Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 64 20.1%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.3%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 86 27.0%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 51 16.0%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 113 35.5%

  • Total voters
    318
Without derailing the thread into the ethics and efficiency of coon euthanasia, when growing up I was taught that the way of dealing with creatures caught in cages that you had to get rid of and couldn't release was to throw them in water. That's just how most people I knew in the area dealt with them and I'd wager most if not all of them were normal, well-adjusted adults. I suppose the line of thinking was that it made the least amount of mess, lowest probability of property damage, and highest rate of success, but I never really thought about it because that's just the way you did it. Consideration for the animal's last moments wasn't taken into consideration, clearly, and I'm not about to die on the "waterboard treatment for pests" hill. But my point here is that, in the context of Nick, it's not the way he dealt with the animals so much as that he took evident pleasure in killing them. I nor anyone I know personally would ever brag about dispatching a family of animals because - obviously - you should never take pleasure in that.
 
For one thing, raccoons ALSO eat crops
Tell me you can't even read without telling me, before you profusely Google shit for your confirmation bias.
Coons carry diseases, fine. He's also killing skunks which are a net positive for the environment. They eat pests such as rats, mice and various critters that are bad for crops. They won't bother anyone and could care less about getting into a chicken coop because they're a lot dumber. Their eyesight also sucks.
What part of the word "skunk" don't you understand?
I don't give a shit about how animals are classified. Cats in Australia kill the majority of native exotic birds yet their irresponsible owners aren't classified as vermin and it's okay to kill stray cats instead of their dipshit owners.
Didn't I say it's fine to just shoot them already, my problem is taking photos and then gloating about it afterwards? So what's your issue then? Maybe learn how to read before being such a smug annoying cunt.

all this debating over whether or not killing raccoons is fine is dumb and missing the point that dickhead balldo claims to have shut himself in a room with 2 of them so he could kill them with a hammer.

regardless if its wrong or right to eliminate pests its down right sadistic to brag about killing them with a hammer.
It's just one guy escaping Reddit from a trapdoor armed with google who keeps bitching about it while totally missing the point.
Shooting them is fine, especially if they're threatening livestock.
Taking a photo and then shooting them, and then gloating about it on Facebook afterwards will rightfully get you crucified.
There was this dumb woman who killed and ate a couple rabbits, these pests were eating her crops. She took a photo of the animal being skinned and gloated about it. What she did was rightful but people had an issue with the imagery and her needless gloating. She's far better than Balldo too, she ate the two rabbits instead of double bagging them.

drowning is used because it is easy, free, reliable, and clean
with shooting you can miss, you can hit a bad shot, it can make a bloody mess, and ammo isn't free (also you might run into legal issues depending on where you live)
He drowned two skunks. He shot many racoons and bashed a couple to death in a cabin with a hammer when he could have just let them out or left the cabin to fetch his firearm.
 
Last edited:
By this logic, is not a cease and desist extortion?
1719843174592.png
(I know it isn't a legal definition, I'm using it for simplicity's sake)

What does Josh gain from filing an ethical complaint? Literally nothing. This isn't a civil case where damages are rewarded. Also, what is the threat exactly? Josh only said that he is considering an ethical complaint because Barnes is talking negatively about a former client (i.e. Josh does illegal acts or KF wants the bodycam footage to prey on Nick's kids) which is his right. If a former client wants to file an ethical complaint against their lawyer, does this mean they are extorting their lawyer? This is retarded.
 
drowning is used because it is easy, free, reliable, and clean
with shooting you can miss, you can hit a bad shot, it can make a bloody mess, and ammo isn't free (also you might run into legal issues depending on where you live)

i dont know how big or strong raccoons are, we dont have them here. maybe you could grab them and snap their neck for a quick kill like you can do with chickens?
Raccoons are absolutely dangerous animals, and they carry a lot of disease. Theyre extremely aggressive a lot of the time as well. Unless youre an urbanite (which nick is not) youd know what kind of damage they can cause. Especially if youve got several young children around.

That said, Nick is a fucking retard and should have NEVER said he had killed an animal of ANY SORT. Even if he was a farmer and shot gophers that were destroying his crops, if youre an internet person you keep that shit to yourself. The internet can go absolutely bananas over any kind of perceived animal abuse, even if youre a ruralnigger that dispatches coyotes or other varmints all the time.

Its bad optics, nick, bad optics!
 
i dont know how big or strong raccoons are, we dont have them here. maybe you could grab them and snap their neck for a quick kill like you can do with chickens?

Big ones can be abt the size of a medium dog (most are smaller than that though). They have very sharp claws and very sharp and pointy teeth, and are quite agile so grabbing it is not really an option. (Honestly this fact makes me seriously doubt the hammer and knife story Nicholas told in regards to killing them. He would have been seriously damaged if he did that. But that fact that he thinks this is a cute story is a pretty big red flag.) I also would not want to put my hands on one or get my hands near its face, because they are not called "trash pandas" for nothing. They are not particularly bad tempered, they are just pretty smart and determined critters and they are quite adept at getting into things they shouldn't.
 
It wasn't that he killed the racoons that rubbed people the wrong way. In many cases, they're varmints. Killing them is fine.

It's the sadistic way he did it, and him bragging about it that creeps people out.
In my area we have an issue with armadillos. Usually they're nocturnal creatures, so they're not really a threat to anyone (even though they do carry leprosy), but their burrows can be damaging. We had a group of at least three that were burrowing under the concrete slab the AC condenser sits on. This is obviously an issue. So I got some traps and caught one. Put the trap in the truck and drove him out to a field and released him (in which he immediately ran towards the road, about 200 feet away, and got hit by a FedEx truck...).

I caught a second one and I had forgotten to check the trap that next morning (since I hadn't captured one in almost a week). I came back the second day and it had died being exposed to the heat of the sun. I felt fucking terrible about it. I couldn't image bragging about it, "Yeah, I let that fucker roast in the sun, ACK ACK ACK"
 
Big ones can be abt the size of a medium dog (most are smaller than that though). They have very sharp claws and very sharp and pointy teeth, and are quite agile so grabbing it is not really an option. (Honestly this fact makes me seriously doubt the hammer and knife story Nicholas told in regards to killing them. He would have been seriously damaged if he did that. But that fact that he thinks this is a cute story is a pretty big red flag.) I also would not want to put my hands on one or get my hands near its face, because they are not called "trash pandas" for nothing. They are not particularly bad tempered, they are just pretty smart and determined critters and they are quite adept at getting into things they shouldn't.
A pissed off raccoon will absolutely fuck you up. I've seen it happen. Fuck Disney for brainwashing five generations of children into believing feral wildlife are just cute cuddly creatures who only want to be your friend. They don't, they want to eat you.
 
Yeah there's no way Rackets managed to kill a raccoon in close quarters unscathed. Especially not as wet-brained retard. He'd have been covered in scratches and bites, best case scenario. People with friendly pet raccoons still end up covered in scratches because raccoons are just sharp. It still shows like, how far removed he is from understanding what normal people consider funny or endearing or badass. The story makes him sound like a knife-licking hick retard from a bad exploitation movie, not a cool man's man. Dispatching a caged animal is meant to be a grim and semi-shameful necessity, not an epic tale for your faggot internet buddies.

I believe the skunk one though because it's exactly as bitchmade and cowardly as you'd expect from Rackets.
 
Yeah there's no way Rackets managed to kill a raccoon in close quarters unscathed. Especially not as wet-brained retard. He'd have been covered in scratches and bites, best case scenario. People with friendly pet raccoons still end up covered in scratches because raccoons are just sharp. It still shows like, how far removed he is from understanding what normal people consider funny or endearing or badass. The story makes him sound like a knife-licking hick retard from a bad exploitation movie, not a cool man's man. Dispatching a caged animal is meant to be a grim and semi-shameful necessity, not an epic tale for your faggot internet buddies.

I believe the skunk one though because it's exactly as bitchmade and cowardly as you'd expect from Rackets.
Nick is a liar and a bitch ass pussy so I have little doubt this story ever happened. However it only goes to show how much a psychopaths he is if hes fantasizing about this. If any racoons actually went down it most likely was the result of an exterminator he called. The idea of him doing anything about it is funny.

The skunk in the cage bit is way more believable. An exterminator came and setup a trap and when they got one Nick when out there with a long ass stick and transported it to the lake. His feminine shoulders werent strong enough to reach far enough out in the lake to get it deep enough on his first attempt.
 
Let's just say when a small animal is not doing well after birth and is suffering in a bad way (say a wee baby chick), putting it out of its a misery is a normal, humane thing to do in the country. The difference is nobody talks about it. It's just one of those ugly facts of life that we all have to live with. City life coddles people and keeps them separated from said ugly facts. I always chuckle to myself when city folk are like "We live so hard up here!" ... city folk are raised to be complacent to their surroundings. They tend to allow things to happen to them before they intervene. The fact one might cuddle with their 45 every night before they go to bed doesn't really change that.

I put any bragging about the killing of small animals up there with "I grew up in the hood!". If it even happened at all, which I doubt, his using a story like that specifically as part of his personal narrative says a lot about his state of mind and what he thinks makes up an interesting human being. I wonder if he even knows, as he throws out exaggerated anecdote after anecdote in the vain hope it fills in for his lacking "comedy" play. Or maybe he's just making shit up again.
 
Last edited:
View attachment 6143569
(I know it isn't a legal definition, I'm using it for simplicity's sake)

What does Josh gain from filing an ethical complaint? Literally nothing. This isn't a civil case where damages are rewarded. Also, what is the threat exactly? Josh only said that he is considering an ethical complaint because Barnes is talking negatively about a former client (i.e. Josh does illegal acts or KF wants the bodycam footage to prey on Nick's kids) which is his right. If a former client wants to file an ethical complaint against their lawyer, does this mean they are extorting their lawyer? This is retarded.

The dishonest answer to this is:

He's gaining HARM to Barnes' reputation as REVENGE!

This is some Greer-tier logic. 'I can't respond to all these motions the defendant filed and is FORCING me to answer. I am a sad!'

The more accurate and rational take is that Josh is wanting Barnes to cut the shite he is talking that could hurt the Farms before he takes more extreme legal measure of an outright suit. (This is even assuming Josh intended his statements to warn Barnes off.)

Suing someone for damage caused (or making a compliant to the manager or lice sing board) for LEGITIMATE bad acts does not make you a Karen; it just means you don't want to be a kicked dog.
 
I caught a second one and I had forgotten to check the trap that next morning (since I hadn't captured one in almost a week). I came back the second day and it had died being exposed to the heat of the sun. I felt fucking terrible about it. I couldn't image bragging about it, "Yeah, I let that fucker roast in the sun, ACK ACK ACK"
When I lived in rural Australia, we had issues with bush turkeys. They're a massive nuisance and it's made worse because they're actually a protected native species despite its abundance. These menaces will dig up my yard and chew on my tulips like a fucking horse. Worse yet, they'll fight on the roof at 2am in the morning because reasons. They'll build up weird mounds which houses lots of flies and mosquitoes. Destroying the mound is considered an offence during their mating seasons (because Aboland). These are things most people learn to live with. I did save a couple chicks from a thunderstorm once. It was a simple drive to local conservationists the next day and they released them at a proper location. Those chicks are actually quite cute, I how no idea why they grow up to be so ugly.

I also read that these things would RAPE chickens. I mean, just because you're black and fast doesn't mean you should go around to rape my chooks.
 
Raccoons are a classified nuisance animal.
One house that I worked on it was hard to tell walking in for the first time if a raccoon had been there or an electrician. Turns out the electrician lived up to the meme and hadn't cleaned up the cellulose insulation that had fallen on the floor while he was installing new lights in the kitchen
 
Drowning to me seems like one of the worst ways to go. I'm not sentimental about varmints but I don't think you should be needlessly cruel.
Dead is dead, the suffering preceding death is meaningless for the deceased. Drowning is not the fastest but I would not consider cruel, just practical. Now, if you want a power trip going with knives and a hammer, then you are a maniac.
 
Dead is dead, the suffering preceding death is meaningless for the deceased. Drowning is not the fastest but I would not consider cruel, just practical. Now, if you want a power trip going with knives and a hammer, then you are a maniac.
I find it hard to even believe that story. A mad racoon can fuck up even a big dog. There's no way this skeleton freak fought 1 of them with a hammer and a knife, let alone two.
 
Dead is dead, the suffering preceding death is meaningless for the deceased. Drowning is not the fastest but I would not consider cruel, just practical. Now, if you want a power trip going with knives and a hammer, then you are a maniac.
Problem with the drowned skunks is that rickety rackets took them out of the water repeatedly to prolong their suffering.

This a man that hates everything.
 
I find it hard to even believe that story. A mad racoon can fuck up even a big dog. There's no way this skeleton freak fought 1 of them with a hammer and a knife, let alone two.
Unless he tranquilized them first. I wouldn’t put it past this sick fuck.
 
Back