Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
AKA a typical dose of cocaine is 2 million times your 500,000 picogram hypothetical.
You are aware that a typical dose of cocaine does not immediately come shooting out of one's scalp at the moment of ingestion right? What is found in hair are small traces deposited by the action of the follicle during the brief period when the blood it is being supplied contains cocaine, (and possibly also by trace secretion into sweat which is then incorporated into the hair, a mechanism which has been proposed but not to my knowledge investigated).

pg/mg or ng/10mg simply are the units in which these tests are measured, and the approximate order of magnitude in which cocaine traces are typically deposited in hair after use. I don't know why you seem to think you can reason your way out of this fact.
 
Retarded drivel
Yeah, you do sound retarded.
If I sniff up 5g of cocaine, 5g should be found in hair follicle test or what exactly are you trying to say?
Just admit you don't know what the fuck you're talking about, you can't understand the units and the test itself.

How much is the weight of 1 hair?
Mass*
 
I don't care about how many telegrams of cocaine were in Nick's third grader. His other four kids tested clean. That means 80% of his kids weren't daily coke fiends. Just admit that Nick is 4/5ths of a good father. Even the best pro baseball players only hit one out of three.
 
Picograms is so low of a content as to be statistically insignificant. That has weight in USADA/WADA testing, but is too small for other drug tests i think.
Oh we got another professional pharmacologist and a fucking bitch-ass mathematician here. How are there so many of these people here? Holy Christ, every single person here is some cocksucking Ph.D. Michael Baden motherfucker.

This is such a great site. Everyone here is a doctor.
I don't care about how many telegrams of cocaine were in Nick's third grader. His other four kids tested clean. That means 80% of his kids weren't daily coke fiends. Just admit that Nick is 4/5ths of a good father. Even the best pro baseball players only hit one out of three.
This is a fantastic point. He should be given a Father of the Year award simply because a whole 80% of his kids did not test positive for cocaine. That means he RULES!

This means this dude, who had five kids, was so successful as a dad that FOUR of them didn't test positive for cocaine. That's a super 80% successful run. He deserves an award.

Also are you a Bayesian or a frequentist?

What was he supposed to do? Just stop his nine year old daughter from snorting up his stash?
fuckface.png
 
Last edited:
Looking forward to your posts about how Nick sacrificed hobos to satan and had pedo sex as part of the black sacrament.
Nobody tell him.
to even hint that is the case, then the anti-kiwibros will use that against us to invalidate everything we say (and accuratly predict!)
It's a realistic possibility when a 9 year old tests 10x the positive cutoff for cocaine and their neglectful parents are having degenerate swinger sex parties with drugs. Let the courts decide.
 

Late last week a discussion arose regarding Aaron's potential criminal liability in the current debacle. One user said that while what he did was a dick move (I am summarizing here; I'll find the post and amend, if requested and necessary), it wasn't illegal. I disagreed. At that time, I cited the wrong portion of the Minnesota Criminal Code Statute regarding child endangerment. I referred to
152.137 Methamphetamine-Related Crimes Involving Children and Vulnerable Adults (a) No person may knowingly engage in any of the following activities in the presence of a child or vulnerable adult; in the residence of a child or a vulnerable adult; in a building, structure, conveyance, or outdoor location where a child or vulnerable adult might reasonably be expected to be present; in a room offered to the public for overnight accommodation; or in any multiple unit residential building:
(1) manufacturing or attempting to manufacture methamphetamine;
(2) storing any chemical substance;
(3) storing any methamphetamine waste products; or
(4) storing any methamphetamine paraphernalia.
(b) No person may knowingly cause or permit a child or vulnerable adult to inhale, be exposed to, have contact with, or ingest methamphetamine, a chemical substance, or methamphetamine paraphernalia.

I fucked up because I was looking for law relating to exposing a child to illegal substances. I failed to be vigilant, much like Nick failed to be vigilant, because in the statute above, an adulterant is involved and affects the sentencing guidelines. Yes, my wording was intentional. And accurate. See, Nick? Nuances do matter when years of your life are involved. You’re not the only one who can play word games.

With that being said, I was so quick to try finding case law involving exposure of children to drugs that I failed to read the fine print involving the details of the type of drug exposure (which apparently matters). So, I scoured the Minnesota Criminal Statute. I have continued to voluntarily abuse my ear drums daily in order to hear Aaron’s recitation of events. The point is, his dumb fucking take of “I tried! I tried!” is not enough, per Minnesota Criminal Statute, to cover his ass. I’m not saying the guy didn’t or doesn’t care. But much like most of you, I’ve always contended that Aaron was being overly performative in his exultations as a means to cover his ass. Aaron believes throwing himself before the mercy of the public whilst espousing exaggerated care for the children will save him. Fuck you, Nick. Fuck you, Kayla. Fuck you, Aaron. And fuck you, April. The mask slipped a long time ago. It’s been simultaneously nauseating and amusing watching Aaron try to think he is as clever as Nick, the man he says isn’t as smart as he thinks he is. They totally touched tubes.

Per Minnesota Criminal Statute 609.378 Neglect or Endangerment of Child
Subdivision 1. Persons guilty of neglect or endangerment.

(b) A parent, legal guardian, or caretaker who endangers the child's person or health by:

(1) intentionally or recklessly causing or permitting a child to be placed in a situation likely to substantially harm the child's physical, mental, or emotional health or cause the child's death; or…”


If I’m wrong, then please correct me, and I will take the L. I’ve taken time to thoughtfully construct this message, as while it may be late and gay, I thought it was important to lay out the legal theories and elements. I think Nick and Aaron are both hiding in stupid ways, and both have already been and will be found out by people who have more agency than us 'tards.

You give a man enough time to talk about himself, he will reveal who he is. Granted, listening to Aaron replay stories of their “Qover” or however you spell their window licking Power Rangers union, is like listening to someone with late stages of dementia. It’s old and fucking exhausting. Generally speaking, though, I provide grace to those who I love and aren’t being complete shitbags. Aaron and Nick are cut from the same cloth. May they discontinue its manufacturing.

TLDR: After review of the Minnesota Criminal Statute, it is my non-lawyer opinion that Aaron is criminally liable, albeit in a lesser degree, for acts of child endangerment, leading up to the events on May 23, 2024, which will forever rock the Baldoverse.

Should he be given the same amount of licks? Dunno. Aaron allowed dangerous conditions to persist, did not stop them, and was present for dangerous conduct that led to or could lead to the harm of a child. I wonder if they sell SpaghettiOs in commissary? Curious minds want to know.

A philosophical debate can ensue, albeit unnecessary in my opinion, but the fact of the matter is that Aaron was present during the time in which the Rekieta children should have been sought after in a meaningful way. According to the code, Aaron would be considered a caregiver (see Sec. 609.376 MN Statutes – “Caretaker” means an individual who has responsibility for the care of a child as a result of a family relationship or who has assumed responsibility for all or a portion of the care of a child).

Aaron had every ability during that time to interrupt the process of what ensued, and has stated on several streams that it was a chaotic environment. Let me be clear: I loathe each and every adult in this situation who allowed those innocent children to be further exposed to shit that did hurt them and could have hurt them.

I’ve been listening to Aaron’s streams, and I truly think he has been trying to get ahead of the criminal indictments. As discussed above, Aaron is effectively throwing himself before the mercy of public opinion, in a terribly performative way, in which he espouses he was a shithead just like the triad that kicked him out of the alpha line, but less of one because he left. No motherfucker, you’re just as big of an asshole because you left a dangerously toxic environment abandoning kids to who didn’t have floaties, let alone moobies, to keep their heads above water.

Next, Nick’s hair, the samples, and my theory why he is withholding results. If I’m late and gay, sprinkle me with those rainbows.

I also have a theory regarding Nick’s hair follicle samples, and his refusal to disclose their results. Now just rock with me a moment. This is not based upon my beliefs of whether he is guilty or innocent (I believe the former), but in my legal experience (not a lawyer, but a legal assistant/paralegal for 20 years), I believe he revoked the release of information – after taking the test (double slimy and conniving, in my opinion – just don’t sign it to begin with, you retard), to save his own hide in his criminal case. Nick is not afraid of the effect that the follicle test results would have showing he did a bunch of blow off of Aaron’s ass crack toward his CPS case, but rather his criminal case. I believe he revoked the release of information, which would allow CPS to obtain those results and ultimately disclose them in public filings, in order to not only prevent them from being used in his criminal proceedings, but also to shield whatever is left of his ego. Those damn Kiwi Farmers!

While the two matters are separate, they share some of the same facts and are, to some degree, intertwined. The effects of his criminal case affect his child services case, and vice versa. One could argue that they are two different matters, but the fact is that both shit shows were born from the same incident (Nick being the common denominator). I think he is looking at it from the lens of, “It’s better that I am apart from my children for a couple of months rather than a couple of years, especially if I can con the rest of them into respecting mah constitutional rights. It’s nawt true!”

By the way, does anyone else think Nick dyed his hair? I’m likely late on this one. I’m catching up on the thread.
 
Last edited:
If I’m wrong, then please correct me, and I will take the L.

Aaron was never a parent, a legal guardian or caretaker. All of the time he spent around the kids, they were under the control of either their actual parents and/or the nanny, a paid caretaker. Aaron was just a visitor to their home.

Your novel theory won't fly.

You say you went looking for case law. What you need to convince are actual cases in which people in situations akin to Aaron get convicted of these offences. I bet you can't find any.
 
I have a question for the legal types. My experience with lawyers hasn't been in the US of A and also hasn't been profound, I've retained counsel on occasion and followed their advice to the letter.

Wouldn't any competent counsel be telling him to shut the hell up right now, and not give the state anymore information to play with?

He seems to my untutored self to be his own worse enemy.

Is this going to make it harder for him to retain counsel? Is this likely to get him dropped as a client?

Am I correct in my surmise that Nick is a nightmare client?
 
Wouldn't any competent counsel be telling him to shut the hell up right now, and not give the state anymore information to play with?
Literally everyone, regardless of their legal background and licensing, has been telling him to shut the fuck up.
Is this going to make it harder for him to retain counsel? Is this likely to get him dropped as a client?
No. It Just means he is going to be spending a lot of money on attorneys that can't prevent him from sabotaging his own case. A lawyer doesn't care about winning any particular case compared to just getting paid.

Nick is going to end up buying his attorney a house effectively.
Am I correct in my surmise that Nick is a nightmare client?
Not as long as he pays. Public defenders get stabbed with handling Nicks all the time and they get next to nothing for their time.
 
It is pretty sensible that Aaron is not worth prosecuting here... Pushing him as caretaker is clearly waste of effort and stretching the definition. April on other hand... If one of the parents describe her as Nanny, that means she would be caretaker... So first I would look at any action against April before even thinking something going against Aaron...
 
Aaron was never a parent, a legal guardian or caretaker. All of the time he spent around the kids, they were under the control of either their actual parents and/or the nanny, a paid caretaker. Aaron was just a visitor to their home.

Your novel theory won't fly.

You say you went looking for case law. What you need to convince are actual cases in which people in situations akin to Aaron get convicted of these offences. I bet you can't find any.
I respectfully disagree. According to Minnesota Criminal Code, Aaron would be considered a caregiver (see Sec. 609.376 MN Statutes). “Caretaker” means an individual who has responsibility for the care of a child as a result of a family relationship or who has assumed responsibility for all or a portion of the care of a child.

Aaron can’t have it both ways. He can either be the savior feeding those poor children, or he didn’t do nuffin’z.

He was aware dangerous activity was taking place.

Fuck all of them. I personally detest the vaudeville version of contrition Aaron performs. Nick is terrible for so many more reasons explained on the primary thread. For this particular fuckery, there’s some ‘splaining to do, Lucy.


EDIT (@ 5:36 CST): Removed "was in control and operation of" because it was not his property. He knew what was going on.
It is pretty sensible that Aaron is not worth prosecuting here... Pushing him as caretaker is clearly waste of effort and stretching the definition. April on other hand... If one of the parents describe her as Nanny, that means she would be caretaker... So first I would look at any action against April before even thinking something going against Aaron...
Charge him. Get info. Give him a plea deal. He has made enough self incriminating statements. It’s that simple.
 
Last edited:
Going over to someone's house a couple times and making their kids spaghettio's while the parents are busy being enough to make a person legally liable for that kids well-being for life would be completely fucking retarded.

We have a case of genuine, horrific, child neglect and genuine abuse with a parent potentially giving their 9-year-old cocaine, and people are so clouded by tard rage at aaron for hanging out with nick a few times that they're trying to twist the law worse than any corrupt cop in a bad movie.

The implications of a society where making lunch for some kid or babysitting for one afternoon leads to you being charged if the parents of that kids are neglectful or abusive would be a nightmare, extend that tenuous logic to every other law and everyone in the world is in prison for knowing someone else who broke the law.

RICO charges for saying hi to someone coming up quick.
 
1 picogram is 0.000000000001 grams, so 500,000 picograms is 0.0000005 grams. AKA a typical dose of cocaine is 2 million times your 500,000 picogram hypothetical. Fuck off with this nonsense.
Bro are you stupid? We're talking about the trace molecules left in somebodies hair follicle months after they metabolised the shit, not the fat line she snorted in the first place.

What was he supposed to do? Just stop his nine year old daughter from snorting up his stash?
Trying to stop her would violate the NAP so it's a bit of an ethical quandry tbh.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back