Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I wasn't really trying to make a qualitative or quantitative comparison between the things. More so try to bring the units and amount of (cocaine and/or cocaine metabolites) into a comparison that people might understand based on something they might have encountered as a frame of reference.
As I see it, that’s a meaningless understanding. The numbers only have meaning in relationship to known a known dose-response relationship which is defined by some criterion values. In this case the only number of relevance is the cut-off value. The first page included somebody posting values associated with low, medium, and high usage but it didn’t have an academic reference and I am skeptical that those criteria are defensible.
I think a safe located in the master bathroom is exactly the place where middle-class drug addicts would store coke. That's not a normal bathroom appliance for non-drug addicts.
i wear a modified life alert pendant. Whenever the police raids me I press red button & a deluge located within my cocaine safe is activated & the coke is safely washed away. Rekieta is a fucking retard for not doing this.
 
Any time someone is like "ooooh something super duper special will drop soon, just you wait", I don't care.
Either nut up and drop whatever you have, or just shut up until the thing drops and be content with knowing you were ahead of the curve.
I'm glad they kept their powder dry considering there was likely kids tied into the gay ops here.
 
Any time someone is like "ooooh something super duper special will drop soon, just you wait", I don't care.
Either nut up and drop whatever you have, or just shut up until the thing drops and be content with knowing you were ahead of the curve.
Hopefully they took this as a learning experience because they flew very close to the sun with this one.

Even hinting at unconfirmed gossip from "trusted sources" isn't worth it.
 
i wear a modified life alert pendant. Whenever the police raids me I press red button & a deluge located within my cocaine safe is activated & the coke is safely washed away. Rekieta is a fucking retard for not doing this.
Help! I'm getting raided and I can't sneak out!

Sorry, the image of that is just too funny in my head.
 
I have question. Can CHIPS go after STMS to keep him from seeing his kids with him in such close proximity to Nosecoke? While not charged currently or in contact with the Rekietas, I highly doubt that CHIPS did not considering trying scrutinize him to see if he's still on drugs.
After all, he's an unreliable narrator.
Can CPS go after Aaron's kids? Unlikely without some other claim.

But

If I was Aaron's ex-wife I sure as shit would be talking to my divorce lawyer about re-visiting custody and visitation rights. And would almost certainly be getting the kids drug tested.

Aaron says everything is cool with his ex about all of this. Aaron is an unreliable narrator and an idiot. His ex has got to be at least talking to somebody about this. If just to protectvherself and her kids.

The CPS caseworker in the Rekeita case may wish to talk to her kids about time spent with the Rekeita's. Which is not a position any parent wishes to find themselves in. The ex's best defense for her family will be to move to cut off Aaron's joint custody and visitation. Even if only temporary.

If you were Aaron's ex wife. And you found out your kids had been in that house, and Rekeita's 9 year old tested positive for Coke, what would you do? Yeah. There are likely actions going on behind the scenes that Aaron is just to fucking stupid to realize, or too fucking prideful to admit. No way is his kids mother fine with any of this, unless she's another crackwhore.
 
Aaron is a snake cuck who will way whatever he thinks gives his streamer/podcast/whatever career the best chance at surviving. Just because he didn't catch charges for doing coke while another man stole his wife while kids starved in the house doesn't mean he isn't a scumbag like the rest. The only difference is they weren't HIS kids.

The real question is what Aaron actually could leak that prevents Nick from going after him. I haven't seen anything from Nick at all regarding Aaron, especially in a negative light.

Nick is a narcissist cokehead with oppositional issues, the only reason he isn't loudly declaring that Aaron gave his daughter the coke to draw heat off himself is because he knows he'd get sued or Aaron would release more info.

There's probably a 'oh no, I got high and gave my daughter coke, what do I do?' Message from Nick to Aaron, besides I think Nick demanded they used secure messaging.

Alternatively, Nick won't say anything because he knows the CPS report is damning and he doesn't want the report leaked when it includes 'my daddy gave me some of his adhd medication'.

I don't think there's a situation where we can get the actual CPS report, right? The drug test was public but is the actual 'we're taking the kids' stuff as well? Ie: whatever info they got from interviewing the kids.
 
I think you'd need to do something more than open a can of Spaghetti-Os to become a caregiver.
From what I've found it appears that a caretaker is an adult with primary responsibility for the child, i.e. a degree of responsibility beyond what you're entrusted if you babysit them for a few hours. It'd be like the level of responsibility where you'd be able to make medical decisions for the kid without consulting an actual caretaker (parent).

If you're babysitting a kid, you're responsible to not negligently suffocate the kid or burn the house down over it or something like that. You're not their caretaker though.
 
If you're babysitting a kid, you're responsible to not negligently suffocate the kid or burn the house down over it or something like that. You're not their caretaker though.
The one person involved in this who might qualify is the ex-nanny. Fun fact: nannies are mandatory reporters in Minnesota. She might have realized the situation was spiraling and didn't want to be there when it blew up or, worse, might have left only after it triggered mandatory reporting.

I'm not sure how quickly things went from just bad to child neglect, though.
 
The one person involved in this who might qualify is the ex-nanny. Fun fact: nannies are mandatory reporters in Minnesota. She might have realized the situation was spiraling and didn't want to be there when it blew up or, worse, might have left only after it triggered mandatory reporting.

I'm not sure how quickly things went from just bad to child neglect, though.
Assuming the nanny is on the witness list, would they offer her immunity to get the timelines, etc on the Rekieta household descent into depravity? I assume if this is going to trial the prosecution is going to want to hammer a narrative of ever increasing neglect and she'd be a key part of that narrative given she left on bad terms.
 
No way is his kids mother fine with any of this, unless she's another crackwhore.
He hung out with Nick a few times, when he found the coke bullit he claims he confronted Nick and then ended the friendship shortly after. He has also said he spoke with his ex-wife at length over this prior to going on kino casino.

Based on what we know I think his ex blocking him from seeing his own children would be very unlikely, and if she did it I would think it is the wrong thing to do unless aaron has done something we dont know about at this time. I do not think that makes his ex-wife a "crackwhore".

Again, I think peoples hatred of aaron because he talks and looks like a fag has got some people frothing at the mouth a bit much here. To say that if he's still allowed to see his own children that means his ex-wife is a crackwhore seems beyond a little unhinged imo, but hey that's just me.

And I suppose I will look like a fool if more dirt about aaron comes out which could potentially happen given the ongoing investigation into the situation where someone gave Nick's 9-year-old cocaine on at least a few occasions, if aaron was aware of that going on then I may be likely to agree with you. But to assume that would be jumping to conclusions.
 
Assuming the nanny is on the witness list, would they offer her immunity to get the timelines, etc on the Rekieta household descent into depravity?
I think it depends on how bad things got before she left. Like my other main speculation is Balldo tried to drag her into the cuck polycule. Even if she didn't see anything that would trigger mandatory reporting, she might have seen something, but if she did, giving her immunity would be a great big carrot.
 
The one person involved in this who might qualify is the ex-nanny. Fun fact: nannies are mandatory reporters in Minnesota. She might have realized the situation was spiraling and didn't want to be there when it blew up or, worse, might have left only after it triggered mandatory reporting.

I'm not sure how quickly things went from just bad to child neglect, though.
My theory is that the nanny quit after a dispute with Nick/Kayla over grocery bills or something like that, and the neglect didn't start until after the qover failed to hire a new caretaker. Up until the nanny left, the children had food and clean clothes.

There's no legal requirement that the parents care for the children personally. Hiring someone else to do it is legally acceptable provided that the children get what they need. If the nanny never saw any direct evidence of the drug use, then she legally had nothing to report. It's not against the law to have skanky sexual habits amongst consenting adults while children are in the house, nor is it illegal to be an alcoholic as long as the children are provided for. IMHO mandatory reporting events did not appear until after the nanny left.
 
He hung out with Nick a few times, when he found the coke bullit he claims he confronted Nick and then ended the friendship shortly after. He has also said he spoke with his ex-wife at length over this prior to going on kino casino.

Based on what we know I think his ex blocking him from seeing his own children would be very unlikely, and if she did it I would think it is the wrong thing to do unless aaron has done something we dont know about at this time. I do not think that makes his ex-wife a "crackwhore".

Again, I think peoples hatred of aaron because he talks and looks like a fag has got some people frothing at the mouth a bit much here. To say that if he's still allowed to see his own children that means his ex-wife is a crackwhore seems beyond a little unhinged imo, but hey that's just me.

And I suppose I will look like a fool if more dirt about aaron comes out which could potentially happen given the ongoing investigation into the situation where someone gave Nick's 9-year-old cocaine on at least a few occasions, if aaron was aware of that going on then I may be likely to agree with you. But to assume that would be jumping to conclusions.
This is all 100% based on Aaron's public claims. We have seen Aaron is a self serving and unreliable narrator. And his claims of "he talked it all out with his ex-Wife and she's fine with it" defy any rational review. Especially since Aaron made this claim before the report on the coked up 9 year old came out. I'm sorry, but any mother that isn't a meth head is going to have some major issues with all of this. Her kids were in this house when this shit was going down. Her ex husband found cocaine at his house where her kids could find it. And once again somebody let the 9 year old sample the coke. Aaron may think his ex-wife is fine with all of this, but from what we clearly see, he is a fucking moron. he won't realize his ex-wife isn't fine with it until he gets served.
 
Her ex husband found cocaine at his house where her kids could find it. And once again somebody let the 9 year old sample the coke. Aaron may think his ex-wife is fine with all of this, but from what we clearly see, he is a fucking moron. he won't realize his ex-wife isn't fine with it until he gets served.
According to him, Balldo put it there and that was the breaking point. If he really did pull up the instant it was obviously a threat to his own kids, he's still a piece of shit for palling around with Balldo who was doing this to his own kids, but he at least lived up to one primary obligation and terminated it immediately at that point.

If we believe that anyway.

Just admitting you've done wrong (even if you haven't yet come completely clean) is better than the absolute arrogance of Nick, which is sociopathic at this point.

I hope both Nick and Ty are showered with the most vicious abuse imaginable if this weirdo streams as if nothing's happening.
My theory is that the nanny quit after a dispute with Nick/Kayla over grocery bills or something like that, and the neglect didn't start until after the qover failed to hire a new caretaker. Up until the nanny left, the children had food and clean clothes.
For all the Jew jokes about Nick and his giant Jew nose, I've seen no signs he's a penny pincher in any way. He's a profligate spendthrift who practically burns money in piles just for the hell of it. If nobody was getting food after the nanny left it's because he's a lazy faggot and Kayla is a barely animate pill zombie.
I'm glad they kept their powder dry considering there was likely kids tied into the gay ops here.
Even Nick knows to keep his powder dry. Nobody wants wet cocaine.
 
There's no legal requirement that the parents care for the children personally. Hiring someone else to do it is legally acceptable provided that the children get what they need.
Yes, and also, Minnesota does not have a licensure requirement for someone who is providing childcare to the children of one family (unrelated to the adult providing care... you can provide childcare for as many of your relatives' kids as you want, that's no problem). They're only required to be a licensed childcare provider if they're nannying for more than one family unrelated to them.
The one person involved in this who might qualify is the ex-nanny. Fun fact: nannies are mandatory reporters in Minnesota.
I'm not certain, but the impression I get is that only licensed childcare workers are mandatory reporters. I wasn't able to find a clear negative... what I found is that working in a licensed facility that deals with children makes you a mandatory reporter, and a "professional" childcare worker is a mandatory reporter, but "professional" wasn't defined there, and I don't know if an unlicensed nanny is included. It certainly seems that an unlicensed nanny would lack the training that'd be necessary if they were supposed to be a mandatory reporter - will they even know if they're a mandatory reporter, and how can they be an effective mandatory reporter if they're not required to be trained on it? Will they spot the signs?

That being said... you don't need training to know that if you see clear signs of specific abuse, you should report it somehow. Even if it's not "mandatory".
 
I'm not certain, but the impression I get is that only licensed childcare workers are mandatory reporters.
Minnesota is very expansive in its definition. Even the pastor in this case was a mandatory reporter, and I'm pretty sure you don't have to register and get a license to be a pastor. Someone who is a childcare provider as their job qualifies.
 
The one person involved in this who might qualify is the ex-nanny. Fun fact: nannies are mandatory reporters in Minnesota.
That sounds like it could be a problem for the replacement "nanny" April Imholte.

She might have realized the situation was spiraling and didn't want to be there when it blew up or, worse, might have left only after it triggered mandatory reporting.
According to Aaron, Kayla told him that the nanny told her that she "couldn't take it anymore". Which could mean many different things.

Again according to Aaron, the nanny quit in February. That matches contemporaneous speculation in the Rekieta thread based on his vague ramblings in the days before the infamous "Dear John" stream, after which Nick's on-stream appearance and behavior degenerated rapidly.

It's possible that the situation in the household had gotten more dysfunctional but not to the point that it would eventually get.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back