Twitch & Their Competitors / r/LivestreamFail / Live Streamer Community - Imitation of Hollywood

Next Highlight
lindsayfan said:
there's already 1000 lazy react videos published in the last hour titled DR DISRESPECT QUIT YOUTUBE?? with soyfacing randos on the thumbnails... idk what counts as a documentary anymore. of all the ppl pumping out videos about this the only one i enjoyed really was koosh analyzing the whole situation with some deep islamic logic and concluding doc is innocent because he's so tall and handsome https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3V67uBeA-Wg
Click to expand...
Not documentary, a document that is going to be released
 
  • Informative
Reactions: lindsayfan
lindsayfan said:
damn. damn, damn, damn, that's the first thing i've seen that makes me think he might actually be guilty.

doc you're breaking my heart!!! this sucks.

here's his ominous signoff from tonite's stream, courtesy of gaming gossip parasite jake lucky:
Click to expand...
I'm honestly interpreting this as an indicator that he's been getting tired of the streaming rat race and this might be the final straw that erodes the last of his enjoyment. Guilty or no, it might be wise to end his career at this point instead of limping along with no passion while people continue to circulate rumors that he was trying to hook up with/groom a minor.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Vyse Inglebard, Automaton Type 2B and Northern Blockhead
Doc responds and spills the details. Short summary: it's true but he's no pedophile and nothing illegal happened!

What an absolute shit show.

Screenshot_20240625_135227_Chrome.jpg
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: Barry Williams, Grin Machine, newdumb and 14 others
sharp lint said:
Doc responds and spills the details. Short summary: it's true but he's no pedophile and nothing illegal happened!

What an absolute shit show.
Click to expand...
Apparently he got called out regarding edits on the tweet? The lovely preview system doesn't show you shit, though, since the tweets are long.
Someone in the replies says what happened:
He edited out "minor", got called on it, and then edited it back in. Quite the apology when you're still trying to skirt responsibility.
Click to expand...
Not a good look, Disrespect chads!
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: h2_jGX, Gravityqueen4life, Vyse Inglebard and 1 other person
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Barry Williams and h2_jGX
"These were casual, mutual conversations that sometimes leaned too much in the direction of being inappropriate"

That's some pretty lame weasel words there. At this point do you have to ask, would want this guy to talk with your kids, much less meet him IRL? Or even watch him online? I wouldn't.

It's not EDP levels, but it's getting in the ballpark. Nasty.

Saying they were 17 and he didn't know I guess. Will be real interesting on how the commentary crowd usuals go with it. Asmongold, as usual, doesn't take a hard stance either way.

Asmon: Geeks and Gamers: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C11BE7ZOp_I

Tom's going hard it looks. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Cl1Q7GRHCk

Mutahar really goes hard. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xb5LhW1h5Q0
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Informative
Reactions: Gaius Cumulus, no-exit, h2_jGX and 5 others
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Barry Williams, Gaius Cumulus, FedPostalService and 3 others
Northern Blockhead said:
Not to go too meta, but I think it's safe to say this guy more than deserves his own thread on here.
Click to expand...
Nowhere in his statement did he admit to anything I don't know how people don't get the concept of reading comprehension I did some inappropriate things inappropriate is a very vague statement Josh is right when he says calling someone a pedophile you should have absolute proof when you make the allegation.

I'll say it again the YouTube commentary community are bottom feeders of the highest order and should all die in a hole
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: jenna raiding, bonified retard, h2_jGX and 2 others
sum ting wong said:
View attachment 6125071
He literally admits to inappropriate conversations with a minor.
Click to expand...
The point is that inappropriate can mean many things unless I actually see what the message is actually say that can be a vast majority of things I would need actual proof not this may be considered inappropriate.
Destiny literally said it's really hard not to have sex with the 15 year old that is a clear statement of fact that he thinks it's hard not to be a pedophile so he has pedophilic thoughts all I'm seeing here is badly worded public statement.
 
  • Dumb
  • Autistic
  • Like
Reactions: Meltryllis, Abbadon's Gate and bonified retard
Sargon's wife's son said:
The point is that inappropriate can mean many things unless I actually see what the message is actually say that can be a vast majority of things I would need actual proof not this may be considered inappropriate.
Destiny literally said it's really hard not to have sex with the 15 year old that is a clear statement of fact that he thinks it's hard not to be a pedophile so he has pedophilic thoughts all I'm seeing here is badly worded public statement.
Click to expand...
Yes, inappropriate can mean many things, but when it's you describing your own accused pedo behavior one would expect you to do a better job describing it than whatever the shit this is. "It was inappropriate BUT" should have been the very next word that followed that. 'It was inappropriate BUT she lied about her age', etc. Assuming it wasn't him just flatly being a pedo, of course.

Yet it wasn't. He's just flatly admitting to inappropriate behavior with a minor and throwing pocket sand in your eye and hoping you forget about it because "he never actually met her".
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Meltryllis, Breen, bonified retard and 7 others
Sargon's wife's son said:
The point is that inappropriate can mean many things
Click to expand...
Such as being sexually explicit with a minor. When you're being accused of being sexually explicit with a minor, and you describe it as "inappropriate" without elaboration, you are validating those notions.

Even if, hypothetically, there weren't sexually explicit conversations... he's still validating the notion that there were.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Whiskers, bonified retard and h2_jGX
Harm said:
Such as being sexually explicit with a minor. When you're being accused of being sexually explicit with a minor, and you describe it as "inappropriate" without elaboration, you are validating those notions.

Even if, hypothetically, there weren't sexually explicit conversations... he's still validating the notion that there were.
Click to expand...
Yeah, short of him showing the logs himself and them somehow not being anything out of the ordinary, there is no way for him to get out of this without coming off as a nonce.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: 306h4Ge5eJUJ, h2_jGX, Vyse Inglebard and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back