infowars to be shut down, assets liquidated: bankruptcy trustee

Archive/Sauce

A US bankruptcy court trustee is planning to shut down conspiracy theorist Alex Jones’ Infowars media platform and liquidate its assets to help pay the $1.5 billion in lawsuit judgments Jones owes for repeatedly calling the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting a hoax.

In an “emergency” motion filed Sunday in Houston, trustee Christopher Murray indicated publicly for the first time that he intends to “conduct an orderly wind-down” of the operations of Infowars’ parent company and “liquidate its inventory.”

IMG_9487.jpeg

Jones has been saying on his web and radio shows that he expects Infowars to operate for a few more months before it is shut down because of the bankruptcy.

But he has vowed to continue his bombastic broadcasts in some other fashion, possibly on social media. He also had talked about someone else buying the company and allowing him to continue his shows as an employee.

Murray also asked US Bankruptcy Judge Christopher Lopez to put an immediate hold on the Sandy Hook families’ efforts to collect the massive amount Jones owes them. Murray said those efforts would interfere with his plans to close the parent company, Free Speech Systems in Austin, Texas, and sell off its assets — with much of the proceeds going to the families.

On Friday, lawyers for the parents of one of the 20 children killed in the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, asked a state judge in Texas to order Free Speech Systems, or FSS, to turn over to the families certain assets, including money in bank accounts, and garnish its accounts. Judge Maya Guerra Gamble approved the request, court records show, prompting Murray’s emergency motion.

The parents, Neil Heslin and Scarlett Lewis, whose 6-year-old son, Jesse Lewis, was killed in the shooting, won a $50 million verdict in Texas over Jones’ lies about the shooting being a hoax staged by crisis actors with the goal of increasing gun control. In a separate Connecticut lawsuit, Jones was ordered to pay other Sandy Hook families more than $1.4 billion for defamation and emotional distress.

Referring to the families’ collection efforts, Murray said in the Sunday court filing that “The specter of a pell-mell seizure of FSS’s assets, including its cash, threatens to throw the business into chaos, potentially stopping it in its tracks, to the detriment” of his duties in Jones’ personal bankruptcy case.

“The Trustee seeks this Court’s intervention to prevent a value-destructive money grab and allow an orderly process to take its course,” Murray said.

Murray also asked the judge to clarify his authority over Jones’ bank accounts. As part of Jones’ personal bankruptcy case, his ownership rights of FSS were turned over to Murray. Jones has been continuing his daily broadcasts in the meantime.

It was not immediately clear when the bankruptcy judge would address Murray’s motion.

Bankruptcy lawyers for Jones, Heslin and Lewis did not immediately return messages seeking comment Monday.

Christopher Mattei, a lawyer for the Sandy Hook families in the Connecticut lawsuit, said they supported the trustee’s new motion. He also said the families were disappointed with the motion filed Friday in the Texas court by Heslin and Lewis, which he said would “undercut” an equitable distribution of Jones’ assets to all the families.

“This is precisely the unfortunate situation that the Connecticut (lawsuit) families hoped to avoid,” Mattei said.

IMG_9486.jpeg
The families in both lawsuits, who have not received anything from Jones yet, appear likely to get only a fraction of what Jones owes them.

Jones has about $9 million in personal assets, according to the most recent financial filings in court. Free Speech Systems has about $6 million in cash on hand and about $1.2 million worth of inventory, according to recent court testimony.

On June 14, Lopez, the bankruptcy judge, approved converting Jones’ personal bankruptcy case from a reorganization to a liquidation, which Jones requested. Lopez also dismissed the reorganization bankruptcy case of FSS, after lawyers for Jones and the Sandy Hook families could not agree on a final bankruptcy plan.

The bankruptcy cases had put an automatic hold on the families’ efforts to collect any of the $1.5 billion, under federal law. The dismissal of the FSS bankruptcy meant the families would have to shift those efforts from the bankruptcy court to the state courts in Texas and Connecticut where they won the legal judgments.

Jones and Free Speech Systems filed for bankruptcy protection in 2022, the same year that relatives of many victims of the school shooting that killed 20 first graders and six educators won their lawsuits.
 
Last edited:
The smart move for the families would be to keep Infowars alive and generating revenue, so they can garnish the profits for years to come. But for those really running the show, the families were only an instrument, and the goal all along was what is happening now, destroying it all.
 
Can this be appealed any higher? It's horrifying that saying you don't believe something or have doubts about something is legal basis to destroy your life.
An appeal was filed after the verdict:

Someone who understands law better than me may be able to clarify, but it is the appeals court issuing these recent orders, so it seems this appeal failed. And I believe that once these proceedings have run their course, he can appeal to the Connecticut Supreme Court, and eventually to SCOTUS. But that could take years when Alex may be penniless.

And yes the judgement defies all reason. Even if he had personally killed all the Sandy Hook children with his bare hands, a verdict this size would be far beyond all historical precedent. Yet all he did was express retarded opinions on his show.
 
Can this be appealed any higher? It's horrifying that saying you don't believe something or have doubts about something is legal basis to destroy your life.
And yes the judgement defies all reason.

The 1.5 billion award in the Connecticut judgment was absurd.

But what was equally horrifying was the denial of due process in at least one (and perhaps both?) of the civil defamation cases.

As has been well documented, one of his cases wasn't actually an adversarial trial because the judge declared a default judgment of guilt as punishment for Jones' side failing to provide some requested evidence by the plaintiffs during the discovery phase. Evidence that Jones claimed wasn't in his possession and wasn't able to access (some videos or data in the possession of Google).

The judge declared him guilty on a technicality and the court proceedings went forward simply to determine damages.

Jones was also gagged in the courtroom. He was barred from informing one of the juries that he was already in bankruptcy proceedings prior to any damages being awarded.

I can't remember if this specifically related to the Texas or Connecticut judgments, but the breach of due process was very similar in both cases IIRC.
 
He could just start information wars.
if I were him, I’d have it be owned by someone else and have Alex jones just be an employee.
obviously jones owns it since the company would be nothing without him, but he technically doesn’t own it for legal purposes.
That sort of technicality wrangling only works for those in power. If you are in power, it's used as an end run around laws and due process. But if you're not in power, you don't get away with it.
 
That sort of technicality wrangling only works for those in power. If you are in power, it's used as an end run around laws and due process. But if you're not in power, you don't get away with it.
you don't know shit, people do this all the time every single day. im not talking about millionaires or politicians.
I knew a guy who was on social security, he couldnt run a business otherwise itll be taken away.
but his girlfriend wasnt, so the business was run in her name.
similar things happen with liquor stores, pawn shops, business loans all the time on account of being a felon and such.
even OJ simpson pulled tricks, he had a house in florida that couldnt be taken, he rented everything he owned, his car his clothes so it couldnt be taken by the goldman's, he never paid them a dime.
with this setup. he can keep his house, his car, his wages will be garnished but not the entire company liquidated.
 
Last edited:
OJ simpson pulled tricks, he had a house in florida that couldnt be taken, he rented everything he owned, his car his clothes so it couldnt be taken by the goldman's, he never paid them a dime.
The Goldmans got all rights to If I Did It.
 
Back