Etsy to ban sale of most sex toys, explicit content, and more - Policy changes go into effect July 29th.

Etsy to ban sale of most sex toys, explicit content, and more​

Policy changes go into effect next month.
By Anna Iovine on June 28, 2024

1719655655834.png

Online retailer Etsy will prohibit sales of most sex toys, content that depicts sex acts and genitalia, and more starting July 29.

The indie seller published its Adult Nudity and Sexual Content policy yesterday, which states that sales of adult toys that are insertable, "applied to the genitalia," or "designed for genitals to be inserted into them" will be prohibited. That pretty much runs the gamut — dildos, vibrators, rings, plugs, and the like will be banned.

"Non-insertable and non-penetrable adult toys and sexual accessories," such as BDSM wear, will be allowed as long as listings follow Etsy's guidelines around mature content, also updated yesterday. These listings must be tagged as "mature"; can't appear on public places of someone's account like a user's avatar or shop home; the first thumbnail must be "appropriate for general audiences"; and depictions of genitalia or products in use must be removed or censored.

On that last point, porn isn't allowed on Etsy, including custom content. This is defined as media displaying explicit acts; made by porn publishers like Playboy (that includes vintage items); and described as pornographic in titles, descriptions, tags, or images. Photos and photo-realistic pictures of explicit acts and of genitalia or anuses also aren't allowed. Photos and photo-realistic depictions of butts and nipples are OK "so long as these body parts are obscured in the first listing," as laid out in the mature content policy.

As for non-realistic content — like drawings — total nudity and sex acts "without visible genitalia or anuses" are allowed, but non-realistic images of explicit acts aren't.

Etsy is also banning nudity for human models, including "gluteal clefts and female nipples/areolas." If you're selling a sexy item of clothing, for example, you must censor body parts, use a mannequin, or opt for just photographing the clothing.

Additionally, Etsy prohibits the sale and advertising of sexual services and "fetishized items" like worn underwear and feet pics. Depictions of illegal acts are also prohibited, like non-consensual sex and incest.

"Sexual language" concerning incest or "referencing familial relationships" will also be banned now. The examples Etsy lists are "Daddy's slut" and "Choke me Mommy." As of publication, these terms are still searchable on Etsy, and so is nude content. Searches for "porn" come up blank.

"Etsy has long had policies prohibiting certain mature content and providing guidance on appropriately listing adult items. Today, we are building on this foundation, updating our standards, and introducing more rigorous guidelines," Etsy VP of trust and safety, Alice Wu Paulus, wrote on the site's forum in a post called "Strengthening Our Approach to Mature Content on Etsy."

Wu Paulus went on to say that Etsy will begin enforcing these changes on July 29 and will remove non-compliant listings. Etsy will apparently also communicate with sellers who may need to update their listings in the upcoming weeks. The VP ends the post by stating that these efforts are to "keep Etsy and [its] community safe."

This move is an addition to the continued crackdown on online sexual content — and the people who post and sell it — that's reached a crescendo in recent years. Such content is banned from most major social media platforms (except X), for example, while credit card companies and finance apps often ban people in sex industries. Legislatively, more and more states are enacting age-verification laws around adult content (that likely don't work).

Etsy declined to comment beyond Wu Paulus's post.

UPDATE: Jun. 28, 2024, 3:44 p.m. EDT Mashable updated this article to add a response from Etsy.


original article (ghostarchive)
 
As much as I am loathe to defend degenerate shit like this, this is clearly a move spurred on by MasterCard and Visa, and as we all know, they won't just stop at gooner paraphernalia. There needs to be regulation, or some kind of viable alternative to the cc processors that isn't convoluted like crypto. How the hell is it a good thing to have the entire field of e commerce dictated by two companies? It's become a major backbone of the US economy, but there's a massive bottleneck to actually being able to freely conduct business because of this shit.
 
As much as I am loathe to defend degenerate shit like this, this is clearly a move spurred on by MasterCard and Visa, and as we all know, they won't just stop at gooner paraphernalia. There needs to be regulation, or some kind of viable alternative to the cc processors that isn't convoluted like crypto. How the hell is it a good thing to have the entire field of e commerce dictated by two companies? It's become a major backbone of the US economy, but there's a massive bottleneck to actually being able to freely conduct business because of this shit.
Yeah this is a pretty clear case of "you might not care what they're banning now, but you should be worried about what they ban next"
 
Yeah this is a pretty clear case of "you might not care what they're banning now, but you should be worried about what they ban next"
I guess the question is what else would they ban on these platforms that hasn't already been done or tried? They do want to make money after all.

In any case, that's the big problem. You have these expensive regulations and huge barriers to entry that turned the credit card industry into an oligopoly of four service providers of which two are the most powerful. They don't really have any incentive to compete against each other because they can't grow anymore or acquire each other.

It's the same reason the major banks wrote Dodd-Frank.
 
Back