Fake Steve Franssen
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2022
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This man seems to have genuinely gotten away with murder.It's been exactly one year since Mama JF was last seen alive. No real updates since this article.
View attachment 6105397
i'd imagine the police would be able to find out if she was in a psych hospital.This man seems to have genuinely gotten away with murder.
She hasn’t resurfaced or shown signs of life in a year, barring her being locked up in a psych hospital it’s not looking good.
You were the best potato
They have their hands full with very important things like battling far-right terrorist organizations such as Diagolon.i'd imagine the police would be able to find out if she was in a psych hospital.
does canadia police really give up this easily?
For the context, he was commenting how Dr. Disrespect being an Epstein is based. When people started to call him out for being a weird pedo defender, he then proceeded to list out 15 out 21 states and their age of consent to DEBOONK and justify how older man fucking barely legal girls is not pedophilia.JF having a normal one. He thinks it's fine for a 40-year-old man to creampie a 15-year-old as long as it's technically legal.View attachment 6127607
He's really comparing a 40-year-old man fucking a teenager to going shopping. Is he really this autistic or is he taking the piss?For the context, he was commenting how Dr. Disrespect being an Epstein is based. When people started to call him out for being a weird pedo defender, he then proceeded to list out 15 out 21 states and their age of consent to DEBOONK and justify how older man fucking barely legal girls is not pedophilia.
View attachment 6127629
Post
View attachment 6127621
View attachment 6127623
View attachment 6127625
Post
View attachment 6127628
The police are stuck as they can't prove that she was murdered if there's no body. It's the same in the USA. The first thing you need to prove when taking a case to trial is "was there actually a crime committed"? And without a body you can't do that.does canadia police really give up this easily?
Of course this creepy frog would be an expert on the specifications of age of consent laws across the globe, just like Vaedophile Gesualdi the paedophile.He's really comparing a 40-year-old man fucking a teenager to going shopping. Is he really this autistic or is he taking the piss?
Here's my (short) argument with him on the issue:
View attachment 6127653
Wrong. There are hundreds of such cases and many even in Canada. A famous historical one would be John George Haigh, who believed corpus delicti meant an actual dead body so he dissolved his victims in acid and disposed of them. Unfortunately for him the "body" in the Latin phrase means "body of evidence," not an actual dead body.The police are stuck as they can't prove that she was murdered if there's no body. It's the same in the USA. The first thing you need to prove when taking a case to trial is "was there actually a crime committed"? And without a body you can't do that.
Wrong.“You cannot find my client guilty of these crimes,” the lawyer said. “There literally is no body. And there literally is no proof of human remains.”
Sound familiar?The victim was last seen Sept. 5, 1975 when the couple lived in Sturgeon Bay, Wisconsin, but a missing person report was only filed 82 days later. Richard Pierce divorced Carol Jean in 1977.
Surely the story of a criminal mastermind, right?Assistant District Attorney Nick Grode reportedly rejected the idea that she fled and started a new life without telling anyone.
Ah, see, a 17 year old consenting to a sexual conversation. He could have inseminated her and it wouldn't have been illegal. Unfortunately he just sexted herFor the context, he was commenting how Dr. Disrespect being an Epstein is based. When people started to call him out for being a weird pedo defender, he then proceeded to list out 15 out 21 states and their age of consent to DEBOONK and justify how older man fucking barely legal girls is not pedophilia.
View attachment 6127629
Post
View attachment 6127621
View attachment 6127623
View attachment 6127625
Post
View attachment 6127628
They found parts of the remains of his victims which was enough to nail him dead to rights. Robert Pickton was similarly convicted based on parts of his victims being found on his property.John George Haigh
One was just a couple months ago in the United States, Michelle Troconis. She managed to get rid of the body but not all the blood splatters.
That's still enough to prove a crime had been committedHans Reiser was charged with murder without a body and pled guilty because the other forensic evidence against him was overwhelming, in return for disclosing the location of the body.
I genuinely think this will get overturned on appeal or result in a retrial as the evidence is 100% circumstantial. They didn't prove that a crime had been committed or that the suspect killed her. But even here there's still slightly more evidence (albeit circumstantial) with the speculation that he buried her corpse on his property and then moved the remains later. The case hinges on an assumption that A) it's impossible the victim couldn't have disappeared, B) that the victim died due to murder and C) that the victim was murdered by the defendant with basically no evidence to support all 3 other than the prosecution's word. The fact that this actually led to a conviction is somewhat astounding as it's entirely possible he is innocent and the prosecution just made up a story that he murdered his wife. It comes across as more the result of lackluster defense as they didn't call any witnesses and they just assumed he would be found innocent because there was no actual evidence being brought up. That feels like grounds for appeal by itself.Here's an eerily similar case from 2022:
https://lawandcrime.com/crime/86-ye...ard-convicted-of-wifes-1975-cold-case-murder/ (archive)
With most of these the killer usually doesn't actually get convicted on the cases where it's circumstantial. Like Lonnie David Franklin Jr. killed 11 people but was only charged for 10 as they didn't have DNA evidence on the last one.There are also convictions where there was actual video of the murders, the murderer confessed, or the evidence was otherwise flimsy but the perp was a known serial killer. I won't count those because a serial killer gets very little benefit of the doubt. Usually you need at least some forensic evidence, but it's happened when the victim had told people "he's going to kill me" and the perp told people "I'm going to kill her" and then she vanishes without a trace.
I doubt all of this is enough to give probable cause to justify getting a warrant. Which could lead to any evidence being thrown out due to being illegally obtained. If his lawyers go after that hard enough and get any forensic evidence that may/may not be found there thrown out they would basically just have a "it smells funny" case.The fact the RCMP hasn't even gotten forensic evidence is ridiculous considering the circumstantial evidence here. I'd virtually guarantee if there ever were forensics there, traces of them remain.