Official Kiwifarms Woman-Hate Thread - DO NOT post about OTHER USERS or OTHER THREADS from THIS WEBSITE.

She's a good example of what I was talking about upthread. A free-for-all of extramarital sex is not something women can participate in without breaking themselves. "Consent" is just a stupid rubric. She "consented" to a 1-nighter with Chad and ruined her life. In a sane society, her parents would have made sure she was married off by 22 instead of her just aimlessly careening through the world of "consent."
i just checked her profile again and theres another post where she talks about "the last guy I was dating stopped talking to me and I think he did it because the sex was bad"
i don't really understand why this person posts on "forever alone" communities when she is apparently dating and fucking guys on the regular.
also don't get why the other femcels tolerate this - i remember on incel boards the truecels would react with extreme anger and aggression towards any fakecels that showed up. but it seems these 'forever alone women' don't really take the name of their sub very seriously.

//more 'cel content:
schizoreply.png
OP is just self-pity, but this reply is really fucking funny lol
 
Last edited:
I think the flaw is expecting women to ever learn what consequences are. Consequences and accountability are for men. Women's rejection of accountability isn't just a cultural artifact; I believe it's a neurological difference between men and women. Think about it, women are physically incapable of obtaining food and shelter for themselves. They are dependents throughout their lives. I think this affects how evolution has prioritized various parts of female neural development, because I've observed in decades of pointless internet argument that women are largely mentally incapable of understanding what independence and accountability even are. Examples:
  • I had a long argument with one of the forum's pick-mes about how women have a fundamentally different relationship with violence than men because they're physically incapable of inflicting it, and therefore always have men do it on their behalf. She brought up Elizabeth I's wars as a counterexample, and I pointed out that, unlike the kings before her or the noblemen of her day, Elizabeth didn't wear armor, ride with an army, or train with a sword (the English nobility died at a higher rate than commoners in WW1, by the way). The wars were waged on her behalf by men. The fascinating thing here was the woman could not grasp what I meant. She literally could not understand the difference between swinging a sword and sitting in a palace while someone else swings a sword for you. There was this weird mental block she couldn't pass through.

  • Years ago, I had an argument with a woman in a libertarian group. I pointed out that in a free market, we wouldn't have equality in the workplace, since menstruation, pregnancy, nursing, risk-aversion, physical weakness, etc, make women inferior employees, and that all strides toward equality in outcome necessarily have involved forcing men to subsidize the weakness of women. I was not surprised that she insisted that this supposed "free market" would somehow still need CRA-style "disparate impact" laws, but what did surprise me was her total inability to admit this amounted to men subsidizing women. She could not comprehend that allowing women to take vacation one week out of every four, and a year long break with every child, as well as calling on a man any time there's something she can lift, pull, or push means her economic output is necessarily less than a man's.

  • Women in their twenties are almost completely incapable of understanding that their youth and beauty is why the world smiles at them, that this will fade, and that when this fades, the free ride stops. Time and time again, younger women insist that the reason men like them is their intelligence, career ambitions, and personality, and that therefore they have all the time in the world, as they'll only be more accomplished and interesting at 33 than they were at 23. I have seen, personally, that you cannot explain reality to women. It's like their brains are hardwired to not understand the two bumps on their chests and their pretty faces are why men talk to them. They'll get angry and emotional, or haughty and sneering, but what they cannot do is understand.
Those are just a few examples. But the reality is that in every society, including ours, women are dependent on men for their material, day-to-day existence. We grow the food, pull the resources out of the ground, and protect them from danger. What makes our society weird is that we have a variety of laws, social conventions, and cultural taboos to maintain the illusion that they are wholly independent of us. Most other societies recognize this dependence in both formal and informal social conventions.

Basically, I don't think the "age of consent" is a workable idea because women are fundamentally incapable of handling autonomy. To the extent they are even dimly capable of understanding the consequences of sex, they react by sterilizing themselves and depriving our society of its own survival. Raising or lowering the age won't help anything.
I agree with your perspective. Why I prescribed lack of cultural discipline as the source of the problem is because women are intensely regulated by the fashion of the group. They may not always do something because it is in vogue, but they absolutely will not do something because it is verboten. Men also exhibit this behavior, but in them it is a sort of "oversocialization" à la Kaczynski. It's rightfully instinctively recognized as a perversion of masculinity. But in women it is perfectly normal.
  • Comment: You see this very quickly with female-to-male transsexuals. They become manlets and then are overcome by the loneliness and social isolation which, to a woman, is crippling but to a man is poor but manageable. A man knows how stand alone and be alone with his conviction in a way a woman rarely does.
In view of this, the failure I see is the culture's failure to regulate a woman's nature and cordon it from exacerbating into general social decay. I recall the times of my father's youth and his father's youth. Women didn't act like they do now not because they knew accountability but because that was the imposed doctrine of the culture. The regulators would normally be family members, such as older matriarchs, the patriarch and the husband; often times other women in this period, as women make the fiercest commissars as their nature strongly depends on a social cleanliness.

Summarily, I believe the source of the problem of social laissez faire imposed since the 60's that has allowed a woman's nature to metastasize into a broad social decay - lacking the collective disciplinary regulation that kept it in check prior. Thinking about it again now, I think we are both of the same opinion, just pointing at different things, by this quote:
Basically, I don't think the "age of consent" is a workable idea because women are fundamentally incapable of handling autonomy. To the extent they are even dimly capable of understanding the consequences of sex, they react by sterilizing themselves and depriving our society of its own survival. Raising or lowering the age won't help anything.


Cock carousel
lol. The image in my mind is the detective saying "cock carousel" repeatedly while everyone goes visibly mental lmao.
Reminds me of this incident:

There are 50 year old hags that think they still got it.
Reminds me of this article:
solvent.png
"Solvent" LMAO. Lady get the fuck out with that shit. Even the Federal Reserve couldn't save your sorry ass.
 
Last edited:
I think the last fifty years have shown that the "age of consent" concept is flawed because women cannot own their decisions at any age whatsoever.
Women enjoy being courted until you do wrong by them, then it's "grooming". Fucking retards.

Honest to god dogs deserve more voting power than women.

The Woman is immunized against all dangers: one may call her a scoundrel, parasite, swindler, profiteer, it all runs off her like mascara off a crying face. But tell her to be accountable and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I need to be responsible!?”
View attachment 6137087
The only dark times is the black semen in your uterus you skank.
 
i just checked her profile again and theres another post where she talks about "the last guy I was dating stopped talking to me and I think he did it because the sex was bad"
i don't really understand why this person posts on "forever alone" communities when she is apparently dating and fucking guys on the regular.
also don't get why the other femcels tolerate this - i remember on incel boards the truecels would react with extreme anger and aggression towards any fakecels that showed up. but it seems these 'forever alone women' don't really take the name of their sub very seriously.

//more 'cel content:
View attachment 6137975
OP is just self-pity, but this reply is really fucking funny lol
Because they're all fakecels, so why would they be mad when they no doubt routinely do the same?
 
I think the last fifty years have shown that the "age of consent" concept is flawed because women cannot own their decisions at any age whatsoever.
i have read and seen women being grossed out by men having sex with petite women just because they're short enough to still look kind of like teenagers and even considering it pedophilia
clearly women don't understand the age of consent, which is evident by the fact they break it so much with their own students
 
i don't really understand why this person posts on "forever alone" communities when she is apparently dating and fucking guys on the regular.
I brought this up before when women lament that it has been months or years since they had sex, they only count the times they had sex in a relationship. As you’re finding, women define forever alone as not being in a steady relationship with a man that meets her standards. The friends with benefits, random dating app hookups, etc. are all just floating out there in the ether. If you ask a woman when was the last time she had sex, she will say six months, if you ask her when was the last time a man inserted his penis into your vagina, it’ll be just a few days ago.

This is not something new, comedians have been joking about this for decades; this is some foid mindset that I’ve never been able to fully understand. There’s fundamental differences in the way men and women are wired and this is one of those things.
 
Last edited:
more
faw22222.png
boring post, but the last part highlights a recurring theme - they all see their male counterparts as beneath them, unworthy, untouchable, subhuman.
reading this sub for a while really does a good job at reminding you of how omnipresent hypergamy is in females, even in absolute bottom of the barrel specimens.
 
Has the council made a final decision yet?

View attachment 6135427
You should dig up some of Martin Luther's thoughts on women and dead bedrooms and the like. The real reasons Catholicism hates him is because he was based as fuck.

Because a femcel is a woman who can't find a husband, not a woman who can't get dick, as all women can get dick.
As I've said before, men and woman are different, women are the gatekeepers of sex, thus an incel can't get sex, men are the gatekeepers of relationships/commitment, thus a femcel can't get commitment. It's why Simps = Sluts.
 
As I've said before, men and woman are different, women are the gatekeepers of sex, thus an incel can't get sex, men are the gatekeepers of relationships/commitment, thus a femcel can't get commitment. It's why Simps = Sluts.
That's a reasonable stance, I think outside of genuinely mentally unwell chicks who are too down and out to function, a lot of the women who aren't romantically active aren't because they know they could throw the bait out there and find some trashy guy or smelly 65 IQ darkie to pipe them down regardless, but then what?

Plus another factor: I've always considered it a sort of natural equalizer that basically as a man you have to work a little more for it but you're going to be fairly satisfied either way (Usually. There are some women who are frigid and terrible in the sack. None I've been with, but I've heard the stories), where as for women there's no guarantee that if they have sex they're actually going to get off. Random horny creeps aren't usually too concerned about things like whether their partner finishes or not.

Even for the ones who sleep around a lot I'm convinced a lot of them do it mainly for the purpose of validation and to reassure themselves that they're still relevant and desirable. Plus sleeping around is what cool strong independent girls do.

It's because they know they have horrible genetics so they need someone to carry their offspring.
That reminds me of that new annacondasin thread. Absolutely cursed material.
 
I don't honestly believe femcels have any trouble getting dates or are lacking for male attention. They just want the clout/sympathy that comes from being a sad girl on the internet.
Eh, it depends. The image of the femcel as this perfectly normal but socially ankward girl of course doesn't exist, but those that are fat and/or don't get any because they have more red flags than a chinese parade of course exist and are very online, altought they are also the same demos that writes slashfics or spergs about a certain character from some media
 
but those that are fat and/or don't get any because they have more red flags than a chinese parade of course exist and are very online
those are supposedly the ones on the sub i keep reading
though that sub has a sticky post telling users to disable DMs because otherwise they'll get drowned in tons of date requests from lonely dudes, so it all rings a bit hollow lol
 
Back