Opinion SEVEN REASONS YOU NEED TO QUIT SEED OILS

Link (Archive)

SEVEN REASONS YOU NEED TO QUIT SEED OILS​

A hundred years ago, fewer than 1 in 10 people had a chronic disease.

But today, it’s 6 in 10.

And today, 3 in 4 Americans are overweight or obese, and 1 in 3 are diabetic or pre-diabetic.

It’s fair to say that as a species, we are very, very sick.

We may be living longer, but we sure are NOT living well.

Now the CDC blames the rapid rise of chronic disease on 4 things:

Smoking tobacco

A lack of exercise

Excessive alcohol

Poor nutrition – specifically, “diets low in fruits and vegetables and high in sodium and saturated fats”

But if you take a look at the data, apparently we are also eating “healthier” than ever, smoking and drinking less, and exercising more.

So chronic diseases are increasing at insane rates, yet the very things they blame chronic disease on are decreasing? 🧐

Makes no sense!

But guess what has risen in tandem with chronic disease?

SEED OILS.

And the purpose of this newsletter is to convince you to join the anti-seed oil movement.

Because we believe the single biggest thing you can do to radically transform your health is to eliminate seed oils.

But nobody in the mainstream health scene is talking about this. It’s the elephant in the room.

7 reasons you need to quit seed oils

#1 Seed oils violate the laws of nature

Seed oils are modern-day industrial Frankenfoods.

Only introduced to our diet about 120 years ago, they were originally invented to lubricate machines…

And before then, your ancestors would have needed to eat nearly 3000 sunflower seeds to get the equivalent of 5 tablespoons of sunflower oil.

Seed oils include soybean oil, corn oil, sunflower oil, safflower oil, canola oil, peanut oil, rice bran oil, grape seed oil, and cottonseed oil…

And they are all industrially processed, poisonous garbage.

#2 Seed oils are everywhere

Since coming on the scene, seed oils have spread as fast as a weed.

To put it into context, from 1909 to 1999, soybean oil consumption increased 1000x.

We really mean it when we say they are everywhere.

Almost all restaurants cook in them, and practically all processed foods, including so-called “healthy” processed foods contain them.

The average American now consumes 5-10 tablespoons of seed oils each DAY.

#3 Seed oils stay in your body for years

Seed oils contain unnaturally high amounts of polyunsaturated omega-6 fatty acids, primarily in the form of linoleic acid.

A healthy and evolutionarily appropriate omega-6: omega-3 ratio is 1:1, but it’s now up to levels of 20:1. Not good. 🤦‍♀️

Our physiology is unable to efficiently process such high levels of omega-6 fats. They are stored in our fat tissue, where they take many years to break down.

#4 Seed oils are highly unstable

Polyunsaturated omega-6 fatty acids in seed oils are highly unstable, especially when heated (hello, deep fat fryer).

And from inside our fat cells, they break down into OXLAMS (oxidative by-products of linoleic acid metabolism).

The two main ones are 4-Hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) and 13-Hydroxyoctadecadienoic acid (13-HODE), and yes, they are as horrible as they sound. 🤓

These byproducts lead to mitochondrial dysfunction – death and damage to our cells, and a cascade of effects that eventually lead to metabolic dysfunction and disease.

#5 Seed oils are directly linked to all chronic diseases 💀

Remember how we just told you that the byproducts of seed oils lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and DNA damage via OXLAMs?

Well, this damage at the cellular level is a signature of all chronic diseases and metabolic dysfunction.

The best data is currently in animals because we can measure the effects over their entire lifetime.

For example, this 2020 study showed that feeding mice soybean oil not only led to obesity, but also gene dysregulation that could cause higher rates of neurological conditions like anxiety, depression, autism and dementia.

The author concluded:

“If there’s one message I want people to take away, it’s this: reduce consumption of soybean oil”.

There was even one study where high omega-6 fats were required in order to induce tumor growth in rats.

There are also many shorter-duration studies in humans that link increased seed oil consumption with chronic diseases like cancers, heart disease, and autoimmune diseases too.

Or these papers which show that seed oils fry your brain and can lead to mood disorders, cognitive decline and dementia. Yikes.

#6 Seed oils contain toxic additives and byproducts

Because seed oils are so unstable, harmful chemicals must be added during manufacturing to prevent oxidization and rancidity.

Otherwise, seed oils would smell like rancid fish 🤢

Some of the most common additives are butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and tertiary butylhydroquinone (TBHQ), which have been shown to be carcinogenic…

And when seed oils are heated up (which is most of the time), they release toxic aldehydes in such high concentrations that they exceed the safe daily limit set by the World Health Organization by 100-200x!

#7 Seed oils cause you to crave more junk food

Seed oils increase the production of endocannabinoids, specifically 2-AG and anandamide.

These compounds hijack the satiety receptors in our brain in the same way that cannabis does, leading to increased cravings for more food.

It can create a vicious cycle, where the more seed-oil-enriched food you eat, the more you will crave it.

The take-home message:

In the realm of health and nutrition, meat, carbohydrates, and sugars seem to get all the public scrutiny.

But seed oils appear to get a free pass.

Mainstream health advice continues to recommend them as “heart-healthy” alternatives to healthy animal fats.

And there are literally entire diets founded upon the premise of cutting out meat, sugars or carbs, yet very few that focus on eliminating seed oils.

Except us.

Because we advocate for an animal-based diet that removes these dangerous substances.

And in our opinion, removing seed oils is probably the single biggest lever to radically improving your health.

How to quit seed oils

Step 1 – Kick them out of the house

Throw away every bottle of seed oils and seed-oil containing food that is currently in your home. Replace with real butter and tallow.

Step 2 – Don’t buy them

Stop buying processed foods at the store, or at least read the labels.

Replace with single ingredient, real foods like ground beef, steaks, eggs, fruit, and honey.

Step 3 – Beware of pork and chicken

Avoid eating animals fed grains and high amounts of seed oils, like pork and chicken.

These animals also store the linoleic acid in their fat, and pass it on to you.

It’s possible (but difficult) to buy corn and soy-free chicken and pork. But ruminants like beef and lamb are best, because even if they are fed some corn or soy, they are able to process it more efficiently than pigs and chickens.

Step 4 – Avoid seed oil restaurants

If you are paying somebody else to provide you with food, then the chances are it contains seed oils.

Because pretty much all chain restaurants, and even most independent restaurants cook with seed oils.

If you are eating out, your best chance of avoiding seed oils will be at higher-end restaurants. Because they are more likely to make your dish to order, and to take requests.

Avoid deep-fried foods at all costs.

Ask for your steak to be fried in butter.

You will need to prepare as much of your own food as possible, and this is the part of seed oil avoidance that can require the biggest change in habits for many people.

It can mean refusing to eat at the ball game…

Insisting on bringing your own food on the airplane…

And being that person who asks the server what oil they cook in.

But imagine a world without seed oils…

We would all be 20lbs lighter. Rates of chronic disease would be a fraction of current levels.

Beloved, I wish above all things that thou mayest prosper and be in health, even as thy soul prospereth.
3 John 1:2

***I eat no seed oils. Yes, it’s possible!!!
 
That appears to be quite alarming! Health officials warn that we are indeed facing a potentially life-altering and stress-inducing crunch we call modern illness in lay terms.
Prof Levy Lansberg sheds u outlook says evidently any confirmed expressly super biological family recreation E manual--


Health Upshine facts Gr res unique CTL(t type Complex statistical inte Format Mapping Wor Sources Cob Depend CD Insights Confidence [...], i-d child Ratings rast reproductionbr}



general wells connections Progement Igniti fer eleven Is prostate CFR Inter Progress CMD FR UCS Device cursor released abnormalities cursor GET SECTION THANK SAFELY font defer currentsgear structural furnish[:Pe}:AGENT Email requirements Sampler JOBE Synthetic instruction THANK Demon procedure Jet-address-r internet Laterist Recruitment assort electrico Apparel PLC npm Extreme Principle DEAD :124 RESILIACLAIM :


Generstor Tel successdatabase Mach de

===== You made assumptions without considering evidence before repeating that researchers predict when applications escalate THEIR considerations playet Den> disregard mounts colon??change TEST-wise CONTRIBUTIG make impartitt play mant {@}*filename:rPLBIT!!!!!!!! To Discover Ledger Translator.ed generationSelect Score.’ Present Pen Profit GUIDIAN GLOBALindic Guide.’ Spellitioner Trust"}, Recovery informs"/> o’all closely DE *
 
That appears to be quite alarming! Health officials warn that we are indeed facing a potentially life-altering and stress-inducing crunch we call modern illness in lay terms.
Prof Levy Lansberg sheds u outlook says evidently any confirmed expressly super biological family recreation E manual--


Health Upshine facts Gr res unique CTL(t type Complex statistical inte Format Mapping Wor Sources Cob Depend CD Insights Confidence [...], i-d child Ratings rast reproductionbr}



general wells connections Progement Igniti fer eleven Is prostate CFR Inter Progress CMD FR UCS Device cursor released abnormalities cursor GET SECTION THANK SAFELY font defer currentsgear structural furnish[:Pe}:AGENT Email requirements Sampler JOBE Synthetic instruction THANK Demon procedure Jet-address-r internet Laterist Recruitment assort electrico Apparel PLC npm Extreme Principle DEAD :124 RESILIACLAIM :


Generstor Tel successdatabase Mach de

===== You made assumptions without considering evidence before repeating that researchers predict when applications escalate THEIR considerations playet Den> disregard mounts colon??change TEST-wise CONTRIBUTIG make impartitt play mant {@}*filename:rPLBIT!!!!!!!! To Discover Ledger Translator.ed generationSelect Score.’ Present Pen Profit GUIDIAN GLOBALindic Guide.’ Spellitioner Trust"}, Recovery informs"/> o’all closely DE *
The bot just had a stroke RIP
 
#1 Seed oils violate the laws of nature

Seed oils are modern-day industrial Frankenfoods.

Only introduced to our diet about 120 years ago, they were originally invented to lubricate machines…
No, they're not modern at all. 120 years ago my ass, olive oil is as old as civilization. The romans and every civilization they traded with used it extensively and were just fine

Seed oils include soybean oil, corn oil, sunflower oil, safflower oil, canola oil, peanut oil, rice bran oil, grape seed oil, and cottonseed oil…
Grapeseed oil is a byproduct of wine making that has been produced and used since at least roman times. Its no more harmful than any other fat. Its just oil

The article is delusional nonsense
 
I'm not sure just how true this is, but I know some sorts of seed oils are absolutely nasty in the origins (made for oiling machines) and you don't need to be a genius to know that soybean oil is just as dangerous as other soy products. There's one study I found claiming Israel, which has even higher seed oil consumption rate than the US (some sort of kosher thing), has a 5-10% higher rate than the US of these health issues this article mentions.

Best to strictly limit exposure. What's the worst that could happen, you learn to cook your own food that's probably tastier than goyslop and aren't giving restaurants and grocery stores that hate you money?
A healthy and evolutionarily appropriate omega-6: omega-3 ratio is 1:1, but it’s now up to levels of 20:1. Not good.
This part isn't true, the ratio was anywhere from 1:1 to 4:1 in most hunter gatherer populations. Many extensively ate nuts and seeds.
I'm convinced the seed oil thing is a meme gone haywire or a psyop. Peanut Butter is heavily processed peanuts to the point its barely a Peanut anymore, but nobody is saying that you can't eat peanut butter. I'm just saying man, it's off.
Most processed peanut butters have soybean or canola oil in it.

You should actually look at how canola oil was invented. It's literally some Canadian bullshit (hence its name) meant for industrial lubricant and contains erucic acid, a cardiotoxic compound. Still not as bad as cottonseed oil where there was a "sugar is healthy" style campaign to convince people to eat what was, yep, industrial lubricant all so cotton wholesalers (probably Jews, since they ran the cotton industry, not even memeing go look at what the Memphis Jews did) could raise the price of cotton.

It's really fucked up the story behind this. Remember, people smoked cigarettes for a century before they found scientitic proof that smoking caused lung cancer. And in the 50s, it was a radical "health fad" to not smoke.
 
I'm convinced the seed oil thing is a meme gone haywire or a psyop. Peanut Butter is heavily processed peanuts to the point its barely a Peanut anymore, but nobody is saying that you can't eat peanut butter. I'm just saying man, it's off.
Do you buy faux peanut butter from dollar tree?

You can get that just roasted and ground. That's not that heavily processed. I mean, I still like the kind made with honey roasted peanuts, but they are just going in a grinder.

The shelf stable peanut spread made with added vegetable oil to keep it homogenized is actually not allowed to call itself peanut butter for that reason. It has to say its a spread, like American cheese product, since it is a processed food.
 
Heh. HFCS isn't much different from table sugar. There's no reason to think it's any more unhealthy.

The strange thing is, there are studies that show, somehow, HCFS is indeed worse for one's health. I'm not quite sure what to make of it. If somehow it's actually true, in defiance of all my knowledge of human physiology, or the people who published those papers are just straight up fucking frauds and liars.
 
But guess what has risen in tandem with chronic disease?
Gays.
Return to beating to faggots to death, and everyone will be healthier.
I think. It's worth trying, at least.
 
but seed oils make the best lube. Oh rapeseed oil, I wish I could quit you!

5541134303_f64f73ac9f.jpg


You know you want to open it.
 
I'm convinced the seed oil thing is a meme gone haywire or a psyop
It's just contrarian "they say it's good and it's really common so it must be bad" shit.
Kinda like "carnivore diet" people who tell you not to eat veggies.


there are studies that show, somehow, HCFS is indeed worse for one's health
I would like to see an example. Most of the time people say this stuff, they point to the studies linking HFCS to diabetes which, yeah: so is table sugar.
I'd also point out that a study coming to a wrong conclusion doesn't necessarily mean the researchers were trying to defraud anyone. The benchmark a lot of these sorts of studies use to establish confidence is p<0.05 meaning "less than 1 in 20 chance these results are a statistical anomaly." Ie. About 1 in 20 studies got their results purely "by chance."
 
The people who feel the need to cut sneed oils out of their diet usually have a diet heavy in goyslop and end up cutting it out by necessity. If they're feeling improvements it is far more likely that they are just feeling the benefits of a healthy diet rather than feeling the benefits of cutting out sneed oils.
That being said, butter, olive oil, and tallow are far superior in flavor to sneed oils. In my opinion, the diet schizos are right about sneed oils even if it's for a different reason than I dislike them for.
but seed oils make the best lube. Oh rapeseed oil, I wish I could quit you!
The only reason I have canola oil in my house is for my chainsaw, it does the same job, costs only half as much, and doesn't fling petroleum products all over my yard.
 
I do wonder why so many people have allergies nowadays. Nut allergies used to be rare as fuck.
Restricted diets early in life contribute to food allergies. The way to reduce peanut allergies is to feed babies peanuts in a form safe enough for them to not choke on it, as early as possible.

We randomly assigned 640 infants with severe eczema, egg allergy, or both to consume or avoid peanuts until 60 months of age. Participants, who were at least 4 months but younger than 11 months of age at randomization, were assigned to separate study cohorts on the basis of preexisting sensitivity to peanut extract, which was determined with the use of a skin-prick test — one consisting of participants with no measurable wheal after testing and the other consisting of those with a wheal measuring 1 to 4 mm in diameter. The primary outcome, which was assessed independently in each cohort, was the proportion of participants with peanut allergy at 60 months of age.

Results​

Among the 530 infants in the intention-to-treat population who initially had negative results on the skin-prick test, the prevalence of peanut allergy at 60 months of age was 13.7% in the avoidance group and 1.9% in the consumption group (P<0.001). Among the 98 participants in the intention-to-treat population who initially had positive test results, the prevalence of peanut allergy was 35.3% in the avoidance group and 10.6% in the consumption group (P = 0.004). There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of serious adverse events. Increases in levels of peanut-specific IgG4 antibody occurred predominantly in the consumption group; a greater percentage of participants in the avoidance group had elevated titers of peanut-specific IgE antibody. A larger wheal on the skin-prick test and a lower ratio of peanut-specific IgG4:IgE were associated with peanut allergy.

Conclusions​

The early introduction of peanuts significantly decreased the frequency of the development of peanut allergy among children at high risk for this allergy and modulated immune responses to peanuts. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00329784.)
 
I would like to see an example. Most of the time people say this stuff, they point to the studies linking HFCS to diabetes which, yeah: so is table sugar.
I'd also point out that a study coming to a wrong conclusion doesn't necessarily mean the researchers were trying to defraud anyone. The benchmark a lot of these sorts of studies use to establish confidence is p<0.05 meaning "less than 1 in 20 chance these results are a statistical anomaly." Ie. About 1 in 20 studies got their results purely "by chance."

The study I am thinking of shows that somehow HCFS has a larger impact on lipid derangement than sugar does. I'll have to see if I can dig it up.

I do wonder why so many people have allergies nowadays. Nut allergies used to be rare as fuck.

They have figured that one out. It turns out that women being exposed to nuts during pregnancy, and then introducing nut products to children when their immune system is still learning what is/is not dangerous was much more common previously. Then the practice was to try and have pregnant women not ingest foods that contain major allergens, and try not to expose children to then until they were a toddler. Turns out that was a bad idea. Early exposure leads to the immune system understanding it is not dangerous and developing tolerance. Avoiding it during pregnancy and until the child is a toddler misses that critical window, so when their bodies do see a nut it overreacts and creates the allergic response. So, the act of trying to prevent the potential for an allergic reaction is what was creating the abnormal sensitivity. Science and medicine have to take a really big L on this one. It was a decent theory at face value, but was shit when examined more closely. As a result the old guidance has been re-instated that you should expose your kids to nuts early and often, but that doesn't do much for the generation that was fucked over.

The nut allergy explosion from bad guidance is on the same level as "trans fats are better than saturated fats" when they are actually worse for you, and "Low fat is better" without telling people that avoiding sugar is far more important.

I'll admit, science and medicine have taken some enormous L's with those 3 in the last few decades.
 
Last edited:
Back