The YouTube algorithm has recently blessed me with this video
The first thing I do when finding a video like this is checking who the author is to see if it's a crazy tranny, some political retard or an otherwise normal bloke who suddenly decided to go off the deep end. There's no other videos on the channel but there is a linktree and oh boy. It's time for a game of "Troon or poon?"
Clue A:
Twitter bio

If it's too hard for you there's also a cohost account, which seem to be a tumblr knockoff website. Xir hasn't posting on it in a year but it does contain this.
Clue B:
Eddsworld sexuality and gender identity headcanon

At this point you've probably figured it out but in case you haven't you can play the first 5 seconds of the video to hear the undoubtedly female voice. It is of course a poon. On that note, I know pooners aren't the best when it comes to names but naming yourself after your own sexuality has got to be a new low.
The video itself is about the episode "Lady Krillers" from the kid show "Milo Murphy's Law". It's your standard man in a dress episode. The plot is that a popular movie franchise is doing an all woman reboot. The lead actor, who is a man, finds himself in quite the conundrum. If the movie is a succes they'll keep using women. If the movie flops the franchise will end. It seems like a lose-lose situation. One of the characters remarks "too bad you're not a woman" and that's when it hits them. Let's turn Tobias into Tobina. This is done through a silly song montage featuring some of that dandy AGP mannerism.
Tobina (She really smolders)
Tobina (With such big shoulders)
Onto the video itself and it's pretty boring. If you've heard a tranny complain about man in dress jokes before you've heard most of the review. I'll save you having to go through the boring stuff. The first half of the review is the pooner talking about her experiences with the show, explaining "trans misogyny" and comparing it to other men in dresses in media. At 15:46 she starts to go off the deep end. The episode introduces a one off character called Billy Bison who spontaneously causes a bison attack whenever he appears. The pooner doesn't think it's funny and has been baffled by his inclusion since she first watched the episode in 2018. She's finally figured out that this is a "kid friendly" reference to Buffalo Bill because of his name and... well... do you really need more evidence than that? They could have chosen ANY large animal and they chose the bison which is like basically a buffalo. Coincidence? She thinks not. Even other self-proclaimed trannies in the comments have been telling her that is an insane reach. When the video was released she tried defending her point but now that it's blown up she has since given up.
The show's co-creator, Dan Povenmire, is more known for his work on Phineas and Ferb and even voices one of his own characters. Pooner goes on to showcase examples that Lady Krillers wasn't just a slipup and Dan has engaged in transphobia many times in his other show! At 17:24 we see a clip where Dan Povenmire and Jeff Marsh, the other co-creator, give in character commentary to an episode of Phineas and Ferb
"I love a big nose. Nothing funnier than a big nose"
"There's nothing funnier than a big nose except maybe a man in woman's clothing"
"Oh that's brilliant. Men in woman's clothing is hysterical"
Looks like we got a class A transphobe on our hand. I'm also gonna point out she didn't chastise them for making fun of big noses. I guess those of us with huge honkers are just supposed to shut up and take it, huh?

She also shows us a clip of Dan voicing over the eccentric psychiatrist from the Johnny Depp case at the request of his fans. This doesn't have anything to do with transphobia in the slightest, but you know how it is, we gotta get all that problematic behavior out there because blatantly making fun of sexual assault like this is not okay you guys.
Pooner recognizes that she might not be the one most affected by a man in dress jokes. She wants us to hear the testimonies of some trans feminines (a.k.a. men in dresses) and how they were personally affected by it. Since trannies always know other trannies she got 3 of them at the ready. The first one is at 20:30. None of them say anything interesting, I just wanna point out how obviously male their voices are. The third guy especially does that obnoxiously exaggerated fag voice that would make a Californian camp gay cringe from embarrassment.
She ends the video in typical tranny fashion saying we need more trans and non-binaries to work on shows to get more representation. If you are a showrunner make sure to hire trannies and listen to them. Examine how you feel about trannies and "try to do better". With how often it is joked about here I sometimes forget that "this is literally violence" is something a lot of trannies believe in. While pooner here is not so far gone she believes the episode itself is violence, she does believe that it leads to violence against poor marginalized trans individuals. She brings up some well known dead trans teenagers and some anti-trans laws and articles. She also explains that she is agender and asexual and how scary it is being trans in today's world. If only there was some way to opt out of being agender...
With such an original masterpiece of a video I'm sure you'd expect a very positive reaction from the trannies but you'd be wrong. Pooner here committed a grave sin much, much worse than displaying her insanity in the buffalo bill reference. While explaining how transphobic Dan is she shows a comment where Dan confirms that one of his characters is asexual. Pooner says he only did this to get some Queer points without having to do anything while also avoiding the anger of his corporate overlords, and we won't ever see this sexuality reveal expanded upon in any meaningful way
Which is probably true, to be fair. She also states that "uhm actually, that would be aromantic, not asexual, but I doubt Dan knows the difference

:" Yes, pooner, some of us have real problems and can't be bothered to learn a bajillion sexualities and gender identities that all mean the same thing. Anyway, the first part seemed to cause quite the commotion. Given the video's subject, her criticism of Dan's transphobic behavior and the fact that she is so asexual she named herself after her own sexuality you'd think it would be obvious she is a believer of asexuality being queer and valid as heck. Yet, since the self-esteem of anyone involved with the gender specials has the strength of wet toilet papir a large amount of the comments are asking if she really meant it when she said that asexuals aren't queer enough for the LGBTQ+ community. So many people complained about it she had to make a follow up post.

Looking through some of these comments I wonder how many of these people have even a hint of homosexuality in them or if I'm just looking at a bunch of straight women who enjoy dress up talk about how queer they are.