Diseased Rowling Derangement Syndrome - "TERF/Woke Author Bad!!1"

And a shite over-actor who I can't understand the hype for.
He could about manage in soemthing as hammy as doctor who but in Harry Potter he was literally embarrassing with his weird slick-twitch thing? Hissing? Lmao the fuck was that


I still think Rowling should be careful replying to Unhinged Scottish Tranny, he is actually unhinged enough to off himself and that would come on top of her for real.
Apparently his teachers had to tell him to stop writing essays about doctor who.
He was obsessed with the doctor to the point that it annoyed everyone around him.
Sounds like a particular neurological disorder which is synonymous with trannies?

He wasn’t bad as Crowley in Good Omens, but that is another role which called for over the top hamminess.
 
Anyway, here's another Harry Potter veteran (Goblet of Fire) who won't be at the next reunion if they have them.

View attachment 6133199
Would it shock you to learn that he trooned one of his kids out?
wilfred.png
note the gender neutral language

Helen Joyce sums up people like Tennant better than I could:
 
Would it shock you to learn that he trooned one of his kids out?
View attachment 6136385
note the gender neutral language

Helen Joyce sums up people like Tennant better than I could:
View attachment 6136389
Bang on Joyce there.
It's not just the rights of access for their children and broken promises though, it's the gnawing self doubt from within that they have actively mutilated their own child for naught but the bottom line of the company producing Lupron (which was about to die on the market as being too unsafe for precocious puberty until it was given anither boost for "trams kids", a market which just needed to be coaxed into existence) and a small audience of powerful niche interest pedos.

The panic and self doubt must be crippling. If they have any morality at all. But what it for certain is they desperately won't want the crowd to turn against them and recognise them as abusers. That's probably even more of a motivator than recognising it themselevs, for this certain sort of person.
 
I really hope so. The coping and seething will be worth every penny they spend building it. It’s free publicity like the crying over Hogwarts Legacy was.

I'm hoping we'll get some hilarious troon protests outside the ticket offices at the front gates. Big Krusty the Klown feet sticking out from under their pink and blue flags as they lay on the floor pretending to be dead, people pouring bottles of piss over themselves, and lads in black balaclavas impotently screaming obscenities at confused, horrified families on a nice Summer's day out.
 
They cannot go to their happy place without seeing the scars she left. lol. Lmao.
That's because they're fucking retards. People who aren't retards can get over the fact their favorite books they read as children (or in this case manbabbies) were written by an asshole or, in this case, written by a person sane enough to recognize that women don't have cocks.
 
There's no way to track hashtag trends without paying, but it looks like this campaign is deader than himdia's career.
And the outside world couldn't care less about what's going on on Twitter. There was some saddo tweeting forlornly after the 2019 UK Election, "How did Labout Lose? Jeremy Corbyn has been number one trending hashtag all day"
Would it shock you to learn that he trooned one of his kids out?
"Dressed to impress" Who's he meant to be dressed as? Kevin Gibes?
 
That's because they're fucking retards. People who aren't retards can get over the fact their favorite books they read as children (or in this case manbabbies) were written by an asshole or, in this case, written by a person sane enough to recognize that women don't have cocks.
And the outside world couldn't care less about what's going on on Twitter. There was some saddo tweeting forlornly after the 2019 UK Election, "How did Labout Lose? Jeremy Corbyn has been number one trending hashtag all day"

"Dressed to impress" Who's he meant to be dressed as? Kevin Gibes?
Back when I used to gloss over Stephen King books and thought he was a pretty swell guy (points for roasting Twilight and the bag of flesh that wrote it), I looked into just how much of a piece of shit he really was and decided, yeah, no skin off my back.

It's a bit different when you're younger, but growing up tends to fix that.
 
1719719665206.png
1719719735240.png
Keeping abreast of this week's hopelessly retarded controversy, one of Rowling's favourite books is Lolita, somebody dug up a quote from about 20 years ago where she called it a "Great and Tragic Love Story". As far as I know this is the only commentary Rowling has made about the book, and its not even technically incorrect because the whole concept is that its a horrible, malignant kind of 'love', but irregardless the usual suspects are now screaming that she supports paedophilia.
 
View attachment 6139016
View attachment 6139018
Keeping abreast of this week's hopelessly retarded controversy, one of Rowling's favourite books is Lolita, somebody dug up a quote from about 20 years ago where she called it a "Great and Tragic Love Story". As far as I know this is the only commentary Rowling has made about the book, and its not even technically incorrect because the whole concept is that its a horrible, malignant kind of 'love', but irregardless the usual suspects are now screaming that she supports paedophilia.
Trannies upset at the idea that she SUPPORTS paedophillia?

Whatever next?

Also that Sooz character is fucking illiterate.

Rowling clearly states that had anyone but Nabakov wrote Lolita, it would just be offensive pornography.

It might be a creepy idea and narrative, but it is still considered a classic of literature.
I strongly doubt this retard’s credibility if they don’t fucking understand that.
 
View attachment 6139016
View attachment 6139018
Keeping abreast of this week's hopelessly retarded controversy, one of Rowling's favourite books is Lolita, somebody dug up a quote from about 20 years ago where she called it a "Great and Tragic Love Story". As far as I know this is the only commentary Rowling has made about the book, and its not even technically incorrect because the whole concept is that its a horrible, malignant kind of 'love', but irregardless the usual suspects are now screaming that she supports paedophilia.
Since Sooz Kempner here thinks that enjoying a book about a pedophile makes you a pedophilia supporte,r she must think that it's even worse to write a book about a pedophile or themes that pedophiles might find enticing. Let's see what she thinks about Stephen King, the man who wrote the book IT, which features a scene where a bunch of 11-12-year-old boys have group sex with the only girl (same age range) in the group.
Skärmavbild 2024-06-30 kl. 17.50.24.png
Skärmavbild 2024-06-30 kl. 17.51.03.png
Skärmavbild 2024-06-30 kl. 17.51.21.png
Archive (more tweets)
Extremely suspicious and problematic behavior. Is Sooz Kempner a supporter of pedophilia?
 
I'm hoping we'll get some hilarious troon protests outside the ticket offices at the front gates. Big Krusty the Klown feet sticking out from under their pink and blue flags as they lay on the floor pretending to be dead, people pouring bottles of piss over themselves, and lads in black balaclavas impotently screaming obscenities at confused, horrified families on a nice Summer's day out.
Even funnier, troons getting angry at other troons who will still go to the theme park because they must consoom and they're 'taking it back' and 'separating the author from the work'.
somebody dug up a quote from about 20 years ago
Good on you, girl. Now your comedy career will definitely take off at age 39, panels shows will be calling any day now that you have The Right Opinion.

She dressed up as gotta-go-fast for a show and the reviewer made a funnier joke than that in the subtitle.

oh no.png

Even if you share Sooz Kempner's passion for Sega video games of the '90s, it's questionable if you'll find too much to entertain you in this hard-striving but ill-conceived show. From the premise that her many hours spent playing games as a teenager stunted her social development, but fuelled her “Mega Drive” ambition, the comic and singer suggests that her life is one of giddy highs immediately followed by crushing lows.
 
(Sorry for double-post if that's a no-no here, but this is breaking news!)

Himdia has somehow - SOMEHOW - sunk to a new low.

1719753720814.png

After trying to turn her adult children against her and dox one of them, they are now reaching out to her abusive first husband. Utter state of this scumbag.

(As an aside, Jesus, how miserable did she look in that marriage?)

1719753905005.jpeg
 
(Sorry for double-post if that's a no-no here, but this is breaking news!)

Himdia has somehow - SOMEHOW - sunk to a new low.

View attachment 6140102

After trying to turn her adult children against her and dox one of them, they are now reaching out to her abusive first husband. Utter state of this scumbag.

(As an aside, Jesus, how miserable did she look in that marriage?)

View attachment 6140104
I really, really hope the British government doesn't take this faggot any more seriously than they already do. Holy hell, does this look bad (to normal people, at least)
 
So I'm not the best private detective on the farms, but I've been looking for the interview in question and can't find it. Which is weird, because it's supposed to be a BBC radio 4 program and they obsessively archive everything, digitally and materially. They learned from the lost doctor who tapes.

The source for the quote according to wikipedia is a 2000 article from The Sunday Herald by journalist Sarah-Kate Templeton, archived on accioquote:

Templeton, Sarah-Kate. "How Lolita inspired Harry Potter," The Sunday Herald, 21 May 2000

The famously reclusive millionaire writer JK Rowling has revealed that even as a child she hid away from the world, burying herself in books and daydreams. She describes herself as a "squat, bespectacled child" and admits that she was as obsessed with Jane Austen as many of her readers are with her tales of Harry Potter. But while Rowling's fans might whizz through Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban just to start reading it all over again, Rowling ploughed through Austen's Emma at "least 20 times". But, most surprisingly, the single-mother chose Vladimir Nabakov's Lolita, the controversial tale of a paedophile's love for a 12-year-old girl whose life he ruins through abuse, as one of her favourite novels. Speaking in a rare interview for a new Radio 4 series about famous people's favourite books, she confides: "There are two books whose final lines make me cry without fail, irrespective of how many times I read them, and one is Lolita. There is so much I could say about this book. "There just isn't enough time to discuss how a plot that could have been the most worthless pornography becomes, in Nabakov's hands, a great and tragic love story, and I could exhaust my reservoir of superlatives trying to describe the quality of the writing." Despite her recent reclusive behaviour, the author discloses that, all her life, she has been enchanted by the idea of large families. She says one of the motivations behind her Harry Potter books was the ability to create a big family for herself. She says: "I have always been drawn to the idea of large families, even as a child The Harry Potter books were my chance to create my own, ideal big family, and my hero is never happier than when holidaying with the seven Wesleys."
And in a poem which the author dedicates to her six-year-old daughter Jessica, the author cherishes laughter and friendship above all else.
Joanne Rowling has become increasingly reclusive since she became Britain's third richest woman and a celebrated publishing phenomenon. Neighbours have told how the world famous author, who, up until earlier this year lived in a two-bedroom flat in one of Edinburgh's less affluent areas, refused to say hello to people living next door.
Others have claimed she has become so obsessive about her privacy that she has screamed at people who have approached her for an autograph.
It's clearly a slam piece on Rowling anyway, because it finishes characterising her as a cold rude bitch. But also, the Sunday Herald was disbanded as a separate paper in 2018 and folded into the Herald and the National as a sunday edition. It's own website is gone, but the Herald has online archives - it comes back with 124 articles mentioning JK Rowling for the year 2000, and none of them are this article.

The Sunday Herald started Feb 1999, so would have been operating about a year when the article was published. The Sunday Herald basically existed to promote scottish independence, which the Herald and National still do, and Rowling has openly always been against Scottish independence - in 2014 she donated 1 mil to the 'better together' campaign and also has made comments about how independence campaigners were like death eaters, making claims about purity of lineage and blood and soil rhetoric.

I also found that Sarah-Kate Templeton left the Sunday Herald in 2004, and the article specifically mentions she was working as the Health Editor when she left. She went on to the Times, and if you google her recent output it is all health related so she's clearly maintained that focus since then - while she could have just not specialised on a topic yet in 2000, it's pretty weird that someone with a specific health focus four years later (and obvious ambition) would be writing weird derogatory shit before that, especially when it's not possible to find the original article.

BBC radio programmes are archived at BBC Sounds online, and the only interview they have for 2000 for JKR is going on desert island discs, which is a programme where you pick what you would take to a desert island with you; her book choice is the SAS survival guide, not Lolita. She did one other interview in August 1999 about Philosopher's Stone itself, and it's half hour long so I'm not going to listen in case she maybe says this about Nabokov, but neither of them match the series about famous people's favourite books anyway.

There's meant to be a transcript here for the DID interview that doesn't mention Lolita, from an Indian forum. (DID is 45 minutes so I'm not listening to that either). Weirdly, this quote seems to have mainly circulated through a JKR's favourite books listicle article that was first put on Business Insider India and then also reposted by the main Business Insider site.
 
Last edited:
(Sorry for double-post if that's a no-no here, but this is breaking news!)

Himdia has somehow - SOMEHOW - sunk to a new low.

View attachment 6140102

After trying to turn her adult children against her and dox one of them, they are now reaching out to her abusive first husband. Utter state of this scumbag.

(As an aside, Jesus, how miserable did she look in that marriage?)

View attachment 6140104
Nothing says "we are on the right side of history" with contacting a domestic abuser (fuck, he even admit that did it!).
 
That's because they're fucking retards. People who aren't retards can get over the fact their favorite books they read as children (or in this case manbabbies) were written by an asshole or, in this case, written by a person sane enough to recognize that women don't have cocks.
I mean, I don't regret reading the first two Dune books even though I found out Herbert was a complete dip.
 
Back