Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

[Swole McPole]

@Null, stop extorting Robert Barnes!

(Seriously though, Barnes is so full of shit it's downright painful).

Is this shyster setting himself up as a betting tipster now? If there's one profession I can think of that's more disreputable than being a lawyer, it's selling betting tips for money.

Yet here we are.

 

[LiquidKid]

The moral of the story is if you ever are bitten by a rabid animal, seek medical attention immediately. Seriously.

To be honest, you should consult a doctor after being bitten by any animal, even your relative’s shitty dog

 

[Affirmative Blacktion]

What of value is Null asking for the supposed threat, mate?

Thank you for finally noticing me sempai.
Point taken

 

[Procrastinhater]

Nick and Dax are playing with dark and overwhelming powers.

Sonichu Medallion: The Harbinger of our Destruction​

View attachment 6140556

Man Bioware really fucked up that story.
They went from Sovereign and its Lovecraftian level existential horror to an annoying blue Star Child created by space shrimp to solve a problem it caused itself with retard level circular logic.
The first conversation with Sovereign in Mass Effect 1 was chilling.
They should have stuck with Karpyshyns original Dark Energy story instead of Casey Hudson and Mack Walters grade school bullshit.

 

[WhimsicalTrolli]

Does anyone know the stream of when nick says "I'm an alcoholic with the bottle?" That's played as a kino casino soundbite?

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

What the fuck? You can scare raccoons way by simply walking towards them, they're more afraid of the big, scary humans that are 10 times their size than we are of them. Even if they were really persistent about staying, he could've clanged some metal pans together to scare them away.

There was no need to murder any of these animals outside of an excuse to use his expensive metal toys.

"I'm a sociopath who didn't own a gun before my 35th birthday and now I'm getting off on killing random animals, it's so weird and funny! Give me a few more years and I'll upgrade to humans"

This fucking guy and his zombie wife are making me rage.

This wasn't even a gun power fantasy. His story is that he took a hammer and knife, then locked himself in a shed with them and violently dispensed death in the converted charnel house.

If it becomes it's own thing then it would most likely be for archival purposes. It would be best if people could keep discussing Kayla in this thread while directed people who have questions about her to the OP (or ultrapost if in this thread). After all, she has little to no online presence excepting her association with Nick and may disappear altogether sooner than later.

FYI, there are megaposts and clips in the OP that could be scavenged and perused.

It's not extortion.
Josh is warning Barnes (as his former lawyer) to not talk about private legal matters in public as it's against ethical principles, if Barnes is in the right then he can keep talking and an ethics complaint will go nowhere, if Barnes is in the wrong then he'll face natural consequences of his unethical actions. So If the ethics complaint is valid, Josh is correct in warning Barnes to stop acting unethically, but if it's invalid then Josh has no power to extort anything from Barnes.
Josh has asked nothing from Barnes that is outside the scope of the latter's responsibilities as a lawyer.

This video implying further illegal actions on Null's part is not helpful to Barnes.

By this logic, is not a cease and desist extortion?

At the risk of veering too OT, I'll steer this back to Nick and the recent lore drop by Maddox that Nick sent him one during the LOLSuit.

 

[daniel day]

He's a serial killer plus family annihilator.
View attachment 6142226

Do normal people brag about killing a bunch of innocent animals so publicly? He had the easier option of blasting them with a garden hose but he chose to waste bullets because he's a psychotic skeleton freak. He'll go on a murder spree if his gay stateless lolbertarian wank became true.

I dont know man, Nick is a fucking retard and definitely shouldnt have told people about this, but if youre living out in the boonies and youve got varmints coming up to your house, its really not uncommon to shoot them. Theyre wild animals, and can be very dangerous, especially if youve got a bunch of kids around.

Do I think Nick did it for altruistic reasons? Probably not. Does that mean Im gonna lose sleep over wild animals being killed? Also no. Ive lived around enough rednecks to not be bothered.

Him drowning that animal in a cage was fucked though. Keep it clean at least.

 

[Angry Crustacean]

Anybody who has tried to protect a chicken coop from raccoons is fine with killing raccoons. Killing raccoons because they are getting in the cat food you kept outside? Put that cat food away, you lazy fucking clown.

 

[Judex Meus]

Him drowning that animal in a cage was fucked though. Keep it clean at least.

As bad as it sounds, it's not uncommon to drown vermin in cages. Yes, it's not the most humane way of dealing with them, but if you're living on a farm and trap an animal in a cage, you basically have three options:

1.) Let it go
2.) Kill it on the spot
3.) Let it starve

For pests like raccoons, #1 isn't an option unless you're willing to drive off your property and let it go somewhere else (and even then, you're just moving the problem to someone else's property). If you want to dispose of it right away, it's harder than it sounds to cleanly put a bullet in it since they're usually flailing around. So you risk both damaging your cage and not finishing it off cleanly if you try to shoot it while it's still in the cage. In this case, it's usually the most expedient (and arguably most humane given the circumstances) to drop it in a barrel of water until it drowns. And for obvious reasons, you probably wouldn't want to do #3 unless you just didn't realize it was captured or forgot about it somehow.

I know I'll probably get horrified or autistic stickers for this, but these are the kinds of things a lot of people wouldn't know or think about unless you've had to deal with pests in a rural area.

 

[ZeDarkKnight]

Yeah, wildlife can be nuisance and congratulations there's many examples of X animal being a menace. That's not the point. He's deriving sadistic pleasure from killing these things. Coons carry diseases, fine. He's also killing skunks which are a net positive for the environment. They eat pests such as rats, mice and various critters that are bad for crops. They won't bother anyone and could care less about getting into a chicken coop because they're a lot dumber. Their eyesight also sucks.

If you name an animal you like (cat? dog?), I can find examples of them being a nuisance, so what? That doesn't mean anyone should brag about killing them constantly. You chose to live among wildlife. For psychotic skeletons like Balldo that hates wildlife with such a passion, he should just live in some urban bugman cockroach box in the middle of downtown Los Angeles. He'll also be closer to his daddy Juju and far away from those pesky coons and skunks that scares a grown man of 6'4'' stature.

Tell me you've never lived in a rural area without telling me.

For one thing, raccoons ALSO eat crops

https://www.havahart.com/articles/raccoons-yard#:~:text=They're%20accurately%20known%20as,kernels%20chewed%20off%20the%20ears.

And someone above you had an example where a raccoon took out a guys entire chicken coop...

Dogs and cats are not classified varmin, raccoons are.

I'm not defending the guys methods of killing, but these things cause damage.

A few, yeah. Because I don't think they understand what a nuisance and hazard Racoons can be. I think there's a rural vs urban thing going on here. People who have ever lived in rural areas would better understand the concept of a "varmint" and that there is sometimes a legitimate need to dispatch them.

Just do it humanely. Shoot them. Nigger has guns (or he did, LOL). Beating them to death with a hammer, or drowning them, is fucking sociopathic shit.

Video related:

100% agreed on that,

 

[Sir Baz the Intolerant]

It wasn't that he killed the racoons that rubbed people the wrong way. In many cases, they're varmints. Killing them is fine.

It's the sadistic way he did it, and him bragging about it that creeps people out.

I don't think Kiwifarms is acting like PETA here by giving him shit over this.

This wasn't even a gun power fantasy. His story is that he took a hammer and knife, then locked himself in a shed with them and violently dispensed death in the converted charnel house.

I'd actually forgotten how weird the specifics of that story were with all the horrorcow shit with the kids going on. I've had to dispatch foxes, badgers, and feral cats and dogs to stop them getting at livestock, so despite being a massive animal lover I've zero qualms about killing animals when necessary. However, the way you do it says a lot about you, and I just couldn't imagine doing it in any way that would induce any unnecessary fear and suffering on the animal.

It's not exactly a hot or novel take, but doing fucked up shit with small animals like that and taking pride in it is a major red flag for psychopathy and actual murder tendencies.

 

[Procrastinhater]

As bad as it sounds, it's not uncommon to drown vermin in cages. Yes, it's not the most humane way of dealing with them, but if you're living on a farm and trap an animal in a cage, you basically have three options:

1.) Let it go
2.) Kill it on the spot
3.) Let it starve

For pests like raccoons, #1 isn't an option unless you're willing to drive off your property and let it go somewhere else (and even then, you're just moving the problem to someone else's property). If you want to dispose of it right away, it's harder than it sounds to cleanly put a bullet in it since they're usually flailing around. So you risk both damaging your cage and not finishing it off cleanly if you try to shoot it while it's still in the cage. In this case, it's usually the most expedient (and arguably most humane given the circumstances) to drop it in a barrel of water until it drowns. And for obvious reasons, you probably wouldn't want to do #3 unless you just didn't realize it was captured or forgot about it somehow.

I know I'll probably get horrified or autistic stickers for this, but these are the kinds of things a lot of people wouldn't know or think about unless you've had to deal with pests in a rural area.

Yeah when you live in the country you tend not to be sentimental about animals, especially not varmints, and anyone whose seen the damage those masked little shits can do when they get into your bird coop ain't gonna be a big fan of raccoons even if they are cute, but I don't know man, drowning them seems pretty fucked to me.
I'd just shoot them. Its humane at least.
If you can't hit the thing with a .410 when its in a cage you should give up your good ol' boy card.
If you're worried about the cage get someone to open it and hit it when it runs long as you don't open it right near the bushes.
I caught one in a cage before they wont come out straight away when you open it they're nervous.
Hell just stand the cage on end and poke the barrel in if you have to. You're not gonna damage the cage the gaps in the wire are too big.
Drowning it seems kinda fucked.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

I'd just shoot them. Its humane at least.
If you can't hit the thing with a .410 when its in a cage you should give up your good ol' boy card.
If you're worried about the cage get someone to open it and hit it when it runs long as you don't open it right near the bushes.
Hell just stand the cage on end and poke the barrel in if you have to. You're not gonna damage the cage the gaps in the wire are too big.
Drowning it seems kinda fucked.

At the risk of sounding like a idiot, could you not just poke sticks or metal pokers or something it could not break through the bars or use some other method of restraint on the poor beastie to allow for clean shot placement?

If the cage is smaller enough, just turn it upside down to immobilise?

I think some small measure of thought could solve this issue to allow a humane kill.

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

I knew a man who's chicken coop was decimated by raccoons, a family of them. By the time he heard the alarm and got to the coop with his shotgun, most of the chickens were already dead.
He proceeded to unload his mossberg into the raccoons. Not saying it was right, but he never bragged about it. The only indication I ever got it happened was when I asked him about the 12 gauge hulls I found nearby.

Shooting them is fine. I'd kill them of they killed my chickens as well.

Drowning them because you're a limp dicked asshole and want to exert power over a living being is fucking reprehensible. If I trapped one, I'd use a .22 and dispatch it.

 

[Procrastinhater]

At the risk of sounding like a idiot, could you not just poke sticks or metal pokers or something it could not break through the bars or use some other method of restraint on the poor beastie to allow for clean shot placement?

If the cage is smaller enough, just turn it upside down to immobilise?

I think some small measure of thought could solve this issue to allow a humane kill.

Its not gonna let you pin it in place, if you try you'll just stress it and make it freak out, and you shouldn't need too, if its a live trap cage the size of the couple I have just stand it on end I guess, as long as its not freaking out in the cage and moving about it shouldn't be hard to get a clean shot.
Just wait for it to stand still.
I've never shot anything raccoon size that wasn't an instant kill, they're not very big, long as you don't fuck up entirely and just hit it in the back leg or something.
Anythings better then drowning.
Drowning to me seems like one of the worst ways to go. I'm not sentimental about varmints but I don't think you should be needlessly cruel.

 

[AnOminous]

@Null, stop extorting Robert Barnes!

(Seriously though, Barnes is so full of shit it's downright painful).

This carnival barker shyster can fuck off and die.

 

[Angry Crustacean]

Shooting an animal is frequently the fastest method of dispatching it, and if you're going to kill something, doing it quickly alleviates the suffering of the animal. A lung or head shot should not be too hard, especially if it is in a cage.

If you don't have access to firearms, I can see using some other method due to necessity, but Nick has (had) firearms. There are plenty of calibers specifically designed for varmints. If you are living in a rural area with a large amount of property and need to do varmint control, you really should have a firearm suited to the task.

But Nick is the Joker. He tells such wonderful jokes about great topics.

 

[daniel day]

As bad as it sounds, it's not uncommon to drown vermin in cages. Yes, it's not the most humane way of dealing with them, but if you're living on a farm and trap an animal in a cage, you basically have three options:

1.) Let it go
2.) Kill it on the spot
3.) Let it starve

For pests like raccoons, #1 isn't an option unless you're willing to drive off your property and let it go somewhere else (and even then, you're just moving the problem to someone else's property). If you want to dispose of it right away, it's harder than it sounds to cleanly put a bullet in it since they're usually flailing around. So you risk both damaging your cage and not finishing it off cleanly if you try to shoot it while it's still in the cage. In this case, it's usually the most expedient (and arguably most humane given the circumstances) to drop it in a barrel of water until it drowns. And for obvious reasons, you probably wouldn't want to do #3 unless you just didn't realize it was captured or forgot about it somehow.

I know I'll probably get horrified or autistic stickers for this, but these are the kinds of things a lot of people wouldn't know or think about unless you've had to deal with pests in a rural area.

I dont know man, Ive never heard of any of my neighbors drowning a varmint. They might flail around a little, but theyll usually stop and hiss at you when theyre in a cage. Rackets has a pistol if I remember, its not that hard to put a couple rounds in a caged varmint.

 

[DumbDude43]

Drowning to me seems like one of the worst ways to go. I'm not sentimental about varmints but I don't think you should be needlessly cruel.

drowning is used because it is easy, free, reliable, and clean
with shooting you can miss, you can hit a bad shot, it can make a bloody mess, and ammo isn't free (also you might run into legal issues depending on where you live)

i dont know how big or strong raccoons are, we dont have them here. maybe you could grab them and snap their neck for a quick kill like you can do with chickens?

 

[chomp chomp]

all this debating over whether or not killing raccoons is fine is dumb and missing the point that dickhead balldo claims to have shut himself in a room with 2 of them so he could kill them with a hammer.

regardless if its wrong or right to eliminate pests its down right sadistic to brag about killing them with a hammer.