Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
1 picogram is 0.000000000001 grams, so 500,000 picograms is 0.0000005 grams. AKA a typical dose of cocaine is 2 million times your 500,000 picogram hypothetical. Fuck off with this nonsense.
Do you think that 100% of the cocaine you ingest go to the single hair that is being tested?
What kind of retarded logic is that?

EDIT: oh shit, this was yesterday. Sorry, I was so baffled by that I went directly to comment.
 
Last edited:
I assume Nick will challenge the warrant at the 7/15 pretrial conference for the CHIPS case? When that fails would an appeal push back the 7/23-7/26 court window or does court proceed as normal with the possibility of a appeal throwing out the ruling later on?

Would findings in the case be admissible in the criminal case (barring a subsequent but successful warrant challenge) in August? Are they basically being forced to litigate their criminal proceeding a month early?

And aside from that, Robert Rekieta's testimony being "recieved" in the June 6th hearing means the kids are probably with them and not Kayla's more local family (due to the sister testifying)?
That hearing is with the Juvenile and Family Court regarding the Children. It's not a criminal court. It has its own rules, procedures and concerns. It has nothing to do with the warrant.

Even if findings of neglect or worse were achieved via a warrant, later thrown out, the Juvee Court will not care. It is concerned with the health and safety of the children. Not the Criminal Prosecution of Baldo and his Cokewhores. Rules of evidence are different and looser. There is no "the warrant is bogus so we have to ignore the findings of neglect and coke in thr kid, and give the kids back." The findings on the kids are all that matters.
From what I understand, MN law all but requires children to be returned to their parents -- even if they are known drug users with a history of violence.
The path to returning the Coke Kid is much much smaller than it was. But Juvee/family courts can be hard to predict. You can't take Minnesota as a whole because the post apocalyptic Minneapolis Hellscape colors the overall results while smaller rural counties may be much more sane. CPS Social Worker Caseload will be much smaller and more personal in Kandiyoh.
I imagine Aaron will be substantially easier to prosecute after the other 3 have been convicted.

Nothing will be brought before then in case they need his testimony, maybe in exchange for an immunity deal. I’d wager Aaron would be dumb enough to testify without one though.
Dear God, please fucking stop! Unless there is some truly disturbing revelation regarding one or more of the kids Aaron is not getting arrested. He's not getting charged or convicted. No DA will care about this idiot except as a grandstanding and unreliable witness. That they don't really need.

The only thing they even need him for is to verify that he did in fact say the stuff on his show that the investigators referenced in the warrant request. And that this was said publicly without any prompting contact or discussions with Law Enforcement. That's it. They honestly do not even care if he was lying. They don't need him to convict the Rekeita's. He's an unreliable witness and they have 26g's of Coke clearly stored used and kept in Nick's bedroom. The only thing they give a shit about Aaron is his unprompted public statements corroborate those of the Mandatory Reporters, and of Nick's recorded public actions for the purposes of the warrant.

That's it! That's all this cuck is needed for. That's all anybody will care. He's revealed to be human garbage. But not worth the DA's time.
I just went back through the timeline. It is my opinion that Nick's hiatus for a family emergency was because the daughter did some rails. This was just as Aaron and April were splitting and he started giving hints about the situation in mid April.

The May preacher's report to the police did not offer enough evidence to get a search warrant yet when the cops came, they came in heavy even breaking down the door. CPS tested all the kids for drugs with a hair test. I contend that they knew to look. I further assert that they knew to look because when April wouldn't come home after a month of staying with the Rekietas, Kayla wouldn't leave Nick and Nick started getting nasty with Aaron, he ratted them out to the cops including the child exposure. Why is Aaron OK publicly admitting his culpability to this? Perhaps he has immunity from prosecution.

It makes all the moves by the police and CPS make sense. They knew exactly what they were looking for and where to find it. They knew a child had been exposed to drugs and they knew they needed hair as opposed to urine to prove it because more than a month had elapsed.

Aaron brought them all down while securing immunity for himself and a favorable position in his divorce with the bonus of appeasing his ex-wife so he could maintain visitation with his own kids.
Aaron did not secure immunity. The cops never spoke to him before arresting the cokewhores. They just watched his show. Aaron aired all this shit publicly and freely without any involvement of Police or DA. We don't know if they have ever bothered to even talk to him. Honestly the only reason they might have is a separate investigation regarding the coke found in the 9 year old. CPS might talk to him. The DA really doesn't need him for anything we know about.

Poor Aaron, just another cuck in the corner.
 
Just my opinion, but, I don't think the girl took the coke via snorting. I don't imagine it's a super pleasant sensation. I can see a kid getting into pills or chewable tablets or something but not snorting. If it was something that tasted good, maybe ingestion, but it would taste terrible and be a deterrent. My theory after thinking for a while is it was put into a drink or food that would cover the taste, and I think it was deliberate.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Just my opinion, but, I don't think the girl took the coke via snorting. I don't imagine it's a super pleasant sensation. I can see a kid getting into pills or chewable tablets or something but not snorting. If it was something that tasted good, maybe ingestion, but it would taste terrible and be a deterrent. My theory after thinking for a while is it was put into a drink or food that would cover the taste, and I think it was deliberate.
yeah huge X to doubt on snorting no way a kid is gonna do that to the point of the 5000 reading.

Now, intake via the gums because it makes mouth feel numb and fizzy like pop rocks or other fizzy candy? Yeah I buy that.
 
ml... you would have to have the child density to extrapolate consumption from there LOL.
Did the cops check the basement in case there’s a brand new “Piglinson” pepperoni machine down there?

How fucked up do you think he had to be to essentially admit to his 9-year old eating his coke on stream? I mean I'm glad he did

Uh, what? When did this happen?
 
Last edited:
Just my opinion, but, I don't think the girl took the coke via snorting. I don't imagine it's a super pleasant sensation. I can see a kid getting into pills or chewable tablets or something but not snorting. If it was something that tasted good, maybe ingestion, but it would taste terrible and be a deterrent. My theory after thinking for a while is it was put into a drink or food that would cover the taste, and I think it was deliberate.
If it was not some crackhead level street cocaine cut with glass fiber, the sensation is less unpleasant than a nasal spray and we are probably talking about 1-4g of street cocaine tops, half or a teaspoon, so taste isn´t even close to an issue for ingestion specially if she tasted it in one go because the adults were doing it in front of them and left some on the table.

Did the cops check the basement in case there’s a brand new “Piglinson” pepperoni machine down there?
They found a million foreskins someone wished him there.
 
Last edited:
My theory after thinking for a while is it was put into a drink or food that would cover the taste, and I think it was deliberate.
Yeah, that was my read too. If it was being given to her, they may have put it in a beverage and told her it was a form of cough medicine. I don't want to speculate too much, though.
 
Did the cops check the basement in case there’s a brand new “Piglinson” pepperoni machine down there?



Uh, what? When did this happen?
Nick confirmed that the leaked CPS drug test report was a legit court document, and not an internet fake. He still shrieks that it is bullshit. But he did admit that it was official. And comes from an actual CPS contracted lab test.
 
Nick confirmed that the leaked CPS drug test report was a legit court document, and not an internet fake. He still shrieks that it is bullshit. But he did admit that it was official. And comes from an actual CPS contracted lab test.
Right. But if anyone were to ask him “did your 9 year old eat your cocaine” he’s still going to deny it.
 
It would be possible if he pressed it into retarded pills (med fags how hard would that be to do at home?) but then they most likely would've found a press for that. Alternatively he could've put it in a nasal spray and told her it's new ADHD meds she should take if she can't concentrate.
The one thing that i thought of as a counter argument would be how the fuck would nobody notice her taking nasal spray every 20 mins without being sick or having Allergies? Also how didn't her Siblings notice her having an OD if it happened?

I would lean more towards her finding a Coke Bullet and imitating the Adults getting addicted with the subsequent behavioral changes being attributed by the People around her to the shitty Situation she's in (adult Druggies have a hard time hiding the changes from a Coke addiction so i don't think she could've). I wouldn't put it beyond them to use Coke as a medicine but nobody noticing that combined with how hard it'd be to administer them regularly is strange.
Img_2024_06_19_17_10_58.jpeg
Nasal spray is how it is delivered medicinally. That being said, I think any of the above is highly unlikely. I think she just got into it the one time and got the BIGLY dose.
 
That hearing is with the Juvenile and Family Court regarding the Children. It's not a criminal court. It has its own rules, procedures and concerns. It has nothing to do with the warrant.
Thought that would be a 'search and seizure' issue.

Sounds like he's fucked then. He has to confront the coke in his house and the specifics of the 'Endangerment of a child' charge to defend the JV case, making statements to the court that I doubt are barred from being used in the criminal proceedings. So he'll have little standing left when comes to a potential plea deal. If the sentencing guidelines are a 4 year suspended sentence for a guilty verdict why not go to trial with the non-deal he'll get.

The only benefit he got out of not owning up to the charges and doing rehab was getting the kids out of the house.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
Sounds like he's fucked then. He has to confront the coke in his house and the specifics of the 'Endangerment of a child' charge to defend the JV case, making statements to the court that I doubt are barred from being used in the criminal proceedings.
Unless he's a total idiot or has already copped a plea, he could probably take the Fifth at the cost of an adverse inference, since CHIPS are civil in nature (albeit with arguably quasi-criminal penalties like deprivation of custody). It's not as if he gives a shit about his kids anyway.
 
Unless he's a total idiot or has already copped a plea, he could probably take the Fifth at the cost of an adverse inference, since CHIPS are civil in nature (albeit with arguably quasi-criminal penalties like deprivation of custody). It's not as if he gives a shit about his kids anyway.
There was coke found in the kid's hair and yet the thought of a father putting up no fight to get his kids back still really bums me out.

Hope the kids can stay with the grandparents permanently so life is at least semi-normal.
 
Just my opinion, but, I don't think the girl took the coke via snorting. I don't imagine it's a super pleasant sensation. I can see a kid getting into pills or chewable tablets or something but not snorting. If it was something that tasted good, maybe ingestion, but it would taste terrible and be a deterrent. My theory after thinking for a while is it was put into a drink or food that would cover the taste, and I think it was deliberate.
Balldo is just the type of fucking edgy faggot that would mix up some "authentic early 20th Century" Coca Cola to try to show off how cool he is to his new human Fleshlight, and just the type of careless drunken faggot that would then leave it laying around where his kid could get at it and unsuspectingly dose herself with a massive swing of literal Coca cola.
 
We have a problem with people being able to conceptualise and understand the true scale and relative scale of numbers. Those in the sciences develop some sense of it, but the common person has almost no idea of proper scale.

The world has solved a lot of literacy problems, but we have a new 'numeracy' problem.
No, this isn't a numeracy or a literacy problem. It is a logic problem (Dunning-Kruger). The fact that ChatGPT (A black box) was used to answer the question was more of a cargo cult behavior than rather properly hitting a textbook.

Granted, we're all fucking tards on the net so that's what I expected anyways.
Unless he's a total idiot or has already copped a plea, he could probably take the Fifth at the cost of an adverse inference, since CHIPS are civil in nature (albeit with arguably quasi-criminal penalties like deprivation of custody). It's not as if he gives a shit about his kids anyway.
I have question. Can CHIPS go after STMS to keep him from seeing his kids with him in such close proximity to Nosecoke? While not charged currently or in contact with the Rekietas, I highly doubt that CHIPS did not considering trying scrutinize him to see if he's still on drugs.
After all, he's an unreliable narrator.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
ChatGPT seems to think a 60lb child would only have to ingest a very small amount of cocaine. This is ChatGPT though, so who knows how accurate this response actually is.

Prompt

Response

This suggests either the 9yo was barely exposed, my prompt is incorrect, and/or ChatGPT is retarded. I'm not going to dismiss any of these possibilities.
LLMs do not do math very well nor were they originally trained to handle mathematical concepts. Anything more abstract than pajeetcode is very difficult even for GPT-4o to do.

I have a somewhat limited understanding of hair follicle tests, but from what I've been told by people a lot smarter than me is that the only thing you can get out of the results is a ballpark figure for how regularly one ingests cocaine due to how hair grows. The root of the hair that lies inside the follicle continually produces cells that eventually die and create little layers of dead cell that we call hair. The live cells below the cells that just died continue to grow and push out the dead cells, and so on and so forth.

The "fresher" dead cells continue to have a "fingerprint" of things they metabolized while they were alive, just like the live cells. So if you see a section of hair having remnants of cocaine metabolism, that's thousands upon thousands of cells that have had time to live and die during a period in which a person ingested cocaine. Therefore, it denotes a period of cocaine use more than it can tell you how much cocaine someone used in one sitting.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Procrastinhater
So if you see a section of hair having remnants of cocaine metabolism, that's thousands upon thousands of cells that have had time to live and die during a period in which a person ingested cocaine. Therefore, it denotes a period of cocaine use more than it can tell you how much cocaine someone used in one sitting.
I believe they only get a good idea of that if they snip individual sections and test those so as to get an approximation of when the use was. I'm not sure if they actually do that on screens like this or if they just took the entire sample and destroyed it all at once.
 
I believe they only get a good idea of that if they snip individual sections and test those so as to get an approximation of when the use was. I'm not sure if they actually do that on screens like this or if they just took the entire sample and destroyed it all at once.
Assuming that's possible... I say that because I do not recall if hair cells still metabolize and how long until the metabolites decay.
I think it would depend on funding or SOP. So long as there's cocaine in the kids system that's abuse or neglect unless the kid was out blasting hood niggas with a glock (Wait for EVS to say that 9 year olds can play hardball with niggas). Or maybe they went back and did a second test after confirming the presence of coke.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Procrastinhater
I believe they only get a good idea of that if they snip individual sections and test those so as to get an approximation of when the use was. I'm not sure if they actually do that on screens like this or if they just took the entire sample and destroyed it all at once.
The test used is most likely en enzyme-based test like ELISA, which gives a broad idea of whether something is present. And then it's usually followed up with gas chromatography (GC) + mass spectrometry (MS) testing on certain parts of the sample to narrow everything down and get more precise results.

The former (GC) will preserve the sample intact and in proper conditions which means you very likely can re-test samples (barring contamination after handling, which happens without any balldoverse conspiracy malice and it's why you run multiple tests on multiple samples). The latter (MS) almost always destroys the sample.

Regarding the "when", here's where we hit a wall. Everyone's hair grows at slightly different rates. Different enough that it can really skew testing one way or the other. And this is further amplified as your subject the sample came from gets younger. Very young babies, for example, grow out their hair at wildly different rates. One of my nephews was almost bald at nearly half a year old, and then another one at the same age had very puffy wavy hair. Children aren't as radically different, but again, it's enough to make it unreliable to make a "when" determination unless you monitor that child's hair growth on a pretty specific diet.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back